research-article

Tales of Institutioning and Commoning: Participatory Design Processes with a Strategic and Tactical Perspective

Authors:

Mariacristina Sciannamblo,

Irina Anastasiu,

Peter LyleAuthors Info & Claims

PDC '20: Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020 - Participation(s) Otherwise - Volume 1

Pages 159 - 171

https://doi.org/10.1145/3385010.3385020

Published: 18 June 2020 Publication History

Abstract

With the concept of infrastructuring as a background for our reflections, this paper focuses on two complementary verbifications have entered the PD vocabulary: institutioning, which describes engagement with institutions, and commoning, which describes engagement with grassroots communities – and by extension alternative economic frameworks that challenge the status quo. We contribute to this discourse to reflect, theoretically, on themes emerging from the triad of relationships between designers, institutions, and grassroots communities. We do so presenting ‘tales’, excerpts of our own PD work with institutions and grassroots communities. In this way, we present a nascent conceptual framework that offers analytical potential to promote pluralist understandings of PD scholarship and practices.

References

[1]

[n.d.]. A new home for former tenants. https://www.kbfprecinct.com.au/about/a-new-home-for-former-tenants/. Accessed: 2019-12-4.

[2]

2018. Logan City Council - Posts. https://www.facebook.com/logancitycouncil/posts/10155373721056898. Accessed: 2019-12-4.

[3]

2019. KBF Precinct - Posts. https://www.facebook.com/KBFPrecinct/posts/532693117276025. Accessed: 2019-12-4.

[4]

2019. Logan City Council - Posts. https://www.facebook.com/logancitycouncil/posts/10156372432046898. Accessed: 2019-12-4.

[5]

ABS. 2016. 2016 Census QuickStats: Logan. http://www.censusdata.abs.gov.au/census_services/getproduct/census/2016/quickstat/SED30046. Accessed: 2018-2-21.

[6]

Lisa Adkins. 2011. Cultural Intermediaries. In Encyclopedia of Consumer Culture, Dale Southerton (Ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, 389–391. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412994248.n147

[7]

Irina Anastasiu and Marcus Foth. 2020. Participation without Challenge? Re-Politicising Co-Creation in Smart Cities for Systemic Change. Forthcoming. (2020).

[8]

Irina Anastasiu, Marcus Foth, Ronald Schroeter, and Markus Rittenbruch. 2018. From Repositories to Switchboards: Local Governments as Facilitators of Open Data and Co-Creation. In Open Cities | Open Data: Collaborative Cities in the Information Era, Scott Hawken, Hoon Han, and Chris Pettit(Eds.). Palgrave Macmillan.

[9]

Gabriela Avram, Jaz Hee jeong Choi, Stefano De Paoli, Ann Light, Peter Lyle, and Maurizio Teli. 2019. Repositioning CoDesign in the age of platform capitalism: from sharing to caring. CoDesign 15, 3 (2019), 185–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2019.1638063 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2019.1638063

[10]

Karen Barad. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Duke University Press.

[11]

Chiara Bassetti, Francesco Botto, and Maurizio Teli. 2018. The Commonfare Project. Designing to Support Grassroots Welfare Initiatives. DigitCult - Scientific Journal on Digital Cultures 3, 1 (June 2018), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.4399/97888255159095

[12]

Chiara Bassetti, Mariacristina Sciannamblo, Peter Lyle, Maurizio Teli, Stefano De Paoli, and Antonella De Angeli. 2019. Co-designing for common values: creating hybrid spaces to nurture autonomous cooperation. CoDesign 15, 3 (2019), 256–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2019.1637897 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2019.1637897

[13]

Adam Beck. 2017. Go bold or go home: One mayor’s vision for collaborative city-building. https://www.thefifthestate.com.au/columns/spinifex/go-bold-or-go-home-one-mayors-vision-for-collaborative-city-building. Accessed: 2018-2-15.

[14]

Ana Bilandzic, Dario Casadevall, Marcus Foth, and Greg Hearn. 2018. Social and Spatial Precursors to Innovation: The Diversity Advantage of the Creative Fringe. 1 14, 1 (Nov. 2018).

