research-article

State Case Study of Computing Education Governance

Authors:

Marie DesjardinsAuthors Info & Claims

ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), Volume 19, Issue 4

Article No.: 35, Pages 1 - 21

https://doi.org/10.1145/3320491

Published: 16 July 2019 Publication History

Abstract

High school computing education reform efforts have been ongoing across the United States, particularly in the past decade. Although national Computer Science (CS) for All initiatives are promising, states retain control over education policies. Recent computing education reform efforts in the state of Maryland (U.S.A.) focused on providing every public high school student with access to high-quality high school computing courses. Such access provides exposure to computing careers and better prepares a diverse pool of students for computing majors in college and the workforce. This comprehensive embedded multi-level case study examines the state’s computing education reform efforts from 2010 through 2016. The expansion of computing education indicates that while there was positive growth, the growth was not the same for all categories of public high school students. Top-down policies assist in providing leverage to elevate the need for CS; however, bottom-up efforts to support students and to enable teachers to retain autonomy and professionalism is also needed for CS expansion. Despite successes, barriers at the state, Local Education Agencies (LEA), school, and classroom levels persist and are discussed. The findings in this study can be applied to other states with similar governance structures and policies, and we provide specific recommendations.

References

[1]

Computer Science Teachers Association. 2013. Comparison Results for the 2005, 2007, 2009, 2011, and 2013 CSTA National Secondary School Computer Science Surveys. Technical Report. CSTA. Retrieved from: https://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.csteachers.org/resource/resmgr/Docs/Research/HSSurveys/CSTASurvey2013Comp.pdf.

[2]

College Board. 2018. About AP Computer Science Principles (kernel description). Retrieved from: https://apcentral.collegeboard.org/courses/ap-computer-science-principles.

[3]

Ira E. Bogotch. 2014. Autonomy and accountability: The power/knowledge knot. School Lead. Manag. 34, 4 (2014), 317--323.

[4]

Hae Yeon Choo and Myra Marx Ferree. 2010. Practicing intersectionality in sociological research: A critical analysis of inclusions, interactions, and institutions in the study of inequalities. Socio. Theor. 28, 2 (June 2010), 129--149.

[5]

Code.org. 2018. About Code.org. Retrieved from: https://code.org/about.

[6]

David K. Cohen and Jal D. Mehta. 2017. Why reform sometimes succeeds: Understanding the conditions that produce reforms that last. Amer. Educ. Res. J. 54, 4 (2017), 644--690.

[7]

College Board. 2017. AP CSP Curriculum Framework. Retrieved from: https://apcentral.collegeboard.org/pdf/ap-computer-science-principles-course-and-exam-description.pdf.

[8]

Patricia Hill Collins. 2000. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. Routledge.

[9]

Commission on Standards for School Mathematics. 1989. Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

[10]

Marie desJardins and Susan Martin. 2013. CE21-Maryland: The state of computer science education in Maryland high schools. In Proceedings of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE’13). ACM, New York, NY, 711--716.

Digital Library

[11]

John Dewey. 1902. The Child and the Curriculum. Number 5. University of Chicago Press.

[12]

John Dewey. 1998. Experience and Education. Kappa Delta Pi.

[13]

John Dewey. 2004. Democracy and Education. Courier Corporation.

[14]

Gallup. 2018. Pioneering Results in the Blueprint of U.S. K--12 Computer Science Education. Retrieved from: http://csedu.gallup.com/home.aspx.

[15]

Christopher Gamrat, Heather Toomey Zimmerman, Jaclyn Dudek, and Kyle Peck. 2014. Personalized workplace learning: An exploratory study on digital badging within a teacher professional development program. Brit. J. Educ. Technol. 45, 6 (2014), 1136--1148.

[16]

Megean Garvin, Michael Neary, Kayla Carrigan, and Marie desJardins. 2018. Maryland computing education growth from 2011--2016. In Proceedings of the 3rd RESPECT Conference. IEEE Special Technical Community on Broadening Participation, Baltimore, MD.

[17]

Joanna Goode. 2007. If you build teachers, will students come? The role of teachers in broadening computer science learning for urban youth. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 36, 1 (2007), 65--88.

[18]

Mark Guzdial. 2016. Bringing computer science to U.S. schools, state by state. Commun. ACM 59, 5 (Apr. 2016), 24--25.

Digital Library

[19]

Mark Guzdial, Barbara J. Ericson, Tom McKlin, and Shelly Engelman. 2012. A statewide survey on computing education pathways and influences: Factors in broadening participation in computing. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER’12). ACM, New York, NY, 143--150.

Digital Library

[20]

Atli Harðarson. 2018. The school as a democratic workplace: The political dimension of Dewey’s democracy and education. Educ. Cult. 34, 1 (2018), 3--18.

