Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3366423.3380260acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesthewebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Do podcasts and music compete with one another? Understanding users’ audio streaming habits

Published: 20 April 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Over the past decade, podcasts have been one of the fastest growing online streaming media. Many online audio streaming platforms such as Pandora, Spotify, etc. that traditionally focused on music content have started to incorporate services related to podcasts. Although incorporating new media types such as podcasts has created tremendous opportunities for these streaming platforms to expand their content offering, it also introduces new challenges. Since the functional use of podcasts and music may largely overlap for many people, the two types of content may compete with one another for the finite amount of time that users may allocate for audio streaming. As a result, incorporating podcast listening may influence and change the way users have originally consumed music. Adopting quasi-experimental techniques, the current study assesses the causal influence of adding a new class of content on user listening behavior by using large scale observational data collected from a widely used audio streaming platform. Our results demonstrate that podcast and music consumption compete slightly but do not replace one another – users open another time window to listen to podcasts. In addition, users who have added podcasts to their music listening demonstrate significantly different consumption habits for podcasts vs. music in terms of the streaming time, duration and frequency. Taking all the differences as input features to a machine learning model, we demonstrate that a podcast listening session is predictable at the start of a new listening session. Our study provides a novel contribution for online audio streaming and consumption services to understand their potential consumers and to best support their current users with an improved recommendation system.

