research-article

A review of Visual-Based Localization

Authors:

Yin ZouAuthors Info & Claims

RICAI '19: Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Robotics, Intelligent Control and Artificial Intelligence

September 2019

Pages 94 - 105

https://doi.org/10.1145/3366194.3366211

Published: 20 September 2019 Publication History

Abstract

The visual-based localization (VBL) obtains the corresponding pose estimation in the localization system by utilizing various useful information in the surrounding environment, such as images, point cloud models, geometric information, semantic information. In recent years, visual-based localization (VBL) has been widely concerned by scientists, mainly because the commonly used GPS localization system cannot be effectively used in various environments. When GPS localization fails in some scenes such as very messy environments and severe signal occlusion, we can consider using visual-based localization to obtain the pose of the query images. Visual-based localization (VBL) has been widely used in the field of visual tasks, such as augmented reality, unmanned vehicle navigation, robotics, closed-loop detection, SFM (Structure from Motion) models. After years of development, the methods of visual-based localization (VBL) have been enriched and developed, In order to better understand the latest developments in VBL, overall research status and possible future development trends, we need make a systematic detailed classification of VBL. Although the predecessors have summarized the methods of VBL, due to the many new breakthroughs in VBL in recent years, the original summary is not perfect enough. So this paper will make a new and more detailed review of VBL in recent years. This paper divides the visual-based localization methods into three categories: image-based localization, localization based on learning model and localization based on 3D structure. And we also detail the principle, development of methods and the advantages and disadvantages of each method and future development trends.

References

[1]

Piasco, N., Sidibé, D., Demonceaux, C. and Gouet-Brunet, V, 2018. A survey on visual-based localization: On the benefit of heterogeneous data. Pattern Recognition, 74, 90--109.

Digital Library

[2]

Schonberger, J. L., and Frahm, J. M. 2016. Structure-from-motion revisited. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 4104--4113).

[3]

Lynen, S., Sattler, T., Bosse, M., Hesch, J. A., Pollefeys, M., and Siegwart, R. 2015. Get Out of My Lab: Large-scale, Real-Time Visual-Inertial Localization. In Robotics: Science and Systems (Vol. 1).

[4]

Schreiber, M., Knöppel, C., and Franke, U. 2013. Laneloc: Lane marking based localization using highly accurate maps. In 2013 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) (pp. 449--454).

[5]

Dubé, R., Dugas, D., Stumm, E., Nieto, J., Siegwart, R., and Cadena, C. 2016. Segmatch: Segment based loop-closure for 3d point clouds. In ICRA, arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.07720.

[6]

Arandjelovic, R., Gronat, P., Torii, A., Pajdla, T., and Sivic, J. 2016. NetVLAD: CNN architecture for weakly supervised place recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (pp. 5297--5307).

[7]

Mur-Artal, R., Montiel, J. M. M., and Tardos, J. D. 2015. ORB-SLAM: a versatile and accurate monocular SLAM system. IEEE transactions on robotics, 31(5), 1147--1163.

[8]

Chen, Z., Jacobson, A., Sünderhauf, N., and Milford, M. 2017. Deep learning features at scale for visual place recognition. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (pp. 3223--3230).

[9]

Sattler, T., Maddern, W., Toft, C., Torii, A. and Kahl, F. 2018. Benchmarking 6dof outdoor visual localization in changing conditions. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 8601--8610).

[10]

Li, Y., Snavely, N., Huttenlocher, D., and Fua, P. 2012. Worldwide pose estimation using 3d point clouds. In European conference on computer vision (pp. 15--29).

[11]

Lowe, D. G. 2004. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. International journal of computer vision, 60(2), 91--110.

[12]

Yi, K. M., Trulls, E., Lepetit, V., and Fua, P. 2016. Lift: Learned invariant feature transform. In European Conference on Computer Vision (pp. 467--483).

[13]

Brejcha, J., and Čadík, M. 2017. State-of-the-art in visual geo-localization. Pattern Analysis and Applications, 20(3), 613--637.

Digital Library

[14]

Hakeem, A., Zamir, L., Van Gool, Shah, M., and Szeliski, R. 2016. Large-scale visual geo-localization. Cham: Springer.

[15]

Arandjelović, R., and Zisserman, A. 2012. Three things everyone should know to improve object retrieval. In 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 2911--2918).