[21]

Angela K. Henneberger, Mathew C. Uretsky, Susan Klumpner, and Michael E. Woolley. 2016. Remedial Coursework in Maryland: Examining Trends, High School Predictors, and College Outcomes. Technical Report. MLDS and University of Maryland, Baltimore. Retrieved from: https://mldscenter.maryland.gov/egov/Publications/Remedial_Oct2016__Final.pdf.

[22]

Joseph Kahne. 1994. Democratic communities, equity, and excellence: A Deweyan reframing of educational policy analysis. Educ. Eval. Policy Anal. 16, 3 (1994), 233--248.

[23]

Suneal Kolluri. 2018. Advanced placement: The dual challenge of equal access and effectiveness. Rev. Educ. Res. 88, 5 (2018), 671--711.

[24]

John Konvalina, Stanley A. Wileman, and Larry J. Stephens. 1983. Math proficiency: A key to success for computer science student. Commun. ACM 26, 5 (1983), 377--382.

Digital Library

[25]

James Kurose and Erwin Gianchandani. 2018. NSF Highlights Expanded Efforts for Broadening Participation in Computing (kernel description). Retrieved from: https://www.hpcwire.com/2018/09/13/nsf-highlights-expanded-efforts-for-broadening-participation-in-computing.

[26]

Judith Warren Little. 1993. Teachers’ professional development in a climate of educational reform. Educ. Eval. Policy Anal. 15, 2 (1993), 129--151.

[27]

Paul Manna. 2013. Centralized governance and student outcomes: Excellence, equity, and academic achievement in the US states. Policy Stud. J. 41, 4 (2013), 682--705.

[28]

Paul Manna and Patrick McGuinn. 2013. Education Governance for the Twenty-first Century: Overcoming the Structural Barriers to School Reform. Brookings Institution Press.

[29]

Jane Margolis. 2010. Stuck in the Shallow End: Education, Race, and Computing. The MIT Press.

Digital Library

[30]

NSF. 2014. College Board Launches New AP Computer Science Principles Course. Retrieved from: https://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=133571.

[31]

Barack Obama. 2016. Fact Sheet: President Obama Announces Computer Science for All Initiative. Retrieved from: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2016/01/30/fact-sheet-president-obama-announces-computer-science-all-initiative-0.

[32]

Noa Ragonis, Orit Hazzan, and Judith Gal-Ezer. 2010. A survey of computer science teacher preparation programs in Israel tells us: Computer science deserves a designated high school teacher preparation! In Proceedings of the 41st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. ACM, 401--405.

Digital Library

[33]

Hunter Railey. 2017. State education governance structures: 2017 update. 50-state review. Education Commission of the States (2017).

[34]

Daniel Reyes-Guerra, Marianne R. Russo, Ira E. Bogotch, and Maria D. Vásquez-Colina. 2014. Building a school leadership programme: An American paradox of autonomy and accountability. School Lead. 8 Manag. 34, 4 (2014), 414--437.

[35]

Jean J. Ryoo, Jane Margolis, Clifford H. Lee, Cueponcaxochitl D. M. Sandoval, and Joanna Goode. 2013. Democratizing computer science knowledge: Transforming the face of computer science through public high school education. Learn., Media Technol. 38, 2 (2013), 161--181.

[36]

Nicholas Tampio. 2017. Democracy and national education standards. J. Politics 79, 1 (2017), 33--44.

[37]

William G. Tierney, Zoë B. Corwin, and Amanda Ochsner. 2018. Diversifying Digital Learning: Online Literacy and Educational Opportunity. JHU Press.

Digital Library

[38]

Baltimore County University of Maryland. 2018b. Freshman Applicant Requirements. Retrieved from: https://www.admissions.umd.edu/apply/requirements/freshman.

[39]

Baltimore County University of Maryland. 2018a. Undergraduate Admissions. Retrieved from: https://undergraduate.umbc.edu/apply/freshmen.php.

[40]

Jennifer Wang and Sepehr Hejazi Moghadam. 2017. Diversity barriers in K--12 computer science education: Structural and social. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE’17). ACM, New York, NY, 615--620.

Digital Library

[41]

Jennifer Wang, Hai Hong, Jason Ravitz, and Sepehr Hejazi Moghadam. 2016. Landscape of K--12 computer science education in the U.S.: Perceptions, access, and barriers. In Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education (SIGCSE’16). ACM, New York, NY, 645--650.

Digital Library

[42]

Terri S. Wilson and Matthew Ryg. 2017. Non-ideal autonomy: Dewey and reframing educational authority. Philosophy of Education Archive (2017), 247--255.

