Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3385956.3418951acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesvrstConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

CorFix: Virtual Reality Cardiac Surgical Planning System for Designing Patient Specific Vascular Grafts

Published: 01 November 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Patients with single ventricle heart defect undergo Fontan surgery to reroute the blood flow from the lower body to the lung by connecting the inferior vena cava to the pulmonary artery using a vascular graft. Since each patient has an unique anatomical structure and blood flow dynamics, the graft design is a critical factor for maximizing the long-term survival rate of Fontan patients. Currently, designing and evaluating grafts involve computer aided design (CAD) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) skills. CAD incorporates numerous tools for design but lacks depth perception, surgical features, and design parameters for creating vascular grafts while visualizing and modifying patient anatomies. These limitations may lead to long lead times, inconsistent workflow, and surgically infeasible graft designs. In this paper, we introduce a novel virtual reality vascular graft modeling software - CorFix, that provides solutions to these challenges. CorFix includes several visualization features for performing diagnostics and surgical features with design guidelines for creating patient specific tube-shaped grafts in 3D. The designed vascular graft can be exported into a 3D model, which can be utilized for performing computational fluid dynamic analysis and 3D printing. The patient specific vascular graft designs in CorFix were compared to an engineering CAD software, SolidWorks (Dassault Systèmes, Vélizy-Villacoublay, France), by 8 participants. Through all participants had only received one time 10-minute tutorial on CorFix, CorFix had a higher success rate and 3.4 times faster performance in designing surgically feasible grafts than CAD. CorFix also scored higher in usability and lower in perceived workload than CAD. CorFix may be the tool that can enable medical doctors without 3D modeling background to design patient specific grafts.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (a15-kim-supplement.mp4)

References

[1]
Matthew P. Brennan, Alan Dardik, Narutoshi Hibino, Jason D. Roh, Gregory N. Nelson, Xenophon Papademitris, Toshiharu Shinoka, and Christopher K. Breuer. 2008. Tissue-engineered vascular grafts demonstrate evidence of growth and development when implanted in a juvenile animal model. 248, 3 (September 2008), 370–377. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e318184dcbd
[2]
Jan L. Bruse, Giuliano Giusti, Catriona Baker, Elena Cervi, Tain-Yen Hsia, Andrew M. Taylor, Silvia Schievano, and MOCHA Collaborative Group. 2017. Statistical Shape Modeling for Cavopulmonary Assist Device Development: Variability of Vascular Graft Geometry and Implications for Hemodynamics. 11, 2 (June 2017). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4035865
[3]
Richard Chin and Bruce Y. Lee. 2008. Chapter 6 - Periods, Sequences, and Trial Design. In Principles and Practice of Clinical Trial Medicine, Richard Chin and Bruce Y. Lee (Eds.). Academic Press, 95–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-373695-6.00006-5
[4]
Mark Dennis, Diana Zannino, Karin du Plessis, Andrew Bullock, Patrick J. S. Disney, Dorothy J. Radford, Tim Hornung, Leeanne Grigg, Rachael Cordina, Yves d’Udekem, and David S. Celermajer. 2018. Clinical Outcomes in Adolescents and Adults After the Fontan Procedure. 71, 9 (February 2018), 1009–1017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.12.054
[5]
Joseph D. Drews, Hideki Miyachi, and Toshiharu Shinoka. 2017. Tissue Engineered Vascular Grafts for Congenital Cardiac Disease: Clinical Experience and Current Status. 27, 8 (November 2017), 521–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcm.2017.06.013
[6]
Florin Gîrbacia, Andreea Beraru, Doru Talabă, and Gheorghe Mogan. 2014. Visual Depth Perception of 3D CAD Models in Desktop and Immersive Virtual Environments. 7, 5 (September 2014), 840–848. https://doi.org/10.15837/ijccc.2012.5.1339
[7]
Julien I. E. Hoffman and Samuel Kaplan. 2002. The incidence of congenital heart disease. 39, 12 (June 2002), 1890–1900.
[8]
Rickichard Izzo, David A. Steinman, Simone Manini, Elena Faggiano, and Luca Antiga. 2018. The Vascular Modeling Toolkit: A Python Library for the Analysis of Tubular Structures in Medical Images. (2018). https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00745
[9]
Byeol Kim, Yue-Hin Loke, Florence Stevenson, Dominik Siallagan, Paige Mass, Justin D. Opfermann, Narutoshi Hibino, Laura Olivieri, and Axel Krieger. 2019. Virtual Cardiac Surgical Planning Through Hemodynamics Simulation and Design Optimization of Fontan Grafts. In Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2019 (2019) (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Dinggang Shen, Tianming Liu, Terry M. Peters, Lawrence H. Staib, Caroline Essert, Sean Zhou, Pew-Thian Yap, and Ali Khan (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, 200–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32254-0_23
[10]
Yasuhiro Kotani, Devin Chetan, Jiaquan Zhu, Arezou Saedi, Lisa Zhao, Luc Mertens, Andrew N. Redington, John Coles, Christopher A. Caldarone, Glen S. Van Arsdell, and Osami Honjo. 2018. Fontan Failure and Death in Contemporary Fontan Circulation: Analysis From the Last Two Decades. 105, 4 (2018), 1240–1247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.10.047
[11]
Yue-Hin Loke, Byeol Kim, Paige Mass, Justin D. Opfermann, Narutoshi Hibino, Axel Krieger, and Laura Olivieri. 2020. Role of surgeon intuition and computer-aided design in Fontan optimization: a computational fluid dynamic simulation study. (January 2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.12.068
[12]
Mark Luffel, Mukul Sati, Jarek Rossignac, Ajit P. Yoganathan, Christopher M. Haggerty, Maria Restrepo, Timothy C. Slesnick, Kirk R. Kanter, Pedro del Nido, and Mark A. Fogel. 2016. SURGEM: A solid modeling tool for planning and optimizing pediatric heart surgeries. 70 (January 2016), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2015.06.018
[13]
Maria Restrepo, Mark Luffel, Jake Sebring, Kirk Kanter, Pedro del Nido, Alessandro Veneziani, Jarek Rossignac, and Ajit Yoganathan. 2015. Surgical Planning of the Total Cavopulmonary Connection: Robustness Analysis. 43, 6 (June 2015), 1321–1334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-014-1149-7
[14]
Dominik Siallagan, Yue-Hin Loke, Laura Olivieri, Justin Opfermann, Chin Siang Ong, Diane de Zélicourt, Anastasios Petrou, Marianne Schmid Daners, Vartan Kurtcuoglu, Mirko Meboldt, Kevin Nelson, Luca Vricella, Jed Johnson, Narutoshi Hibino, and Axel Krieger. 2018. Virtual surgical planning, flow simulation, and 3-dimensional electrospinning of patient-specific grafts to optimize Fontan hemodynamics. 155, 4 (April 2018), 1734–1742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.11.068
[15]
Enoch Yeung, Takahiro Inoue, Hiroshi Matsushita, Justin Opfermann, Paige Mass, Seda Aslan, Jed Johnson, Kevin Nelson, Byeol Kim, Laura Olivieri, Axel Krieger, and Narutoshi Hibino. 2019. In vivo Implantation of 3D Printed Customized Branched Tissue Engineered Vascular Graft in Porcine Model. (October 2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.09.138

