Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3361525.3361543acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmiddlewareConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Monitorless: Predicting Performance Degradation in Cloud Applications with Machine Learning

Published: 09 December 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Today, software operation engineers rely on application key performance indicators (KPIs) for sizing and orchestrating cloud resources dynamically. KPIs are monitored to assess the achievable performance and to configure various cloud-specific parameters such as flavors of instances and autoscaling rules, among others. Usually, keeping KPIs within acceptable levels requires application expertise which is expensive and can slow down the continuous delivery of software. Expertise is required because KPIs are normally based on application-specific quality-of-service metrics, like service response time and processing rate, instead of generic platform metrics, like those typical across various environments (e.g., CPU and memory utilization, I/O rate, etc.)
In this paper, we investigate the feasibility of outsourcing the management of application performance from developers to cloud operators. In the same way that the serverless paradigm allows the execution environment to be fully managed by a third party, we discuss a monitorless model to streamline application deployment by delegating performance management. We show that training a machine learning model with platform-level data, collected from the execution of representative containerized services, allows inferring application KPI degradation. This is an opportunity to simplify operations as engineers can rely solely on platform metrics -- while still fulfilling application KPIs -- to configure portable and application agnostic rules and other cloud-specific parameters to automatically trigger actions such as autoscaling, instance migration, network slicing, etc.
Results show that monitorless infers KPI degradation with an accuracy of 97% and, notably, it performs similarly to typical autoscaling solutions, even when autoscaling rules are optimally tuned with knowledge of the expected workload.

References

[1]
Martín Abadi, Ashish Agarwal, Paul Barham, Eugene Brevdo, Zhifeng Chen, Craig Citro, Greg S. Corrado, Andy Davis, Jeffrey Dean, Matthieu Devin, Sanjay Ghemawat, Ian Goodfellow, Andrew Harp, Geoffrey Irving, Michael Isard, Yangqing Jia, Rafal Jozefowicz, Lukasz Kaiser, Manjunath Kudlur, Josh Levenberg, Dandelion Mané, Rajat Monga, Sherry Moore, Derek Murray, Chris Olah, Mike Schuster, Jonathon Shlens, Benoit Steiner, Ilya Sutskever, Kunal Talwar, Paul Tucker, Vincent Vanhoucke, Vijay Vasudevan, Fernanda Viégas, Oriol Vinyals, Pete Warden, Martin Wattenberg, Martin Wicke, Yuan Yu, and Xiaoqiang Zheng. 2015. TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Systems. https://www.tensorflow.org/ Software available from tensorflow.org.
[2]
Amazon. 2018. Amazon Web-Services Auto Scaling. Retrieved September 5, 2019 from https://aws.amazon.com/autoscaling/
[3]
Amazon. 2018. DevOps and AWS. Retrieved September 5, 2019 from https://aws.amazon.com/devops/
[4]
Appcentrica. 2016. "Deathstar Diagrams". Retrieved September 5, 2019 from "https://www.appcentrica.com/the-rise-of-microservices"
[5]
Peter Bodík, Rean Griffith, Charles Sutton, Armando Fox, Michael Jordan, and David Patterson. 2009. Statistical Machine Learning Makes Automatic Control Practical for Internet Datacenters. In Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Hot Topics in Cloud Computing (HotCloud'09). USENIX Association, Berkeley, CA, USA, Article 12, 5 pages. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1855533.1855545
[6]
Leo Breiman. 2001. Random forests. Machine learning 45, 1 (2001), 5--32.
[7]
Leo Breiman, Jerome Friedman, Charles J Stone, and Richard A Olshen. 1984. Classification and regression trees. Routledge, New York, NY, USA.
[8]
Tianqi Chen and Carlos Guestrin. 2016. XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. In Proceedings of the 22Nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 785--794. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785
[9]
François Chollet et al. 2015. Keras. https://keras.io.
