Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3319502.3374837acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Live Dance Performance Investigating the Feminine Cyborg Metaphor with a Motion-activated Wearable Robot

Published: 09 March 2020 Publication History

Abstract

This paper presents artistic work that comments on the exploitation of feminine gender performance in technology, from the point of view of a particular artist, enabled by a wearable robotic device that creates an onstage cyborg character. The piece, entitled "Babyface'' was created in residence in a robotics lab and has catalyzed the development of a motion-activated wearable robot. This paper reports on the creation of this piece, its accompanying device, along with initial responses that have been shared informally. Iterations of multiple flexible attachment structures, a clear plastic dress that references the hyperbolic representation of the female sex, as well as the electronic subsystems are presented alongside discussion of the somatic and choreographic investigations that accompanied prototype development. These fabricated elements alongside the actions of the performer and a soundscape that quotes statements made by real "female'' robots create an otherwordly, sad cyborg character that causes viewers to question their assumptions about and pressures on the female ideal. This work is an important first step in the development of a wearable robot with embodied connection to the performer and, eventually, audience members.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (fp1376vf.mp4)
Supplemental video
MP4 File (p243-ladenheim.mp4)

References

[1]
I. Bartenieff and D. Lewis. 1980. Body Movement: Coping with the Environment .Gordon and Breach Science Publishers. 80007454
[2]
Christoph Bartneck. 2013. Robots in the theatre and the media. (2013).
[3]
Oliver Bown, Petra Gemeinboeck, and Rob Saunders. 2014. The machine as autonomous performer. In Interactive Experience in the Digital Age. Springer, 75--90.
[4]
Catie Cuan, Ishaan Pakrasi, Erin Berl, and Amy LaViers. 2018. CURTAIN and Time to Compile: A Demonstration of an Experimental Testbed for Human-Robot Interaction. In 2018 27th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, 255--261.
[5]
Friederike Eyssel and Frank Hegel. 2012. (S)he's got the look: Gender stereotyping of robots 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 42, 9 (2012), 2223--2226.
[6]
Naomi T Fitter, Heather Knight, Nikolas Martelaro, and David Sirkin. 2017. What actors can teach robots. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 574--580.
[7]
Nikhil Garg, Londa Schiebinger, Dan Jurafsky, and James Zou. 2018. Word embeddings quantify 100 years of gender and ethnic stereotypes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 115, 16 (2018), E3635--E3644.
[8]
Petra Gemeinboeck and Rob Saunders. 2017. Movement matters: How a robot becomes body. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Movement Computing. ACM, 8.
[9]
P. Hackney. 2003. Making connections: Total body integration through Bartenieff fundamentals. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. http://www.library.illinois.edu.proxy2.library.illinois.edu/proxy/go.php?url=http://search.ebscohost.com.proxy2.library.illinois.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edselc&AN=edselc.2--52.0--84906296038&site=eds-live&scope=site
[10]
Thomas Hanna. 1988. What is somatics.
[11]
Donna Haraway. 2006. A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late 20th century. In The international handbook of virtual learning environments. Springer, 117--158.
[12]
Kristina Höök, Caroline Hummels, Katherine Isbister, Patrizia Marti, Elena Márquez Segura, Martin Jonsson, Florian'Floyd' Mueller, Pedro AN Sanches, Thecla Schiphorst, Anna Ståhl, et almbox. 2017. Soma-based design theory. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 550--557.
[13]
Kristina Höök, Martin P Jonsson, Anna Ståhl, and Johanna Mercurio. 2016. Somaesthetic appreciation design. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3131--3142.
[14]
William Kilbourne and Susan Weeks. 2002. A socio-economic perspective on gender bias in technology. The Journal of Socio-Economics, Vol. 26, 3 (2002), 243--260.
[15]
Heather Knight. 2011. Eight lessons learned about non-verbal interactions through robot theater. In International Conference on Social Robotics. Springer, 42--51.
[16]
Amy LaViers, Catie Cuan, Catherine Maguire, Karen Bradley, Kim Brooks Mata, Alexandra Nilles, Ilya Vidrin, Novoneel Chakraborty, Madison Heimerdinger, Umer Huzaifa, et almbox. 2018. Choreographic and somatic approaches for the development of expressive robotic systems. In Arts, Vol. 7. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 11.
[17]
Junichi Nabeshima, MHD Yamen Saraiji, and Kouta Minamizawa. 2019. Arque: Artificial Biomimicry-lnspired Tail for Extending Innate Body Functions. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2019 Emerging Technologies (SIGGRAPH '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 8, bibinfonumpages2 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3305367.3327987
[18]
Clifford Nass, Youngme Moon, and Nancy Green. 2012. Are Machines Gender Neutral? Gender-Stereotypic Responses to Computers With Voices. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 27, 10 (2012), 11.
[19]
Rebecca Nettl-Fiol and Luc Vanier. 2011. Dance and the Alexander technique: Exploring the missing link .University of Illinois Press.
[20]
D. Prattichizzo, M. Malvezzi, I. Hussain, and G. Salvietti. 2014. The Sixth-Finger: A modular extra-finger to enhance human hand capabilities. In The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication . 993--998. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2014.6926382
[21]
Jesús Retto. 2017. Sophia, first citizen robot of the world. ResearchGate https://www. researchgate. net (2017).
[22]
Wali Rizvi, Reika McNish, Kate Ladenheim, and Amy LaViers. 2019. Babyface Code Repository. https://github.com/the-rad-lab/babyface
[23]
J. Robertson. 2010. Gendering humanoid robots: Robo-sexism in Japan. Body and Society, Vol. 16, 2 (2010), 1--36. https://doi.org/
[24]
Yochanan Rywerant. 2003. The Feldenkrais method: Teaching by handling .Basic Health Publications, Inc.
[25]
Londa L Schiebinger. 2008. Gendered innovations in science and engineering .Stanford University Press Stanford, CA.
[26]
Diller Scofidio and Renfro. 2018. Heavenly Bodies: Fashion and the Catholic Imagination. The Metropolitan Museum of Art.
[27]
Laetitia Sonami. 1991. lady's glove. http://sonami.net/ladys-glove/
[28]
R.A. Soraa. 2017. Mechanical genders: How do humans gender robots?. Gender, Technology and Development, Vol. 21, 1--2 (2017), 99--115. http://www.library.illinois.edu.proxy2.library.illinois.edu/proxy/go.php?url=http://search.ebscohost.com.proxy2.library.illinois.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edselc&AN=edselc.2--52.0--85048722584&site=eds-live&scope=site
[29]
K. Suzuki, H. Kadone, and A. Gruebler. 2011. Kinematic and physiological cues for human system interaction. In 2011 4th International Conference on Human System Interactions, HSI 2011. 415--418. https://doi.org/10.1109/HSI.2011.5937402
[30]
Aimee Van Wynsberghe. 2016. Service robots, care ethics, and design. Ethics and information technology, Vol. 18, 4 (2016), 311--321.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Brain Body Jockey project: Transcending Bodily Limitations in Live Performance via Human AugmentationProceedings of the 26th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/3663548.3675621(1-14)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Human-AI Co-Dancing: Evolving Cultural Heritage through Collaborative Choreography with Generative Virtual CharactersProceedings of the 9th International Conference on Movement and Computing10.1145/3658852.3661317(1-10)Online publication date: 30-May-2024
  • (2024)DanceGen: Supporting Choreography Ideation and Prototyping with Generative AIProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661594(920-938)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
HRI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
March 2020
690 pages
ISBN:9781450367462
DOI:10.1145/3319502
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 09 March 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. expressive robotics
  2. feminism
  3. human-augmentation
  4. performance

