Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3366424.3383555acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesthewebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Unifying Framework for Fairness-Aware Influence Maximization

Published: 20 April 2020 Publication History

Abstract

The problem of selecting a subset of nodes with greatest influence in a graph, commonly known as influence maximization, has been well studied over the past decade. This problem has real world applications which can potentially affect lives of individuals. Algorithmic decision making in such domains raises concerns about their societal implications. One of these concerns, which surprisingly has only received limited attention so far, is algorithmic bias and fairness. We propose a flexible framework that extends and unifies the existing works in fairness-aware influence maximization. This framework is based on an integer programming formulation of the influence maximization problem. The fairness requirements are enforced by adding linear constraints or modifying the objective function. Contrary to the previous work which designs specific algorithms for each variant, we develop a formalism which is general enough for specifying different notions of fairness. A problem defined in this formalism can be then solved using efficient mixed integer programming solvers. The experimental evaluation indicates that our framework not only is general but also is competitive with existing algorithms.

References

[1]
Abhijit Banerjee, Arun G Chandrasekhar, Esther Duflo, and Matthew O Jackson. 2013. The diffusion of microfinance. Science 341, 6144 (2013), 1236498.
[2]
Nicola Barbieri, Francesco Bonchi, and Giuseppe Manco. 2013. Topic-aware social influence propagation models. Knowledge and information systems 37, 3 (2013), 555–584.
[3]
Antonio Caliò, Roberto Interdonato, Chiara Pulice, and Andrea Tagarelli. 2018. Topology-driven diversity for targeted influence maximization with application to user engagement in social networks. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 30, 12(2018), 2421–2434.
[4]
Alexandra Chouldechova. 2017. Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments. CoRR abs/1703.00056(2017).
[5]
Cynthia Dwork, Moritz Hardt, Toniann Pitassi, Omer Reingold, and Richard Zemel. 2012. Fairness through awareness. In Proceedings of the 3rd innovations in theoretical computer science conference. ACM, 214–226.
[6]
Michael Feldman, Sorelle A Friedler, John Moeller, Carlos Scheidegger, and Suresh Venkatasubramanian. 2015. Certifying and removing disparate impact. In Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, 259–268.
[7]
Benjamin Fish, Ashkan Bashardoust, danah boyd, Sorelle A. Friedler, Carlos Scheidegger, and Suresh Venkatasubramanian. 2019. Gaps in Information Access in Social Networks. The Web Conference (WWWW)(2019).
[8]
Shay Gershtein, Tova Milo, Brit Youngmann, and Gal Zeevi. 2018. IM Balanced: Influence Maximization Under Balance Constraints. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 1919–1922.
[9]
Amit Goyal, Wei Lu, and Laks VS Lakshmanan. 2011. Simpath: An efficient algorithm for influence maximization under the linear threshold model. In 2011 IEEE 11th international conference on data mining. IEEE, 211–220.
[10]
Moritz Hardt, Eric Price, Nati Srebro, 2016. Equality of opportunity in supervised learning. In Advances in neural information processing systems. 3315–3323.
[11]
Toshihiro Kamishima, Shotaro Akaho, Hideki Asoh, and Jun Sakuma. 2012. Fairness-aware classifier with prejudice remover regularizer. In Joint European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases. Springer, 35–50.
[12]
David Kempe, Jon Kleinberg, and Éva Tardos. 2003. Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. In Proceedings of the ninth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, 137–146.
[13]
Jinha Kim, Wonyeol Lee, and Hwanjo Yu. 2014. CT-IC: Continuously activated and time-restricted independent cascade model for viral marketing. Knowledge-Based Systems 62 (2014), 57–68.
[14]
Masahiro Kimura, Kazumi Saito, and Hiroshi Motoda. 2008. Minimizing the Spread of Contamination by Blocking Links in a Network. In AAAI, Vol. 8. 1175–1180.
[15]
Jon Kleinberg, Sendhil Mullainathan, and Manish Raghavan. 2016. Inherent trade-offs in the fair determination of risk scores. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.05807(2016).
[16]
Matt J. Kusner, Joshua R. Loftus, Chris Russell, and Ricardo Silva. 2017. Counterfactual Fairness. In NIPS. 4069–4079.
[17]
Jure Leskovec, Andreas Krause, Carlos Guestrin, Christos Faloutsos, Jeanne VanBriesen, and Natalie Glance. 2007. Cost-effective outbreak detection in networks. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, 420–429.
[18]
Guoliang Li, Shuo Chen, Jianhua Feng, Kian-lee Tan, and Wen-syan Li. 2014. Efficient location-aware influence maximization. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data. ACM, 87–98.
[19]
Xiang Li, J David Smith, Thang N Dinh, and My T Thai. 2019. TipTop: Almost Exact Solutions for Influence Maximization in Billion-Scale Networks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON) 27, 2 (2019), 649–661.
[20]
Yuchen Li, Ju Fan, Yanhao Wang, and Kian-Lee Tan. 2018. Influence maximization on social graphs: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 30, 10(2018), 1852–1872.
[21]
Feng Lu, Weikang Zhang, Liwen Shao, Xunfei Jiang, Peng Xu, and Hai Jin. 2017. Scalable influence maximization under independent cascade model. Journal of Network and Computer Applications 86 (2017), 15–23.
[22]
Flaviano Morone and Hernán A Makse. 2015. Influence maximization in complex networks through optimal percolation. Nature 524, 7563 (2015), 65.
[23]
Hung T Nguyen, Thang N Dinh, and My T Thai. 2016. Cost-aware targeted viral marketing in billion-scale networks. In IEEE INFOCOM 2016-The 35th Annual IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications. IEEE, 1–9.
[24]
Matthew Richardson and Pedro Domingos. 2002. Mining knowledge-sharing sites for viral marketing. In Proceedings of the eighth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, 61–70.
[25]
Yaron Singer. 2012. How to win friends and influence people, truthfully: influence maximization mechanisms for social networks. In Proceedings of the fifth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining. ACM, 733–742.
[26]
Richard Steppe. 2017. Online price discrimination and personal data: A General Data Protection Regulation perspective. Computer law & security review 33, 6 (2017), 768–785.
[27]
Youze Tang, Yanchen Shi, and Xiaokui Xiao. 2015. Influence maximization in near-linear time: A martingale approach. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. ACM, 1539–1554.
[28]
Youze Tang, Xiaokui Xiao, and Yanchen Shi. 2014. Influence maximization: Near-optimal time complexity meets practical efficiency. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data. ACM, 75–86.
[29]
Alan Tsang, Bryan Wilder, Eric Rice, Milind Tambe, and Yair Zick. 2019. Group-fairness in influence maximization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.00967(2019).
[30]
Sahil Verma and Julia Rubin. 2018. Fairness definitions explained. In 2018 IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Software Fairness (FairWare). IEEE, 1–7.
[31]
Bryan Wilder, Han-Ching Ou, Kayla de la Haye, and Milind Tambe. 2018. Optimizing Network Structure for Preventative Health. In AAMAS. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems Richland, SC, USA / ACM, 841–849.
[32]
Amulya Yadav, Bryan Wilder, Eric Rice, Robin Petering, Jaih Craddock, Amanda Yoshioka-Maxwell, Mary Hemler, Laura Onasch-Vera, Milind Tambe, and Darlene Woo. 2018. Bridging the Gap Between Theory and Practice in Influence Maximization: Raising Awareness about HIV among Homeless Youth. In IJCAI. 5399–5403.
[33]
Muhammad Bilal Zafar, Isabel Valera, Manuel Gomez-Rodriguez, Krishna P. Gummadi, and Adrian Weller. 2017. From Parity to Preference-based Notions of Fairness in Classification. In NIPS. 228–238.
[34]
Rich Zemel, Yu Wu, Kevin Swersky, Toni Pitassi, and Cynthia Dwork. 2013. Learning fair representations. In International Conference on Machine Learning. 325–333.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Fair Influence Maximization in HypergraphsProceedings of the Third International Workshop on Social and Metaverse Computing, Sensing and Networking10.1145/3698387.3699995(8-14)Online publication date: 4-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Network Fairness Ambivalence: When does social network capital mitigate or amplify unfairness?Proceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Computing Systems10.1145/36560178:2(1-28)Online publication date: 29-May-2024
  • (2024)FairSNA: Algorithmic Fairness in Social Network AnalysisACM Computing Surveys10.1145/365371156:8(1-45)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. A Unifying Framework for Fairness-Aware Influence Maximization
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    WWW '20: Companion Proceedings of the Web Conference 2020
    April 2020
    854 pages
    ISBN:9781450370240
    DOI:10.1145/3366424
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 20 April 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Group Fairness
    2. Influence Maximization
    3. Mixed Integer Programming