[10]
Performance Co-Pilot. 2018. Performance Co-Pilot. Retrieved September 5, 2019 from http://pcp.io/
[11]
Ira Cohen, Moises Goldszmidt, Terence Kelly, Julie Symons, and Jeffrey S. Chase. 2004. Correlating Instrumentation Data to System States: A Building Block for Automated Diagnosis and Control. In Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Symposium on Operating Systems Design & Implementation - Volume 6 (OSDI'04). USENIX Association, Berkeley, CA, USA, 16--16. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1251254.1251270
[12]
Distributed (Deep) Machine Learning Community. 2018. Scalable, Portable and Distributed Gradient Boosting (GBDT, GBRT or GBM) Library, for Python, R, Java, Scala, C++ and more. Runs on single machine, Hadoop, Spark, Flink and DataFlow. Retrieved September 5, 2019 from https://github.com/dmlc/xgboost
[13]
Brian F. Cooper, Adam Silberstein, Erwin Tam, Raghu Ramakrishnan, and Russell Sears. 2010. Benchmarking Cloud Serving Systems with YCSB. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM Symposium on Cloud Computing (SoCC '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 143--154. https://doi.org/10.1145/1807128.1807152
[14]
David R Cox. 1958. The regression analysis of binary sequences. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological) 20, 2 (1958), 215--232.
[15]
DZone.com. 2018. Monitoring Docker Containers - Docker Stats, cAdvisor, Universal Control Plane. Retrieved September 5, 2019 from https://dzone.com/articles/monitoring-docker-containers-docker-stats-cadvisor
[16]
V. C. Emeakaroha, I. Brandic, M. Maurer, and S. Dustdar. 2010. Low level Metrics to High level SLAs - LoM2HiS framework: Bridging the gap between monitored metrics and SLA parameters in cloud environments. In 2010 International Conference on High Performance Computing Simulation. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 48--54. https://doi.org/10.1109/HPCS.2010.5547150
[17]
Vincent C Emeakaroha, Marco AS Netto, Rodrigo N Calheiros, Ivona Brandic, Rajkumar Buyya, and César AF De Rose. 2012. Towards autonomic detection of SLA violations in Cloud infrastructures. Future Generation Computer Systems 28, 7 (2012), 1017--1029.
[18]
Uber Engineering. 2017. Observability at Uber Engineering: Past, Present, Future. Retrieved September 5, 2019 from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2JAnmzVwgP8
[19]
Rong-En Fan, Kai-Wei Chang, Cho-Jui Hsieh, Xiang-Rui Wang, and Chih-Jen Lin. 2008. LIBLINEAR: A Library for Large Linear Classification. Journal of Machine Learning Research 9 (2008), 1871--1874.
[20]
Michael Ferdman, Almutaz Adileh, Onur Kocberber, Stavros Volos, Mohammad Alisafaee, Djordje Jevdjic, Cansu Kaynak, Adrian Daniel Popescu, Anastasia Ailamaki, and Babak Falsafi. 2012. Clearing the Clouds: A Study of Emerging Scale-out Workloads on Modern Hardware. SIGPLAN Not. 47, 4 (March 2012), 37--48. https://doi.org/10.1145/2248487.2150982
[21]
Apache Software Foundation. 2018. Apache Cassandra. Retrieved September 5, 2019 from http://cassandra.apache.org/
[22]
Apache Software Foundation. 2018. Apache CloudStack: Open Source Cloud Computing. Retrieved September 5, 2019 from https://cloudstack.apache.org/
[23]
The Elgg Foundation. 2018. Elgg.org. Retrieved September 5, 2019 from https://elgg.org/
[24]
The MariaDB Foundation. 2018. MariaDB.org - Supporting continuity and open collaboration. Retrieved September 5, 2019 from https://mariadb.org/
[25]
Yoav Freund and Robert E Schapire. 1997. A Decision-Theoretic Generalization of On-Line Learning and an Application to Boosting. J. Comput. System Sci. 55, 1 (1997), 119--139. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcss.1997.1504
[26]
Yu Gan, Meghna Pancholi, Siyuan Hu, Dailun Cheng, Yuan He, and Christina Delimitrou. 2018. Seer: Leveraging Big Data to Navigate the Increasing Complexity of Cloud Debugging. In 10th USENIX Workshop on Hot Topics in Cloud Computing (HotCloud 18). USENIX Association, Boston, MA, 15. https://www.usenix.org/conference/hotcloud18/presentation/gan
[27]
Anshul Gandhi, Parijat Dube, Alexei Karve, Andrzej Kochut, and Li Zhang. 2014. Adaptive, Model-driven Autoscaling for Cloud Applications. In 11th International Conference on Autonomic Computing (ICAC 14). USENIX Association, Philadelphia, PA, 57--64. https://www.usenix.org/conference/icac14/technical-sessions/presentation/gandhi
[28]
Anshul Gandhi, Mor Harchol-Balter, Ram Raghunathan, and Michael A. Kozuch. 2012. AutoScale: Dynamic, Robust Capacity Management for Multi-Tier Data Centers. ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 30, 4, Article 14 (Nov. 2012), 26 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2382553.2382556
[29]
Daniel Gmach, Stefan Krompass, Andreas Scholz, Martin Wimmer, and Alfons Kemper. 2008. Adaptive Quality of Service Management for Enterprise Services. ACM Trans. Web 2, 1, Article 8 (March 2008), 46 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/1326561.1326569
[30]
Google. 2018. Google Compute Engine Auto Scaler. Retrieved September 5, 2019 from https://cloud.google.com/compute/docs/autoscaler/
[31]
Google. 2018. Site Reliability Engineering (SRE). Retrieved September 5, 2019 from https://landing.google.com/sre/
[32]
Brendan Gregg. 2013. Thinking Methodically About Performance. Commun. ACM 56, 2 (Feb. 2013), 45--51. https://doi.org/10.1145/2408776.2408791
[33]
Descartes Research Group. 2018. descartesresearch - Docker Hub. Retrieved September 5, 2019 from https://hub.docker.com/r/descartesresearch/
[34]
Descartes Research Group. 2018. A micro-service reference test application for model extraction, cloud management, energy efficiency, power prediction, multi-tier auto-scaling. Retrieved September 5, 2019 from https://github.com/DescartesResearch/TeaStore
[35]
B. Harrington and R. Rapoport. 2014. "Introducing Netflix's Primary Telemetry Platform". Retrieved September 5, 2019 from "http://techblog.netflix.com/2014/12/introducing-atlas-netflixs-primary.html"
[36]
Helmut Hlavacs and Thomas Treutner. 2011. Predicting web service levels during vm live migrations. In 2011 5th International DMTF Academic Alliance Workshop on Systems and Virtualization Management: Standards and the Cloud (SVM). IEEE, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 1--10.
[37]
Huaweii. 2017. TestCraft. Testing as a Service to Accelerate SDN/NFV Service Deployment. Retrieved September 5, 2019 from http://carrier.huawei.com/~/media/CNBG/Downloads/Services/nfv/Testing%20as%20a%20Service%20to%20Accelerate%20SDN%20NFV%20Service%20Deployment.pdf
[38]
Jesus Omana Iglesias, Jordi Arjona Aroca, Volker Hilt, and Diego Lugones. 2017. ORCA: an ORChestration Automata for Configuring VNFs. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM/IFIP/USENIX Middleware Conference (Middleware '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 81--94. https://doi.org/10.1145/3135974.3135982
[39]
Danga Interactive. 2018. Memcached - A distributed object memory caching system. Retrieved September 5, 2019 from https://memcached.org/
[40]
Vijay Janapa Reddi, Benjamin C Lee, Trishul Chilimbi, and Kushagra Vaid. 2010. Web search using mobile cores: quantifying and mitigating the price of efficiency. ACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News 38, 3 (2010), 314--325.