References

[1]
Alberto Abadie. 2005. Semiparametric difference-in-differences estimators. The Review of Economic Studies 72, 1 (2005), 1–19.
[2]
Tim Althoff, Pranav Jindal, and Jure Leskovec. 2017. Online actions with offline impact: How online social networks influence online and offline user behavior. In Proceedings of the tenth ACM international conference on web search and data mining. ACM, 537–546.
[3]
Sinan Aral, Lev Muchnik, and Arun Sundararajan. 2009. Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106, 51(2009), 21544–21549.
[4]
Richard Berry. 2006. Will the iPod kill the radio star? Profiling podcasting as radio. Convergence 12, 2 (2006), 143–162.
[5]
Jeanette Bicknell. 2007. Explaining strong emotional responses to music. Journal of Consciousness Studies 14, 12 (2007), 5–23.
[6]
Diana Boer. 2009. Music makes the people come together: Social functions of music listening for young people across cultures. (2009).
[7]
Diana Boer, Ronald Fischer, Hasan Gürkan Tekman, Amina Abubakar, Jane Njenga, and Markus Zenger. 2012. Young people’s topography of musical functions: Personal, social and cultural experiences with music across genders and six societies. International Journal of Psychology 47, 5 (2012), 355–369.
[8]
Monica Chadha, Alex Avila, and Homero Gil de Zúñiga. 2012. Listening in: Building a profile of podcast users and analyzing their political participation. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 9, 4 (2012), 388–401.
[9]
Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic, Viren Swami, and Blanka Cermakova. 2012. Individual differences in music consumption are predicted by uses of music and age rather than emotional intelligence, neuroticism, extraversion or openness. Psychology of Music 40, 3 (2012), 285–300.
[10]
Roger Cooper. 1993. An expanded, integrated model for determining audience exposure to television. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 37, 4 (1993), 401–418.
[11]
Roger Cooper. 1996. The status and future of audience duplication research: An assessment of ratings-based theories of audience behavior. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 40, 1 (1996), 96–111.
[12]
Roger Cooper and Tang Tang. 2009. Predicting audience exposure to television in today’s media environment: An empirical integration of active-audience and structural theories. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 53, 3 (2009), 400–418.
[13]
Rajeev H Dehejia and Sadek Wahba. 2002. Propensity score-matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies. Review of Economics and statistics 84, 1 (2002), 151–161.
[14]
Stephen G Donald and Kevin Lang. 2007. Inference with difference-in-differences and other panel data. The review of Economics and Statistics 89, 2 (2007), 221–233.
[15]
Chris Evans. 2008. The effectiveness of m-learning in the form of podcast revision lectures in higher education. Computers & education 50, 2 (2008), 491–498.
[16]
Simon Fietze. 2009. Podcast in higher education: Students usage behaviour. Same places, different spaces. Proceedings ascilite Auckland 2009 (2009), 314–318.
[17]
Pamela L Gay, Rebecca Bemrose-Fetter, Georgia Bracey, and Fraser Cain. 2007. Astronomy Cast: Evaluation of a podcast audience’s content needs and listening habits. Communicating Astronomy with the Public 1, 1 (2007), 24–29.
[18]
Anthony Giddens. 1984. The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Univ of California Press.
[19]
Gerald Joseph Goodhardt, Andrew Samuel Christopher Ehrenberg, Martin Alan Collins, 1987. The television audience: patterns of viewing. An update.Number Ed. 2. Gower Publishing Co. Ltd.
[20]
Alinka E Greasley and Alexandra Lamont. 2011. Exploring engagement with music in everyday life using experience sampling methodology. Musicae Scientiae 15, 1 (2011), 45–71.
[21]
Fabian Greb, Wolff Schlotz, and Jochen Steffens. 2017. Personal and situational influences on the functions of music listening. Psychology of Music (2017), 0305735617724883.
[22]
Khe Foon Hew. 2009. Use of audio podcast in K-12 and higher education: A review of research topics and methodologies. Educational Technology Research and Development 57, 3(2009), 333–357.
[23]
Sepp Hochreiter and Jürgen Schmidhuber. 1997. Long Short-Term Memory. Neural Comput. 9, 8 (1997), 1735–1780.
[24]
Wenjian Hu, Krishna Kumar Singh, Fanyi Xiao, Jinyoung Han, Chen-Nee Chuah, and Yong Jae Lee. 2018. Who Will Share My Image?: Predicting the Content Diffusion Path in Online Social Networks. In Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. ACM, 252–260.
[25]
David Huron. 2001. Is music an evolutionary adaptation?Annals of the New York Academy of sciences 930, 1 (2001), 43–61.
[26]
John S Jenkins. 2001. The Mozart effect. Journal of the royal society of medicine 94, 4 (2001), 170–172.
[27]
Elihu Katz. 1974. Utilization of mass communication by the individual. The uses of mass communications: Current perspectives on gratifications research (1974), 19–32.
[28]
Diederik P Kingma and Jimmy Ba. 2014. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980(2014).
[29]
Amanda E Krause, Adrian C North, and Lauren Y Hewitt. 2016. The role of location in everyday experiences of music.Psychology of Popular Media Culture 5, 3 (2016), 232.
[30]
Emmanuel Kuntsche, Lydie Le Mével, and Irina Berson. 2016. Development of the four-dimensional Motives for Listening to Music Questionnaire (MLMQ) and associations with health and social issues among adolescents. Psychology of Music 44, 2 (2016), 219–233.
[31]
Ang Li, Jennifer Thom, Praveen Chandar, Christine Hosey, Brian St Thomas, and Jean Garcia-Gathright. 2019. Search Mindsets: Understanding Focused and Non-Focused Information Seeking in Music Search. In The World Wide Web Conference. ACM, 2971–2977.
[32]
Melissa Locker. 2018. Apple’s podcasts just topped 50 billion all-time downloads and streams. Fast Company (2018). https://www.fastcompany.com/40563318/apples-podcasts-just-topped-50-billion-all-time-downloads-and-streams
[33]