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Virtual Reality Cardiac Surgical Planning Software (CorFix) for Designing Patient-Specific Vascular Grafts: Development and Pilot Usability StudyJMIR Cardio10.2196/354886:1(e35488)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2022
  • (2022)Surgical Planning and Optimization of Patient-Specific Fontan Grafts With Uncertain Post-Operative Boundary Conditions and Anastomosis DisplacementIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering10.1109/TBME.2022.317092269:11(3472-3483)Online publication date: Nov-2022
  • (2022)Semi-Automatic Planning and Three-Dimensional Electrospinning of Patient-Specific Grafts for Fontan SurgeryIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering10.1109/TBME.2021.309111369:1(186-198)Online publication date: Jan-2022

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
VRST '20: Proceedings of the 26th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology
November 2020
429 pages
ISBN:9781450376198
DOI:10.1145/3385956
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 November 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. 3D Modeling
  2. Applications
  3. Prototyping/Implementation
  4. Usability Study
  5. Virtual Reality

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

Conference

VRST '20

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 66 of 254 submissions, 26%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)11
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 25 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Virtual Reality Cardiac Surgical Planning Software (CorFix) for Designing Patient-Specific Vascular Grafts: Development and Pilot Usability StudyJMIR Cardio10.2196/354886:1(e35488)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2022
  • (2022)Surgical Planning and Optimization of Patient-Specific Fontan Grafts With Uncertain Post-Operative Boundary Conditions and Anastomosis DisplacementIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering10.1109/TBME.2022.317092269:11(3472-3483)Online publication date: Nov-2022
  • (2022)Semi-Automatic Planning and Three-Dimensional Electrospinning of Patient-Specific Grafts for Fontan SurgeryIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering10.1109/TBME.2021.309111369:1(186-198)Online publication date: Jan-2022

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media