[43]

Robert K. Yin. 2010. Qualitative Research from Start to Finish. The Guilford Press.

Cited By

Childs JZarch RDunton SMadkins TTrautmann KTaylor ZJacobson MOzturk SOttenbreit-Leftwich A(2024)Advancing Equity and Access: Addressing the Side Effects of Broadening Participation in Computer Science K–12 EducationReview of Research in Education10.3102/0091732X24128647548:1(121-153)Online publication date: 28-Oct-2024
https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X241286475
Garvin MDunton STrautmann KChilds JFletcher CPearson TStrickland CIsrael M(2024)Situating Equity in Education Policy to Advance Broadening Participation in Computing (BPC)Proceedings of the 2024 on RESPECT Annual Conference10.1145/3653666.3656101(107-115)Online publication date: 16-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3653666.3656101
Sanusi ITshukudu EMonga MLonati VBarendsen ESheard JPaterson J(2024)Exploring Barriers and Strategies to boost Scientific Output in Computing Education in Africa: Early InsightsProceedings of the 2024 on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3649217.3653588(736-742)Online publication date: 3-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3649217.3653588
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

State Case Study of Computing Education Governance
1. Social and professional topics
  1. Computing / technology policy
  2. Professional topics
    1. Computing education
      1. Computing education programs
        Computer science education
        CS1
      2. K-12 education

Recommendations

Computer Science Education in North-Rhine Westphalia, Germany—A Case Study
Special Issue II on Computer Science Education in K-12 Schools

In North-Rhine Westphalia, the most populated state in Germany, Computer Science (CS) has been taught in secondary schools since the early 1970s. This article provides an overview of the past and current situation of CS education in North-Rhine ...
Partnering to Promote State-by-State Computing Education Reform (Abstract Only)
SIGCSE '15: Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education

We are all excited to see an increasing number of national efforts to reform computing education. Persistent and sustainable change in a state, its higher education institutions, and its K12 districts requires the active participation of individuals and ...
State-level advocacy for computing education reform (abstract only)
SIGCSE '14: Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education

While it is exciting to see an increasing number of national efforts to reform computing education, such as those led by CSTA, Computing in the Core, ACM, NCWIT, code.org and many others, real change at the state, district and school level requires the ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Computing Education

ACM Transactions on Computing Education Volume 19, Issue 4

Special Section on ML Education and Regular Articles

December 2019

297 pages

EISSN:1946-6226

DOI:10.1145/3345033

Editor:
Chris Hundhausen
Washington State University, USA

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2019 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 16 July 2019

Accepted: 01 March 2019

Revised: 01 March 2019

Received: 01 September 2018

Published in TOCE Volume 19, Issue 4

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

6
Total Citations
View Citations
295
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)24
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5

Reflects downloads up to 03 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Childs JZarch RDunton SMadkins TTrautmann KTaylor ZJacobson MOzturk SOttenbreit-Leftwich A(2024)Advancing Equity and Access: Addressing the Side Effects of Broadening Participation in Computer Science K–12 EducationReview of Research in Education10.3102/0091732X24128647548:1(121-153)Online publication date: 28-Oct-2024
https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X241286475
Garvin MDunton STrautmann KChilds JFletcher CPearson TStrickland CIsrael M(2024)Situating Equity in Education Policy to Advance Broadening Participation in Computing (BPC)Proceedings of the 2024 on RESPECT Annual Conference10.1145/3653666.3656101(107-115)Online publication date: 16-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3653666.3656101
Sanusi ITshukudu EMonga MLonati VBarendsen ESheard JPaterson J(2024)Exploring Barriers and Strategies to boost Scientific Output in Computing Education in Africa: Early InsightsProceedings of the 2024 on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3649217.3653588(736-742)Online publication date: 3-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3649217.3653588
Sadik OOttenbreit-Leftwich A(2023)Understanding U.S. secondary computer science teachers’ challenges and needsComputer Science Education10.1080/08993408.2023.2209474(1-33)Online publication date: 4-May-2023
https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2023.2209474
Ottenbreit-Leftwich ADunton SFletcher CChilds JJeon MBiggers MDeLyser LGoodhue JRichardson DPeterfreund AGuzdial MAdrion REricson BFall RAbramenka V(2022)How to change a state: Broadening participation in K-12 computer science educationPolicy Futures in Education10.1177/14782103221123363Online publication date: 2-Sep-2022
https://doi.org/10.1177/14782103221123363
Garvin MZarch RXavier JDunton S(2020)Maximizing BPC Through Maryland's Annual State Summits2020 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT)10.1109/RESPECT49803.2020.9272416(1-4)Online publication date: 10-Mar-2020
https://doi.org/10.1109/RESPECT49803.2020.9272416

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Issue’s Table of Contents