Adam J Lonsdale and Adrian C North. 2011. Why do we listen to music? A uses and gratifications analysis. British Journal of Psychology 102, 1 (2011), 108–134.
[34]
Steven McClung and Kristine Johnson. 2010. Examining the motives of podcast users. Journal of Radio & Audio Media 17, 1 (2010), 82–95.
[35]
Walter McDowell and John Sutherland. 2000. Choice versus chance: Using brand equity theory to explore TV audience lead-in effects, a case study. The Journal of Media Economics 13, 4 (2000), 233–247.
[36]
A.P. Merriam. 1964. The Anthropology of Music. Northwestern University Press, Chicago(1964).
[37]
Ben Miroglio, David Zeber, Jofish Kaye, and Rebecca Weiss. 2018. The effect of ad blocking on user engagement with the web. In Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 813–821.
[38]
Steven Mithen, Iain Morley, Alison Wray, Maggie Tallerman, and Clive Gamble. 2006. The Singing Neanderthals: the Origins of Music, Language, Mind and Body, by Steven Mithen. London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson, 2005. ISBN 0-297-64317-7 hardback£ 20 & US $25.2; ix+ 374 pp.Cambridge Archaeological Journal 16, 1 (2006), 97–112.
[39]
Adrian C. North. 2010. Individual differences in musical taste. American journal of psychology 123, 2 (2010), 199–208.
[40]
Adrian C North, David J Hargreaves, and Jon J Hargreaves. 2004. Uses of music in everyday life. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal 22, 1 (2004), 41–77.
[41]
Bruce M Owen and Steven S Wildman. 1992. Video economics. La Editorial, UPR.
[42]
Shabbir A Rana and Adrian C North. 2007. The role of music in everyday life among Pakistanis. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal 25, 1 (2007), 59–73.
[43]
Edison Research. 2019. 2019 Podcast Stats & Facts (New Research From June 2019). available at https://www.podcastinsights.com/podcast-statistics/ (accessed Sept. 12, 2019) (2019).
[44]
Edison Research. 2019. The podcast consumer. available at https://www.edisonresearch.com/the-podcast-consumer-2019/ (accessed Sept. 12, 2019) (2019).
[45]
Paul R Rosenbaum and Donald B Rubin. 1983. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70, 1 (1983), 41–55.
[46]
Alan M Rubin. 2009. Uses-and-gratifications perspective on media effects. In Media effects. Routledge, 181–200.
[47]
Roland T Rust, Wagner A Kamakura, and Mark I Alpert. 1992. Viewer preference segmentation and viewing choice models for network television. Journal of Advertising 21, 1 (1992), 1–18.
[48]
Thomas Schäfer and Peter Sedlmeier. 2009. From the functions of music to music preference. Psychology of Music 37, 3 (2009), 279–300.
[49]
Thomas Schäfer and Peter Sedlmeier. 2010. What makes us like music? Determinants of music preference.Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 4, 4 (2010), 223.
[50]
Thomas Schäfer, Peter Sedlmeier, Christine Städtler, and David Huron. 2013. The psychological functions of music listening. Frontiers in psychology 4 (2013), 511.
[51]
E Glenn Schellenberg. 2004. Music lessons enhance IQ. Psychological science 15, 8 (2004), 511–514.
[52]
Emery Schubert. 2009. The fundamental function of music. Musicae Scientiae 13, 2_suppl (2009), 63–81.
[53]
William R Shadish, Thomas D Cook, and Donald T Campbell. 2002. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. (2002).
[54]
Elizabeth A Stuart. 2010. Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward. Statistical science: a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics 25, 1 (2010), 1.
[55]
Elizabeth A Stuart and Donald B Rubin. 2008. Best practices in quasi-experimental designs. Best practices in quantitative methods(2008), 155–176.
[56]
Harsh Taneja, James G Webster, Edward C Malthouse, and Thomas B Ksiazek. 2012. Media consumption across platforms: Identifying user-defined repertoires. New media & society 14, 6 (2012), 951–968.
[57]
Aaron Tuor, Samuel Kaplan, Brian Hutchinson, Nicole Nichols, and Sean Robinson. 2017. Predicting User Roles from Computer Logs Using Recurrent Neural Networks. In AAAI. 4993–4994.
[58]
James G Webster. 2006. Audience flow past and present: Television inheritance effects reconsidered. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 50, 2 (2006), 323–337.
[59]
James G Webster. 2009. The role of structure in media choice. Media choice: A theoretical and empirical overview (2009), 221–233.
[60]
James G Webster and Thomas B Ksiazek. 2012. The dynamics of audience fragmentation: Public attention in an age of digital media. Journal of communication 62, 1 (2012), 39–56.
[61]
Elaine J Yuan and Thomas B Ksiazek. 2011. The duality of structure in China’s national television market: A network analysis of audience behavior. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 55, 2 (2011), 180–197.
[62]
Ke Zhang and Konstantinos Pelechrinis. 2016. Do street fairs boost local businesses? a quasi-experimental analysis using social network data. In Joint European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases. Springer, 161–176.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Radio, Podcasts, and Music Streaming—An Electroencephalography and Physiological Analysis of Listeners’ Attitude, Attention, Memory, and EngagementBrain Sciences10.3390/brainsci1404033014:4(330)Online publication date: 29-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Exploring the Influence of Reels and Short Videos on the Reading and Listening Habits of Generation Z: A Comprehensive StudySSRN Electronic Journal10.2139/ssrn.4889495Online publication date: 2024
  • (2024)Exploring the Influence of Reels and Short Videos on the Reading and Listening Habits of Generation Z: A Comprehensive StudySSRN Electronic Journal10.2139/ssrn.4889423Online publication date: 2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Do podcasts and music compete with one another? Understanding users’ audio streaming habits
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image ACM Conferences
        WWW '20: Proceedings of The Web Conference 2020
        April 2020
        3143 pages
        ISBN:9781450370233
        DOI:10.1145/3366423
        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Sponsors

