Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
opinion
Free access

Four internets

Published: 24 February 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Considering the merits of several models and approaches to Internet governance.

References

[1]
Benkler, Y. The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, 2006.
[2]
Cerf, V.G. Ownership vs. stewardship, Commun. ACM 62, 3 (Mar. 2019), 6
[3]
Cerf, V.G. The upper layers of the Internet. Commun. ACM 61, 11 (Nov. 2018), 5
[4]
Creemers, R. Cyber China: Upgrading propaganda, public opinion work and social management for the twenty-first century, Journal of Contemporary China 26, 103, 85--100
[5]
DeNardis, L. The Global War for Internet Governance. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, 2014.
[6]
EDPS Ethics Advisory Group. Towards a Digital Ethics, European Data Protection Supervisor, 2018, https://edps.europa.eu/sites/edp/files/publication/18-01-25_eag_report_en.pdf
[7]
Lee, K.-F. AI Superpowers: China, Silicon Valley and the New World Order. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, New York, 2018.
[8]
Mueller, M. Will the Internet Fragment? Polity Press, Cambridge, MA, 2017.
[9]
Nunziato, D.C. Virtual Freedom: Net Neutrality and Free Speech in the Internet Age. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, 2009.
[10]
O'Hara, K. and Hall, W. Four Internets: The Geopolitics of Internet Governance, Centre for International Governance Innovation paper no.206, 2018; https://www.cigionline.org/publications/four-internets-geopolitics-digital-governance.
[11]
Ristolainen, M. Should 'RuNet 2020' be taken seriously? Contradictory views about cyber security between Russia and the West. Journal of Information Warfare 16, (2017), 113--131.
[12]
Shilton, K. Engaging values despite neutrality: Challenges and approaches to values reflection during the design of Internet infrastructure. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 43, 2 (2018), 247--269; https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0162243917714869.
[13]
Snyder, T. The Road to Unfreedom. Bodley Head, London, 2018.
[14]
Soldatov, A. and Borogan, I. The Red Web: The Kremlin's War on the Internet. Public Affairs, New York, 2015.
[15]
Zaagman, E. China's computing ambitions. Commun. ACM 61, 11 (Nov. 2018), 40--41

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)An evolutionary game-theoretic analysis of the "multi-agent co-governance" system of unfair competition on internet platformsPLOS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.030444519:6(e0304445)Online publication date: 20-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Research on the "multi-agent co-governance" system of unfair competition on internet platforms: Based on the perspective of evolutionary gamePLOS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.030162719:4(e0301627)Online publication date: 18-Apr-2024
  • (2022)Effective Synergy of Market Agents: The Core of Achieving Multi-Agent Governance on the Internet PlatformSustainability10.3390/su14241657414:24(16574)Online publication date: 10-Dec-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Communications of the ACM
Communications of the ACM  Volume 63, Issue 3
March 2020
98 pages
ISSN:0001-0782
EISSN:1557-7317
DOI:10.1145/3385399
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 24 February 2020
Published in CACM Volume 63, Issue 3

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Opinion
  • Popular
  • Un-reviewed

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)164
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)30
Reflects downloads up to 16 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)An evolutionary game-theoretic analysis of the "multi-agent co-governance" system of unfair competition on internet platformsPLOS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.030444519:6(e0304445)Online publication date: 20-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Research on the "multi-agent co-governance" system of unfair competition on internet platforms: Based on the perspective of evolutionary gamePLOS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.030162719:4(e0301627)Online publication date: 18-Apr-2024
  • (2022)Effective Synergy of Market Agents: The Core of Achieving Multi-Agent Governance on the Internet PlatformSustainability10.3390/su14241657414:24(16574)Online publication date: 10-Dec-2022
  • (2022)Introduction: Governing the Algorithmic Distribution of the NewsThe Algorithmic Distribution of News10.1007/978-3-030-87086-7_1(1-24)Online publication date: 23-Sep-2022
  • (2022)A comparative study on false information governance in Chinese and American social media platformsPolicy & Internet10.1002/poi3.30114:2(263-283)Online publication date: 31-May-2022
  • (2021)Governing “European values” inside data flows: interdisciplinary perspectivesInternet Policy Review10.14763/2021.3.158210:3Online publication date: 30-Sep-2021
  • (2021)The Treachery of Images in the Digital Sovereignty DebateMinds and Machines10.1007/s11023-021-09566-731:3(439-456)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2021

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Digital Edition

View this article in digital edition.

Digital Edition

Magazine Site

View this article on the magazine site (external)

Magazine Site

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media