Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3340496.3342757acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesfseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

AppNet: understanding app recommendation in Google Play

Published: 27 August 2019 Publication History

Abstract

With the prevalence of smartphones, mobile apps have seen widespread adoption. Millions of apps in markets have made it difficult for users to find the most interesting and relevant apps. App markets such as Google Play have deployed app recommendation mechanisms in the markets, e.g., recommending a list of relevant apps when a user is browsing an app, which naturally forms a network of app recommendation relationships. In this work, we seek to shed light on the app relations from the perspective of market recommendation. We first build “AppNet”, a large-scale network containing over 2 million nodes (i.e., Android apps) and more than 100 million edges (i.e., the recommendation relations), by crawling Google Play. We then investigate the “AppNet” from various perspectives. Our study suggests that AppNet shares some characteristics of human networks, i.e., a large portion of the apps (more than 69%) have no incoming edges (no apps link to them), while a small group of apps dominate the network with each having thousands of incoming edges. Besides, we also reveal that roughly 147K (7%) apps form a fully connected cluster, in which most of the apps are popular apps, while covering 97% of all the edges. The results also reveal several interesting implications to both app marketers and app developers, such as identifying fraudulent app promotion behaviors, improving the recommendation system, and enhancing the exposure of apps.

References

[1]
Réka Albert, Hawoong Jeong, and Albert-László Barabási. 1999. Diameter of the world-wide web. nature 401, 6749 (1999), 130.
[2]
Albert-László Barabási and Réka Albert. 1999. Emergence of scaling in random networks. science 286, 5439 (1999), 509–512.
[3]
Andrei Broder, Ravi Kumar, Farzin Maghoul, S Raghavan, P Rajagopalan, R Stata, A Tomkins, and J Wiener. 2000. Graph structure inthe Web: Experiments and models. In Proceedings of the 9th World Wide Web Conference.
[4]
Ning Chen, Steven CH Hoi, Shaohua Li, and Xiaokui Xiao. 2015. SimApp: A framework for detecting similar mobile applications by online kernel learning. In Proceedings of WSDM ’15. ACM, 305–314.
[5]
Hawoong Jeong, Bálint Tombor, Réka Albert, Zoltan N Oltvai, and A-L Barabási. 2000. The large-scale organization of metabolic networks. Nature 407, 6804 (2000), 651.
[6]
Alexandros Karatzoglou, Linas Baltrunas, Karen Church, and Matthias Böhmer. 2012. Climbing the App Wall: Enabling Mobile App Discovery Through Contextaware Recommendations. In Proceedings of CIKM ’12.
[7]
Bin Liu, Deguang Kong, Lei Cen, Neil Zhenqiang Gong, Hongxia Jin, and Hui Xiong. 2015. Personalized Mobile App Recommendation: Reconciling App Functionality and User Privacy Preference. In Proceedings of WSDM ’15. 315–324.
[8]
Stanley Milgram. 1967. The small world problem. Phychology Today 1, 1 (1967), 61–67.
[9]
Mark EJ Newman. 2001. The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences 98, 2 (2001), 404–409.
[10]
Haoyu Wang, Hao Li, and Yao Guo. 2019. Understanding the evolution of mobile app ecosystems: A longitudinal measurement study of google play. In Proceedings of the World Wide Web Conference. ACM, 1988–1999.
[11]
Haoyu Wang, Hao Li, Li Li, Yao Guo, and Guoai Xu. 2018. Why are Android apps removed from Google Play?: a large-scale empirical study. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories. ACM, 231–242.
[12]
Haoyu Wang, Zhe Liu, Yao Guo, Xiangqun Chen, Miao Zhang, Guoai Xu, and Jason Hong. 2017. An explorative study of the mobile app ecosystem from app developers’ perspective. In Proceedings of WWW ’17. 163–172.
[13]
John G White, Eileen Southgate, J Nichol Thomson, and Sydney Brenner. 1986. The structure of the nervous system of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 314, 1165 (1986), 1–340.
[14]
Soon-Hyung Yook, Hawoong Jeong, and Albert-László Barabási. 2002. Modeling the Internet’s large-scale topology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99, 21 (2002), 13382–13386.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Smart Real-Time Recommendation of Mobile ServicesWSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS AND CONTROL10.37394/23203.2021.16.6016(655-667)Online publication date: 20-Dec-2021
  • (2021)Smart Recommendation of Telecommunication Services2021 29th National Conference with International Participation (TELECOM)10.1109/TELECOM53156.2021.9659557(1-8)Online publication date: 28-Oct-2021
  • (2021)Towards Understanding iOS App Store Search Advertising: An Explorative Study2021 IEEE/ACM 8th International Conference on Mobile Software Engineering and Systems (MobileSoft)10.1109/MobileSoft52590.2021.00011(40-51)Online publication date: May-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
WAMA 2019: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGSOFT International Workshop on App Market Analytics
August 2019
46 pages
ISBN:9781450368582
DOI:10.1145/3340496
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 27 August 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Android
  2. App Store
  3. App recommendation
  4. Google Play

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

ESEC/FSE '19
Sponsor:

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)26
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 30 Aug 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Smart Real-Time Recommendation of Mobile ServicesWSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS AND CONTROL10.37394/23203.2021.16.6016(655-667)Online publication date: 20-Dec-2021
  • (2021)Smart Recommendation of Telecommunication Services2021 29th National Conference with International Participation (TELECOM)10.1109/TELECOM53156.2021.9659557(1-8)Online publication date: 28-Oct-2021
  • (2021)Towards Understanding iOS App Store Search Advertising: An Explorative Study2021 IEEE/ACM 8th International Conference on Mobile Software Engineering and Systems (MobileSoft)10.1109/MobileSoft52590.2021.00011(40-51)Online publication date: May-2021
  • (2019)Characterizing Android app signing issuesProceedings of the 34th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering10.1109/ASE.2019.00035(280-292)Online publication date: 10-Nov-2019
  • (2019)DaPandaProceedings of the 34th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering10.1109/ASE.2019.00017(66-78)Online publication date: 10-Nov-2019

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media