[16]

Jégou, H., Douze, M., Schmid, C., and Pérez, P. 2010. Aggregating local descriptors into a compact image representation. In CVPR 2010-23rd IEEE Conference on Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (pp. 3304--3311).

[17]

Torii, A., Arandjelovic, R., Sivic, J., Okutomi, M., and Pajdla, T. 2015. 24/7 place recognition by view synthesis. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 1808--1817).

[18]

Kim, H. J., Dunn, and E., Frahm, J.-M., 2015. Predicting good features for image geo-localization using per-bundle VLAD. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). Vol. 11-18-Dece. pp. 1170--1178.

Digital Library

[19]

Jégou, H., and Zisserman, A. 2014. Triangulation embedding and democratic aggregation for image search. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (pp. 3310--3317).

[20]

Cummins, M., and Newman, P. FAB-MAP: Probabilistic Localization and Mapping in the Space of Appearance. IJRR, 27(6):647--665, 2008.

[21]

Azzi, C., Asmar, D., Fakih, A., and Zelek, J., 2016. Filtering 3D Keypoints Using GIST For Accurate Image-Based Localization. In: British Machine Vision Conference (BMVC). No. 2. pp. 1--12.

[22]

Radenović, F., Tolias, G., and Chum, O., 2016. CNN Image Retrieval Learns from BoW: Unsupervised Fine-Tuning with Hard Examples. In: Proceedings of the IEEE European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV). Vol. 9905. pp. 3--20

[23]

Sivic, J., and Zisserman, A. 2003. Video Google: A text retrieval approach to object matching in videos. In null (pp. 1470--1477).

[24]

Philbin, J., Chum, O., Isard, M., Sivic, J., and Zisserman, A., 2008. Lost in Quantization: Improving Particular Object Retrieval in Large Scale Image Databases. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[25]

Jégou, H., Perronnin, F., Douze, M., Sanchez, J., and Schmid, C., 2012. Aggregating local image descriptors into compact codes. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (TPAMI), 1--12

Digital Library

[26]

Torii, A., Sivic, J., Okutomi, M., and Pajdla, T., 2015. Visual Place Recognition with Repetitive Structures. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (TPAMI) 37 (11), 2346--2359.

Digital Library

[27]

Sünderhauf, N., Shirazi, S., Jacobson, A., Dayoub, F., Pepperell, E., Upcroft, B., and Milford, M. 2015. Place recognition with convnet landmarks: Viewpoint-robust, condition-robust, training-free. Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems XII.

[28]

Cao, S., and Snavely, N., 2015. Graph-Based Discriminative Learning for Location Recognition. International Journal of Computer Vision (IJCV) 112 (2), 239--254

Digital Library

[29]

Shotton, J., Glocker, B., Zach, C., Izadi, S., Criminisi, A., and Fitzgibbon, A., 2013. Scene coordinate regression forests for camera relocalization in RGB-D images. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2930--2937

[30]

Guzman-Rivera, A., Pushmeet, K., Glocker, B., and Shotton, J., 2014. Multi-Output Learning for Camera Relocalization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). pp. 1--6.

[31]

Valentin, J., Fitzgibbon, A., Shotton, J., and Torr, P. H. S., 2015. Exploiting Uncertainty in Regression Forests for Accurate Camera Relocalization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). pp. 4400--4408.

[32]

Meng, L., Chen, J., Tung, F., Little, J., and de Silva, C. W., 2016. Exploiting Random RGB and Sparse Features for Camera Pose Estimation. In: British Machine Vision Conference (BMVC). pp. 1--12.

[33]

Brachmann, E., Michel, F., Krull, A., Ying Yang, M., and Gumhold, S. 2016. Uncertainty-driven 6D pose estimation of objects and scenes from a single RGB image. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 3364--3372).

[34]

Massiceti, D., Krull, A., Brachmann, E., Rother, C., and Torr, P. H. 2017. Random forests versus Neural Networks---What's best for camera localization? In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (pp. 5118--5125).

[35]

Glocker, B., Shotton, J., Criminisi, A., and Izadi, S. 2014. Real-time RGB-D camera relocalization via randomized ferns for keyframe encoding. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 21(5), 571--583.

[36]

Cavallari, T., Golodetz, S., Lord, N. A., and Valentin, J., 2017. On-the-Fly Adaptation of Regression Forests for Online Camera Relocalisation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[37]

Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., and Hinton, G. E. 2012. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In Advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 1097--1105).

