Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3364836.3364904acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesisicdmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An Accurate Estimation of T2* Mapping for Fast Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Published: 24 August 2019 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Purpose Quantitative T2* mapping is promising due to its clinical applicability and has been employed for the assessment of cartilage repair procedures of the knee. Generally, the under-sampling k-space technique was applied to accelerate T2* mapping which is considerable time-consuming with traditional sequences. However, the under-sampling k-space technique may be impractical for acquiring reliable sampling of the T2* decay. In order to improve the corresponding accuracy of T2* mapping with under-sampled k-space technique, a new method has been proposed of deep learning (DL) based under-sampling MR images reconstruction.
    Methods In this work, we employed a residual network with 3 layers to explore latent functions between fully-sampled and under-sampled MR images and then applied these functions to regularize the MR images reconstruction from under-sampling k-space data. The proposed method includes three steps. Firstly, the regridding reconstruction and ESPIRiT reconstruction algorithm was used to reconstruct MR images from fully sampling and under-sampling k-space data, respectively. Then, 12 MR images at different echo time (TE=0.2/0.5/0.8/2/3.3/5.5/8/11/15/20/25/30ms) derived from under-sampling k-space data were fed into the proposed network. Ultimately, the optimized MR images were utilized to calculate T2* values.
    Results The T2* values derived from the proposed method were more accurate than that from the regridding reconstruction or ESPIRiT reconstruction in four tissues. For instance, when the acceleration ratio (ACC) was set at 4, the T2* values (mean ± standard deviation) of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) were 7.97±0.40ms in regridding constructed reference image, the T2* values derived from the regridding reconstruction of 7.34±1.04ms fluctuated wildly, while the T2* values from the proposed method were restored to 7.84±1.39ms which were closer to the reference T2* values. Additionally, the T2* values of PCL were 6.99±9.47ms in ESPIRiT reconstructed reference image, the T2* values derived from the ESPIRiT reconstruction of 5.32±8.44ms fluctuated wildly, while the T2* values from the proposed method were restored to 6.64±11.73ms.The similar phenomenon can be seen in other three ROIs with ACC = 4 or 2.
    Conclusion T2* mapping optimized by the proposed DL-based method resembles the reference qualitatively and quantitatively. In conclusion, the proposed method has great promise on improving the accuracy of T2* mapping based on under-sampling k-space technique for fast magnetic resonance imaging.