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 20 April 2020

        Permissions

        Request permissions for this article.

        Check for updates

        Author Tags

        1. listening habits
        2. music
        3. podcast

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Conference

        WWW '20
        Sponsor:
        WWW '20: The Web Conference 2020
        April 20 - 24, 2020
        Taipei, Taiwan

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)197
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
        Reflects downloads up to 30 Aug 2024

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all
        • (2024)Radio, Podcasts, and Music Streaming—An Electroencephalography and Physiological Analysis of Listeners’ Attitude, Attention, Memory, and EngagementBrain Sciences10.3390/brainsci1404033014:4(330)Online publication date: 29-Mar-2024
        • (2024)Exploring the Influence of Reels and Short Videos on the Reading and Listening Habits of Generation Z: A Comprehensive StudySSRN Electronic Journal10.2139/ssrn.4889495Online publication date: 2024
        • (2024)Exploring the Influence of Reels and Short Videos on the Reading and Listening Habits of Generation Z: A Comprehensive StudySSRN Electronic Journal10.2139/ssrn.4889423Online publication date: 2024
        • (2023)The relationship between environmental context and attentional engagement in podcast listening experiencesFrontiers in Psychology10.3389/fpsyg.2022.107432013Online publication date: 16-Jan-2023
        • (2023)AsQM: Audio Streaming Quality Metric Based on Network Impairments and User PreferencesIEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics10.1109/TCE.2023.325541169:3(408-420)Online publication date: Aug-2023
        • (2022)Content-based Stock Recommendation Using Smartphone DataJournal of Information Processing10.2197/ipsjjip.30.36130(361-371)Online publication date: 2022
        • (2022)Competing sounds? Podcasting and popular musicRadio Journal: International Studies in Broadcast & Audio Media10.1386/rjao_00052_220:1(3-15)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2022
        • (2022)More Gamification Is Not Always BetterProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35555536:CSCW2(1-32)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
        • (2022)Sequential Recommendation via Stochastic Self-AttentionProceedings of the ACM Web Conference 202210.1145/3485447.3512077(2036-2047)Online publication date: 25-Apr-2022
        • (2021)Interview and Think Aloud Accessibility for Deaf and Hard of Hearing Participants in Design ResearchProceedings of the 23rd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/3441852.3476526(1-3)Online publication date: 17-Oct-2021
        • Show More Cited By

        View Options

        Get Access

        Login options

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format.

        HTML Format

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media