[38]

He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J. 2016. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (pp. 770--778).

[39]

Girshick, R. 2015. Fast R-CNN. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision (pp. 1440--1448).

[40]

Kendall, A., and Cipolla, R. 2016. Modelling uncertainty in deep learning for camera relocalization. In 2016 IEEE international conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (pp. 4762--4769).

[41]

Kendall, A., Grimes, M., and Cipolla, R. 2015. Convolutional networks for real-time 6-DOF camera relocalization. CoRR abs/1505.07427.

[42]

Kendall, A., and Cipolla, R. 2017. Geometric loss functions for camera pose regression with deep learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 5974--5983).

[43]

Walch, F., Hazirbas, C., Leal-Taixé, L., Sattler, T., and Cremers, D. 2016. Image-based localization with spatial lstms. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.07890, 2(6).

[44]

Walch, F., 2016. Deep Learning for Image-Based Localization. Ph.D. thesis, Technical University of Munich.

[45]

Liu, Z., Duan, L.-Y., Chen, J., and Huang, T., 2016. Depth-Based Local Feature Selection for Mobile Visual Search. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[46]

Jia, D., Su, Y., and Li, C., 2016. Deep Convolutional Neural Network for 6-DOF Image Localization. arXiv preprint (413113), 1790--1798.

[47]

Contreras, L., and Mayol-Cuevas, W. 2017. Towards CNN Map Compression for camera relocalisation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.00845.

[48]

Weyand, T., Kostrikov, I., and Philbin, J., 2016. PlaNet - Photo Geolocation with Convolutional Neural Networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV). Vol. 9905. pp. 37--55.

[49]

Valada, A., Radwan, N., and Burgard, W. 2018, May. Deep auxiliary learning for visual localization and odometry. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (pp. 6939--6946).

[50]

Radwan, N., Valada, A., and Burgard, W. 2018. Vlocnet++: Deep multitask learning for semantic visual localization and odometry. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 3(4), 4407--4414.

[51]

Sarlin, P. E., Cadena, C., Siegwart, R., and Dymczyk, M. 2019. From coarse to fine: Robust hierarchical localization at large scale. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 12716--12725).

[52]

Bui, M., Baur, C., Navab, N., Ilic, S., and Albarqouni, S. 2019. Adversarial Joint Image and Pose Distribution Learning for Camera Pose Regression and Refinement. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.06646.

[53]

Sattler, T., Zhou, Q., Pollefeys, M., and Leal-Taixe, L. 2019. Understanding the Limitations of CNN-based Absolute Camera Pose Regression. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 3302--3312).

[54]

Cavallari, T., Bertinetto, L., Mukhoti, J., Torr, P., and Golodetz, S. 2019. Let's Take This Online: Adapting Scene Coordinate Regression Network Predictions for Online RGB-D Camera Relocalisation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.08744.

[55]

Zeisl, B., Sattler, T., and Pollefeys, M. 2015. Camera Pose Voting for Large-Scale ImageBased Localization. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[56]

Liu, L., Li, H., and Dai, Y. 2017. Efficient global 2d-3d matching for camera localization in a large-scale 3d map. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (pp. 2372--2381).

[57]

Sattler, T., Torii, A., Sivic, J., Pollefeys, M., and Taira, H. 2017. Are large-scale 3d models really necessary for accurate visual localization? In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 1637--1646).

[58]

Fischler, M. A., and Bolles, R. C. 1981. Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Communications of the ACM, 24(6), 381--395.

Digital Library

[59]

Kneip, L., Scaramuzza, D., and Siegwart, R. 2011. A novel parametrization of the perspective-three-point problem for a direct computation of absolute camera position and orientation. In CVPR 2011 (pp. 2969--2976).

[60]

Sattler, T., Leibe, B., and Kobbelt, L. 2016. Efficient & effective prioritized matching for large-scale image-based localization. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 39(9), 1744--1756.

[61]

Camposeco, F., Sattler, T., Cohen, A., and Pollefeys, M. 2017. Toroidal constraints for two-point localization under high outlier ratios. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 4545--4553).

[62]

Svärm, L., Enqvist, O., and Oskarsson, M. 2016. City-scale localization for cameras with known vertical direction. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 39(7), 1455--1461.