    References

    [1]
    T. Hesper, H. S. Hosalkar, D. Bittersohl, G. H. Welsch, R. Krauspe, C. Zilkens, et al., "T2* mapping for articular cartilage assessment: principles, current applications, and future prospects," Skeletal Radiol, vol. 43, pp. 1429--45, Oct 2014.
    [2]
    B. Bernd, H. S. Hosalkar, F. R. Miese, S. Jonas, D. P. K Nig, H. Monika, et al., "Zonal T2* and T1Gd assessment of knee joint cartilage in various histological grades of cartilage degeneration: an observational in vitro study," vol. 5, p. e006895, 2015.
    [3]
    S. C. L. Deoni, %J Topics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Tmri, "Quantitative relaxometry of the brain," vol. 21, p. 101, 2010.
    [4]
    S. Eagle, H. G. Potter, and M. F. J. J. o. O. R. Koff, "Morphologic and quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of knee articular cartilage for the assessment of post-traumatic osteoarthritis," vol. 35, p. 412, 2016.
    [5]
    T. S. Windt, De, G. H. Welsch, B. Mats, L. A. Vonk, M. Stefan, T. Siegfried, et al., "Is magnetic resonance imaging reliable in predicting clinical outcome after articular cartilage repair of the knee? A systematic review and meta-analysis," vol. 41, pp. 1695--1702, 2013.
    [6]
    B. Bittersohl, J. Kircher, F. R. Miese, C. Dekkers, P. Habermeyer, J. Frobel, et al., "T2* mapping and delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in cartilage (dGEMRIC) of humeral articular cartilage--a histologically controlled study," J Shoulder Elbow Surg, vol. 24, pp. 1644--52, Oct 2015.
    [7]
    A. Williams, Y. Qian, D. Bear, and C. R. Chu, "Assessing degeneration of human articular cartilage with ultra-short echo time (UTE) T2* mapping," Osteoarthritis Cartilage, vol. 18, pp. 539--46, Apr 2010.
    [8]
    S. Apprich, T. C. Mamisch, G. H. Welsch, H. Bonel, K. A. Siebenrock, Y. J. Kim, et al., "Evaluation of articular cartilage in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) using T2* mapping at different time points at 3.0 Tesla MRI: a feasibility study," Skeletal Radiol, vol. 41, pp. 987--95, Aug 2012.
    [9]
    M. D. Crema, F. W. Roemer, M. D. Marra, D. Burstein, G. E. Gold, F. Eckstein, et al., "Articular cartilage in the knee: current MR imaging techniques and applications in clinical practice and research," vol. 31, pp. 37--61, 2011.
    [10]
    B. Bernd, H. S. Hosalkar, H. Tim, K. Young-Jo, W. Stefan, K. A. Siebenrock, et al., "Feasibility of T2* mapping for the evaluation of hip joint cartilage at 1.5T using a three-dimensional (3D), gradient-echo (GRE) sequence: a prospective study," Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 62, pp. 896--901, 2010.
    [11]
    B. Bittersohl, F. R. Miese, H. S. Hosalkar, M. Herten, G. Antoch, R. Krauspe, et al., "T2* mapping of hip joint cartilage in various histological grades of degeneration," Osteoarthritis Cartilage, vol. 20, pp. 653--660, 2012.
    [12]
    Y. Qian, C. R. Williams AAChu, and F. E. Boada, "Multicomponent T2* mapping of knee cartilage: technical feasibility ex vivo," Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 64, pp. 1426--1431, 2010.
    [13]
    T. C. Mamisch, "T2 star relaxation times for assessment of articular cartilage at 3 T: a feasibility study," Skeletal Radiology, vol. 41, pp. 287--292, 2012.
    [14]
    W. Goetz Hannes, T. Siegfried, P. S. Tatjana, B. Klaus, G. Sabine, S. David, et al., "Parametric T2 and T2* mapping techniques to visualize intervertebral disc degeneration in patients with low back pain: initial results on the clinical use of 3.0 Tesla MRI," Skeletal Radiology, vol. 40, pp. 543--551, 2011.
    [15]
    J. Du, M. Carl, W. C. Bae, S. Statum, E. Y. Chang, G. M. Bydder, et al., "Dual Inversion Recovery Ultrashort Echo Time (DIR-UTE) Imaging and Quantification of the Zone of Calcified Cartilage (ZCC)," vol. 21, pp. 77--85, 2013.
    [16]
    B. Chen, Y. Zhao, X. Cheng, Y. Ma, E. Y. Chang, A. Kavanaugh, et al., "Three-dimensional ultrashort echo time cones (3D UTE-Cones) magnetic resonance imaging of entheses and tendons," vol. 49, pp. 4--9, 2018.
    [17]
