Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3337821.3337885acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicppConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

COMBFT: Conflicting-Order-Match based Byzantine Fault Tolerance Protocol with High Efficiency and Robustness

Published: 05 August 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Byzantine Fault-Tolerant (BFT) state machine replication protocol is an important building block for highly available distributed computing. This paper presents COMBFT, a BFT protocol that achieves both efficiency and robustness simultaneously. The major novelty of COMBFT lies in Conflicting-Order-Match (COM), a new request ordering mechanism that uses a new way to select the available sequence number for requests, and detects the possible malicious primary early. COM assigns sequence number based on request interference, and requires both primary and backup nodes to conduct request ordering, which can greatly reduce the impact of malicious primary and clients. When the backup suspects the primary may be malicious, it triggers an efficient commit protocol with two phases (i.e., suspect phase and commit phase) to further confirm whether the primary is malicious, and commit the request. The performance of COMBFT is evaluated via simulations and the results illustrate the outstanding performance of COMBFT in terms of throughput, latency and fault scalability.

References

[1]
Yair Amir, Brian A Coan, Jonathan Kirsch, and John Lane. 2011. Prime: Byzantine Replication under Attack. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing 8, 4 (2011), 564--577.
[2]
Mary Baker, John H Hartman, Michael D Kupfer, Ken W Shirriff, and John K Ousterhout. 1991. Measurements of a distributed file system. symposium on operating systems principles 25, 5 (1991), 198--212.
[3]
Mihir Bellare. 2006. New proofs for NMAC and HMAC: security without collision-resistance. international cryptology conference (2006), 602--619.
[4]
Mihir Bellare, Ran Canetti, and Hugo Krawczyk. 1996. Keying Hash Functions for Message Authentication. (1996), 1--15.
[5]
Mihir Bellare and Phillip Rogaway. 1996. The exact security of digital signatures-how to sign with RSA and Rabin. (1996), 399--416.
[6]
Miguel Castro and Barbara Liskov. 1999. Practical Byzantine fault tolerance. operating systems design and implementation (1999), 173--186.
[7]
Allen Clement, Edmund L Wong, Lorenzo Alvisi, Michael Dahlin, and Mirco Marchetti. 2009. Making Byzantine fault tolerant systems tolerate Byzantine faults. (2009), 153--168.
[8]
Sisi Duan, Sean Peisert, and Karl N Levitt. 2015. hBFT: Speculative Byzantine Fault Tolerance with Minimum Cost. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing 12, 1 (2015), 58--70.
[9]
Cynthia Dwork, Nancy A Lynch, and Larry J Stockmeyer. 1988. Consensus in the presence of partial synchrony. J. ACM 35, 2 (1988), 288--323.
[10]
Michael J Fischer, Nancy A Lynch, and Michael S Paterson. 1985. Impossibility of distributed consensus with one faulty process. J. ACM 32, 2 (1985), 374--382.
[11]
Rachid Guerraoui, Nikola Kneževic, Vivien Quema, and Marko Vukolic. 2010. The next 700 BFT protocols. (2010), 363--376.
[12]
Ramakrishna Kotla, Lorenzo Alvisi, Michael Dahlin, Allen Clement, and Edmund L Wong. 2007. Zyzzyva: speculative byzantine fault tolerance. symposium on operating systems principles 41, 6 (2007), 45--58.
[13]
L. Lamport. 2005. Generalized consensus and Paxos. (2005), http://research.microsoft.com/apps/pubs/default.aspx?id=64631.
[14]
L. Lamport. 2006. Lower bounds for asynchronous consensus. Distributed Computing. (2006), 104--125.
[15]
Leslie Lamport, Robert E Shostak, and Marshall C Pease. 1982. The Byzantine Generals Problem. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems 4, 3 (1982), 382--401.
[16]
Leslie Lamport, Robert E Shostak, and Marshall C Pease. 1982. The Byzantine Generals Problem. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems 4, 3 (1982), 382--401.
[17]
Iulian Moraru, David G Andersen, and Michael Kaminsky. 2013. There is more consensus in Egalitarian parliaments. (2013), 358--372.
[18]
Brian D Noble and Mahadev Satyanarayanan. 1994. An empirical study of a highly available file system. measurement and modeling of computer systems 22, 1 (1994), 138--149.
[19]
Marshall C Pease, Robert E Shostak, and Leslie Lamport. 1980. Reaching Agreement in the Presence of Faults. J. ACM 27, 2 (1980), 228--234.
[20]
Marco Platania, Daniel Obenshain, Thomas Tantillo, Yair Amir, and Neeraj Suri. 2016. On Choosing Server- or Client-Side Solutions for BFT. Comput. Surveys 48, 4 (2016), 61.
[21]
Giuliana Santos Veronese, Miguel Correia, Alysson Neves Bessani, and Lau Cheuk Lung. 2009. Spin One's Wheels? Byzantine Fault Tolerance with a Spinning Primary. (2009), 135--144.
[22]
Giuliana Santos Veronese, Miguel Correia, Alysson Neves Bessani, Lau Cheuk Lung, and Paulo Verissimo. 2013. Efficient Byzantine Fault-Tolerance. IEEE Trans. Comput. 62, 1 (2013), 16--30.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Designing a Security Platform for Collaborating Autonomous Systems - An Experience Report2021 IEEE 18th International Conference on Software Architecture Companion (ICSA-C)10.1109/ICSA-C52384.2021.00018(1-7)Online publication date: Mar-2021

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
ICPP '19: Proceedings of the 48th International Conference on Parallel Processing
August 2019
1107 pages
ISBN:9781450362955
DOI:10.1145/3337821
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

In-Cooperation

  • University of Tsukuba: University of Tsukuba

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 05 August 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Byzantine fault tolerance
  2. consensus
  3. distributed computing
  4. state machine replication

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

Conference

ICPP 2019

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 91 of 313 submissions, 29%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 13 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Designing a Security Platform for Collaborating Autonomous Systems - An Experience Report2021 IEEE 18th International Conference on Software Architecture Companion (ICSA-C)10.1109/ICSA-C52384.2021.00018(1-7)Online publication date: Mar-2021

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media