Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3345094.3345112acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicieiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Multi-Label Emotion Mining From Student Comments

Published: 10 July 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) education is gaining more attention not today but has been under research, and discussion for the past few decades. Factors that are considered for research include but not limited to the following, culture on campus, teaching and learning models, and student experience in classroom, gender bias, and stereotypes. One of the major factors is the teaching model adopted which have impact on the student learning styles and their experience in the classroom. Teaching models include traditional models, modern flipped class-room models, and active learning approaches. This study focuses on active learning approaches and their impact on students learning and experience. Light-weight team is an active learning approach, in which team members have little direct impact on each other's final grades, with significant long-term socialization. In this work we used data from end of course student evaluation. We propose extend our previous method for assessing the effectiveness of the Light-weight team teaching model, through automatic detection of emotions in student feedback in computer science course by creating multi-label for each text comment. The students are surveyed about their feelings and thoughts about teaching and learning models adopted and student experience in the classroom. Results show that implementation of these methods result in increased positivity in student emotions.

References

[1]
Latulipe, C., Long, N. B., & Seminario, C. E. (2015, February). Structuring flipped classes with lightweight teams and gamification. In Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 392--397). ACM.
[2]
Dorodchi, M., & Dehbozorgi, N. (2017, June). Addressing the Paradox of Fun and Rigor in Learning Programming. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (pp. 370--370). ACM.
[3]
Gehringer, E. F., & Peddycord III, B. W. (2013, March). The inverted-lecture model: a case study in computer architecture. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (pp. 489--494). ACM.
[4]
MacNeil, S., Latulipe, C., Long, B., & Yadav, A. (2016, February). Exploring lightweight teams in a distributed learning environment. In Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education (pp. 193--198). ACM.
[5]
Silpasuwanchai, C., Ma, X., Shigemasu, H., & Ren, X. (2016, June). Developing a comprehensive engagement framework of gamification for reflective learning. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (pp. 459--472). ACM.
[6]
Tucker, C., Pursel, B. K., & Divinsky, A. (2014). Mining student-generated textual data in MOOCs and quantifying their effects on student performance and learning outcomes. The ASEE Computers in Education (CoED) Journal, 5(4), 84.
[7]
Ortigosa, A., Martín, J. M., & Carro, R. M. (2014). Sentiment analysis in Facebook and its application to e-learning. Computers in human behavior, 31, 527--541.
[8]
Daniel, J. (2012). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. Journal of interactive Media in education, 2012(3).
[9]
Rivard, R. (2013). Measuring the MOOC dropout rate. Inside Higher Ed, 8, 2013.
[10]
Wen, M., Yang, D., & Rose, C. (2014, July). Sentiment Analysis in MOOC Discussion Forums: What does it tell us?. In Educational data mining 2014.
[11]
Nichols, M. (2003). A theory for eLearning. Educational technology & society, 6(2), 1--10.
[12]
Cross, J. (2004). An informal history of eLearning. On the Horizon, 12(3), 103--110.
[13]
Kechaou, Z., Ammar, M. B., & Alimi, A. M. (2011, April). Improving e-learning with sentiment analysis of users' opinions. In 2011 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 1032--1038). IEEE.
[14]
Martín, J. M., Ortigosa, A., & Carro, R. M. (2012, October). SentBuk: Sentiment analysis for e-learning environments. In 2012 International Symposium on Computers in Education (SIIE) (pp. 1--6). IEEE.
[15]
Song, D., Lin, H., & Yang, Z. (2007, September). Opinion mining in e-learning system. In 2007 IFIP International Conference on Network and Parallel Computing Workshops (NPC 2007) (pp. 788--792). IEEE.
[16]
Colace, F., De Santo, M., & Greco, L. (2014). SAFE: a sentiment analysis framework for e-learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 9(6), 37--41.
[17]
Binali, H. H., Wu, C., & Potdar, V. (2009, June). A new significant area: Emotion detection in e-learning using opinion mining techniques. In 2009 3rd IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies (pp. 259--264). IEEE.
[18]
Altrabsheh, N., Cocea, M., & Fallahkhair, S. (2014). Learning sentiment from students' feedback for real-time interventions in classrooms. In Adaptive and Intelligent Systems (pp. 40--49). Springer, Cham.
[19]
Leong, C. K., Lee, Y. H., & Mak, W. K. (2012). Mining sentiments in SMS texts for teaching evaluation. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 2584--2589.
[20]
Altrabsheh, N., Gaber, M., & Cocea, M. (2013, June). SA-E: sentiment analysis for education. In International Conference on Intelligent Decision Technologies (Vol. 255, pp. 353--362).
[21]
Dhanalakshmi, V., Bino, D., & Saravanan, A. M. (2016, March). Opinion mining from student feedback data using supervised learning algorithms. In 2016 3rd MEC International Conference on Big Data and Smart City (ICBDSC) (pp. 1--5). IEEE.
[22]
Jagtap, B., & Dhotre, V. (2014). SVM and HMM based hybrid approach of sentiment analysis for teacher feedback assessment. International Journal of Emerging Trends & Technology in Computer Science (IJETTCS), 3(3), 229--232.
[23]
Rajput, Q., Haider, S., & Ghani, S. (2016). Lexicon-based sentiment analysis of teachers' evaluation. Applied Computational Intelligence and Soft Computing, 2016, 1.
[24]
Stoyanov, V., Cardie, C., & Wiebe, J. (2005, October). Multi-perspective question answering using the OpQA corpus. In Proceedings of the conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 923--930). Association for Computational Linguistics.
[25]
Mac Kim, S., & Calvo, R. A. (2010, June). Sentiment Analysis in Student Experiences of Learning. In EDM (pp. 111--120).
[26]
Angelina, A.T., & Jaishree, R. (2018 September). Emotion Mining from Student Comments a Lexicon Based Approach for Pedagogical Innovation Assessment. In European Journal of Education and Applied Psychology (issue. 3, pp. 3--13).
[27]
Hedley, J. (2009). jsoup: Java html parser. 2009-11-29){2015-06-12} http://jsoup. org.
[28]
Bird, S., Klein, E., & Loper, E. (2009). Natural language processing with Python: analyzing text with the natural language toolkit. " O'Reilly Media, Inc.".
[29]
Mohammad, S. M., & Turney, P. D. (2013). Crowdsourcing a word--emotion association lexicon. Computational Intelligence, 29(3), 436--465.
[30]
Mohammad, S. M., & Turney, P. D. (2010, June). Emotions evoked by common words and phrases: Using mechanical turk to create an emotion lexicon. In Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 workshop on computational approaches to analysis and generation of emotion in text (pp. 26--34). Association for Computational Linguistics.
[31]
Cleveland, W. S. (1993). Visualizing data. Hobart Press.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Unveiling Insights: A Machine Learning Approach to Decipher Student Sentiments in Computer University of Myanmar2024 Second International Conference on Emerging Trends in Information Technology and Engineering (ICETITE)10.1109/ic-ETITE58242.2024.10493361(1-5)Online publication date: 22-Feb-2024
  • (2024)Assessment of Teaching, Learning and Student Progress in Computer Science Courses2024 IEEE International Conference on Contemporary Computing and Communications (InC4)10.1109/InC460750.2024.10649257(1-5)Online publication date: 15-Mar-2024
  • (2020)AI-Driven Assessment of Students: Current Uses and Research TrendsLearning and Collaboration Technologies. Designing, Developing and Deploying Learning Experiences10.1007/978-3-030-50513-4_22(292-302)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2020

Index Terms

  1. Multi-Label Emotion Mining From Student Comments

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICIEI '19: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Information and Education Innovations
    July 2019
    131 pages
    ISBN:9781450371698
    DOI:10.1145/3345094
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    In-Cooperation

    • University of Sunderland, UK: University of Sunderland, UK
    • UNIPMN: University of Piemonte Orientale

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 10 July 2019

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Education
    2. Emotion Mining
    3. Learning Approaches
    4. Light-Weight Team

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    ICIEI 2019

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)14
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
    Reflects downloads up to 26 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Unveiling Insights: A Machine Learning Approach to Decipher Student Sentiments in Computer University of Myanmar2024 Second International Conference on Emerging Trends in Information Technology and Engineering (ICETITE)10.1109/ic-ETITE58242.2024.10493361(1-5)Online publication date: 22-Feb-2024
    • (2024)Assessment of Teaching, Learning and Student Progress in Computer Science Courses2024 IEEE International Conference on Contemporary Computing and Communications (InC4)10.1109/InC460750.2024.10649257(1-5)Online publication date: 15-Mar-2024
    • (2020)AI-Driven Assessment of Students: Current Uses and Research TrendsLearning and Collaboration Technologies. Designing, Developing and Deploying Learning Experiences10.1007/978-3-030-50513-4_22(292-302)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2020

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media