Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3371382.3378364acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

From Psychological Intention Recognition Theories to Adaptive Theory of Mind for Robots: Computational Models

Published: 01 April 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Progress in robots' application to everyday scenarios has increased the interest in human-robot interaction (HRI) research. However, robots' limited social skills are associated with decreased humans' positive attitude during HRI. Here, we put forward the idea of developing adaptive Theory of Mind (ToM) model-based systems for social robotics, able to deal with new situations and interact with different users in new tasks. Therefore, we grouped current research from developmental psychology debating the computational processes underlying ToM for HRI strategy development. Defining a model describing adaptive ToM processes may in fact aid the development of adaptive robotic architectures for more flexible and successful HRI. Finally, we hope with this report to both further promote the cross-talk between the fields of developmental psychology and robotics and inspire future investigations in this direction.

References

[1]
A. Abubshait, and E. Wiese, "You Look Human, But Act Like a Machine: Agent Appearance and Behavior Modulate Different Aspects of Human-Robot Interaction," Front Psychol, vol. 8, pp. 1393, 2017.
[2]
L. Sinnema, and M. Alimardani, "The Attitude of Elderly and Young Adults towards a Humanoid Robot as a Facilitator for Social Interaction.," 2019.
[3]
Alessia Vignolo, Alessandra Sciutti, Francesco Rea, and J. Michael, "Spatiotemporal Coordination Supports a Sense of Commitment in Human-Robot Interaction," 2019.
[4]
T. B. Sheridan, "Human--Robot Interaction: Status and Challenges," Human Factors, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 525--532, 2016.
[5]
Cecilia Roselli, Francesca Ciardo, and A. Wykowska, "Robots Improve Judgments on Self-generated Actions: An Intentional Binding Study."
[6]
J. B. G.Z. Yang, P. E. Dupont, P. Fisher, L. Floridi, R. Full, et al, "The grand challenges of science robotics," Science Robotics, vol. 3, pp. eaar7650, 2018.
[7]
F. Bianco, Ognibene, D., "Functional Advantages of an adaptive Theory of Mind for robotics: a review of current architectures."
[8]
F. Bianco, Ognibene, D., "Transferring adaptive Theory of Mind to social robots: insights from developmental psychology."
[9]
S. Lemaignan, and P. Dillenbourg, "Mutual Modelling in Robotics: Inspirations for the Next Steps," ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, vol. 2015, pp. 303--310, 03/02, 2015.
[10]
G. G. Csibra G, ""Obsessed with goals': Functions and mechanisms of teleological interpretation of actions in humans," acta psychol, vol. 124, no. 1, pp. 60--78, 2007.
[11]
V. Southgate, M. H. Johnson, and G. Csibra, "Infants attribute goals even to biomechanically impossible actions," Cognition, vol. 107, no. 3, pp. 1059--69, Jun, 2008.
[12]
A. Cangelosi, and M. Schlesinger, "From Babies to Robots: The Contribution of Developmental Robotics to Developmental Psychology," Child Development Perspectives, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 183--188, 2018.
[13]
Y. Demiris, and A. Dearden, "From motor babbling to hierarchical learning by imitation: a robot developmental pathway," Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Epigenetic Robotics, pp. 31--37, 2005.
[14]
A. L. Woodward, "Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor's reach," Cognition, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 1--34, Nov, 1998.
[15]
C. Monroy, S. Gerson, and S. Hunnius, "Infants' Motor Proficiency and Statistical Learning for Actions," Front Psychol, vol. 8, pp. 2174, 2017.
[16]
V. Southgate, M. H. Johnson, T. Osborne, and G. Csibra, "Predictive motor activation during action observation in human infants," Biol Lett, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 769--72, Dec 23, 2009.
[17]
A. E. Skerry, S. E. Carey, and E. S. Spelke, "First-person action experience reveals sensitivity to action efficiency in prereaching infants," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 110, no. 46, pp. 18728--18733, 2013.
[18]
G. Gergely, and G. Csibra, "Teleological reasoning in infancy: the nai;ve theory of rational action," Trends Cogn Sci, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 287--292, Jul, 2003.
[19]
L. Hiatt, A. Harrison, and J. Trafton, Accommodating Human Variability in Human-Robot Teams through Theory of Mind, 2011.
[20]
A. F. T. Winfield, "Experiments in Artificial Theory of Mind: From Safety to Story-Telling," Frontiers in Robotics and AI, vol. 5, no. 75, 2018-June-26, 2018.
[21]
C. Keysers, and V. Gazzola, "Integrating simulation and theory of mind: From self to social cognition," Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 194--196, 2007.
[22]
C. L. Baker, J. Jara-Ettinger, R. Saxe, and J. B. Tenenbaum, "Rational quantitative attribution of beliefs, desires and percepts in human mentalizing," Nature Human Behaviour, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 0064, 2017.
[23]
J. Hamlin, T. Ullman, J. Tenenbaum, N. Goodman, and C. Baker, "The mentalistic basis of core social cognition: experiments in preverbal infants and a computational model," Dev Sci, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 209--226, Mar, 2013.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)A Vision-Based Measure of Environmental Effects on Inferring Human Intention During Human Robot InteractionIEEE Sensors Journal10.1109/JSEN.2021.313959322:5(4246-4256)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2022
  • (2020)The ANEMONE: Theoretical Foundations for UX Evaluation of Action and Intention Recognition in Human-Robot InteractionSensors10.3390/s2015428420:15(4284)Online publication date: 31-Jul-2020

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
HRI '20: Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
March 2020
702 pages
ISBN:9781450370578
DOI:10.1145/3371382
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 April 2020

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. action recognition
  2. belief recognition
  3. intention recognition
  4. prediction
  5. theory of mind
  6. user state

Qualifiers

  • Abstract

Funding Sources

  • NA

Conference

HRI '20
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 192 of 519 submissions, 37%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)22
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 03 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)A Vision-Based Measure of Environmental Effects on Inferring Human Intention During Human Robot InteractionIEEE Sensors Journal10.1109/JSEN.2021.313959322:5(4246-4256)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2022
  • (2020)The ANEMONE: Theoretical Foundations for UX Evaluation of Action and Intention Recognition in Human-Robot InteractionSensors10.3390/s2015428420:15(4284)Online publication date: 31-Jul-2020

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media