Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3343055.3359708acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesissConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Feel the Water: Expressing Physicality of District Heating Processes in Functional Overview Displays

Published: 10 November 2019 Publication History

Abstract

This paper describes an explorative design study conducted in the scope of a collaborative research project in the district heating domain. In the scope of the project, we have arranged extensive field studies at two power plants to understand the workflows, problems, and needs of industrial operators. We relied on the gained knowledge to design and develop novel visual interfaces that would communicate the overall status of the district heating system at-a-glance. We aimed at exploring potential directions and alternatives beyond conventional industrial interfaces. One particular aspect of our research was related to how the physicality of the underlying industrial processes can be expressed by purely visual means. The paper introduces three high-fidelity prototypes demonstrating the novel visualizations developed. The paper explains the design choices made, namely the relation between the selected visual encodings to the requirements of the industrial operators' tasks. Preliminary evaluation indicates industrial operators' interest in the designed solutions. Future work will incorporate an extensive qualitative evaluation on site.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (p229-domova.mp4)

References

[1]
Aly Abdelalim, Zixiao Shi, and William O'Brien. 2016. An Approach towards Developing Methods to Analyze and Visualize Energy Flow of HVAC System. Society for Modeling and Simulation International (SCS) (2016).
[2]
Lyn Bartram, Johnny Rodgers, and Kevin Muise. 2010. Chasing the negawatt: visualization for sustainable living. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 30, 3 (2010), 8--14.
[3]
Fritz Böhle and Brigitte Milkau. 1988. Computerised manufacturing and empirical knowledge. AI & SOCIETY 2, 3 (1988), 235--243.
[4]
Paulo VR Carvalho, Isaac L dos Santos, Jose Orlando Gomes, Marcos RS Borges, and Stephanie Guerlain. 2008. Human factors approach for evaluation and redesign of human--system interfaces of a nuclear power plant simulator. Displays 29, 3 (2008), 273--284.
[5]
Nick Dinadis and Kim J Vicente. 1999. Designing functional visualizations for aircraft systems status displays. The international journal of aviation psychology 9, 3 (1999), 241--269.
[6]
Veronika Domova, Maria Ralph, Elina Vartiainen, Alvaro Aranda Muñoz, Adam Henriksson, and Susanne Timsjö. 2017. Re-Introducing Physical User Interfaces into Industrial Control Rooms. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics 2017 (ECCE 2017). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 162--168.
[7]
Robb Dussault. 2013. Dashboard Demystified:Making Sense of Industrial Energy Management Visualization Systems. ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Industry (2013).
[8]
Stephen Few. 2006. Information dashboard design. (2006).
[9]
Svend Frederiksen and Sven Werner. 2013. District heating and cooling. Vol. 579. Studentlitteratur Lund.
[10]
Sarah Goodwin, Jason Dykes, Sara Jones, Iain Dillingham, Graham Dove, Alison Duffy, Alexander Kachkaev, Aidan Slingsby, and Jo Wood. 2013. Creative user-centered visualization design for energy analysts and modelers. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 19, 12 (2013), 2516--2525.
[11]
Anton Gustafsson and Magnus Gyllenswärd. 2005. The power-aware cord: energy awareness through ambient information display. In CHI'05 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 1423--1426.
[12]
Magnus Gyllensward, Anton Gustafsson, and Magnus Bang. 2006. Visualizing energy consumption of radiators. In International Conference on Persuasive Technology. Springer, 167--170.
[13]
Sung H Han, Huichul Yang, and Dong-Gwan Im. 2007. Designing a human--computer interface for a process control room: A case study of a steel manufacturing company. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 37, 5 (2007), 383--393.
[14]
Greg Judelman. 2004. Aesthetics and inspiration for visualization design: bridging the gap between art and science. In Proceedings. Eighth International Conference on Information Visualisation, 2004. IV 2004. IEEE, 245--250.
[15]
