Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3394231.3397899acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswebsciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Constructive Approach for Early Extraction of Viral Spreading Social Issues from Twitter

Published: 06 July 2020 Publication History

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a rapid increase in viral spreading social issues that emerge in the public consciousness through the fast spread of information online. With the advent of social media, they sometimes yield unexpected side effects such as product boycotts. Therefore, it is important to recognize them as the earliest and take preventive measures against them. Existing researches on social issue extraction have mainly focused on news channels and newspapers as the primary information sources. However, such approaches cannot be applied for the early extraction of viral spreading social issues because their epicenter is the online public’s opinion. In this study, we propose a constructive method inspired by a social issues research approach, called constructivism, for the early extraction of viral spreading social issues. It is characteristic that our method identifies the keywords related to social issues using information obtained from the claims-making activities on Twitter and Twitter-user clustering. We conducted experiments on a large Twitter dataset comprising tens of billions of tweets and the proposed method successfully extracted six out of the seven viral spreading social issues earlier than their first TV news coverage. Furthermore, the proposed method could identify such cases approximately two weeks earlier, on average, than the first national TV news coverage.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (3394231.3397899.mp4)
Presentation Video

References

[1]
Apoorv Agarwal, Boyi Xie, Ilia Vovsha, Owen Rambow, and Rebecca J Passonneau. 2011. Sentiment analysis of twitter data. In Proceedings of the 1st ACL workshop on language in social media. 30–38.
[2]
Eiji Aramaki, Sachiko Maskawa, and Mizuki Morita. 2011. Twitter catches the flu: detecting influenza epidemics using Twitter. In Proceedings of the 2011 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing. 1568–1576.
[3]
Mario Cataldi, Luigi Di Caro, and Claudio Schifanella. 2010. Emerging Topic Detection on Twitter Based on Temporal and Social Terms Evaluation. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Workshop on MDM.
[4]
Tianqi Chen and Carlos Guestrin. 2016. Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. In Proceedings of the 22nd acm sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. 785–794.
[5]
Yu-Liang Chi. 2009. A consumer-centric design approach to develop comprehensive knowledge-based systems for keyword discovery. Expert Systems with Applications 36 (03 2009), 2481–2493.
[6]
Ernesto Diaz-Aviles and Avaré Stewart. 2012. Tracking twitter for epidemic intelligence: case study: Ehec/hus outbreak in germany, 2011. In Proceedings of the 4th annual ACM web science conference. 82–85.
[7]
Richard C Fuller and Myers Richard R. 1941. Some Aspects of a Theory of Social Problems.American Sociological Review 6, 1 (1941), 24–32.
[8]
Gabriel Pui Cheong Fung, Jeffrey Xu Yu, Philip S Yu, and Hongjun Lu. 2005. Parameter free bursty events detection in text streams. In Proceedings of the 31st international conference on Very large data bases. 181–192.
[9]
Taiichi Hashimoto, Koji Murakami, Takashi Inui, Kazuo Utsumi, and Masamichi Ishikawa. 2008. Topic Extraction and Social problem detection based on Document Clustering. Journal of Social Technology Research 5 (2008), 216–226.
[10]
Dan He and D Stott Parker. 2010. Topic dynamics: an alternative model of bursts in streams of topics. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. 443–452.
[11]
Sepp Hochreiter and Jürgen Schmidhuber. 1997. Long Short-term Memory. Neural computation 9 (12 1997), 1735–80.
[12]
Philip N Howard, Aiden Duffy, Deen Freelon, Muzammil M Hussain, Will Mari, and Marwa Maziad. 2011. Opening closed regimes: what was the role of social media during the Arab Spring?Available at SSRN 2595096(2011).
[13]
JAPAN PRESS RESEARCH INSTITUTE. 2019. Summary of the 12th National Opinion Poll on Media (2019). Technical Report. https://www.chosakai.gr.jp/project/notification/
[14]
Shiau Chou Jen, Masano Ochi, Takeshi Sakaki, Junichirou Mori, and Ichirou Sakata. 2019. Building a dataset with crowdsourcing for early social issues extraction. ICS 2019-ICS-196, 9 (2019), 1–5.
[15]
Dami Jeong, Jaeseok Kim, Gi-Nam Kim, Jong-Uk Heo, Byung-Won On, and Mijung Kang. 2013. A Proposal of a Keyword Extraction System for Detecting Social Issues. Journal of Intelligence and Information Systems 19 (09 2013).
[16]
Yoon Kim. 2014. Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classification. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). 1746–1751.
[17]
Jon Kleingberg. 2002. Bursty and hierarchical structure in streams. Proc. 8th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, July 2002 (2002), 1–25.
[18]