[15]

Mark Bilandzic and Marcus Foth. 2017. Designing hubs for connected learning: Social, spatial and technological insights from Coworking, Hackerspaces and Meetup groups. In Place-Based Spaces for Networked Learning, Lucila Carvalho, Peter Goodyear, and Maarten de Laat(Eds.). Routledge, Oxon, United Kingdom, 191–206.

[16]

Erling Björgvinsson, Pelle Ehn, and Per-Anders Hillgren. 2010. Participatory Design and ”Democratizing Innovation”. In Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference(PDC ’10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1145/1900441.1900448 event-place: Sydney, Australia.

Digital Library

[17]

Susanne Bødker, Christian Dindler, and Ole Sejer Iversen. 2017. Tying Knots: Participatory Infrastructuring at Work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 26, 1-2 (April 2017), 245–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-017-9268-y

Digital Library

[18]

Susanne Bødker, Henrik Korsgaard, Peter Lyle, and Joanna Saad-Sulonen. 2016. Happenstance, Strategies and Tactics: Intrinsic Design in a Volunteer-based Community. In Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction(NordiCHI ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 10:1–10:10. https://doi.org/10.1145/2971485.2971564

Digital Library

[19]

Francesco Botto and Maurizio Teli. 2017. PIE News. A public design project toward commonfare. The Journal of Community Informatics 13, 2 (Aug. 2017). http://www.ci-journal.net/index.php/ciej/article/view/1383

[20]

Neil Brenner and Nik Theodore. 2002. Cities and the Geographies of “Actually Existing Neoliberalism”. Antipode 34, 3 (July 2002), 349–379.

[21]

Jacob Buur and Henry Larsen. 2010. Crossing Intentions in Participatory Innovation. In Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference (Sydney, Australia) (PDC ’10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 251–254.

Digital Library

[22]

Paolo Cardullo and Rob Kitchin. 2019. Smart urbanism and smart citizenship: The neoliberal logic of ‘citizen-focused’ smart cities in Europe. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 37, 5 (Aug. 2019), 813–830. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X18806508

[23]

Pål Castell. 2016. Institutional framing of citizen initiatives: a challenge for advancing public participation in Sweden. International Planning Studies 21, 4 (Oct. 2016), 305–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2015.1124756

[24]

Manuel Castells. 1981. Local government, urban crisis and political change. Institute of Urban & Regional Development, University of California, Berkeley.

[25]

Roberto Cibin, Maurizio Teli, and Sarah Robinson. 2019. Institutioning and Community Radio. A Comparative Perspective. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Communities & Technologies - Transforming Communities (Vienna, Austria) (C&T ’19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1145/3328320.3328392

Digital Library

[26]

Rachel Clarke, Sara Heitlinger, Ann Light, Laura Forlano, Marcus Foth, and Carl DiSalvo. 2019. More-than-human Participation: Design for Sustainable Smart City Futures. Interactions 26, 3 (April 2019), 60–63. https://doi.org/10.1145/3319075

Digital Library

[27]

Peter Conlin. 2015. The cultural intermediary in plutocratic times. European Journal of Cultural Studies 18, 3 (June 2015), 265–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549414526732

[28]

Logan City Council. 2018. Innovation Hubs Concept Design and Feasibility Study – Published Confidential Report. https://www.logan.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/491853/20180828ordinarycouncilminutespart2.pdf Accessed: 05/09/2019.

[29]

Clara Crivellaro, Rob Anderson, Daniel Lambton-Howard, Tom Nappey, Patrick Olivier, Vasilis Vlachokyriakos, Alexander Wilson, and Pete Wright. 2019. Infrastructuring Public Service Transformation: Creating Collaborative Spaces Between Communities and Institutions Through HCI Research. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 26, 3 (May 2019), 15:1–15:29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3310284

Digital Library

[30]

Clara Crivellaro, Rob Anderson, Daniel Lambton-Howard, Tom Nappey, Patrick Olivier, Vasilis Vlachokyriakos, Alexander Wilson, and Pete Wright. 2019. Infrastructuring Public Service Transformation: Creating Collaborative Spaces Between Communities and Institutions Through HCI Research. ACM Trans. Comput. -Hum. Interact. 26, 3 (May 2019), 15:1–15:29.

Digital Library

[31]

Stuart Cunningham. 2011. Developments in measuring the “creative” workforce. Cultural Trends 20, 1 (March 2011), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2011.540810

[32]

Nuno F da Cruz, Philipp Rode, and Michael McQuarrie. 2019. New urban governance: A review of current themes and future priorities. J. Urban Aff. 41, 1 (Jan. 2019), 1–19.

