Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3340764.3340768acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmundcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Text Analysis Using Large High-Resolution Displays

Published: 08 September 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Large high-resolution displays (LHRDs) are entering into our daily life. Today, we already see them in installations where they display tailored applications, e.g. in exhibitions. However, while heavily studied under lab conditions, real-world applications for personal use, which utilize the extended screen space are rarely available. Thus, today's studies of LHRD are particularly designed to embrace the large screen space. In contrast, in this paper, we investigate a real-world application designed for researchers working on large text corpora to support them in deep text understanding. We conducted a study with 14 experts from the humanities and computational linguistics which solved a text analysis task using a standard desktop version on a 24 inch screen and an LHRD version on three 50 inch screens. Surprisingly, the smaller display condition outperformed the LHRD in terms of task completion time and error rate. While participants appreciated the overview provided by the large screen, qualitative feedback also revealed that the need for head movement and the scrolling mechanism decreased the usability of the LHRD condition.

References

[1]
Jason Alexander and Andy Cockburn. 2008. An Empirical Characterisation of Electronic Document Navigation. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2008 (GI '08). Canadian Information Processing Society, Toronto, Ont., Canada, Canada, 123--130. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1375714.1375736
[2]
Christopher Andrews, Alex Endert, and Chris North. 2010. Space to Think: Large High-resolution Displays for Sensemaking. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 55--64.
[3]
Sebastian Arnold, Robert Dziuba, and Alexander Löser. 2016. TASTY: Interactive Entity Linking As-You-Type. In Proceedings of COLING 2016, the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations. http://aclweb.org/anthology/C16-2024
[4]
Robert Ball, Chris North, and Doug A. Bowman. 2007. Move to Improve: Promoting Physical Navigation to Increase User Performance with Large Displays. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 191--200.
[5]
John Brooke. 1996. SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability evaluation in industry 189, 194 (1996), 4--7.
[6]
Andy Cockburn, Carl Gutwin, and Jason Alexander. 2006. Faster Document Navigation with Space-filling Thumbnails. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1--10.
[7]
Joachim Daiber, Max Jakob, Chris Hokamp, and Pablo N. Mendes. 2013. Improving Efficiency and Accuracy in Multilingual Entity Extraction. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Semantic Systems.
[8]
Vishal Doshi, Sneha Tuteja, Krishna Bharadwaj, Davide Tantillo, Thomas Marrinan, James Patton, and G. Elisabeta Marai. 2017. StickySchedule: An Interactive Multi-user Application for Conference Scheduling on Large-scale Shared Displays. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (PerDis '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 2, 7 pages.
[9]
Clifton Forlines, Chia Shen, Daniel Wigdor, and Ravin Balakrishnan. 2006. Exploring the Effects of Group Size and Display Configuration on Visual Search. In Proceedings of the 2006 20th Anniversary Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 11--20.
[10]
Markus Gärtner, Sven Mayer, Valentin Schwind, Eric Hämmerle, Emine Turcan, Florin Rheinwald, Gustav Murawski, Lars Lischke, and Jonas Kuhn. 2018. NLATool: An Application for Enhanced Deep Text Understanding. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations (COLING '18).
[11]
Genevieve Gorrell, Johann Petrak, and Kalina Bontcheva. 2015. Using @Twitter Conventions to Improve #LOD-Based Named Entity Disambiguation. In Proceedings of the 12th European Semantic Web Conference on The Semantic Web. Latest Advances and New Domains. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, USA, 16.
[12]
Carl Gutwin, Andy Cockburn, and Nickolas Gough. 2017. A Field Experiment of Spatially-Stable Overviews for Document Navigation. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 5905--5916.
[13]
Sandra G. Hart. 2006. Nasa-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX); 20 Years Later. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 50, 9, 904--908.
[14]
Sandra G. Hart and Lowell E. Staveland. 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research. Advances in Psychology 52 (1988), 139--183.
[15]
Marc Hassenzahl, Michael Burmester, and Franz Koller. 2003. AttrakDiff: Ein Fragebogen zur Messung wahrgenommener hedonischer und pragmatischer Qualität. In Mensch & Computer 2003. Springer, 187--196.
[16]
ISO 9241-210:2010(E) 2010. Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems. Standard. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, CH.
[17]
Mikkel R. Jakobsen and Kasper Hornbæk. 2015. Is Moving Improving?: Some Effects of Locomotion in Wall-Display Interaction. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 4169--4178.
[18]
Lars Lischke, Jan Hoffmann, Robert Krüger, Patrick Bader, Paweł W. Wozniak, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2017. Towards Interaction Techniques for Social Media Data Exploration on Large High-Resolution Displays. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2752--2759.
[19]
Lars Lischke, Sven Mayer, Katrin Wolf, Niels Henze, Harald Reiterer, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2016. Screen Arrangements and Interaction Areas for Large Display Work Places. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (2016-01-01) (PerDis '16). ACM, Oulu, Finland, 228--234.
[20]
Lars Lischke, Sven Mayer, Katrin Wolf, Niels Henze, Albrecht Schmidt, Svenja Leifert, and Harald Reiterer. 2015. Using Space: Effect of Display Size on Users' Search Performance. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1845--1850.
[21]
Can Liu, Olivier Chapuis, Michel Beaudouin-Lafon, Eric Lecolinet, and Wendy E. Mackay. 2014. Effects of display size and navigation type on a classification task. Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '14 (2014), 4147--4156.
[22]
Catherine C Marshall. 2009. Reading and writing the electronic book. Synthesis lectures on information concepts, retrieval, and services 1, 1 (2009), 1--185.
[23]
Kenton O'Hara and Abigail Sellen. 1997. A Comparison of Reading Paper and On-line Documents. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '97). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 335--342.
[24]
Roman Rädle, Hans-Christian Jetter, Jens Müller, and Harald Reiterer. 2014. Bigger is Not Always Better: Display Size, Performance, and Task Load During Peephole Map Navigation. In Proceedings of the 32Nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 4127--4136.
[25]
Fateme Rajabiyazdi, Jagoda Walny, Carrie Mah, John Brosz, and Sheelagh Carpendale. 2015. Understanding Researchers' Use of a Large, High-Resolution Display Across Disciplines. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Interactive Tabletops & Surfaces (ITS '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 107--116.
[26]
Umar Rashid, Miguel A. Nacenta, and Aaron Quigley. 2012. Factors Influencing Visual Attention Switch in Multi-display User Interfaces: A Survey. In Proceedings of the 2012 International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (PerDis '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 1, 6 pages.
[27]
Jeff Sauro and James R Lewis. 2016. Quantifying the user experience: Practical statistics for user research. Morgan Kaufmann.
[28]
Desney S. Tan, Darren Gergle, Peter Scupelli, and Randy Pausch. 2003. With Similar Visual Angles, Larger Displays Improve Spatial Performance. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '03). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 217--224.
[29]
Chen-Tse Tsai and Dan Roth. 2016. Illinois cross-lingual wikifier: Grounding entities in many languages to the English Wikipedia. In Proceedings of COLING 2016, the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations.
[30]
Daniel Wigdor, Chia Shen, Clifton Forlines, and Ravin Balakrishnan. 2007. Perception of Elementary Graphical Elements in Tabletop and Multi-surface Environments. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 473--482.
[31]
Beth Yost, Yonca Haciahmetoglu, Chris North, and Chris North. 2007. Beyond Visual Acuity: The Perceptual Scalability of Information Visualizations for Large Displays. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 101--110.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)ICT-Based Individualized Training of Institutionalized Individuals With Dementia. Evaluation of Usability and Trends Toward the Effectiveness of the InCoPE-AppFrontiers in Physiology10.3389/fphys.2022.92110513Online publication date: 8-Jul-2022
  • (2020)Challenges in Designing Interfaces for Large Displays: the Practitioners’ Point of ViewProceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society10.1145/3419249.3421240(1-6)Online publication date: 25-Oct-2020

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
MuC '19: Proceedings of Mensch und Computer 2019
September 2019
863 pages
ISBN:9781450371988
DOI:10.1145/3340764
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 08 September 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Large high-resolution displays
  2. application study
  3. wall-sized display

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

Conference

MuC'19
MuC'19: Mensch-und-Computer
September 8 - 11, 2019
Hamburg, Germany

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)12
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 10 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)ICT-Based Individualized Training of Institutionalized Individuals With Dementia. Evaluation of Usability and Trends Toward the Effectiveness of the InCoPE-AppFrontiers in Physiology10.3389/fphys.2022.92110513Online publication date: 8-Jul-2022
  • (2020)Challenges in Designing Interfaces for Large Displays: the Practitioners’ Point of ViewProceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society10.1145/3419249.3421240(1-6)Online publication date: 25-Oct-2020

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media