Jure Leskovec, Andreas Krause, Carlos Guestrin, Christos Faloutsos, Jeanne VanBriesen, and Natalie Glance. 2007. Cost-effective outbreak detection in networks. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. 420–429.
[19]
Chenliang Li, Aixin Sun, and Anwitaman Datta. 2012. Twevent: segment-based event detection from tweets. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management. 155–164.
[20]
Shogo Matsuno, Sakae Mizuki, and Takeshi Sakaki. 2019. Constructing of the word embedding model by Japanese large scale SNS + Web corpus. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of JSAI JSAI2019 (2019).
[21]
Tomas Mikolov, Ilya Sutskever, Kai Chen, Greg S Corrado, and Jeff Dean. 2013. Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In Advances in neural information processing systems. 3111–3119.
[22]
Yuhiro Mizunuma, Shuhei Yamamoto, Yutaro Yamaguchi, Atsushi Ikeuchi, Tetsuji Satoh, and Satoshi Shimada. 2014. Twitter bursts: Analysis of their occurrences and classifications. Proceedings of the 8th international conference on digital society (2014), 182–187.
[23]
Tetsuya Nasukawa and Jeonghee Yi. 2003. Sentiment analysis: Capturing favorability using natural language processing. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Knowledge capture. 70–77.
[24]
Jonathon Read. 2005. Using emoticons to reduce dependency in machine learning techniques for sentiment classification. In Proceedings of the ACL student research workshop. 43–48.
[25]
Sven Rill, Dirk Reinel, Jörg Scheidt, and Roberto V Zicari. 2014. Politwi: Early detection of emerging political topics on twitter and the impact on concept-level sentiment analysis. Knowledge-Based Systems 69 (2014), 24–33.
[26]
Takeshi Sakaki, Makoto Okazaki, and Yutaka Matsuo. 2010. Earthquake shakes Twitter users: real-time event detection by social sensors. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on world wide web. 851–860.
[27]
Jagan Sankaranarayanan, Hanan Samet, Benjamin E Teitler, Michael D Lieberman, and Jon Sperling. 2009. Twitterstand: news in tweets. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM sigspatial international conference on advances in geographic information systems. 42–51.
[28]
Malcolm Spector and John I Kitsuse. 1977. Constructing social problems. Menlo Park, Calif. : Cummings Pub. Co.
[29]
Dario Stojanovski, Gjorgji Strezoski, Gjorgji Madjarov, and Ivica Dimitrovski. 2016. Finki at semeval-2016 task 4: Deep learning architecture for twitter sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the 10th international workshop on semantic evaluation. 149–154.
[30]
Jong Suh. 2019. SocialTERM-Extractor: Identifying and Predicting Social-Problem-Specific Key Noun Terms from a Large Number of Online News Articles Using Text Mining and Machine Learning Techniques. Sustainability 11 (01 2019), 196.
[31]
Kazuo Utsumi, Takashi Inui, Taiichi Hashimoto, Koji Murakami, and Masamichi Ishikawa. 2009. Extraction of Critical Knowledge Concerning Socila Problems and Technological Solutions. Journal of Social Technology Research 6 (2009), 187–198.
[32]
Xin Wang, Yuanchao Liu, Chengjie Sun, Baoxun Wang, and Xiaolong Wang. 2015. Predicting Polarities of Tweets by Composing Word Embeddings with Long Short-Term Memory. In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers). 1343–1353.
[33]
Jianshu Weng and Bu-Sung Lee. 2011. Event detection in twitter. In Proceedings of the 5th international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media.
[34]
Wei Xie, Feida Zhu, Jing Jiang, Ee-Peng Lim, and Ke Wang. 2016. Topicsketch: Real-time bursty topic detection from twitter. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 28, 8(2016), 2216–2229.
[35]
Jiejun Xu, Daniel Xie, Tsai-Ching Lu, and John Cafeo. 2017. EDSV: Emerging Defect Surveillance for Vehicles. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM on web science conference. 219–222.
[36]
Jie Yin, Sarvnaz Karimi, Andrew Lampert, Mark Cameron, Bella Robinson, and Robert Power. 2015. Using social media to enhance emergency situation awareness. In Proceedings of the 24th international joint conference on artificial intelligence.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
WebSci '20: Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Web Science
July 2020
361 pages
ISBN:9781450379892
DOI:10.1145/3394231
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike International 4.0 License.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 06 July 2020

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Constructivism
  2. Twitter
  3. social issues extraction
  4. viral spreading social issues

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

  • Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists

Conference

WebSci '20
Sponsor:
WebSci '20: 12th ACM Conference on Web Science
July 6 - 10, 2020
Southampton, United Kingdom

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 245 of 933 submissions, 26%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 770
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)167
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)29
Reflects downloads up to 06 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Get Access

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media