[33]

Carl DiSalvo, Andrew Clement, and Volkmar Pipek. 2012. Participatory design for, with, and by communities. In International Handbook of Participatory Design, Jesper Simonsen and Toni Robertson (Eds.). Routledge, Oxford, 182–209.

[34]

Carl DiSalvo and Andrew Clement and Volkmar Pipek. 2012. Communities: Participatory Design for, with and by communities. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203108543-15

[35]

Andy Dow, Rob Comber, and John Vines. 2019. Communities to the left of me, bureaucrats to the right…here I am, stuck in the middle. Interactions 26, 5 (Aug. 2019), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1145/3351735

Digital Library

[36]

Pelle Ehn. 2008. Participation in Design Things. In Proceedings of the Tenth Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design 2008 (Bloomington, Indiana) (PDC ’08). Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA, 92–101. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1795234.1795248

Digital Library

[37]

Hamid R. Ekbia and Bonnie A. Nardi. 2017. Heteromation, and Other Stories of Computing and Capitalism. MIT Press.

[38]

Carlos Estrada-Grajales, Marcus Foth, and Peta Mitchell. 2018. Urban imaginaries of co-creating the city: Local activism meets citizen peer-production. Journal of Peer Production11 (Jan. 2018).

[39]

Mark Fisher. 2009. Capitalist realism: Is there no alternative?John Hunt Publishing.

[40]

Marcus Foth. 2006. Sociocultural Animation. In Encyclopedia of Developing Regional Communities with Information and Communication Technology, Stewart Marshall, Wallace Taylor, and Xinghuo Yu (Eds.). IGI, Hershey, PA, 640–645. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-575-7.ch114

[41]

Marcus Foth and Barbara Adkins. 2006. A Research Design to Build Effective Partnerships between City Planners, Developers, Government and Urban Neighbourhood Communities. Journal of Community Informatics 2, 2 (Feb. 2006). http://ci-journal.net/index.php/ciej/article/view/292

[42]

Marcus Foth and Martin Brynskov. 2016. Participatory Action Research for Civic Engagement. In Civic Media: Technology, Design, Practice, Eric Gordon and Paul Mihailidis (Eds.). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 563–580.

[43]

Marcus Foth, Martin Brynskov, and Timo Ojala. 2015. Citizen’s Right to the Digital City: Urban Interfaces, Activism, and Placemaking. Springer.

[44]

Marcus Foth, Eric Paulos, Christine Satchell, and Paul Dourish. 2009. Pervasive Computing and Environmental Sustainability: Two Conference Workshops. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 8, 1 (2009), 78–81. https://doi.org/10.1109/mprv.2009.13

[45]

Marcus Foth, Martin Tomitsch, Christine Satchell, and M. Hank Haeusler. 2015. From Users to Citizens: Some Thoughts on Designing for Polity and Civics. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction (Parkville, VIC, Australia) (OzCHI ’15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 623–633. https://doi.org/10.1145/2838739.2838769

Digital Library

[46]

Marcus Foth and Troy John Turner. 2019. The Premise of Institutioning for the Proliferation of Communities and Technologies Research. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Communities & Technologies - Transforming Communities (Vienna, Austria) (C&T ’19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 24–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3328320.3328398

Digital Library

[47]

Christopher Frauenberger, Marcus Foth, and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2018. On Scale, Dialectics, and Affect: Pathways for Proliferating Participatory Design. In Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers - Volume 1(Hasselt and Genk, Belgium) (PDC ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 12, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3210586.3210591

Digital Library

[48]

Andrea Fumagalli, Rachele Serino, Sandro Gobetti, Cristina Morini, Giuseppe Allegri, Sabrina Del Pico, Luca Santini, Daniela Paes Leão, Merel Willemsen, Maja Pleic, Sandra Bencic, and Vladimir Cvijanovic. 2017. PIE News - Research Report. Deliverable D2.1 produced for the PIE News project (2017). http://pieproject.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/PIE_D2.1.pdf

[49]

Johannes Gärtner and Ina Wagner. 1996. Mapping Actors and Agendas: Political Frameworks of Systems Design and Participation. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 11, 3 (Sept. 1996), 187–214. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci1103_1

Digital Library

[50]

Alison Gilchrist. 2000. The Well-connected community: networking to the ’edge of chaos’. Community Development Journal 35, 3 (2000), 264–275. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/35.3.264

[51]

Alison Gilchrist. 2009. The Well-connected Community: A Networking Approach to Community Development. Policy Press, Bristol, UK.

