Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3341163.3347737acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Personal thermal perception models using skin temperatures and HR/HRV features: comparison of smartwatch and professional measurement devices

Published: 09 September 2019 Publication History

Abstract

In order to detect a person's individual momentary thermal sensation and comfort, an increased number of models are developed that involve physiological data, especially skin temperatures and features based on the heart activity. In this paper, we investigate the feasibility of Machine Learning (ML) models which include physiological data based on two data sources: (1) a smartwatch and (2) a portable chest belt device. Further, we investigate the difference between thermal sensation and comfort votes and propose a new combined ground truth label. Data were collected in lab-like studies in a single-bed hotel room. Our study focuses on the detection of cold-induced thermal discomfort by varying the room air temperature between 24 °C and 20 °C. Results show that ML based approaches lead to accuracies up to 83.1% when using a chest belt device. Using a smartwatch, accuracies drop down to 79.8%. Our investigation shows that even though Heart Rate (HR) based features improve the prediction accuracy, the highest feature importances have distal skin temperature features.

References

[1]
ASHRAE. 1992. Standard 55 - Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy. ASHRAE Inc., Atlanta.
[2]
ASHRAE. 2010. Standard 55R. Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy. ASHRAE Inc., Atlanta.
[3]
Changzhi Dai, Hui Zhang, Edward Arens, and Zhiwei Lian. 2017. Machine learning approaches to predict thermal demands using skin temperatures: Steady-state conditions. Building and Environment 114 (2017), 1--10.
[4]
Richard De Dear. 2011. Revisiting an old hypothesis of human thermal perception: alliesthesia. Building Research & Information 39, 2 (2011), 108--117.
[5]
Deutsches Institut für Normung. 2001. DIN ISO Standard 7726-2001, Ergonomics of the Thermal Environment - Instruments for Measuring Physical Quantities.
[6]
Deutsches Institut für Normung. 2005. ISO Standard 7730-2005, Ergonomics of the Thermal Environment. Analytical Determination and Interpretation of Thermal Comfort using Calculation of the PMV and PPD Indices and Local Thermal Comfort Criteria.
[7]
Diana Enescu. 2017. A review of thermal comfort models and indicators for indoor environments. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 79 (2017), 1353--1379.
[8]
Povl O. Fanger. 1970. Thermal comfort. Analysis and Applications in Environmental Engineering. Copenhagen: Danish Technical Press.
[9]
Julien Fatisson, Victor Oswald, and François Lalonde. 2016. Influence diagram of physiological and environmental factors affecting heart rate variability: an extended literature overview. Heart International 11, 1 (2016), e32--e40.
[10]
Ian D. Griffiths and Donald A. McIntyre. 1974. Sensitivity to Temporal Variations in Thermal Conditions. Ergonomics 17, 4 (1974), 499--507.
[11]
Michael A. Humphreys and Mary Hancock. 2007. Do people like to feel 'neutral'?: Exploring the variation of the desired thermal sensation on the ASHRAE scale. Energy and buildings 39, 7 (2007), 867--874.
[12]
Boris R. M. Kingma, Arjan J. H. Frijns, Lisje Schellen, and Wouter D. van Marken Lichtenbelt. 2014. Beyond the classic thermoneutral zone: including thermal comfort. Temperature 1 (2014), 142--149.
[13]
Jakub Kolarik. 2008. Occupant responses and energy use in buildings with moderately drifting operative temperatures. Ph.D. Dissertation. Technical University of Denmark.
[14]
Jakub Kolarik, Jørn Toftum, Bjarne W. Olesen, and Avharam Shitzer. 2009. Occupant responses and office work performance in environments with moderately drifting operative temperatures (RP-1269). HVAC&R Research 15, 5 (2009), 931--960.
[15]
Joo-Young Lee, Eric A. Stone, Hitoshi Wakabayashi, and Yutaka Tochihara. 2010. Issues in combining the categorical and visual analog scale for the assessment of perceived thermal sensation: Methodological and conceptual considerations. Applied ergonomics 41, 2 (2010), 282--290.
[16]
Da Li, Carol C. Menassa, and Vineet R. Kamat. 2017. Personalized human comfort in indoor building environments under diverse conditioning modes. Building and Environment 126 (2017), 304--317.
[17]
Donald A. McIntyre. 1980. Indoor climate. Applied Science Publisher, London.
[18]
Fergus Nicol, Michael Humphreys, and Susan Roaf. 2012. Adaptive Thermal Comfort: Principles and Practice. London: Routledge.
[19]
Francesco Salamone, Lorenzo Belussi, Cristian Currò, Ludovico Danza, Matteo Ghellere, Giulia Guazzi, Bruno Lenzi, Valentino Megale, and Italo Meroni. 2018. Application of IoT and Machine Learning techniques for the assessment of thermal comfort perception. Energy Procedia 148 (2018), 798--805.
[20]
Francesco Salamone, Lorenzo Belussi, Cristian Currò, Ludovico Danza, Matteo Ghellere, Giulia Guazzi, Bruno Lenzi, Valentino Megale, and Italo Meroni. 2018. Integrated Method for Personal Thermal Comfort Assessment and Optimization through Users' Feedback, IoT and Machine Learning: A Case Study. Sensors 18, 5 (2018), 1602.
[21]
Stefan Sammito and Irina Böckelmann. 2016. Factors influencing heart rate variability. In International Cardiovascular Forum Journal, Vol. 6. 18--22.
[22]
Lisje Schellen, Wouter D. van Marken Lichtenbelt, Marcel G. L. C. Loomans, Jørn Toftum, and Martin H. De Wit. 2010. Differences between young adults and elderly in thermal comfort, productivity, and thermal physiology in response to a moderate temperature drift and a steady-state condition. Indoor Air 20, 4 (2010), 273--283.
[23]
Philip Schmidt, Attila Reiss, Robert Duerichen, Claus Marberger, and Kristof Van Laerhoven. 2018. Introducing WESAD, a Multimodal Dataset for Wearable Stress and Affect Detection. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (ICMI '18). ACM, 400--408.
[24]
Marcel Schweiker, Gesche M. Huebner, Boris R. M. Kingma, Rick Kramer, and Hannah Pallubinsky. 2018. Drivers of diversity in human thermal perception - A review for holistic comfort models. Temperature 5, 4 (2018), 308--342.
[25]
Soo Sim, Myung Koh, Kwang Joo, Seungwoo Noh, Sangyun Park, Youn Kim, and Kwang Park. 2016. Estimation of thermal sensation based on wrist skin temperatures. Sensors 16, 4 (2016), 420.
[26]
Joost van Hoof. 2008. Forty years of Fanger's model of thermal comfort: comfort for all? Indoor Air 18 (2008), 182--201.
[27]
Danni Wang, Hui Zhang, Edward Arens, and Charlie Huizenga. 2007. Observations of upper-extremity skin temperature and corresponding overall-body thermal sensations and comfort. Building and Environment 42, 12 (2007), 3933--3943.
[28]
Ye Yao, Zhiwei Lian, Weiwei Liu, and Qi Shen. 2008. Experimental study on physiological responses and thermal comfort under various ambient temperatures. Physiology and Behavior 93, 1-2 (2008), 310--321.
[29]
Hui Zhu, Hanqing Wang, Zhiqiang Liu, Duanru Li, Guangxiao Kou, and Can Li. 2018. Experimental study on the human thermal comfort based on the heart rate variability (HRV) analysis under different environments. Science of The Total Environment 616 (2018), 1124--1133.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Joint Measurement of Thermal Discomfort by Occupant Pose, Motion and Appearance in Indoor Surveillance Videos for Building Energy SavingJournal of Circuits, Systems and Computers10.1142/S021812662450051833:03Online publication date: 7-Sep-2023
  • (2022)Investigating User Experience of On-Body Heating Strategies in Indoor EnvironmentsErgonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications10.1177/1064804622107872032:2(25-32)Online publication date: 20-Apr-2022
  • (2021)Metrological characterization and signal processing of a wearable sensor for the measurement of heart rate variability2021 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA)10.1109/MeMeA52024.2021.9478713(1-6)Online publication date: 23-Jun-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Personal thermal perception models using skin temperatures and HR/HRV features: comparison of smartwatch and professional measurement devices

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image ACM Conferences
        ISWC '19: Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers
        September 2019
        355 pages
        ISBN:9781450368704
        DOI:10.1145/3341163
        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Sponsors

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 09 September 2019

        Permissions

        Request permissions for this article.

        Check for updates

        Author Tags

        1. cold-induced thermal discomfort
        2. heart rate
        3. heart rate variability
        4. machine learning
        5. personal thermal comfort
        6. personal thermal sensation
        7. skin temperatures
        8. smartwatch

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article

        Conference

        UbiComp '19

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate 38 of 196 submissions, 19%

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)53
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)10
        Reflects downloads up to 15 Jan 2025

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all
        • (2023)Joint Measurement of Thermal Discomfort by Occupant Pose, Motion and Appearance in Indoor Surveillance Videos for Building Energy SavingJournal of Circuits, Systems and Computers10.1142/S021812662450051833:03Online publication date: 7-Sep-2023
        • (2022)Investigating User Experience of On-Body Heating Strategies in Indoor EnvironmentsErgonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications10.1177/1064804622107872032:2(25-32)Online publication date: 20-Apr-2022
        • (2021)Metrological characterization and signal processing of a wearable sensor for the measurement of heart rate variability2021 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA)10.1109/MeMeA52024.2021.9478713(1-6)Online publication date: 23-Jun-2021
        • (2021)Sensing Physiological and Environmental Quantities to Measure Human Thermal Comfort Through Machine Learning TechniquesIEEE Sensors Journal10.1109/JSEN.2021.306470721:10(12322-12337)Online publication date: 15-May-2021
        • (2020)Study of Human Thermal Comfort for Cyber–Physical Human Centric System in Smart HomesSensors10.3390/s2002037220:2(372)Online publication date: 9-Jan-2020
        • (2020)Review on occupant-centric thermal comfort sensing, predicting, and controllingEnergy and Buildings10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110392226(110392)Online publication date: Nov-2020

        View Options

        Login options

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media