[41]
Klaus Krogmann, Michael Kuperberg, and Ralf Reussner. 2010. Using genetic search for reverse engineering of parametric behavior models for performance prediction. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 36, 6 (2010), 865--877.
[42]
Sajib Kundu, Raju Rangaswami, Ajay Gulati, Ming Zhao, and Kaushik Dutta. 2012. Modeling Virtualized Applications Using Machine Learning Techniques. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGPLAN/SIGOPS Conference on Virtual Execution Environments (VEE '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3--14. https://doi.org/10.1145/2151024.2151028
[43]
Philipp Leitner and Jurgen Cito. 2016. Patterns in the Chaos: A Study of Performance Variation and Predictability in Public IaaS Clouds. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. 16, 3, Article 15 (April 2016), 23 pages. https://doi.org/10-1145/2885497
[44]
Locust. 2018. Scalable user load testing tool written in Python. Retrieved September 5, 2019 from https://github.com/locustio/locust
[45]
Andréa Matsunaga and José A. B. Fortes. 2010. On the Use of Machine Learning to Predict the Time and Resources Consumed by Applications. In Proceedings of the 2010 10th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing (CCGRID '10). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 495--504. https://doi.org/10.1109/CCGRID.2010.98
[46]
microservices demo. 2018. Deployment scripts and config for Sock Shop. Retrieved September 5, 2019 from https://github.com/microservices-demo/microservices-demo
[47]
Microsoft. 2018. Microsoft Azure Autoscale. Retrieved September 5, 2019 from http://azure.microsoft.com/features/autoscale/
[48]
Apache Software Foundatio n. 2018. Apache Solr. Retrieved September 5, 2019 from https://lucene.apache.org/solr/
[49]
Hiep Nguyen, Zhiming Shen, Xiaohui Gu, Sethuraman Subbiah, and John Wilkes. 2013. AGILE: Elastic Distributed Resource Scaling for Infra structure-as-a-Service. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Autonomic Computing (ICAC 13). USENIX, San Jose, CA, 69--82. https://www.usenix.org/conference/icac13/technical-sessions/presentation/nguyen
[50]
Rajesh Nishtala, Hans Fugal, Steven Grimm, Marc Kwiatkowski, Herman Lee, Harry C. Li, Ryan McElroy, Mike Paleczny, Daniel Peek, Paul Saab, David Stafford, Tony Tung, and Venkateshwaran Venkataramani. 2013. Scaling Memcache at Facebook. In Proceedings of the 10th USENIX Conference on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (nsdi'13). USENIX Association, Berkeley, CA, USA, 385--398. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2482626.2482663
[51]
Openstack. 2016. Openstack Kolla. Retrieved September 5, 2019 from http://docs.openstack.org/developer/kolla/
[52]
OpenStack. 2018. Open Stack is open source software for creating private and public clouds. Retrieved September 5, 2019 from https://www.openstack.org/
[53]
T. Palit, Yongming Shen, and M. Ferdman. 2016. Demystifying cloud benchmarking. In 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Performance Analysis of Systems and Software (ISPASS). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 122--132. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISPASS.2016.7482080
[54]
Sinno Jialin Pan and Qiang Yang. 2010. A Survey on Transfer Learning. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 22, 10 (2010), 1345--1359. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2009.191
[55]
Karl Pearson. 1901. LIII. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 2, 11 (1901), 559--572.
[56]
F. Pedregosa, G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V. Michel, B. Thirion, O. Grisel, M. Blondel, P. Prettenhofer, R. Weiss, V. Dubourg, J. Vanderplas, A. Passos, D. Cournapeau, M. Brucher, M. Perrot, and E. Duchesnay. 2011. Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research 12 (2011), 2825--2830.
[57]
Quantcast. 2014. Monitoring at Quantcast. Retrieved September 5, 2019 from https://www.quantcast.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Wait-How-Many-Metrics_-Quantcast-2013.pdf
[58]
Marco Tulio Ribeiro, Sameer Singh, and Carlos Guestrin. 2016. "Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier. In Proceedings of the 22Nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1135--1144.
[59]
Ville Satopaa, Jeannie Albrecht, David Irwin, and Barath Raghavan. 2011. Finding a "Kneedle" in a Haystack: Detecting Knee Points in System Behavior. In Proceedings of the 2011 31st International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops (ICDCSW '11). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 166--171. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDCSW.2011.20
[60]
Abraham Savitzky and Marcel JE Golay. 1964. Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least squares procedures. Analytical chemistry 36, 8 (1964), 1627--1639.
[61]
Mark Schmidt, Nicolas Le Roux, and Francis Bach. 2017. Minimizing finite sums with the stochastic average gradient. Mathematical Programming 162, 1-2 (2017), 83--112.
[62]
S. Shen, V. Beek, and A. Iosup. 2015. Statistical Characterization of Business-Critical Workloads Hosted in Cloud Datacenters. In 2015 15th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing (CCGrid). IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 465--474. https://doi.org/10.1109/CCGrid.2015.60
[63]
Praveen Tammana, Rachit Agarwal, and Myungjin Lee. 2015. CherryPick: Tracing Packet Trajectory in Software-defined Datacenter Networks. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCOMM Symposium on Software Defined Networking Research (SOSR '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 23, 7 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2774993.2775066
[64]
Beth Trushkowsky, Peter Bodík, Armando Fox, Michael J. Franklin, Michael I. Jordan, and David A. Patterson. 2011. The SCADS Director: Scaling a Distributed Storage System Under Stringent Performance Requirements. In Proceedings of the 9th USENIX Conference on File and Stroage Technologies (FAST'11). USENIX Association, Berkeley, CA, USA, 12--12. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1960475.1960487
[65]
Shivaram Venkataraman, Zongheng Yang, Michael Franklin, Benjamin Recht, and Ion Stoica. 2016. Ernest: Efficient Performance Prediction for Large-scale Advanced Analytics. In Proceedings of the 13th Usenix Conference on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI'16). USENIX Association, Berkeley, CA, USA, 363--378. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2930611.2930635
[66]
Jóakim von Kistowski. 2018. HTTP Load Generator for variable load intensities. Retrieved September 5, 2019 from https://github.com/joakimkistowski/HTTP-Load-Generator
[67]
Jóakim von Kistowski, Simon Eismann, Norbert Schmitt, André Bauer, Johannes Grohmann, and Samuel Kounev. 2018. TeaStore: A Micro-Service Reference Application for Benchmarking, Modeling and Resource Management Research. In Proceedings of the 26th IEEE International Symposium on the Modelling, Analysis, and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems (MASCOTS '18). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 223--236. https://doi.org/10.1109/MASCOTS.2018.00030
[68]
Jóakim von Kistowski, Nikolas Herbst, Samuel Kounev, Henning Groenda, Christian Stier, and Sebastian Lehrig. 2017. Modeling and Extracting Load Intensity Profiles. ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems (TAAS) 11, 4, Article 23 (January 2017), 28 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3019596
[69]
Inc Weaveworks. 2018. Sock Shop -- A Microservices Demo Application. Retrieved September 5, 2019 from https://microservices-demo.github.io/
[70]
Timothy Wood, Prashant Shenoy, Arun Venkataramani, and Mazin Yousif. 2009. Sandpiper: Black-box and gray-box resource management for virtual machines. Computer Networks 53, 17 (2009), 2923--2938.
