Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3364641.3364672acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessbqsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An Implementation of a Strategy for IT Projects Portfolio Management in the Public Sector in accordance with the MPS Reference Model for Software using Action Research

Published: 28 October 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Projects are undertaken at all organizational levels, both in the public and private environments, and managing them is not a trivial activity, involving the application of a large amount of knowledge, skills, tools and techniques, in order to better meet requirements agreed between the parties involved. However, in addition to the need of managing projects, one of the major challenges within organizations is how they define which projects are priorities or what is the best combination of projects to achieve strategic business objectives. In this scenario, Project Portfolio Management (PPM) gains importance, becoming the area or process responsible, not only for a specific project, but also for activities that involve the management of an organization's entire portfolio of projects. This type of activity is vital because it has a strong impact on the direction of investments and on the use of certain business opportunities. Nevertheless, researches such as those carried out by the Tribunal de Contas da União, presented a number of concerns regarding the adoption of good practices, present in the PPM, in the area of Information Technology (IT). The purpose of this research was to define, execute and evaluate a strategy for the implementation of the IT Projects Portfolio Management in the public environment, in light of the MPS Reference Model for Software (MR-MPS-SW:2016), in order to improve the practices of a public software development organization and generate knowledge. An Action Research, methodological approach of applied and interventionist nature, which structured the generation of knowledge presented in this work, contributing both to theory and practice, conducted the study. The analysis of the strategy was carried out from the data collection, made by the application of a research questionnaire with the people who executed the PPM strategy.

References

[1]
PMI. 2013. Guia do Conhecimento em Gerenciamento de Projetos. [S.l.]: Newton Square (USA): Project Management Institute-PMI.
[2]
C. M. G. Gusmão e C. H. R. Alexandria. 2009. Gestão de Portfólio de Projetos. Engenharia de Software Magazine, Rio de Janeiro, p. 47 -- 56.
[3]
SOFTEX. 2016. Guia Geral MPS de Software. [S.l.]: Associação para Promoção da Excelência do Software Brasileiro - SOFTEX.
[4]
PMI. 2013. The Standard for Portfolio Management. Third Edition. PMI Publishing Division.
[5]
M. R. A. Souza. 2013. Um Framework de Processo para Gerência De Portfólio de Projetos de Software com base em Padrões de Qualidade. Dissertação (Mestrado) --- Universidade Federal do Pará, Pará.
[6]
J. S. Pennypacker. 2005. Project portfolio management maturity model. Center for Business Practices, Havertown.
[7]
OGC. 2006. Portfolio, programme and project management maturity model (P3M3). [S.l.]: The Stationery Office London.
[8]
GARTNER. 2007. Programme and Portfolio Management Maturity Model. [S.l.]: Gartner RAS Core Research Note G00141742.
[9]
PMI. 2013. Organizational project management maturity model (opm3). In: PROJECT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE. [S.l.].
[10]
ABNT. 2009. Engenharia de Sistemas de Software - Processos de Ciclo de Vida de Software. [S.l.]: ABNT -- ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE NORMAS TÉCNICAS.
[11]
H. R. Costa, M. D. O. Barros, A. R. C. Rocha. 2010. Maturidade em Gerência de Portfolio de Projetos de Software: um estudo experimental. IX Simpósio Brasileiro de Qualidade de Software, p. 199--211.
[12]
BRASIL, T. C. U. 2014. Levantamento de governança de ti 2014. p. 94. Disponível em: <http://portal.tcu.gov.br/comunidades/fiscalizacao-de-tecnologia-da-informacao/atuacao/perfil-de-governanca-de-ti/>.
[13]
M. Thiollent. 2011. Metodologia da pesquisa-ação. In: Metodologia da pesquisa-ação. [S.l.]: Cortez.
[14]
M. C. Andion e R. Fava. 2002. Gestão empresarial/fae school. Associação Franciscana de Ensino Bom Jesus, Curitiba.
[15]
N. Kock. 2004. The three threats of action research: a discussion of methodological antidotes in the context of an information systems study. Decision Support Systems, v. 37, p. 265--286.
[16]
J. A. P. Oliveira. 2014. Fatores Envolvidos na Estruturação de um Escritório de Processos em uma Organização Pública: Uma Pesquisa-Ação. Dissertação (Mestrado) --- Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife.
[17]
G. I. Susman e R. D. Evered. 1978. An assessment of the scientific merits of action research. Administrative Science Quarterly, v. 23, n. 4, p. 582--603. ISSN 00018392.
[18]
P. A. Medeiros, M. B. L. Júnior, H. A. Cavalcanti, A. C. Rouiller; G. Berbert, e S. R. B. Oliveira. 2015. Implementação dos processos de gerência de reutilização, gerência de conhecimento e gerência de portfólio de projetos usando o redmine: O caso da emprel. Trilha da Indústria -- CBSoft, Belo Horizonte-MG.

Index Terms

  1. An Implementation of a Strategy for IT Projects Portfolio Management in the Public Sector in accordance with the MPS Reference Model for Software using Action Research

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        SBQS '19: Proceedings of the XVIII Brazilian Symposium on Software Quality
        October 2019
        330 pages
        ISBN:9781450372824
        DOI:10.1145/3364641
        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        In-Cooperation

        • SBC: Brazilian Computer Society

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 28 October 2019

        Permissions

        Request permissions for this article.

        Check for updates

        Author Tags

        1. Action Research
        2. Project Portfolio Management
        3. Public Management

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Conference

        SBQS'19
        SBQS'19: XVIII Brazilian Symposium on Software Quality
        October 28 - November 1, 2019
        Fortaleza, Brazil

        Acceptance Rates

        SBQS '19 Paper Acceptance Rate 35 of 99 submissions, 35%;
        Overall Acceptance Rate 35 of 99 submissions, 35%

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • 0
          Total Citations
        • 172
          Total Downloads
        • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
        Reflects downloads up to 22 Dec 2024

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        View Options

        Login options

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media