Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3386762.3391921acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesieeaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Integrated Fuzzy Multi Criteria Decision Making Approach for Sustainable Energy Technology Selection

Published: 29 May 2020 Publication History

Abstract

With the increasing world population and industrial steps taken to meet consumption, the need for energy has increased. Today, the increasing demand for energy of the countries that consider their economic growth has increased their energy consumption. This has led to a global energy crisis. The rapid depletion of energy resources in the world has led countries to look for new resources. The necessity of sustainable energy has made renewable resources a new target. At this point, the selection of the best energy technology becomes important. Hence, this study aims to select the most appropriate sustainable energy technology with multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods. The evaluation criteria with quantitative and qualitative characteristics are determined through a literature survey and with the opinions of industrial experts. The process of calculating the weights of the evaluation criteria and choosing the most appropriate alternative is a decision-making process. Decision-making processes based on the opinions of decision-makers, real-life problems, and their complexity include perceptual differences and uncertainties. Hence, the classical MCDM methods have been extended to fuzzy sets in order to eliminate the uncertainty caused by this perception-based fuzziness. The weights of the evaluation criteria are calculated by fuzzy AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) method. The most appropriate alternative is then selected using among candidate energy technologies with fuzzy VIKOR (Vise Kriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje) method. Finally, a case study is conducted to validate the proposed model. To compare the results, the fuzzy TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) method is utilized.