[52]

S J Greene. 2003. Staged cities: Mega-events, slum clearance, and global capital. Yale Hum. Rts. & Dev. LJ(2003).

[53]

D. Hakken. 1999. Cyborgs@ cyberspace?: an ethnographer looks to the future. Routledge.

[54]

D. Hakken. 2003. The knowledge landscapes of cyberspace. Routledge.

[55]

David Hakken, Maurizio Teli, and Barbara Andrews. 2015. Beyond Capital: Values, Commons, Computing, and the Search for a Viable Future. Routledge.

Digital Library

[56]

Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri. 2009. Commonwealth. Harvard University Press.

[57]

David Harvey. 1989. From Managerialism to Entrepreneurialism: The Transformation in Urban Governance in Late Capitalism. Geogr. Ann. Ser. B 71, 1 (1989), 3–17.

[58]

David Harvey. 2007. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.

[59]

David Harvey. 2012. Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution. Verso Books.

[60]

Mike Hazas and Lisa Nathan. 2017. Digital Technology and Sustainability: Engaging the Paradox (1st ed.). Routledge, New York, NY, 10001.

[61]

Liesbeth Huybrechts, Henric Benesch, and Jon Geib. 2017. Institutioning: Participatory Design, Co-Design and the public realm. CoDesign 13, 3 (2017), 148–159. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15710882.2017.1355006

[62]

Natasha Iskander. 2018. Design Thinking Is Fundamentally Conservative and Preserves the Status Quo. Harvard Business Review (Sept. 2018).

[63]

Victor Kaptelinin and Liam J. Bannon. 2012. Interaction Design Beyond the Product: Creating Technology-Enhanced Activity Spaces. Human–Computer Interaction 27, 3 (2012), 277–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2011.646930 arXiv:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/07370024.2011.646930

[64]

Helena Karasti. 2014. Infrastructuring in Participatory Design. In Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers - Volume 1(PDC ’14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 141–150. https://doi.org/10.1145/2661435.2661450

Digital Library

[65]

Lucy Kimbell. 2011. Rethinking Design Thinking: Part I. Design and Culture 3, 3 (Nov. 2011), 285–306. https://doi.org/10.2752/175470811X13071166525216

[66]

Lucy Kimbell. 2012. Rethinking Design Thinking: Part II. Design and Culture 4, 2 (July 2012), 129–148. https://doi.org/10.2752/175470812X13281948975413

[67]

Stacey Kuznetsov, William Odom, Vicki Moulder, Carl DiSalvo, Tad Hirsch, Ron Wakkary, and Eric Paulos. 2011. HCI, Politics and the City: Engaging with Urban Grassroots Movements for Reflection and Action. In CHI ’11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (CHI EA ’11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2409–2412. https://doi.org/10.1145/1979742.1979568

Digital Library

[68]

John Law. 2010. The Greer-Bush test: on politics in STS. In Débordements: Mélanges offerts à Michel Callon, Madeleine Akrich, Yannick Barthe, Fabian Muniesa, and Phillippe Mustar (Eds.). Ecole des Mines, Paris, 296–281. http://www.ensmp.fr/presses/consultation.php?livreplus=158

[69]

John Law and John Urry. 2004. Enacting the social. Economy and Society 33, 3 (Aug. 2004), 390–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/0308514042000225716

[70]

Christopher A. Le Dantec. 2016. Designing Publics. MIT Press.

[71]

Christopher A. Le Dantec and Carl DiSalvo. 2013. Infrastructuring and the formation of publics in participatory design. Social Studies of Science 43, 2 (April 2013), 241–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312712471581

[72]

Yanki Lee. 2008. Design participation tactics: the challenges and new roles for designers in the co-design process. CoDesign 4, 1 (March 2008), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875613

[73]

Yanki Lee and Kwok Leung Denny Ho. 2010. ‘Teaching the Teachers’ Investigating New Inclusive Design Experience to Enable Secondary School Students to Think Creatively. In Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference (Sydney, Australia) (PDC ’10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 203–206. https://doi.org/10.1145/1900441.1900479

Digital Library

[74]

Henri Lefebvre. 2001. Comments on a New State Form. Antipode 33, 5 (Nov. 2001), 769–782.