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    WWW '20
    Sponsor:
    WWW '20: The Web Conference 2020
    April 20 - 24, 2020
    Taipei, Taiwan

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)104
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)19
    Reflects downloads up to 10 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Fair Influence Maximization in HypergraphsProceedings of the Third International Workshop on Social and Metaverse Computing, Sensing and Networking10.1145/3698387.3699995(8-14)Online publication date: 4-Nov-2024
    • (2024)Network Fairness Ambivalence: When does social network capital mitigate or amplify unfairness?Proceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Computing Systems10.1145/36560178:2(1-28)Online publication date: 29-May-2024
    • (2024)FairSNA: Algorithmic Fairness in Social Network AnalysisACM Computing Surveys10.1145/365371156:8(1-45)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
    • (2024)Many-Objective Evolutionary Influence Maximization: Balancing Spread, Budget, Fairness, and TimeProceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion10.1145/3638530.3654161(655-658)Online publication date: 14-Jul-2024
    • (2024)BIM: Improving Graph Neural Networks with Balanced Influence Maximization2024 IEEE 40th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE)10.1109/ICDE60146.2024.00228(2931-2944)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
    • (2024)Fairgen: Towards Fair Graph Generation2024 IEEE 40th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE)10.1109/ICDE60146.2024.00181(2285-2297)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
    • (2024)Reachability-Aware Fair Influence MaximizationWeb and Big Data10.1007/978-981-97-7238-4_22(342-359)Online publication date: 28-Aug-2024
    • (2023)Mitigating Filter Bubbles Under a Competitive Diffusion ModelProceedings of the ACM on Management of Data10.1145/35893201:2(1-26)Online publication date: 20-Jun-2023
    • (2023)Influence Maximization with Fairness at ScaleProceedings of the 29th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining10.1145/3580305.3599847(4046-4055)Online publication date: 6-Aug-2023
    • (2023)SURE: Robust, Explainable, and Fair Classification without Sensitive AttributesProceedings of the 29th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining10.1145/3580305.3599514(179-189)Online publication date: 6-Aug-2023
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media