    J. Chen, E. Y. Chang, M. Carl, Y. Ma, H. Shao, B. Chen, et al., "Measurement of bound and pore water T1 relaxation times in cortical bone using three-dimensional ultrashort echo time cones sequences," vol. 77, 2017.
    [18]
    V. Positano, A. Pepe, M. Santarelli, B. Scattini, D. De Marchi, A. Ramazzotti, et al., "Standardized T-2* map of normal human heart in vivo to correct T-2(*) segmental artefacts," vol. 20, pp. 578--590, 2010.
    [19]
    T. He, G. C. Smith, R. H. Mohiaddin, D. J. Pennell, and D. N. J. J. o. C. M. R. Firmin, "304 An non subjective method for myocardial T2* curve fitting in thalassemia," vol. 10, p. A107, 2008.
    [20]
    M. A. Griswold, P. M. Jakob, R. M. Heidemann, M. Nittka, V. Jellus, J. Wang, et al., "Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA)," vol. 47, pp. 1202--1210, 2002.
    [21]
    R. Heidemann, M. Griswold, A. Haase, and P. J. M. R. i. M. Jakob, "VD-AUTO-SMASH imaging," vol. 45, p. 1066, 2001.
    [22]
    M. Blaimer, F. Breuer, M. Mueller, R. M. Heidemann, M. A. Griswold, and P. M. J. T. M. R. I. Jakob, "SMASH, SENSE, PILS, GRAPPA: how to choose the optimal method," vol. 15, pp. 223--236, 2004.
    [23]
    K. P. Pruessmann, M. Weiger, M. B. Scheidegger, and P. J. M. R. i. M. Boesiger, "SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI," vol. 42, pp. 952--962, 2015.
    [24]
    M. Uecker, P. Lai, M. J. Murphy, P. Virtue, M. Elad, J. M. Pauly, et al., "ESPIRiT--an eigenvalue approach to autocalibrating parallel MRI: where SENSE meets GRAPPA," vol. 71, pp. 990--1001, 2014.
    [25]
    M. Lustig, D. L. Donoho, J. M. Santos, and J. M. J. I. S. P. M. Pauly, "Compressed Sensing MRI," vol. 25, pp. 72--82, 2008.
    [26]
    M. Lustig, D. Donoho, and J. M. J. M. R. i. M. Pauly, "Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging," vol. 58, pp. 1182--1195, 2010.
    [27]
    A. Majumdar and R. K. J. M. R. I. Ward, "An algorithm for sparse MRI reconstruction by Schatten p -norm minimization," vol. 29, pp. 408--417, 2011.
    [28]
    S. G. Lingala, Y. Hu, E. Dibella, and M. J. I. T. o. M. I. Jacob, "Accelerated dynamic MRI exploiting sparsity and low-rank structure: k-t SLR," vol. 30, pp. 1042--1054, 2011.
    [29]
    B. Zhao, J. P. Haldar, C. Brinegar, and Z. P. Liang, "Low rank matrix recovery for real-time cardiac MRI," in IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Imaging: from Nano to Macro, 2010.
    [30]
    J. P. J. I. T. o. M. I. Haldar, "Low-Rank Modeling of Local k-Space Neighborhoods (LORAKS) for Constrained MRI," vol. 33, pp. 668--81, 2014.
    [31]
    K. T. Block, M. Uecker, and J. J. I. T. o. M. I. Frahm, "Model-based iterative reconstruction for radial fast spin-echo MRI," vol. 28, pp. 1759--1769, 2009.
    [32]
    B. Zhao, F. Lam, and Z. P. J. I. T. o. M. I. Liang, "Model-Based MR Parameter Mapping With Sparsity Constraints: Parameter Estimation and Performance Bounds," 2014.
    [33]
    T. J. Sumpf, U. Martin, B. Susann, and F. J. J. o. M. R. I. Jens, "Model-based nonlinear inverse reconstruction for T2 mapping using highly undersampled spin-echo MRI," vol. 34, pp. 420--428, 2015.
    [34]
    Y. Lecun, Y. Bengio, and G. J. N. Hinton, "Deep learning," vol. 521, p. 436, 2015.
    [35]
    S. Hoo-Chang, M. R. Orton, D. J. Collins, S. J. Doran, M. O. Leach, %J IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis, and M. Intelligence, "Stacked autoencoders for unsupervised feature learning and multiple organ detection in a pilot study using 4D patient data," vol. 35, pp. 1930--1943, 2013.
    [36]
    J. Xu, L. Xiang, Q. Liu, H. Gilmore, J. Wu, J. Tang, et al., "Stacked Sparse Autoencoder (SSAE) for Nuclei Detection on Breast Cancer Histopathology Images," vol. 35, p. 119, 2016.
    [37]
    V. Jain and H. S. Seung, "Natural image denoising with convolutional networks," in International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2008.
    [38]
    L. Xu, J. S. J. Ren, C. Liu, and J. Jia, "Deep convolutional neural network for image deconvolution," in International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2014, pp. 1790--1798.
    [39]
