Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

A Pure Visual Approach for Automatically Extracting and Aligning Structured Web Data

Published: 01 November 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Database-driven websites and the amount of data stored in their databases are growing enormously. Web databases retrieve relevant information in response to users’ queries; the retrieved information is encoded in dynamically generated web pages as structured data records. Identifying and extracting retrieved data records is a fundamental task for many applications, such as competitive intelligence and comparison shopping. This task is challenging due to the complex underlying structure of such web pages and the existence of irrelevant information. Numerous approaches have been introduced to address this problem, but most of them are HTML-dependent solutions that may no longer be functional with the continuous development of HTML. Although a few vision-based techniques have been introduced, various issues exist that inhibit their performance. To overcome this, we propose a novel visual approach, i.e., programming-language-independent, for automatically extracting structured web data. The proposed approach makes full use of the natural human tendency of visual object perception and the Gestalt laws of grouping. The extraction system consists of two tasks: (1) data record extraction, where we apply three of the Gestalt laws (i.e., laws of continuity, proximity, and similarity), which are used to group the adjacently aligned visually similar data records on a web page; and (2) data item extraction and alignment, where we employ the Gestalt law of similarity, which is utilized to group the visually identical data items. Our experiments upon large-scale test sets show that the proposed system is highly effective and outperforms the two state-of-art vision-based approaches, ViDE and rExtractor. The experiments produce an average F1 score of 86.02%, which is approximately 55% and 36% better than that of ViDE and rExtractor for data record extraction, respectively; and an average F1 score of 86.19%, which is approximately 39% better than that of ViDE for data item extraction.