[71]
R. Yanggratoke, J. Ahmed, J. Ardelius, C. Flinta, A. Johnsson, D. Gillblad, and R. Stadler. 2015. Predicting real-time service-level metrics from device statistics. In 2015 IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management (IM). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 414--422. https://doi.org/10.1109/INM.2015.7140318
[72]
Rerngvit Yanggratoke, Jawwad Ahmed, John Ardelius, Christofer Flinta, Andreas Johnsson, Daniel Gillblad, and Rolf Stadler. 2015. Predicting Service Metrics for Cluster-based Services Using Real-time Analytics. In Proceedings of the 2015 11th International Conference on Network and Service Management (CNSM) (CNSM '15). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 135--143. https://doi.org/10.1109/CNSM.2015.7367349
[73]
Li Yin, Sandeep Uttamchandani, and Randy Katz. 2006. An Empirical Exploration of Black-Box Performance Models for Storage Systems. In Proceedings of the 14th IEEE International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis, and Simulation (MASCOTS '06). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 433--440. https://doi.org/10.1109/MASCOTS.2006.12

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Detection of quality of service degradation on multi-tenant containerized servicesJournal of Network and Computer Applications10.1016/j.jnca.2024.103839224(103839)Online publication date: Apr-2024
  • (2024)Performance Evaluation of a Legacy Real-Time System: An Improved RAST ApproachSimulation Tools and Techniques10.1007/978-3-031-57523-5_2(18-33)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2024
  • (2023)Queueing System with Two Phases of Service and Service Rate DegradationAxioms10.3390/axioms1202010412:2(104)Online publication date: 19-Jan-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
Middleware '19: Proceedings of the 20th International Middleware Conference
December 2019
342 pages
ISBN:9781450370097
DOI:10.1145/3361525
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 09 December 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Cloud computing
  2. DevOps
  3. Machine learning
  4. Monitoring

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

Middleware '19
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 203 of 948 submissions, 21%

Upcoming Conference

MIDDLEWARE '24
25th International Middleware Conference
December 2 - 6, 2024
Hong Kong , Hong Kong

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)89
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)13
Reflects downloads up to 12 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Detection of quality of service degradation on multi-tenant containerized servicesJournal of Network and Computer Applications10.1016/j.jnca.2024.103839224(103839)Online publication date: Apr-2024
  • (2024)Performance Evaluation of a Legacy Real-Time System: An Improved RAST ApproachSimulation Tools and Techniques10.1007/978-3-031-57523-5_2(18-33)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2024
  • (2023)Queueing System with Two Phases of Service and Service Rate DegradationAxioms10.3390/axioms1202010412:2(104)Online publication date: 19-Jan-2023
  • (2023)A Joint Study of the Challenges, Opportunities, and Roadmap of MLOps and AIOps: A Systematic SurveyACM Computing Surveys10.1145/362528956:4(1-30)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2023
  • (2023)Generating Realistic Attack Data for Microservices: Framework and Case StudyProceedings of the 12th Latin-American Symposium on Dependable and Secure Computing10.1145/3615366.3615377(60-69)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2023
  • (2023)Asymptotic Analysis of Two-Phase Queueing System with Service Rate Degradation and Heterogeneous Customers2023 5th International Conference on Problems of Cybernetics and Informatics (PCI)10.1109/PCI60110.2023.10326020(1-5)Online publication date: 28-Aug-2023
  • (2023)Alioth: A Machine Learning Based Interference-Aware Performance Monitor for Multi-Tenancy Applications in Public Cloud2023 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS)10.1109/IPDPS54959.2023.00095(908-917)Online publication date: May-2023
  • (2023)Exploring Logic Scoring of Preference for DoS Attack Detection in Microservice Applications2023 IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS)10.1109/ICWS60048.2023.00076(573-584)Online publication date: Jul-2023
  • (2023)Causal-Temporal Analysis-Based Feature Selection for Predicting Application Performance Degradation in Edge CloudsICC 2023 - IEEE International Conference on Communications10.1109/ICC45041.2023.10279527(5496-5501)Online publication date: 28-May-2023
  • (2023)Orfeon: An AIOps framework for the goal-driven operationalization of distributed analytical pipelinesFuture Generation Computer Systems10.1016/j.future.2022.10.008140(18-35)Online publication date: Mar-2023
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media