[63]

Zeisl, B., Koser, K., and Pollefeys, M. 2013. Automatic registration of RGB-D scans via salient directions. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision (pp. 2808--2815).

[64]

Irschara, A., Zach, C., Frahm, J.-m., and Bischof, H., 2009. From Structure-from-Motion Point Clouds to Fast Location Recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[65]

Sattler, T., Leibe, B., and Kobbelt, L., 2011. Fast image-based localization using direct 2D-to-3D matching. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 667--674.

[66]

Sattler, T., Havlena, M., Radenović, F., Schindler, K., and Pollefeys, M., 2015. Hyperpoints and fine vocabularies for large-scale location recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). Vol. 11-18-Dece. pp. 2102--2106.

[67]

Heisterklaus, I., Qian, N., and Miller, A., 2014. Image-based pose estimation using a compact 3D model. In: IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics Berlin (ICCE-Berlin). pp. 327--330.

[68]

Donoser, M., and Schmalstieg, D., 2014. Discriminative feature-to-point matching in image-based localization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). pp. 516--523.

[69]

Feng, Y., Fan, L., and Wu, Y., 2016. Fast Localization in Large-Scale Environments Using Supervised Indexing of Binary Features. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing (ToIP) 25 (1), 343--358.

Digital Library

[70]

Cohen, A., Sattler, T., and Pollefeys, M. 2015. Merging the unmatchable: Stitching visually disconnected sfm models. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (pp. 2129--2137).

[71]

Cohen, A., Schönberger, J. L., Speciale, P., Sattler, T., Frahm, J. M., and Pollefeys, M. 2016. Indoor-outdoor 3d reconstruction alignment. In European Conference on Computer Vision (pp. 285--300).

[72]

Yu, F., Xiao, J., and Funkhouser, T. 2015. Semantic alignment of LiDAR data at city scale. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 1722--1731).

[73]

Atanasov, N., Zhu, M., Daniilidis, K., and Pappas, G. J. 2016. Localization from semantic observations via the matrix permanent. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 35(1-3), 73--99.

Digital Library

[74]

Schonberger, J. L., Hardmeier, H., Sattler, T., and Pollefeys, M. 2017. Comparative evaluation of hand-crafted and learned local features. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 1482--1491).

[75]

Hornung, A., Wurm, K. M., Bennewitz, M., Stachniss, C., and Burgard, W. 2013. OctoMap: An efficient probabilistic 3D mapping framework based on octrees. Autonomous robots, 34(3), 189--206.

[76]

Schönberger, J. L., Pollefeys, M., Geiger, A., and Sattler, T. 2018. Semantic visual localization. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 6896--6906).

[77]

Toft, C., Stenborg, E., Hammarstrand, L., Brynte, L., Pollefeys, M., Sattler, T., and Kahl, F. 2018. Semantic match consistency for long-term visual localization. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) (pp. 383--399).

[78]

Geppert, M., Liu, P., Cui, Z., Pollefeys, M., and Sattler, T. 2018. Efficient 2D-3D Matching for Multi-Camera Visual Localization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.06445.

[79]

Li, S., and Calway, A. 2015. RGBD relocalisation using pairwise geometry and concise key point sets. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (pp. 6374--6379).

[80]

Brachmann, E., and Rother, C. 2018. Learning less is more-6d camera localization via 3d surface regression. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 4654--4662).

[81]

Nadeem, U., Jalwana, M. A., Bennamoun, M., Togneri, R., and Sohel, F. 2019. Direct Image to Point Cloud Descriptors Matching for 6-DOF Camera Localization in Dense 3D Point Cloud. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.06064.

Cited By

Hu BChen LChen RBu SHan PLi H(2024)CurriculumLoc: Enhancing Cross-Domain Geolocalization Through Multistage RefinementIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing10.1109/TGRS.2024.338019162(1-14)Online publication date: 2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2024.3380191
Tang SLi YWan JLi YZhou BGuo RWang WFeng Y(2024)TransCNNLoc: End-to-end pixel-level learning for 2D-to-3D pose estimation in dynamic indoor scenesISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2023.12.006207(218-230)Online publication date: Jan-2024
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2023.12.006
Yang LCai H(2024)Enhanced visual SLAM for construction robots by efficient integration of dynamic object segmentation and scene semanticsAdvanced Engineering Informatics10.1016/j.aei.2023.10231359(102313)Online publication date: Jan-2024
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2023.102313
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

