tutorial

Multi-Model Data Query Languages and Processing Paradigms

Authors:

Calvin Sun, and

Steven YuanAuthors Info & Claims

CIKM '20: Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management

October 2020

Pages 3505 - 3506

https://doi.org/10.1145/3340531.3412174

Published: 19 October 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Specifying users' interests with a formal query language is a typically challenging task, which becomes even harder in the context of multi-model data management because we have to deal with data variety. It usually lacks a unified schema to help the users issuing their queries, or has an incomplete schema as data come from disparate sources. Multi-Model DataBases (MMDBs) have emerged as a promising approach for dealing with this task as they are capable of accommodating and querying the multi-model data in a single system. This tutorial aims to offer a comprehensive presentation of a wide range of query languages for MMDBs and to make comparisons of their properties from multiple perspectives. We will discuss the essence of cross-model query processing and provide insights on the research challenges and directions for future work. The tutorial will also offer the participants hands-on experience in applying MMDBs to issue multi-model data queries.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (3340531.3412174.mp4)

In this teaser video, we make a brief introduction to each section that will be discussed in our tutorial.

Download
17.81 MB

References

[1]

ECMA-404 The JSON Data Interchange Standard. https://www.json.org/json-en.html.

[2]

Extensible Markup Language (XML). https://www.w3.org/XML/.

[3]

R. Angles, M. Arenas, P. Barceló, A. Hogan, J. L. Reutter, and D. Vrgoc. Foundations of modern query languages for graph databases. ACM Comput. Surv., 50(5):68:1--68:40, 2017.

Digital Library

[4]

E. F. Codd. A relational model of data for large shared data banks. Commun. ACM, 13(6):377--387, 1970.

Digital Library

[5]

E. F. Codd. Extending the database relational model to capture more meaning. ACM Trans. Database Syst., 4(4):397--434, Dec. 1979.

Digital Library

[6]

A. Deutsch and Y. Papakonstantinou. Graph data models, query languages and programming paradigms. Proc. VLDB Endow., 11(12):2106--2109, 2018.

Digital Library

[7]

J. Lu and I. Holubová. Multi-model data management: What's new and what's next? In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Extending Database Technology, EDBT 2017, Venice, Italy, March 21-24, 2017, pages 602--605. Open Proceedings.org, 2017.

[8]

J. Lu and I. Holubová. Multi-model Databases: A new journey to handle the variety of data. ACM Computing Surveys, 52(3), 2019.

Digital Library

[9]

J. Lu, I. Holubová, and B. Cautis. Multi-model databases and tightly integrated polystores: Current practices, comparisons, and open challenges. In CIKM '18, pages 2301--2302, New York, NY, USA, 2018. ACM.

Digital Library

[10]

I. Robinson, J. Webber, and E. Eifrem. Graph Databases: New Opportunities for Connected Data. O'Reilly Media, Inc., 2nd edition, 2015.

Digital Library

[11]

M. Saeed, M. Villarroel, A. Reisner, G. Clifford, L.-w. Lehman, G. Moody, T. Heldt, T. Kyaw, B. Moody, and R. Mark. Multiparameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care II (Mimic-II): A Public-Access Intensive Care Unit Database. Critical care medicine, 39:952--60, 05 2011.

[12]

M. H. Scholl. Extensions to the Relational Data Model. In Conceptual Modelling, Databases and CASE: An Integrated View of Information Systems Development. Jon. Wiley & Sons, 1992.

[13]

M. H. Scholl, H. Paul, and H. Schek. Supporting flat relations by a nested relational kernel. In VLDB'87, September 1-4, 1987, Brighton, England, pages 137--146. Morgan Kaufmann, 1987.

[14]

P. T. Wood. Query languages for graph databases. SIGMOD Rec., 41(1):50--60, 2012.

Digital Library

[15]

C. Zhang and J. Lu. Holistic evaluation in multi-model databases benchmarking. Distributed and Parallel Databases, pages 1--33, 2019.

Digital Library

[16]

C. Zhang, J. Lu, P. Xu, and Y. Chen. UniBench: A Benchmark for Multi-model Database Management Systems. In TPCTC '18, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, August 27-31, 2018, Revised Selected Papers, volume 11135 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 7--23. Springer, 2018.

Digital Library

Cited By

Zhang CLi GLv T(2024)HyBench: A New Benchmark for HTAP DatabasesProceedings of the VLDB Endowment10.14778/3641204.364120617:5(939-951)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.14778/3641204.3641206
Zhang JZhang CLi GChai C(2024)PACE: Poisoning Attacks on Learned Cardinality EstimationProceedings of the ACM on Management of Data10.1145/36392922:1(1-27)Online publication date: 26-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3639292
Indamutsa ADi Rocco JAlmonte LDi Ruscio DPierantonio A(2024)Advanced discovery mechanisms in model repositoriesSoftware: Practice and Experience10.1002/spe.3332Online publication date: 25-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.1002/spe.3332
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Multi-Model Data Query Languages and Processing Paradigms
1. Information systems
  1. Data management systems
    1. Query languages
      1. Query languages for non-relational engines

Recommendations

Multi-model query languages: taming the variety of big data
Abstract
A critical issue in Big Data management is to address the variety of data–data are produced by disparate sources, presented in various formats, and hence inherently involves multiple data models. Multi-Model DataBases (MMDBs) have emerged as a ...
Read More
Database models and query languages for relational data and metadata query processing
Read More
Data variety, come as you are in multi-model data warehouses
Abstract
Multi-model DBMSs (MMDBMSs) have been recently introduced to store and seamlessly query heterogeneous data (structured, semi-structured, graph-based, etc.) in their native form, aimed at effectively preserving their variety. ...
Highlights
- We investigate the performances of a multi-model DBMS to store multidimensional data for OLAP analyses.
Read More

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

CIKM '20: Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management

October 2020

3619 pages

ISBN:9781450368599

DOI:10.1145/3340531

General Chairs:
Mathieu d'Aquin
DSI, Insight, NUI Galway, Ireland
,
Stefan Dietze
GESIS, Cologne, Germany, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Germany, L3S Research Center, Germany
,
Program Chairs:
Claudia Hauff
TU Delft, The Netherlands
,
Edward Curry
DSI, Insight, NUI Galway, Ireland
,
Philippe Cudre Mauroux
eXascale, University of Fribourg, Switzerland

Copyright © 2020 Owner/Author.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 19 October 2020

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Tutorial

Funding Sources

Finnish Academy
Huawei Canada

Conference

CIKM '20

Sponsor:

CIKM '20: The 29th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management

October 19 - 23, 2020

Virtual Event, Ireland

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,861 of 8,427 submissions, 22%

Upcoming Conference

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

5
Total Citations
View Citations
253
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)51
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)9

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Zhang CLi GLv T(2024)HyBench: A New Benchmark for HTAP DatabasesProceedings of the VLDB Endowment10.14778/3641204.364120617:5(939-951)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.14778/3641204.3641206
Zhang JZhang CLi GChai C(2024)PACE: Poisoning Attacks on Learned Cardinality EstimationProceedings of the ACM on Management of Data10.1145/36392922:1(1-27)Online publication date: 26-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3639292
Indamutsa ADi Rocco JAlmonte LDi Ruscio DPierantonio A(2024)Advanced discovery mechanisms in model repositoriesSoftware: Practice and Experience10.1002/spe.3332Online publication date: 25-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.1002/spe.3332
Sudrajat RRuchjana BAbdullah ABudiarto R(2023)Query Model Framework Design for Conservation History and Endowments Database: A Case Study on the Digitization of the Sumedang Larang Kingdom’s History and Endowments in IndonesiaHeritage10.3390/heritage61203946:12(7508-7530)Online publication date: 29-Nov-2023
https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage6120394
Holubova IContos PSvoboda M(2021)Categorical Management of Multi-Model DataProceedings of the 25th International Database Engineering & Applications Symposium10.1145/3472163.3472166(134-140)Online publication date: 14-Jul-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3472163.3472166

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents