Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3357384.3358069acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Labelling for Venue Visit Detection by Matching Wi-Fi Hotspots with Businesses

Published: 03 November 2019 Publication History

Abstract

User behaviour data is essential for modern companies, as it allows them to measure the impact of decisions they make and to gain new insights. A particular type of such data is user location trajectories, which can be clustered into Points of Interest, which, in turn, can be tied to certain venues (restaurants, schools, theaters, etc.). Machine learning is extensively utilized to detect and predict venue visits given the location data, but it requires a sufficient sample of labeled visits. Few Internet services provide a possibility to check-in for a user --- to send a signal that she is visiting a particular venue. However, for the majority of mobile applications it is unreasonable or far-fetched to introduce such a functionality for labeling purposes only. In this paper, we present a novel approach to label large quantities of location data as visits based on the following intuition: if a user is connected to a Wi-Fi hotspot of some venue, she is visiting the venue. Namely, we address the problem of matching Wi-Fi hotspots with venues by means of machine learning achieving 95% precision and 85% recall. The method has been deployed to production of one of the most popular global geo-based web services. We also release our dataset (that we utilize to develop the matching model) to facilitate research in this area.

References

[1]
T. Althoff, P. Jindal, and J. Leskovec. 2017. Online actions with offline impact: How online social networks influence online and offline user behavior. In WSDM'2017. ACM, 537--546.
[2]
M. Chernyshev, C. Valli, and P. Hannay. 2015. On 802.11 Access Point Locatability and Named Entity Recognition in Service Set Identifiers. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 11 (12 2015), 584--593.
[3]
A.V. Dorogush, A. Gulin, G. Gusev, N. Kazeev, Ostroumova-Prokhorenkova L., and A. Vorobev. 2017. Fighting biases with dynamic boosting. CoRR (2017).
[4]
A. Drutsa, G. Gusev, and P. Serdyukov. 2015. Engagement periodicity in search engine usage: Analysis and its application to search quality evaluation. In WSDM'2015. ACM, 27--36.
[5]
Y. Jiang et. al. 2018. Towards intelligent geospatial data discovery: a machine learning framework for search ranking. International Journal of Digital Earth 11, 9 (2018), 956--971.
[6]
J. H. Friedman. 2001. Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Annals of Statistics (2001).
[7]
B. Kim, J. Ha, S. Lee, S. Kang, Y. Lee, Y. Rhee, L. Nachman, and J. Song. 2011. AdNext: A Visit-pattern-aware Mobile Advertising System for Urban Commercial Complexes. In Proceedings of the 12th Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications (HotMobile '11). 7--12.
[8]
H. Köpcke and E. Rahm. 2010. Frameworks for Entity Matching: A Comparison. Data Knowl. Eng. 69, 2 (Feb. 2010), 197--210.
[9]
H. Köpcke, A. Thor, and E. Rahm. 2010. Evaluation of Entity Resolution Approaches on Real-world Match Problems. Proc. VLDB Endow. 3, 1--2 (2010).
[10]
M. Lee, S. H. Jung, S. Lee, and D. Han. 2012. Elekspot: A Platform for Urban Place Recognition via Crowdsourcing. In 2012 IEEE/IPSJ 12th International Symposium on Applications and the Internet. 190--195.
[11]
R. Meng, S. Shen, R. Roy Choudhury, and S. Nelakuditi. 2015. Matching Physical Sites withWeb Sites for Semantic Localization. In Proceedings of the 2NdWorkshop on Workshop on Physical Analytics (WPA '15). ACM, 31--36.
[12]
F. Rehman, O. Khalid, and S. A. Madani. 2017. A comparative study of locationbased recommendation systems. The Knowledge Engineering Review 32 (2017).
[13]
C. C. Robusto. 1957. The cosine-haversine formula. The American Mathematical Monthly 64, 1 (1957), 38--40.
[14]
S. Seneviratne, F. Jiang, M. Cunche, and A. Seneviratne. 2015. SSIDs in the wild: Extracting semantic information from WiFi SSIDs. In 2015 IEEE 40th Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN). 494--497.
[15]
B. Shaw, J. Shea, S. Sinha, and A. Hogue. 2013. Learning to rank for spatiotemporal search. In WSDM'2013. 717--726.
[16]
K. Sila-Nowicka, J .Vandrol, T. Oshan, J. Long, U. Dem'sar, and A. Fotheringham. 2015. Analysis of human mobility patterns from GPS trajectories and contextual information. 30 (10 2015), 1--26.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Scalabeling: Linear Slider Supported Labeling for the Classification of Streaming DataIEEE EUROCON 2021 - 19th International Conference on Smart Technologies10.1109/EUROCON52738.2021.9535601(233-238)Online publication date: 6-Jul-2021

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CIKM '19: Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
November 2019
3373 pages
ISBN:9781450369763
DOI:10.1145/3357384
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 03 November 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. data mining
  2. entity matching
  3. geocoding
  4. user location
  5. venue visit detection
  6. wi-fi matching

Qualifiers

  • Short-paper

Conference

CIKM '19
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

CIKM '19 Paper Acceptance Rate 202 of 1,031 submissions, 20%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,861 of 8,427 submissions, 22%

Upcoming Conference

CIKM '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 07 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Scalabeling: Linear Slider Supported Labeling for the Classification of Streaming DataIEEE EUROCON 2021 - 19th International Conference on Smart Technologies10.1109/EUROCON52738.2021.9535601(233-238)Online publication date: 6-Jul-2021

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media