A review of Visual-Based Localization
1. General and reference
  1. Document types
    1. Reference works
    2. Surveys and overviews

Recommendations

A survey on Visual-Based Localization

Comprehensive review of recent methods used for the task of Visual-Based Localization.Explicit classification on two main categorizes of state-of-the-art works.Discussion on the strengths and weaknesses of reviewed methods according to the type of data ...
Read More
3D Image-based Indoor Localization Joint With WiFi Positioning
ICMR '18: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM on International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval

We realize a system that utilizes WiFi to facilitate the image-based localization system, which avoids the confusion caused by the similar decoration inside the buildings. While WiFi-based localization thread obtains the rough location information, the ...
Read More
Fusion of wifi and vision based on smart devices for indoor localization
VRCAI '18: Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGGRAPH International Conference on Virtual-Reality Continuum and its Applications in Industry

Indoor localization is an important problem with a wide range of applications such as indoor navigation, robot mapping, especially augmented reality(AR). One of most important tasks in AR technology is to estimate the target objects' position ...
Read More

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

RICAI '19: Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Robotics, Intelligent Control and Artificial Intelligence

September 2019

803 pages

ISBN:9781450372985

DOI:10.1145/3366194

Copyright © 2019 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 20 September 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Conference

RICAI 2019

RICAI 2019: 2019 International Conference on Robotics, Intelligent Control and Artificial Intelligence

September 20 - 22, 2019

Shanghai, China

Acceptance Rates

RICAI '19 Paper Acceptance Rate 140 of 294 submissions, 48%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 140 of 294 submissions, 48%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

10
Total Citations
View Citations
579
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)90
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Hu BChen LChen RBu SHan PLi H(2024)CurriculumLoc: Enhancing Cross-Domain Geolocalization Through Multistage RefinementIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing10.1109/TGRS.2024.338019162(1-14)Online publication date: 2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2024.3380191
Tang SLi YWan JLi YZhou BGuo RWang WFeng Y(2024)TransCNNLoc: End-to-end pixel-level learning for 2D-to-3D pose estimation in dynamic indoor scenesISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2023.12.006207(218-230)Online publication date: Jan-2024
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2023.12.006
Yang LCai H(2024)Enhanced visual SLAM for construction robots by efficient integration of dynamic object segmentation and scene semanticsAdvanced Engineering Informatics10.1016/j.aei.2023.10231359(102313)Online publication date: Jan-2024
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2023.102313
Liu JMa CLee G(2023)Intelligent Spatial Modeling for Autonomous Drone Navigation Enhancement2023 International Conference on Advanced Robotics and Intelligent Systems (ARIS)10.1109/ARIS59192.2023.10268570(1-6)Online publication date: 30-Aug-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/ARIS59192.2023.10268570
Alam MMohamed FSelamat AHossain A(2023)A Review of Recurrent Neural Network Based Camera Localization for Indoor EnvironmentsIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2023.327247911(43985-44009)Online publication date: 2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3272479
Neamati DBhamidipati SGao G(2023)Risk-aware autonomous localization in harsh urban environments with mosaic zonotope shadow matchingArtificial Intelligence10.1016/j.artint.2023.104000(104000)Online publication date: Sep-2023
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2023.104000
Tu CLu E(2022)Visual Localization Based on Deep Learning - Take Southern Branch of the National Palace Museum for ExampleIntelligent Information and Database Systems10.1007/978-3-031-21743-2_4(39-50)Online publication date: 9-Dec-2022
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21743-2_4
Pan ZTang JTjahjadi TGuo F(2021)Fast Geo-Location Method Based on Panoramic Skyline in Hilly AreaISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information10.3390/ijgi1008053710:8(537)Online publication date: 9-Aug-2021
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10080537
Mihara SIto SMurakami TShinbo H(2021)Positioning for User Equipment of a mmWave System Using RSSI and Stereo Camera Images2021 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC)10.1109/WCNC49053.2021.9417559(1-7)Online publication date: 29-Mar-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/WCNC49053.2021.9417559
Thoma JPaudel DGool LLarochelle HRanzato MHadsell RBalcan MLin H(2020)Soft contrastive learning for visual localizationProceedings of the 34th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems10.5555/3495724.3496657(11119-11130)Online publication date: 6-Dec-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3495724.3496657

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents