Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3340555.3353735acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesicmi-mlmiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Predicting Cognitive Load in an Emergency Simulation Based on Behavioral and Physiological Measures

Published: 14 October 2019 Publication History

Abstract

The reliable estimation of cognitive load is an integral step towards real-time adaptivity of learning or gaming environments. We introduce a novel and robust machine learning method for cognitive load assessment based on behavioral and physiological measures in a combined within- and cross-participant approach. 47 participants completed different scenarios of a commercially available emergency personnel simulation game realizing several levels of difficulty based on cognitive load. Using interaction metrics, pupil dilation, eye-fixation behavior, and heart rate data, we trained individual, participant-specific forests of extremely randomized trees differentiating between low and high cognitive load. We achieved an average classification accuracy of 72%. We then apply these participant-specific classifiers in a novel way, using similarity between participants, normalization, and relative importance of individual features to successfully achieve the same level of classification accuracy in cross-participant classification. These results indicate that a combination of behavioral and physiological indicators allows for reliable prediction of cognitive load in an emergency simulation game, opening up new avenues for adaptivity and interaction.

References

[1]
Jackson Beatty. 1982. Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources.Psychological Bulletin 91, 2 (1982), 276.
[2]
Simone Benedetto, Marco Pedrotti, and Bruce Bridgeman. 2011. Microsaccades and exploratory saccades in a naturalistic environment. Journal of Eye Movement Research 4, 2 (2011), 1–10.
[3]
Maneesh Bilalpur, Mohan Kankanhalli, Stefan Winkler, and Ramanathan Subramanian. 2018. Eeg-based evaluation of cognitive workload induced by acoustic parameters for data sonification. In Proceedings of the 2018 on International Conference on Multimodal Interaction. ACM, 315–323.
[4]
Yati N Boutcher and Stephen H Boutcher. 2006. Cardiovascular response to Stroop: effect of verbal response and task difficulty. Biological Psychology 73, 3 (2006), 235–241.
[5]
Carlos Carreiras. 2015–. BioSPPy: Biosignal Processing in Python. https://github.com/PIA-Group/BioSPPy
[6]
Fang Chen, Jianlong Zhou, Yang Wang, Kun Yu, Syed Z Arshad, Ahmad Khawaji, and Dan Conway. 2016. Robust multimodal cognitive load measurement. Springer.
[7]
Siyuan Chen and Julien Epps. 2013. Automatic classification of eye activity for cognitive load measurement with emotion interference. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 110, 2(2013), 111–124.
[8]
Michel De Rivecourt, Marianne Kuperus, Wendy J Post, and Lambertus JM Mulder. 2008. Cardiovascular and eye activity measures as indices for momentary changes in mental effort during simulated flight. Ergonomics 51, 9 (2008), 1295–1319.
[9]
Xin Gao, Hongmei Yan, and Hong-jin Sun. 2015. Modulation of microsaccade rate by task difficulty revealed through between-and within-trial comparisons. Journal of Vision 15, 3 (2015), 3–3.
[10]
Peter Gerjets, Carina Walter, Wolfgang Rosenstiel, Martin Bogdan, and Thorsten O. Zander. 2014. Cognitive state monitoring and the design of adaptive instruction in digital environments: lessons learned from cognitive workload assessment using a passive brain-computer interface approach. Frontiers in Neuroscience 8 (2014), 385. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2014.00385
[11]
Pierre Geurts, Damien Ernst, and Louis Wehenkel. 2006. Extremely randomized trees. Machine Learning 63, 1 (2006), 3–42.
[12]
Promotion Software GmbH. 1999. World of Emergency. https://www.world-of-emergency.com/?lang=en
[13]
Eija Haapalainen, SeungJun Kim, Jodi F Forlizzi, and Anind K Dey. 2010. Psycho-physiological measures for assessing cognitive load. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 301–310.
[14]
Patrick S Hamilton. 2002. Open source ECG analysis software documentation. Computers in Cardiology 2002 (2002), 101–104.
[15]
Sandra G Hart and Lowell E Staveland. 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In Advances in Psychology. Vol. 52. Elsevier, 139–183.
[16]
SM Hadi Hosseini, Jennifer L Bruno, Joseph M Baker, Andrew Gundran, Lene K Harbott, J Christian Gerdes, and Allan L Reiss. 2017. Neural, physiological, and behavioral correlates of visuomotor cognitive load. Scientific Reports 7, 1 (2017), 8866.
[17]
M Sazzad Hussain, Rafael A Calvo, and Fang Chen. 2013. Automatic cognitive load detection from face, physiology, task performance and fusion during affective interference. Interacting with Computers 26, 3 (2013), 256–268.
[18]
Daniel Kahneman. 1973. Attention and effort. Vol. 1063. Citeseer.
[19]
Jeffrey M Klingner. 2010. Measuring cognitive load during visual tasks by combining pupillometry and eye tracking. Ph.D. Dissertation. Stanford University Stanford, CA.
[20]
Arthur F Kramer. 1991. Physiological metrics of mental workload: A review of recent progress. Multiple-task Performance(1991), 279–328.
[21]
Krzysztof Krejtz, Andrew T Duchowski, Anna Niedzielska, Cezary Biele, and Izabela Krejtz. 2018. Eye tracking cognitive load using pupil diameter and microsaccades with fixed gaze. PLOS ONE 13, 9 (2018), e0203629.
[22]
Shiba Kuanar, Vassilis Athitsos, Nityananda Pradhan, Arabinda Mishra, and Kamisetty R Rao. 2018. Cognitive Analysis of Working Memory Load from EEG, by a Deep Recurrent Neural Network. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2576–2580.
[23]
Jesus L Lobo, Javier D Ser, Flavia De Simone, Roberta Presta, Simona Collina, and Zdenek Moravek. 2016. Cognitive workload classification using eye-tracking and EEG data. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction in Aerospace. ACM, 16.
[24]
Caitlin Mills, Igor Fridman, Walid Soussou, Disha Waghray, Andrew M Olney, and Sidney K D’Mello. 2017. Put your thinking cap on: detecting cognitive load using EEG during learning. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference. ACM, 80–89.
[25]
Oskar Palinko, Andrew L Kun, Alexander Shyrokov, and Peter Heeman. 2010. Estimating cognitive load using remote eye tracking in a driving simulator. In Proceedings of the 2010 Symposium on Eye-tracking Research & Applications. ACM, 141–144.
[26]
F. Pedregosa, G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V. Michel, B. Thirion, O. Grisel, M. Blondel, P. Prettenhofer, R. Weiss, V. Dubourg, J. Vanderplas, A. Passos, D. Cournapeau, M. Brucher, M. Perrot, and E. Duchesnay. 2011. Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research 12 (2011), 2825–2830.
[27]
Keith Rayner. 1998. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research.Psychological Bulletin 124, 3 (1998), 372.
[28]
Christian Scharinger, Yvonne Kammerer, and Peter Gerjets. 2015. Pupil Dilation and EEG Alpha Frequency Band Power Reveal Load on Executive Functions for Link-Selection Processes during Text Reading. PLOS ONE 10, 6 (06 2015), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130608
[29]
Eva Siegenthaler, Francisco M Costela, Michael B McCamy, Leandro L Di Stasi, Jorge Otero-Millan, Andreas Sonderegger, Rudolf Groner, Stephen Macknik, and Susana Martinez-Conde. 2014. Task difficulty in mental arithmetic affects microsaccadic rates and magnitudes. European Journal of Neuroscience 39, 2 (2014), 287–294.
[30]
Martin Spüler, Carina Walter, Wolfgang Rosenstiel, Peter Gerjets, Korbinian Moeller, and Elise Klein. 2016. EEG-based prediction of cognitive workload induced by arithmetic: a step towards online adaptation in numerical learning. ZDM 48, 3 (01 Jun 2016), 267–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0754-8
[31]
Zach Chuanzhong Tan, Bryan Reimer, Bruce Mehler, and Joseph F Coughlin. 2011. Detection of elevated states of cognitive demand in drivers in a naturalistic driving environment. In Proceedings of the 2nd Annual International Conference on Advanced Topics in Artificial Intelligence (ATAI 2011). 24–25.
[32]
Benjamin W Tatler, Roland J Baddeley, and Benjamin T Vincent. 2006. The long and the short of it: Spatial statistics at fixation vary with saccade amplitude and task. Vision Research 46, 12 (2006), 1857–1862.
[33]
Karl F Van Orden, Wendy Limbert, Scott Makeig, and Tzyy-Ping Jung. 2001. Eye activity correlates of workload during a visuospatial memory task. Human Factors 43, 1 (2001), 111–121.
[34]
Glenn F Wilson and Christopher A Russell. 2007. Performance enhancement in an uninhabited air vehicle task using psychophysiologically determined adaptive aiding. Human Factors 49, 6 (2007), 1005–1018.
[35]
Beste F Yuksel, Kurt B Oleson, Lane Harrison, Evan M Peck, Daniel Afergan, Remco Chang, and Robert JK Jacob. 2016. Learn piano with BACh: An adaptive learning interface that adjusts task difficulty based on brain state. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 5372–5384.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Preliminary Eye Tracking Scale for Cognitive LoadProceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Information Systems Development10.62036/ISD.2024.90Online publication date: 2024
  • (2024)Deep-Mental Workload Intelligent SystemData-Driven Business Intelligence Systems for Socio-Technical Organizations10.4018/979-8-3693-1210-0.ch011(268-298)Online publication date: 23-Feb-2024
  • (2024)Exploring Communication Dynamics: Eye-tracking Analysis in Pair Programming of Computer Science EducationProceedings of the 2024 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications10.1145/3649902.3653942(1-7)Online publication date: 4-Jun-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
ICMI '19: 2019 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction
October 2019
601 pages
ISBN:9781450368605
DOI:10.1145/3340555
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike International 4.0 License.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 14 October 2019

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Classification
  2. Cognitive Load
  3. Eye Tracking
  4. Heart Rate
  5. Multimodal

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

ICMI '19

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 453 of 1,080 submissions, 42%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)92
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)13
Reflects downloads up to 09 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Preliminary Eye Tracking Scale for Cognitive LoadProceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Information Systems Development10.62036/ISD.2024.90Online publication date: 2024
  • (2024)Deep-Mental Workload Intelligent SystemData-Driven Business Intelligence Systems for Socio-Technical Organizations10.4018/979-8-3693-1210-0.ch011(268-298)Online publication date: 23-Feb-2024
  • (2024)Exploring Communication Dynamics: Eye-tracking Analysis in Pair Programming of Computer Science EducationProceedings of the 2024 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications10.1145/3649902.3653942(1-7)Online publication date: 4-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Uncovering and Addressing Blink-Related Challenges in Using Eye Tracking for Interactive SystemsProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642086(1-23)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)Multimodal Measurement of Cognitive Load in a Video Game Context: A Comparative Study Between Subjective and Objective MetricsIEEE Transactions on Games10.1109/TG.2024.340672316:4(854-867)Online publication date: Dec-2024
  • (2024)Eye Tracking Insights: Analyzing Cognitive Load Across Media TypesEmerging Challenges in Intelligent Management Information Systems10.1007/978-3-031-78465-1_3(27-38)Online publication date: 21-Dec-2024
  • (2023)Prediction of Cognitive Load during Industry-Academia Collaboration via a Web PlatformCONVR 2023 - Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Construction Applications of Virtual Reality10.36253/979-12-215-0289-3.06(57-68)Online publication date: 2023
  • (2023)Prediction of Cognitive Load during Industry-Academia Collaboration via a Web PlatformCONVR 2023 - Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Construction Applications of Virtual Reality10.36253/10.36253/979-12-215-0289-3.06(57-68)Online publication date: 2023
  • (2023)A Panoramic Review of Situational Awareness Monitoring SystemsProceedings of the 2023 6th International Conference on Robot Systems and Applications10.1145/3655532.3655539(56-61)Online publication date: 22-Sep-2023
  • (2023)A Survey on Measuring Cognitive Workload in Human-Computer InteractionACM Computing Surveys10.1145/358227255:13s(1-39)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2023
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media