[75]

Henri Lefebvre, Eleonore Kofman, and Elizabeth Lebas. 1996. Writings on cities. Vol. 63. Blackwell Oxford.

[76]

Ann Light and Yoko Akama. 2014. Structuring Future Social Relations: The Politics of Care in Participatory Practice. In Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers - Volume 1(PDC ’14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 151–160. https://doi.org/10.1145/2661435.2661438

Digital Library

[77]

Ann Light and Clodagh Miskelly. 2019. Platforms, Scales and Networks: Meshing a Local Sustainable Sharing Economy. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) (April 2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-019-09352-1

Digital Library

[78]

Ann Light, Alison Powell, and Irina Shklovski. 2017. Design for Existential Crisis in the Anthropocene Age. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Communities and Technologies (Troyes, France) (C&T ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 270–279. https://doi.org/10.1145/3083671.3083688

Digital Library

[79]

Kristina Lindström and Åsa Ståhl. 2014. Patchworking publics-in-the-making : design, media and public engagement. http://muep.mau.se/handle/2043/16093

[80]

Thomas Lodato and Carl DiSalvo. 2018. Institutional constraints: the forms and limits of participatory design in the public realm. In Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers - Volume 1. ACM, New York, NY, 5. https://doi.org/10.1145/3210586.3210595

Digital Library

[81]

Logan City Council. 2019. Logan cements innovation partnership. https://www.logan.qld.gov.au/about-council/news-and-publications/media-releases/vl-news/logan-cements-innovation-partnership. Accessed: 2019-9-5.

[82]

Peter Lyle, Mariacristina Sciannamblo, Cláudia Silva, and Maurizio Teli. 2018. Communication in Infrastructuring, or Tales from a Collaborative Project. In Proceedings of the 30th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (Melbourne, Australia) (OzCHI ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 156–161. https://doi.org/10.1145/3292147.3292179

Digital Library

[83]

Peter Lyle, Mariacristina Sciannamblo, and Maurizio Teli. 2017. Fostering Commonfare. Strategies and Tactics in a Collaborative Project. In Proceedings of the 29th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (Brisbane, Queensland, Australia) (OZCHI ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 443–447. https://doi.org/10.1145/3152771.3156154

Digital Library

[84]

Peter Lyle, Mariacristina Sciannamblo, and Maurizio Teli. 2018. Fostering Commonfare. Infrastructuring Autonomous Social Collaboration. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 452, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174026

Digital Library

[85]

Kerry Mallan, Marcus Foth, Ruth Greenaway, and Greg T Young. 2010. Serious playground: using Second Life to engage high school students in urban planning. Learning, Media and Technology 35, 2 (June 2010), 203–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2010.494432

[86]

Ezio Manzini. 2015. Design, when everybody designs: An introduction to design for social innovation. MIT press.

[87]

Noortje Marres. 2007. The Issues Deserve More Credit Pragmatist Contributions to the Study of Public Involvement in Controversy. Social Studies of Science 37, 5 (Oct. 2007), 759–780. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312706077367

[88]

Sanna Marttila and Andrea Botero. 2017. Infrastructuring for Cultural Commons. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) (April 2017), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-017-9273-1

[89]

Sanna Marttila, Andrea Botero, and Joanna Saad-Sulonen. 2014. Towards Commons Design in Participatory Design. In Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Industry Cases, Workshop Descriptions, Doctoral Consortium Papers, and Keynote Abstracts - Volume 2 (Windhoek, Namibia) (PDC ’14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 9–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/2662155.2662187

Digital Library

[90]

J McQueenie and E Lally. 2011. Expanding the horizons of possibility: the art of brokerage. The Art of Engagement: Culture, Collaboration, Innovation (2011).

[91]

Maria Menendez-Blanco, Antonella De Angeli, and Maurizio Teli. 2017. Biography of a Design Project through the Lens of a Facebook Page. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) (March 2017), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-017-9270-4

[92]

Oli Mould. 2014. Tactical Urbanism: The New Vernacular of the Creative City. Geography Compass 8, 8 (Aug. 2014), 529–539.

