Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3340764.3344454acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmundcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Sample Size Planning and Questionnaire Length in Website-Evaluations

Published: 08 September 2019 Publication History

Abstract

When planning studies to evaluate websites practitioners need to answer two central questions: (1) Which instrument should be used? (2) How many users should be queried? While the answer to the first question depends on the goal of the specific evaluation, the second question can also be answered in relation to fundamental psychometric relationships. The present study explores the relationship between the reliability of the questionnaire, and the required sample size. Based on questionnaires to assess website-content, we determine how many user have to be sampled to achieve a specific precision. Based on these results we present guidelines, that practitioners can use when planning their evaluation study.

References

[1]
Fan, W. and Yan, Z. 2010. Factors affecting response rates of the web survey: A systematic review. Computers in human behavior. 26, 2 (2010), 132--139.
[2]
Faul, F. et al. 2007. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods. 39, (2007), 175--191.
[3]
Faulkner, L. 2003. Beyond the five-user assumption: Benefits of increased sample sizes in usability testing. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers. 35, 3 (2003), 379--383.
[4]
Kauermann, G. and Küchenhoff, H. 2011. Stichproben. Springer.
[5]
Nielsen, J. 1993. Usability engineering. AP Professional.
[6]
Nunnally, J.C. et al. 1967. Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill.
[7]
Salaschek, M. et al. 2007. Benutzbarkeit von Software: Vor- und Nachteile verschiedener Methoden und Verfahren. Zeitschrift für Evaluation. 6, 2 (2007), 247--276.
[8]
Thielsch, M.T. and Hirschfeld, G. 2019. Facets of website content. Human Computer Interaction. 34, (2019), 279--327.
[9]
Thielsch, M.T. et al. 2014. User evaluation of websites: From first impression to recommendation. Interacting with Computers. 26, 1 (2014), 89--112.
[10]
Trafimow, D. 2014. Estimating true standard deviations. Frontiers in Psychology. 5, 235 (2014).

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)Toolbox zur Website-Evaluation: Erfassung der User Experience von OnlinegesundheitsinformationenToolbox for user-experience evaluation of online health informationBundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz10.1007/s00103-020-03142-763:6(721-728)Online publication date: 4-May-2020

Index Terms

  1. Sample Size Planning and Questionnaire Length in Website-Evaluations

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      MuC '19: Proceedings of Mensch und Computer 2019
      September 2019
      863 pages
      ISBN:9781450371988
      DOI:10.1145/3340764
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 08 September 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Fragebogenlänge
      2. Stichprobenumfang
      3. Studienplanung
      4. Webevaluationen

      Qualifiers

      • Short-paper
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Conference

      MuC'19
      MuC'19: Mensch-und-Computer
      September 8 - 11, 2019
      Hamburg, Germany

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)11
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 24 Dec 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2020)Toolbox zur Website-Evaluation: Erfassung der User Experience von OnlinegesundheitsinformationenToolbox for user-experience evaluation of online health informationBundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz10.1007/s00103-020-03142-763:6(721-728)Online publication date: 4-May-2020

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media