Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3386292.3397119acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmsysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Comparison of HEVC-based OMAF-compliant 6K effective packings for viewport-dependent 360-degree video streaming

Published: 08 June 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Omnidirectional MediA Format (OMAF), a recent standard for representation of 360° video content, supports only equirectangular projection (ERP) and cubemap projection (CMP) and their region-wise packing with a 4K decoding-capability constraint on the end-user devices. Streaming of 4K content allows only a limited viewport resolution, which is lower than the resolution of many current head-mounted displays (HMDs). Two 6K-effective multi-resolution packing schemes for ERP and CMP are recommended by the OMAF standard, which take full advantages of HMDs with quad HD resolution while sticking with 4K-decoding constraint. This paper studies and compares the performance of these two packings in the context of viewport-adaptive streaming using the High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) standard and Zonal-PSNR test methodology. Overall, the experimental results show that rate-distortion performance of both packings sequence wise mixed but similar in average.

References

[1]
Y. Sánchez, R. Skupin, and T. Schierl, "Compressed domain video processing for tile based panoramic streaming using HEVC," Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), pp. 2244--2248, Sep. 2015.
[2]
A. Zare, A. Aminlou, M. M. Hannuksela and M. Gabbouj, "HEVC-compliant tile-based streaming of panoramic video for virtual reality applications," in Proc. of the 2016 ACM on Multimedia Conference, pp. 601--605, Oct. 2016.
[3]
R. Ghaznavi-Youvalari et al., "Comparison of HEVC coding schemes for tile-based viewport-adaptive streaming of omnidirectional video," 2017 IEEE 19th International Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing (MMSP), pp. 1--6, Luton, United Kingdom, 2017.
[4]
A. Zare, A. Aminlou, and M. M. Hannuksela, "Virtual reality content streaming: viewport-dependent and tile-based techniques," IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), Sep. 2017
[5]
M. M. Hannuksela, Y.-K. Wang, and A. Hourunranta, "An overview of the OMAF standard for 360° video," Proc. of Data Compression Conference, Mar. 2019.
[6]
M. M. Hannuksela, A. Zare, and Y. Sanchez, "[OMAF] Arrangements for achieving 6K effective resolution with the HEVC viewport dependent baseline profile," document: MPEG M41610, Oct. 2017.
[7]
A. Zare, A. Aminlou, and M. M. Hannuksela, "6K effective resolution with 4K HEVC decoding capability for OMAF-compliant 360° video streaming," Proc. of 23rd Packet Video Workshop, June 2018.
[8]
A. Zare, M. Homayouni, A. Aminlou, M. M. Hannuksela, and M. Gabbouj," 6K and 8K Effective Resolution with 4K HEVC Decoding Capability for 360 Video Streaming," ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications (TOMM), Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 1--22, July 2019.
[9]
X. Corbillon, F. De Simone, and G. Simon, "360-Degree Video Head Movement Dataset," in Proc. of the 8th ACM on Multimedia Systems Conference (MMSys'17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 199--204, 2017.
[10]
R. Ghaznavi-Youvalari, A. Aminlou, and M. M. Hannuksela, "Analysis of regional down-sampling methods for coding of omnidirectional video," Picture Coding Symposium (PCS), 2016.
[11]
A. Aminlou, K. Kammachi-Sreedhar, A. Zare and, M. M. Hannuksela, "Testing methodology for viewport-dependent encoding and streaming," ITU-T Joint Video Exploration Team (JVET), document JVET-D0079, Chengdu, Oct. 2016.
[12]
M. Yu, H. Lakshman and B. Girod, "A Framework to Evaluate Omnidirectional Video Coding Schemes," 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, pp. 31--36, Fukuoka, 2015.
[13]
A. Singla, S. Fremerey, A. Raake, P. List, and B. Feiten, "Measurement of User Exploration Behavior for Omnidirectional (360°) Videos with a Head Mounted Display," ITU-T Joint Video Exploration Team (JVET), document: JVET-H0050, Macao, Oct. 2017.
[14]
High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC), Fraunhofer Institut for Telecommunications, Heinrich Hertz Institute, Accessed Apr. 2016 from https://hevc.hhi.fraunhofer.de/.
[15]
J. Boyce, K. Suehring, X. Li, V. Seregin, "JVET common test conditions and software reference configurations," Joint Video Exploration Team of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, JVET-J1010, Apr. 2018, San Diego, USA.
[16]
<u>360Lib,_accessed_February_2019,_from https://jvet.hhi.fraunhofer.de/svn/svn_360Lib/tags/360Lib-5.0/</u>
[17]
G. Bjøntegard, "Calculation of average PSNR differences between RD-curves," document: VCEG-M33, Austin, 2001.

Index Terms

  1. Comparison of HEVC-based OMAF-compliant 6K effective packings for viewport-dependent 360-degree video streaming

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    PV '20: Proceedings of the 25th ACM Workshop on Packet Video
    June 2020
    47 pages
    ISBN:9781450379465
    DOI:10.1145/3386292
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 08 June 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. 360 video coding and streaming
    2. HEVC
    3. MCTS
    4. OMAF
    5. virtual reality

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    MMSys '20
    Sponsor:
    MMSys '20: 11th ACM Multimedia Systems Conference
    June 10 - 11, 2020
    Istanbul, Turkey

    Acceptance Rates

    PV '20 Paper Acceptance Rate 6 of 14 submissions, 43%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 8 of 23 submissions, 35%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 110
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
    Reflects downloads up to 26 Sep 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media