References

[1]
Saaty, T.L., 1980. The analytic hierarchy process: Planning priority setting. New York: McGraw Hill.
[2]
Opricovic, S., 1998. Multi-criteria Optimization of Civil Engineering Systems. Faculty of Civil Engineering, Belgrade.
[3]
Zadeh, L.A., 1965. Fuzzy set theory. Information and Control, 8(3), 338--353.
[4]
Ilbahar, E., Cebi, S. and Kahraman, C., 2019. A state-of-the-art review on multi-attribute renewable energy decision making. Energy Strategy Reviews, 25, 18--33.
[5]
Dat, L.Q., Chou, S.Y., Le, N.T., Wiguna, E., Yu, T.H-K., and Phuc, P.N.K. 2014. Selecting renewable energy technology via a fuzzy MCDM approach. In "Moving Integrated Product Development to Service Clouds in the Global Economy" J. Cha et al. (Eds.), 796--805.
[6]
Kaya, T. and Kahraman, C., 2011. Multicriteria decision making in energy planning using a modified fuzzy TOPSIS methodology. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(6), 6577--6585.
[7]
Büyüközkan, G. and Güleryüz, S., 2016. Fuzzy multi criteria decision making approach for evaluating sustainable energy technology alternatives. International journal of renewable energy sources, 1, 1--6.
[8]
Büyüközkan, G. and Güleryüz, S., 2017. Evaluation of Renewable Energy Resources in Turkey using an integrated MCDM approach with linguistic interval fuzzy preference relations. Energy, 123, 149--163.
[9]
Havle, C.A. and Kılıç, B., 2019. A hybrid approach based on the fuzzy AHP and HFACS framework for identifying and analyzing gross navigation errors during transatlantic flights. Journal of Air Transport Management, 76, 21--30.
[10]
Büyüközkan, G., Feyzioğlu, O. and Havle, C.A., 2019. Intuitionistic Fuzzy AHP Based Strategic Analysis of Service Quality in Digital Hospitality Industry. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 52(13), 1687--1692.
[11]
Büyüközkan G., Feyzioğlu O. and Havle C.A., 2020. Analysis of Success Factors in Aviation 4.0 Using Integrated Intuitionistic Fuzzy MCDM Methods. In: Kahraman C., Cebi S., Cevik Onar S., Oztaysi B., Tolga A., Sari I. (eds) Intelligent and Fuzzy Techniques in Big Data Analytics and Decision Making. INFUS 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1029. Springer, Cham
[12]
Ayağ, Z., 2005. A fuzzy AHP-based simulation approach to concept evaluation in a NPD environment. IIE transactions, 37(9), 827--842.
[13]
Ayağ, Z. and Özdemir, R.G., 2006. A fuzzy AHP approach to evaluating machine tool alternatives. Journal of intelligent manufacturing, 17(2), 179--190.
[14]
Büyüközkan, G., Çifçi, G. and Güleryüz, S., 2011. Strategic analysis of healthcare service quality using fuzzy AHP methodology. Expert systems with applications, 38(8), 9407--9424.
[15]
Lee, A.R., 1995. Application of modified fuzzy AHP method to analyze bolting sequence of structural joints.
[16]
Saaty, T.L., 1977. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures, J. Math.Psychol. 15 (1977) 234--281.
[17]
Akyüz, G., 2012. Bulanık VIKOR yöntemi ile tedarikçi seçimi. Ataturk University Journal of Economics & Administrative Sciences, 26(1).
[18]
Güler, M., and Büyüközkan, G., 2019. Analysis of Digital Transformation Strategies with an Integrated Fuzzy AHP-Axiomatic Design Methodology. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 52(13), 1186--1191.
[19]
Yildiz, A. and Deveci, M., 2013. Bulanik VIKOR Yöntemine Dayali Personel Seçim Süreci/Based on Fuzzy VIKOR Approach to Personnel Selection Process. Ege Akademik Bakis, 13(4), 427.
[20]
Chen, L.Y. and Wang, T.-C., 2009. "Optimizing partners' choice in IS/IT outsourcing projects: The strategic decision of fuzzy VIKOR", International Journal of Production Economics, 120(1), ss.233--242.
[21]
Hsieh, T.-Y., Lu, S.-T. and Tzeng, G.-H., 2004. Fuzzy MCDM approach for planning and design tenders' selection in public office buildings. International Journal of Project Management, 22(7), ss.573--584.
[22]
Hwang, C. L., and Yoon, K., 1981. Methods for multiple attribute decision making. In Multiple attribute decision making (pp. 58--191). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
[23]
Büyüközkan, G., Göçer, F. and Feyzioğlu, O., 2018. Cloud computing technology selection based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy MCDM methods. Soft Computing, 22(15), 5091--5114.
[24]
Şenel, M., Şenel, B. and Havle, C.A., 2018. Risk Analysis of Ports in Maritime Industry in Turkey using FMEA Based Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach. In ITM Web of Conferences (Vol. 22, p. 01018). EDP Sciences.
[25]
Chen, C.T., 2000. Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy sets and systems, 114(1), 1--9.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Sustainable Technology Innovations: Optimizing Inverter Selection for Solar PV and Wind Turbine Systems Using Fuzzy MCDM2024 IEEE International Symposium on Consumer Technology (ISCT)10.1109/ISCT62336.2024.10791259(662-668)Online publication date: 13-Aug-2024
  • (2020)Supportiveness of Low-Carbon Energy Technology Policy Using Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision-Making MethodologiesMathematics10.3390/math80711788:7(1178)Online publication date: 17-Jul-2020

Index Terms

  1. Integrated Fuzzy Multi Criteria Decision Making Approach for Sustainable Energy Technology Selection

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      IEEA '20: Proceedings of the 2020 The 9th International Conference on Informatics, Environment, Energy and Applications
      March 2020
      138 pages
      ISBN:9781450376891
      DOI:10.1145/3386762
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 29 May 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Sustainable energy
      2. energy technology selection
      3. fuzzy AHP
      4. fuzzy MCDM
      5. fuzzy TOPSIS
      6. fuzzy VIKOR

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Conference

      IEEA 2020

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 11 Feb 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Sustainable Technology Innovations: Optimizing Inverter Selection for Solar PV and Wind Turbine Systems Using Fuzzy MCDM2024 IEEE International Symposium on Consumer Technology (ISCT)10.1109/ISCT62336.2024.10791259(662-668)Online publication date: 13-Aug-2024
      • (2020)Supportiveness of Low-Carbon Energy Technology Policy Using Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision-Making MethodologiesMathematics10.3390/math80711788:7(1178)Online publication date: 17-Jul-2020

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media