Constantine Kontokosta, Christopher Tull, David Marulli, Renate Pingerra, and Maha Yaqub. 2015. Web-Based Visualization and Prediction of Urban Energy Use from Building Benchmarking Data. In Proceedings of the Bloomberg Data for Good Exchange.
[16]
Ilpo Koskinen, John Zimmerman, Thomas Binder, Johan Redstrom, and Stephan Wensveen. 2011. Design research through practice: From the lab, field, and showroom. Elsevier.
[17]
Youn-Kyung Lim, Erik Stolterman, and Josh Tenenberg. 2008. The anatomy of prototypes: Prototypes as filters, prototypes as manifestations of design ideas. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 15, 2 (2008), 7.
[18]
Jonas Löwgren. 2016. On the significance of making in interaction design research. interactions 23 (2016), 27--33.
[19]
Knut Meissner and Hartmut Hensel. 2005. Design of a generic 3D visualization system for process control. In Sixth International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Multimedia Applications (ICCIMA'05). IEEE, 241--246.
[20]
Benjamin Noah, Jung-Hyup Kim, Ling Rothrock, and Anand Tharanathan. 2014. Evaluating alternate visualization techniques for overview displays in process control. IIE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors 2, 3--4 (2014), 152--168.
[21]
Stephen Palmer and Irvin Rock. 1994. Rethinking perceptual organization: The role of uniform connectedness. Psychonomic bulletin & review 1, 1 (1994), 29--55.
[22]
James R Pomerantz, Michael Kubovy, and others. 1986. Theoretical approaches to perceptual organization: Simplicity and likelihood principles. Organization 36, 3 (1986), 36--1.
[23]
Pere Ponsa Asensio, Beatriz Amante García, and Marta Díaz Boladeras. 2010. Ergonomic design applied in a sugar mill interface. Latin American applied research 40, 1 (2010), 27--33.
[24]
Dal Vernon C Reising and Peter T Bullemer. 2008. A direct perception, span-of-control overview display to support a process control operator's situation awareness: A practice-oriented design process. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 52. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 267--271.
[25]
Johnny Rodgers and Lyn Bartram. 2010. Ambient and artistic visualization of residential resource use. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 588. Citeseer, 17--19.
[26]
Alper Sarikaya, Michael Correll, Lyn Bartram, Melanie Tory, and Danyel Fisher. 2018. What do we talk about when we talk about dashboards? IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 25, 1 (2018), 682--692.
[27]
Anand Tharanathan, Peter Bullemer, Jason Laberge, Dal Vernon Reising, and Richard Mclain. 2012. Impact of functional and schematic overview displays on console operators' situation awareness. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making 6, 2 (2012), 141--164.
[28]
Connor Upton, Fergus Quilligan, C Garcia-Santiago, and Asier González. 2012. Energy Efficient Production Planning A Joint Cognitive Systems Approach. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology 397 (09 2012).
[29]
Sven Werner. 2017. District heating and cooling in Sweden. Energy 126 (2017), 419--429.
[30]
Steve Wexler, Jeffrey Shaffer, and Andy Cotgreave. 2017. The big book of dashboards: visualizing your data using real-world business scenarios. John Wiley & Sons.
[31]
John Zimmerman, Jodi Forlizzi, and Shelley Evenson. 2007. Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 493--502.
[32]
S Zuboff. 1988. Dilemmas of Transformation in the Age of the Smart Machine. PUB TYPE (1988), 81.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
ISS '19: Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces
November 2019
450 pages
ISBN:9781450368919
DOI:10.1145/3343055
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 10 November 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. data visualization
  2. district heating
  3. industrial interface
  4. industrial operator
  5. process control
  6. user-centered design

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

  • WASP
  • PIIA

Conference

ISS '19
Sponsor:
ISS '19: Interactive Surfaces and Spaces
November 10 - 13, 2019
Daejeon, Republic of Korea

Acceptance Rates

ISS '19 Paper Acceptance Rate 26 of 85 submissions, 31%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 147 of 533 submissions, 28%

Upcoming Conference

ISS '24
Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces
October 27 - 30, 2024
Vancouver , BC , Canada

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 116
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 16 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media