References

[1]
B. He, M. Patel, Z. Zhang, and K. C.-C. Chang. 2007. Accessing the deep web. Commun. ACM 50, 5 (2007), 94--101.
[2]
Y. Saissi, A. Zellou, and A. Idri. 2014. Extraction of relational schema from deep web sources: A form driven approach. In Proceedings of the 2nd World Conference on Complex Systems (WCCS’14).
[3]
P. Liakos, A. Ntoulas, A. Labrinidis, and A. Delis. 2016. Focused crawling for the hidden web. World Wide Web 19, 4 (2016), 605--631.
[4]
W. Su, J. Wang, F. H. Lochovsky, and Y. Liu. 2012. Combining tag and value similarity for data extraction and alignment. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 24, 7 (2012), 1186--1200.
[5]
S. Shi, C. Liu, Y. Shen, C. Yuan, and Y. Huang. 2015. AutoRM: An effective approach for automatic web data record mining. Knowl.-based Syst. 89, (2015), 314--331.
[6]
M. I. Varlamov and D. Y. Turdakov. 2016. A survey of methods for the extraction of information from web resources. Prog. Comput. Softw. 42, 5 (2016), 279--291.
[7]
H. A. Sleiman and R. Corchuelo. 2013. A survey on region extractors from web documents. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 25, 9 (2013), 1960--1981.
[8]
E. Ferrara, P. De Meo, G. Fiumara, and R. Baumgartner. 2014. Web data extraction, applications and techniques: A survey. Knowl.-based Syst. 70 (2014), 301--323.
[9]
Z. Xu and J. Miller. 2016. Identifying semantic blocks in web pages using Gestalt laws of grouping. World Wide Web 19, 5 (2016), 957--978.
[10]
N. Anderson and J. Hong. 2013. Visually extracting data records from the deep web. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web.
[11]
L. Bing, W. Lam, and Y. Gu. 2011. Towards a unified solution: Data record region detection and segmentation. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management.
[12]
S. Fan, X. Wang, and Y. Dong. 2014. Web data extraction based on visual information and partial tree alignment. In Proceedings of the 11th Web Information System and Application Conference (WISA’14).
[13]
W. Liu, X. Meng, and W. Meng. 2010. ViDE: A vision-based approach for deep web data extraction. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 22, 3 (2010), 447--460.
[14]
M. Alpuente and D. Romero. 2009. A visual technique for web pages comparison. Electron. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci. 235 (2009), 3--18.
[15]
H. Ahmadi and J. Kong. 2012. User-centric adaptation of web information for small screens. J. Vis. Lang. Comput. 23, 1 (2012), 13--28.
[16]
A. Shahbazi and J. Miller. 2014. Extended subtree: A new similarity function for tree structured data. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 26, 4 (2014), 864--877.
[17]
Y. Yamada, N. Craswell, T. Nakatoh, and S. Hirokawa. 2004. Testbed for information extraction from deep web. In Proceedings of the 13th International World Wide Web Conference on Alternate Track Papers 8 Posters.
[18]
T. Grigalis and A. Čenys. 2014. Unsupervised structured data extraction from template-generated web pages. J. Univ. Comput. Sci. 20, 3 (2014), 169--192.
[19]
D. Cai, S. Yu, J.-R. Wen, and W.-Y. Ma. 2003. VIPS: A vision-based page segmentation algorithm. Microsoft Technical Report. MSR-TR-2003-79.
[20]
J. Cohen. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[21]
N. Cliff. 1993. Dominance statistics: Ordinal analyses to answer ordinal questions. Psychol. Bull. 114, 3 (1993), 494.
[22]
S. S. Sawilowsky. 2009. New effect size rules of thumb. J. Mod. Appl. Stat. Meth. 8, 2 (2009), 26.
[23]
J. Romano, J. D. Kromrey, J. Coraggio, and J. Skowronek. 2006. Appropriate statistics for ordinal level data: Should we really be using t-test and Cohen's d for evaluating group differences on the NSSE and other surveys? In Proceedings of the Meeting of the Florida Association of Institutional Research. 1--33.
[24]
F. Estuka and J. Miller. 2018. Source code and datasets of this research. Retrieved from: https://github.com/Fadwa-estuka?tab=repositories.
[25]
schema.org [n.d.]. Retrieved from: http://schema.org/.
[26]
I. Hernández, C. R. Rivero, and D. Ruiz. 2018. Deep web crawling: A survey. World Wide Web 22, 4 (2018), 1--34.
[27]
K. Khurana and M. B. Chandak. 2016. Survey of techniques for deep web source selection and surfacing the hidden web content. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 7, 5 (2016), 409--418.
[28]
D. Dou, H. Wang, and H. Liu. 2015. Semantic data mining: A survey of ontology-based approaches. In Proceedings of the IEEE 9th International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC’15). 244--251.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Scraping Relevant Images from Web Pages without DownloadACM Transactions on the Web10.1145/361684918:1(1-27)Online publication date: 19-Aug-2023
  • (2020)I Don’t Have That Much Data! Reusing User Behavior Models for Websites from Different DomainsWeb Engineering10.1007/978-3-030-50578-3_11(146-162)Online publication date: 9-Jun-2020

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Internet Technology
ACM Transactions on Internet Technology  Volume 19, Issue 4
Special Section on Trust and AI and Regular Papers
November 2019
201 pages
ISSN:1533-5399
EISSN:1557-6051
DOI:10.1145/3362102
  • Editor:
  • Ling Liu
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 November 2019
Accepted: 01 August 2019
Revised: 01 July 2019
Received: 01 March 2018
Published in TOIT Volume 19, Issue 4

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Gestalt laws of grouping
  2. Information extraction
  3. block tree
  4. data item
  5. data record
  6. extended subtree

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)12
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 01 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Scraping Relevant Images from Web Pages without DownloadACM Transactions on the Web10.1145/361684918:1(1-27)Online publication date: 19-Aug-2023
  • (2020)I Don’t Have That Much Data! Reusing User Behavior Models for Websites from Different DomainsWeb Engineering10.1007/978-3-030-50578-3_11(146-162)Online publication date: 9-Jun-2020

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media