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

HRI '20
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 268 of 1,124 submissions, 24%

Upcoming Conference

HRI '25
ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
March 4 - 6, 2025
Melbourne , VIC , Australia

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)42
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 11 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Brain Body Jockey project: Transcending Bodily Limitations in Live Performance via Human AugmentationProceedings of the 26th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/3663548.3675621(1-14)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Human-AI Co-Dancing: Evolving Cultural Heritage through Collaborative Choreography with Generative Virtual CharactersProceedings of the 9th International Conference on Movement and Computing10.1145/3658852.3661317(1-10)Online publication date: 30-May-2024
  • (2024)DanceGen: Supporting Choreography Ideation and Prototyping with Generative AIProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661594(920-938)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Exploring AI-assisted Ideation and Prototyping for ChoreographyCompanion Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces10.1145/3640544.3645227(11-17)Online publication date: 18-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Power in Human-Robot InteractionProceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610977.3634949(269-282)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Investigating Choking Under Pressure in Dance Performance with Motion and Physiological Information AnalysisAdvances in Mobile Computing and Multimedia Intelligence10.1007/978-3-031-78049-3_1(3-17)Online publication date: 28-Nov-2024
  • (2023)Illustrating Robot MovementsProceedings of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3568162.3576956(231-242)Online publication date: 13-Mar-2023
  • (2023)Social Digital Cyborgs: The Collaborative Design Process of JIZAI ARMSProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581169(1-19)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
  • (2023)Not Only WEIRD but “Uncanny”? A Systematic Review of Diversity in Human–Robot Interaction ResearchInternational Journal of Social Robotics10.1007/s12369-023-00968-415:11(1841-1870)Online publication date: 8-Mar-2023
  • (2023)Breathing with Robots: Notating Performer Strategy, Alongside Choreographer Intent and Audience Observation, in Breath-Driven Robotic Dance PerformanceModeling Visual Aesthetics, Emotion, and Artistic Style10.1007/978-3-031-50269-9_12(203-218)Online publication date: 25-Nov-2023
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media