    J. Xie, L. Xu, and E. Chen, "Image Denoising and Inpainting with Deep Neural Networks," in International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2012.
    [40]
    A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and G. E. Hinton, "ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks," in International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2012.
    [41]
    Z. Zhang, X. Liang, X. Dong, Y. Xie, and G. J. I. T. o. M. I. Cao, "A Sparse-View CT Reconstruction Method Based on Combination of DenseNet and Deconvolution," vol. 37, pp. 1--1, 2018.
    [42]
    G. W. Qing Lyu, "Quantitative MRI-Absolute T1, T2 and Proton Density Parameters from Deep Learning," arXiv:1806.07453, 2018.
    [43]
    C. Gulcehre, K. Cho, R. Pascanu, and Y. Bengio, Learned-Norm Pooling for Deep Feedforward and Recurrent Neural Networks, 2014.
    [44]
    V. Nair and G. E. Hinton, "Rectified linear units improve restricted boltzmann machines," in International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning, 2010.
    [45]
    S. Ioffe and C. Szegedy, "Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift," 2015.
    [46]
    J. L. Mcclelland, D. E. Rumelhart, and G. E. J. R. i. C. S. Hinton, "The appeal of parallel distributed processing," vol. 1, pp. 52--72, 1988.
    [47]
    D. P. Kingma and J. J. C. S. Ba, "Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization," 2014.
    [48]
    M. Abadi, P. Barham, J. Chen, Z. Chen, A. Davis, J. Dean, et al., "TensorFlow: a system for large-scale machine learning," 2016.
    [49]
    V. Juras, S. Apprich, P. Szomolanyi, O. Bieri, X. Deligianni, and S. J. E. R. Trattnig, "Bi-exponential T2* analysis of healthy and diseased Achilles tendons: an in vivo preliminary magnetic resonance study and correlation with clinical score," vol. 23, pp. 2814--2822, 2013.
    [50]
    E. Y. Chang, J. Du, K. Iwasaki, R. Biswas, S. Statum, Q. He, et al., "Single- and Bi-component T2* analysis of tendon before and during tensile loading, using UTE sequences," vol. 42, pp. 114--120, 2015.
    [51]
    Biswas, Reni, Bae, Won, Diaz, Eric, et al., "Ultrashort echo time (UTE) imaging with bi-component analysis: Bound and free water evaluation of bovine cortical bone subject to sequential drying," vol. 50, pp. 749--755, 2012.
    [52]
    E. Diaz, C. B. Chung, W. C. Bae, S. Statum, R. Znamirowski, G. M. Bydder, et al., "Ultrashort echo time spectroscopic imaging (UTESI): an efficient method for quantifying bound and free water," vol. 25, pp. 161--168, 2012.
    [53]
    J. Sun, L. L. Zhang, and C. G. J. M. R. i. M. Yan, "Maximum likelihood estimation of signal amplitude and noise variance from MR data," vol. 51, p. 586, 2010.
    [54]
    J. D. O'Sullivan, %J Medical Imaging IEEE Transactions on, "A fast sinc function gridding algorithm for fourier inversion in computer tomography," vol. 4, pp. 200--207, 1985.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Systematic review of reconstruction techniques for accelerated quantitative MRIMagnetic Resonance in Medicine10.1002/mrm.29721Online publication date: 6-Jun-2023

    Index Terms

    1. An Accurate Estimation of T2* Mapping for Fast Magnetic Resonance Imaging

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ISICDM 2019: Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Image Computing and Digital Medicine
      August 2019
      370 pages
      ISBN:9781450372626
      DOI:10.1145/3364836
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      In-Cooperation

      • Xidian University

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 24 August 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. 3D UTE-Cones sequence
      2. T2* mapping
      3. Under-sampling k-space technique
      4. deep-learning

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Conference

      ISICDM 2019

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 26 Jul 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2023)Systematic review of reconstruction techniques for accelerated quantitative MRIMagnetic Resonance in Medicine10.1002/mrm.29721Online publication date: 6-Jun-2023

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media