Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3334480.3383078acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Does the Presence of Privacy Relevant Information Affect App Market Choice?

Published: 25 April 2020 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    While in most countries, Google Play and Apple App Store dominate, Chinese mobile phone users can choose among dozens of different app markets, which differ greatly in the information presented. This makes the Chinese mobile ecosystem a unique case study for investigating whether users actively choose app markets that conform to their preferences. We investigated this question in a survey of 200 Chinese users aged 18-49. Scenarios covered apps that require disclosure of different types of sensitive information (shopping, dating, health), with gaming as a baseline. Users preferred markets that were easy to use and had a wide choice of apps. Only nine users highlighted security as a feature. Despite this, they primarily used only one app market - the pre-installed one. App-market specific features were important for the game scenario, but less important for all others. We suggest that download decisions for most apps are made before users enter an app market, and discuss implications for presenting privacy and security information.

    References

    [1]
    Hsuan-Ting Chen and Wenhong Chen. 2015. Couldn't or Wouldn't? The Influence of Privacy Concerns and Self-Efficacy in Privacy Management on Privacy Protection. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 18, 1 (Jan. 2015), 13--19.
    [2]
    Jing Chen, Christopher S. Gates, Ninghui Li, and Robert W. Proctor. 2015. Influence of Risk/Safety Information Framing on Android App-Installation Decisions:. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making 9, 2 (2015), 149--168.
    [3]
    Isis Chong, Huangyi Ge, Robert W. Proctor, and Ninghui Li. 2018. Safety Priming and Subsequent App Selection Behaviors:. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 62, 1 (Sept. 2018), 302--306.
    [4]
    Lewis R Goldberg, John A Johnson, Herbert W Eber, Robert Hogan, Michael C Ashton, C Robert Cloninger, and Harrison G Gough. 2006. The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in personality 40, 1 (2006), 84--96.
    [5]
    Jeffrey Hsu, Di Liu, Ya Min Yu, Hui Tong Zhao, Zhi Rou Chen, Jiao Li, and Wei Chen. 2016. The Top Chinese Mobile Health Apps: A Systematic Investigation. J Med Internet Res 18, 8 (Aug. 2016), e222.
    [6]
    Sih-Ci Jhu. 1992. Chinese Translation of the IPIP 50-item Big-Five markers. (1992). https://ipip.ori.org/ChineseAB5CFactorMarkers.htm
    [7]
    Mark J. Keith, Jeffry S. Babb, Paul Benjamin Lowry, Christopher P. Furner, and Amjad Abdullat. 2015. The role of mobile-computing self-efficacy in consumer information disclosure. Information Systems Journal 25, 6 (Nov. 2015), 637--667.
    [8]
    Patrick Gage Kelley, Lorrie Faith Cranor, and Norman Sadeh. 2013. Privacy as Part of the App Decision-Making Process. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 3393--3402.
    [9]
    Konstantin Knorr, David Aspinall, and Maria Wolters. 2015. On the Privacy, Security and Safety of Blood Pressure and Diabetes Apps. In ICT Systems Security and Privacy Protection, Hannes Federrath and Dieter Gollmann (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, 571--584.
    [10]
    Monika Taddicken. 2014. The 'Privacy Paradox' in the Social Web: The Impact of Privacy Concerns, Individual Characteristics, and the Perceived Social Relevance on Different Forms of Self-Disclosure. J. Comp.-Med. Commun. 19, 2 (Jan. 2014), 248--273.
    [11]
    Max Van Kleek, Ilaria Liccardi, Reuben Binns, Jun Zhao, Daniel J. Weitzner, and Nigel Shadbolt. 2017. Better the Devil You Know: Exposing the Data Sharing Practices of Smartphone Apps. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 5208--5220.
    [12]
    Haoyu Wang, Zhe Liu, Jingyue Liang, Narseo Vallina-Rodriguez, Yao Guo, Li Li, Juan Tapiador, Jingcun Cao, and Guoai Xu. 2018. Beyond Google Play: A Large-Scale Comparative Study of Chinese Android App Markets. In Proceedings of the Internet Measurement Conference 2018 (IMC '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 293--307.
    [13]
    T. Wang, D. Wu, J. Zhang, M. Chen, and Y. Zhou. 2016. Measuring and Analyzing Third-Party Mobile Game App Stores in China. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management 13, 4 (Dec. 2016), 793--805.
    [14]
    Heng Xu, Sumeet Gupta, Mary Beth Rosson, and John M Carroll. 2012. Measuring mobile users' concerns for information privacy. In Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Information Systems.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Potential Risks Arising from the Absence of Signature Verification in Miniapp PluginsProceedings of the 2023 ACM Workshop on Secure and Trustworthy Superapps10.1145/3605762.3624433(59-64)Online publication date: 26-Nov-2023

    Index Terms

    1. Does the Presence of Privacy Relevant Information Affect App Market Choice?

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI EA '20: Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2020
        4474 pages
        ISBN:9781450368193
        DOI:10.1145/3334480
        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Sponsors

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 25 April 2020

        Check for updates

        Author Tags

        1. app markets
        2. privacy
        3. security
        4. understanding users

        Qualifiers

        • Abstract

        Funding Sources

        Conference

        CHI '20
        Sponsor:

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate 6,164 of 23,696 submissions, 26%

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)10
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
        Reflects downloads up to

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all
        • (2023)Potential Risks Arising from the Absence of Signature Verification in Miniapp PluginsProceedings of the 2023 ACM Workshop on Secure and Trustworthy Superapps10.1145/3605762.3624433(59-64)Online publication date: 26-Nov-2023

        View Options

        Get Access

        Login options

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format.

        HTML Format

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media