Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3330430.3333658acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesl-at-sConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

automaTA: Human-Machine Interaction for Answering Context-Specific Questions

Published: 24 June 2019 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    When online learners have questions that are related to a specific task, they often use Q&A boards instead of web search because they are looking for context-specific answers. While lecturers, teaching assistants, and other learners can provide context-specific answers on the Q&A boards, there is often a high response latency which can impede their learning. We present automaTA, a prototype that suggests context-specific answers to online learners' questions by capturing the context of the questions. Our solution is to automate the response generation with a human-machine mixed approach, where humans generate high-quality answers, and the human-generated responses are used to train an automated algorithm to provide context-specific answers. automaTA adopts this approach as a prototype in which it generates automated answers for function-related questions in an online programming course. We conduct two user studies with undergraduate and graduate students with little or no experience with Python and found the potential that automaTA can automatically provide answers to context-specific questions without a human instructor, at scale.

    References

    [1]
    Saleema Amershi, Maya Cakmak, William Bradley Knox, and Todd Kulesza. 2014. Power to the people: The role of humans in interactive machine learning. AI Magazine 35, 4 (2014), 105--120.
    [2]
    Adam Fourney, Richard Mann, and Michael Terry. 2011. Query-feature graphs: bridging user vocabulary and system functionality. In Proceedings of the 24th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, 207--216.
    [3]
    Kyong-Jee Kim, Shijuan Liu, and Curtis J Bonk. 2005. Online MBA students' perceptions of online learning: Benefits, challenges, and suggestions. The Internet and Higher Education 8, 4 (2005), 335--344.
    [4]
    Suin Kim, Jae Won Kim, Jungkook Park, and Alice Oh. 2016. Elice: an online CS education platform to understand how students learn programming. In Proceedings of the Third (2016) ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale. ACM, 225--228.
    [5]
    Gierad Laput, Walter S Lasecki, Jason Wiese, Robert Xiao, Jeffrey P Bigham, and Chris Harrison. 2015. Zensors: Adaptive, rapidly deployable, human-intelligent sensor feeds. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1935--1944.
    [6]
    Jonathan Sillito, Gail C Murphy, and Kris De Volder. 2008. Asking and answering questions during a programming change task. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 34, 4 (2008), 434--451.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Forums, Feedback, and Two Kinds of AI: A Selective History of Learning @ ScaleProceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale10.1145/3657604.3664667(376-382)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2024
    • (2023)Automated, content-focused feedback for a writing-to-learn assignment in an undergraduate organic chemistry courseLAK23: 13th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference10.1145/3576050.3576053(531-537)Online publication date: 13-Mar-2023
    • (2023)FORTAGONO: A Model for the Technological Mediation of the Teaching and Learning ProcessesIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2023.325444111(64294-64323)Online publication date: 2023
    • Show More Cited By

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    L@S '19: Proceedings of the Sixth (2019) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale
    June 2019
    386 pages
    ISBN:9781450368049
    DOI:10.1145/3330430
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 24 June 2019

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Context-specific learning
    2. human-machine interaction
    3. programming learning
    4. question answering

    Qualifiers

    • Poster
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    L@S '19

    Acceptance Rates

    L@S '19 Paper Acceptance Rate 24 of 70 submissions, 34%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 117 of 440 submissions, 27%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Forums, Feedback, and Two Kinds of AI: A Selective History of Learning @ ScaleProceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale10.1145/3657604.3664667(376-382)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2024
    • (2023)Automated, content-focused feedback for a writing-to-learn assignment in an undergraduate organic chemistry courseLAK23: 13th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference10.1145/3576050.3576053(531-537)Online publication date: 13-Mar-2023
    • (2023)FORTAGONO: A Model for the Technological Mediation of the Teaching and Learning ProcessesIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2023.325444111(64294-64323)Online publication date: 2023
    • (2021)Voice User Interface: Literature review, challenges and future directionsSYSTEM THEORY, CONTROL AND COMPUTING JOURNAL10.52846/stccj.2021.1.2.261:2(65-89)Online publication date: 31-Dec-2021

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media