Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3339186.3339190acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicppConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Turn Prediction for Special Intersections and Its Case Study

Published: 05 August 2019 Publication History

Abstract

The effect of growing population brings heavy traffic which in turn leads to increased number of traffic accidents. In particular, the majority of traffic accidents happen at special intersections in situations such as heavy traffic, poor intersection design, etc. In this paper, we propose a turn prediction system to predict which road a vehicle will take at special intersection, e.g., T-junction, Y-junction, or junction where more than 4 roads meet. The proposed system uses the radar installed at the intersection to collect vehicle dynamics. The collected data is processed to calculate deflection angles of vehicles corresponding to the road. The smoothing technique is adopted to filter the noise of calculated deflection angles. The ensemble methods are utilized to construct the model to predict future deflection angles of vehicles corresponding to the road. According to the predicted deflection angle, we can predict which road a vehicle will take at a special intersection and alert other vehicles when necessary. To assess the performance of the model prediction, a real-world experiment is carried out, which utilizes radar to collect the dataset at Kaixuan 4th Rd. and Zhenxing Rd., Qianzhen Dist., Kaohsiung City, Taiwan. The experiment results show that the accuracy of the Random Forest algorithm is the highest among all datasets.

References

[1]
E. Bauer and R. Kohavi. An empirical comparison of voting classification algorithms: Bagging, boosting, and variants. Machine learning, 1999.
[2]
L. Breiman. Random forests. Machine learning, 2001.
[3]
D. Caveney. Numerical integration for future vehicle path prediction. In 2007 American Control Conference, 2007.
[4]
A. Chusyairi, N. S. P. Ramadar, and Bagio. The use of exponential smoothing method to predict missing service e-report. In 2017 2nd International conferences on Information Technology, Information Systems and Electrical Engineering (ICI-TISEE), 2017.
[5]
D. R. Cox. The regression analysis of binary sequences. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 1958.
[6]
N. Deo, A. Rangesh, and M. M. Trivedi. How would surrounding vehicles move? a unified framework for maneuver classification and motion prediction. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 2018.
[7]
T. G. Dietterich. Ensemble methods in machine learning. In International workshop on multiple classifier systems. Springer, 2000.
[8]
C. Droke. Moving averages simplified. Marketplace Books, 2001.
[9]
H. Fan, L. Ai, G. Yu, H. Fang, and K. Luo. Lifetime prediction based on opitimal loess smoothing and ukf for lithium-ion batteries. In 2015 Prognostics and System Health Management Conference (PHM), 2015.
[10]
T. Gandhi and M. M. Trivedi. Image based estimation of pedestrian orientation for improving path prediction. In 2008 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, 2008.
[11]
A. S. Hakkert and D. Mahalel. Estimating the number of accidents at intersections from a knowledge of the traffic flows on the approaches. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 1978.
[12]
T. K. Ho. Random decision forests. In Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, 1995.
[13]
P. M. Hsu and Z. W. Zhu. Car trajectory prediction in image processing and control manners. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Engineering (ICITE), 2016.
[14]
J. Huang and H.-S. Tan. Vehicle future trajectory prediction with a dgps/ins-based positioning system. In 2006 American Control Conference, 2006.
[15]
P. Jain, S. Varma, H. P. Gupta, T. Dutta, et al. A supervised approach towards network control system modelling. In Communication Systems and Networks (COMSNETS), 2017 9th International Conference on. IEEE, 2017.
[16]
R. Kohavi et al. A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. In Ijcai. Montreal, Canada, 1995.
[17]
S. Kotsiantis, D. Kanellopoulos, P. Pintelas, et al. Handling imbalanced datasets: A review. GESTS International Transactions on Computer Science and Engineering, 2006.
[18]
Y. Lin, P. Wang, and M. Ma. Intelligent transportation system(its): Concept, challenge and opportunity. In 2017 ieee 3rd international conference on big data security on cloud (bigdatasecurity), ieee international conference on high performance and smart computing (hpsc), and ieee international conference on intelligent data and security (ids), 2017.
[19]
P. Lytrivis, G. Thomaidis, and A. Amditis. Cooperative path prediction in vehicular environments. In 2008 11th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2008.
[20]
P. Lytrivis, G. Thomaidis, M. Tsogas, and A. Amditis. An advanced cooperative path prediction algorithm for safety applications in vehicular networks. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2011.
[21]
N. Persad-Maharaj, S. J. Barbeau, M. A. Labrador, P. L. Winters, R. Perez, and N. L. Georggi. Real-time travel path prediction using gps-enabled mobile phones. In Proc. 15th World Congress on Intelligent Transportation Systems. Citeseer, 2008.
[22]
Z. K. Pourtaheri and S. H. Zahiri. Ensemble classifiers with improved overfitting. In 2016 1st Conference on Swarm Intelligence and Evolutionary Computation (CSIEC), 2016.
[23]
H. S. Tan and J. Huang. Dgps-based vehicle-to-vehicle cooperative collision warning: Engineering feasibility viewpoints. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2006.
[24]
S. H. Tsang, E. G. Hoare, P. S. Hall, and N. J. Clarke. Automotive radar image processing to predict vehicle trajectory. In Proceedings 1999 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. 99CH36348), 1999.
[25]
T.-T. Wong and N.-Y. Yang. Dependency analysis of accuracy estimates in k-fold cross validation. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2017.
[26]
X. Yan and X. Su. Linear regression analysis: theory and computing. World Scientific, 2009.
[27]
B. W. Yap, K. A. Rani, H. A. A. Rahman, S. Fong, Z. Khairudin, and N. N. Abdullah. An application of oversampling, undersampling, bagging and boosting in handling imbalanced datasets. In Proceedings of the first international conference on advanced data and information engineering (DaEng-2013). Springer, 2014.
[28]
Y. Yoo, K. Yun, S. Yun, J. Hong, H. Jeong, and J. Y. Choi. Visual path prediction in complex scenes with crowded moving objects. In 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2016.
[29]
T. Zhang, B. Yu, et al. Boosting with early stopping: Convergence and consistency. The Annals of Statistics, 2005.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Predicting Vehicle Behavior Using Automotive Radar and Recurrent Neural NetworksIEEE Open Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems10.1109/OJITS.2021.31059202(254-268)Online publication date: 2021

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
ICPP Workshops '19: Workshop Proceedings of the 48th International Conference on Parallel Processing
August 2019
241 pages
ISBN:9781450371964
DOI:10.1145/3339186
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

In-Cooperation

  • University of Tsukuba: University of Tsukuba

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 05 August 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. machine learning
  2. special intersections
  3. turn prediction

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

ICPP 2019
ICPP 2019: Workshops
August 5 - 8, 2019
Kyoto, Japan

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 91 of 313 submissions, 29%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 10 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Predicting Vehicle Behavior Using Automotive Radar and Recurrent Neural NetworksIEEE Open Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems10.1109/OJITS.2021.31059202(254-268)Online publication date: 2021

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media