[93]

Elinor Ostrom. 1990. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge university press.

[94]

Karl Palmås and Otto von Busch. 2015. Quasi-Quisling: co-design and the assembly of collaborateurs. CoDesign 11, 3-4 (2015), 236–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2015.1081247

[95]

Sung-Yueh Perng. 2017. Video: Right to the Smart City Session 3: Co-creation and City Governance | The Programmable City. http://progcity.maynoothuniversity.ie/2017/10/video-right-to-the-smart-city-session-3-co-creation-and-city-governance/. Accessed: 2017-11-3.

[96]

Suvi Pihkala and Helena Karasti. 2018. Politics of Mattering in the Practices of Participatory Design. In Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Situated Actions, Workshops and Tutorial - Volume 2(PDC ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 13:1–13:5. https://doi.org/10.1145/3210604.3210616 event-place: Hasselt and Genk, Belgium.

Digital Library

[97]

Volkmar Pipek, Helena Karasti, and Geoffrey C. Bowker. 2017. A Preface to ‘Infrastructuring and Collaborative Design’. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 26, 1 (April 2017), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-017-9271-3

Digital Library

[98]

Volkmar Pipek and Volker Wulf. 2009. Infrastructuring: Toward an integrated perspective on the design and use of information technology. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 10, 5 (2009), 1. http://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1503&context=jais

[99]

Mark Purcell. 2014. Possible Worlds: Henri Lefebvre and the Right to the CIty. Journal of Urban Affairs 36, 1 (Feb. 2014), 141–154.

[100]

Jacques Rancière. 2009. Aesthetics and Its Discontents. Polity.

[101]

Paul A Rodgers, Giovanni Innella, and Craig Bremner. 2017. Paradoxes in Design Thinking. The Design Journal 20, sup1 (July 2017), S4444–S4458. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352941

[102]

Denis Roio and Aspasia Beneti. 2017. PIE News - Reputation Digital Currency and Network Dynamics Components. Deliverable D4.2 produced for the PIE News project (2017). http://pieproject.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/PIE_D4.2_FIN.pdf

[103]

Chris Rust. 2004. Design Enquiry: Tacit Knowledge and Invention in Science. Design Issues 20, 4 (Sept. 2004), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1162/0747936042311959

[104]

Saskia Sassen. 2013. Does the City Have Speech?Public Culture 25, 2 70 (March 2013), 209–221.

[105]

Mariacristina Sciannamblo, Peter Lyle, and Maurizio Teli. 2018. Fostering Commonfare. Entanglements between Participatory Design and Feminism. In Proceedings of DRS 2018 International Conference: Catalyst(DRS 2018), Vol. 2. Limerick, Ireland, 458–471. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2018.557

[106]

SEIFA. 2011. SEIFA disadvantage by small area | Logan City | profile.id. https://profile.id.com.au/logan/seifa-disadvantage-small-area?SeifaKey=40002. Accessed: 2018-2-16.

[107]

Anna Seravalli. 2012. Infrastructuring for opening production, from participatory design to participatory making?. In Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference: Exploratory Papers, Workshop Descriptions, Industry Cases-Volume 2. ACM, 53–56.

Digital Library

[108]

Anna Seravalli. 2014. Making Commons: attempts at composing prospects in the opening of production. Ph.D. Dissertation. Malmö University.

[109]

Anna Seravalli. 2018. Infrastructuring urban commons over time: learnings from two cases. In Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers;, Vol. 1. ACM.

Digital Library

[110]

Joe Shaw and Mark Graham. 2017. An Informational Right to the City? Code, Content, Control, and the Urbanization of Information. Antipode (Jan. 2017).

[111]

Adrian Smith. 2014. The Lucas Plan: What can it tell us about democratising technology today?The Guardian 22(2014).

[112]

Eduardo Srinivas, Nidhi; Staszowski. 2019. Trickery in Civic Design: Co-optation, Subversion and Politics. In Tricky Design: The Ethics of Things, Tom Fisher and Lorraine Gamman (Eds.). Bloomsbury, 59–68.

[113]

Maurizio Teli. 2015. Computing and the Common. Hints of a new utopia in Participatory Design. Aarhus Series on Human Centered Computing 1, 1 (Oct. 2015), 4. https://doi.org/10.7146/aahcc.v1i1.21318

Digital Library

[114]

Maurizio Teli. 2018. The Paradox of a Wise Man: Empirical Work and Future Making in David Hakken’s Cyberspace. Anthropology of Work Review 39, 1 (2018), 22–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/awr.12134

[115]

Maurizio Teli, Silvia Bordin, María Menéndez Blanco, Giusi Orabona, and Antonella De Angeli. 2015. Public design of digital commons in urban places: A case study. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 81 (2015), 17 – 30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2015.02.003 Transdisciplinary Approaches to Urban Computing.

Digital Library

[116]

Maurizio Teli, Angela Di Fiore, and Vincenzo D’Andrea. 2017. Computing and the common: a case of Participatory Design with think tanks. CoDesign 13, 2 (April 2017), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2017.1309439

[117]

Maurizio Teli, Peter Lyle, and Mariacristina Sciannamblo. 2018. Institutioning the Common: The Case of Commonfare. In Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers - Volume 1 (Hasselt and Genk, Belgium) (PDC ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 6, 11 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3210586.3210590

Digital Library

[118]

Maurizio Teli, Linda Tonolli, Angela Di Fiore, and Vincenzo D’Andrea. 2019. Computing and the common. Learning from Participatory Design in the age of platform capitalism.Università degli Studi di Trento, Trento, Italy. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3228359

[119]

Colleen Flynn Thapalia. 1996. Animation and leadership. In Participatory communication for social change, Jan Servaes, Thomas L. Jacobson, Shirley A. White (Ed.). Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 150–161.

[120]

Craig J Thompson and Gokcen Coskuner-Balli. 2007. Countervailing Market Responses to Corporate Co-optation and the Ideological Recruitment of Consumption Communities. J. Consum. Res. 34, 2 (Aug. 2007), 135–152.

[121]

Jakob Trischler, Timo Dietrich, and Sharyn Rundle-Thiele. 2019. Co-design: from expert- to user-driven ideas in public service design. Public Management Review 21, 11 (Nov. 2019), 1595–1619.

[122]

Vasillis Vlachokyriakos, Clara Crivellaro, Pete Wright, and Patrick Olivier. 2018. Infrastructuring the Solidarity Economy: Unpacking Strategies and Tactics in Designing Social Innovation. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 481:1–481:12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174055 event-place: Montreal QC, Canada.

Digital Library

[123]

Timothy Weaver. 2016. Urban crisis: The genealogy of a concept. Urban Stud. 54, 9 (March 2016), 2039–2055.

[124]

Rebecca Wickes. 2013. Bogans from the ’burbs: confronting our hidden biases. The Conversation (Feb. 2013).

[125]

Anna Wilson, Marco Sachy, Stefania Ottaviano, Francesco De Pellegrini, and Stefano De Paoli. 2017. PIE News - User Research Report and Scenarios. Deliverable D3.1 produced for the PIE News project (2017). http://pieproject.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/PIE_D3.1_FIN.pdf

[126]

Jacob Wilson. 2019. Logan City Council abandons plans for Kingston Butter Factory innovation hub. https://www.jimboombatimes.com.au/story/6338920/council-shifts-stance-on-innovation-hub/. Accessed: 2019-12-4.

[127]

Jacob O. Wobbrock and Julie A. Kientz. 2016. Research Contributions in Human-computer Interaction. Interactions 23, 3 (April 2016), 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1145/2907069

Digital Library

[128]

Phil Wood and Charles Landry. 2008. The Intercultural City: Planning for Diversity Advantage. Earthscan, London.

[129]

James Woudhuysen. 2011. The Craze for Design Thinking: Roots, A Critique, and toward an Alternative. Design Principles and Practices 5, 6 (2011), 235–248. https://doi.org/10.18848/1833-1874/CGP/v05i06/38216

[130]

Gina Zappia and Lynda Cheshire. 2014. Addressing concentrations of disadvantage.

Cited By

Valderrama Pineda ASkov IDahy HJokar Arsanjani JBonnevie IBørsen TTeli M(2024)Sustainability Meets Information Technologies: Recent Developments and Future PerspectivesSustainability10.3390/su1611449916:11(4499)Online publication date: 25-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114499
Munenzon D(2024)Co-Production for Equitable Governance in Community Climate Adaptation: Neighborhood Resilience in Houston, TexasUrban Planning10.17645/up.73389Online publication date: 15-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.17645/up.7338
Tsenova VTeli Mvan Donkersgoed JCauvin T(2024)Infrastructuring public history: when participation deals with the pastProceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2024: Full Papers - Volume 110.1145/3666094.3666106(145-158)Online publication date: 11-Aug-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3666094.3666106
Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Between Institutioning and Commoning: Grassroots Co-creation in Web3 Communities
Cross-Cultural Design
Abstract
A growing body of research is focusing on how to co-design with grassroots communities. Particularly within the vision of design for social innovation, the role of designers is shifting from traditional design leads to supporters of collaborative ...
The Premise of Institutioning for the Proliferation of Communities and Technologies Research
C&T '19: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Communities & Technologies - Transforming Communities

The role of institutions both as stakeholders in the work that communities and technologies (C&T) researchers are engaged in and as facilitators for ensuring continuity and scale-making of outcomes, impact and community benefits, is starting to be ...
Institutioning and Community Radio. A comparative perspective
C&T '19: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Communities & Technologies - Transforming Communities

In recent years, designers have pointed to the role of institutioning, the way in which design processes and institutions are mutually shaped, constrained and enabled. This paper seeks to expand this discussion to the field of grassroots communities, a ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

PDC '20: Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020 - Participation(s) Otherwise - Volume 1

June 2020

211 pages

ISBN:9781450377003

DOI:10.1145/3385010

Copyright © 2020 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 18 June 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Funding Sources

Conference

PDC '20

PDC '20: Participatory Design Conference 2020 - Participation Otherwise

June 15 - 20, 2020

Manizales, Colombia

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 49 of 289 submissions, 17%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

56
Total Citations
View Citations
605
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)139
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6

Reflects downloads up to 12 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Valderrama Pineda ASkov IDahy HJokar Arsanjani JBonnevie IBørsen TTeli M(2024)Sustainability Meets Information Technologies: Recent Developments and Future PerspectivesSustainability10.3390/su1611449916:11(4499)Online publication date: 25-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114499
Munenzon D(2024)Co-Production for Equitable Governance in Community Climate Adaptation: Neighborhood Resilience in Houston, TexasUrban Planning10.17645/up.73389Online publication date: 15-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.17645/up.7338
Tsenova VTeli Mvan Donkersgoed JCauvin T(2024)Infrastructuring public history: when participation deals with the pastProceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2024: Full Papers - Volume 110.1145/3666094.3666106(145-158)Online publication date: 11-Aug-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3666094.3666106
Christiansson JGrönvall ESaad-Sulonen J(2024)Mapping User Participation in the Design of Digital Public Services: Is Participatory Design Relevant?Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2024: Full Papers - Volume 110.1145/3666094.3666102(112-122)Online publication date: 11-Aug-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3666094.3666102
Kamio RVasile VHirose K(2024)Commoning the Once Abandoned Satoyama: Re-entangling Ecological Relationship in Rural JapanProceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2024: Exploratory Papers and Workshops - Volume 210.1145/3661455.3669880(122-126)Online publication date: 11-Aug-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3661455.3669880
Gautam A(2024)Reconfiguring Participatory Design to Resist AI RealismProceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2024: Exploratory Papers and Workshops - Volume 210.1145/3661455.3669867(31-36)Online publication date: 11-Aug-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3661455.3669867
DiSalvo CRothschild ASchenck LShapiro BDiSalvo B(2024)When Workers Want to Say No: A View into Critical Consciousness and Workplace Democracy in Data WorkProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36374338:CSCW1(1-24)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3637433
Jensen VLaursen KJensen RSmith R(2024)Imagining Sustainable Energy Communities: Design Narratives of Future Digital Technologies, Sites, and ParticipationProceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642609(1-17)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642609
Chauhan ASoden R(2024)Commoning as a Strategy for HCI Research and Design in South AsiaProceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642547(1-18)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642547
Gonsalves KFoth MCaldwell G(2024)Liminality, Situated Digital Tales, and the Pandemic: Three Cases of Radical Placemaking in AustraliaAntipode10.1111/anti.1303556:5(1642-1664)Online publication date: 2-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.13035
Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents