Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3394486.3403251acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Deep Exogenous and Endogenous Influence Combination for Social Chatter Intensity Prediction

Published: 20 August 2020 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Modeling user engagement dynamics on social media has compelling applications in market trend analysis, user-persona detection, and political discourse mining. Most existing approaches depend heavily on knowledge of the underlying user network. However, a large number of discussions happen on platforms that either lack any reliable social network (news portal, blogs, Buzzfeed) or reveal only partially the inter-user ties (Reddit, Stackoverflow). Many approaches require observing a discussion for some considerable period before they can make useful predictions. In real-time streaming scenarios, observations incur costs. Lastly, most models do not capture complex interactions between exogenous events (such as news articles published externally) and in-network effects (such as follow-up discussions on Reddit) to determine engagement levels. To address the three limitations noted above, we propose a novel framework, ChatterNet, which, to our knowledge, is the first that can model and predict user engagement without considering the underlying user network. Given streams of timestamped news articles and discussions, the task is to observe the streams for a short period leading up to a time horizon, then predict chatter: the volume of discussions through a specified period after the horizon. ChatterNet processes text from news and discussions using a novel time-evolving recurrent network architecture that captures both temporal properties within news and discussions, as well as influence of news on discussions. We report on extensive experiments using a two-month-long discussion corpus of Reddit, and a contemporaneous corpus of online news articles from the Common Crawl. ChatterNet shows considerable improvements beyond recent state-of-the-art models of engagement prediction. Detailed studies controlling observation and prediction windows, over 43 different subreddits, yield further useful insights.

    References

    [1]
    Sitaram Asur and Bernardo A Huberman. 2010. Predicting the future with social media. In ICWSM. 492--499.
    [2]
    Reema Aswani, SP Ghrera, Arpan Kumar Kar, and Satish Chandra. 2017. Identifying buzz in social media: a hybrid approach using artificial bee colony and k-nearest neighbors for outlier detection. SNAM, Vol. 7, 1 (2017), 38.
    [3]
    Erik Cambria, Soujanya Poria, Devamanyu Hazarika, and Kenneth Kwok. 2018. SenticNet 5: Discovering conceptual primitives for sentiment analysis by means of context embeddings. In AAAI. 1795--1802.
    [4]
    Justin Cheng, Lada Adamic, P Alex Dow, Jon Michael Kleinberg, and Jure Leskovec. 2014. Can cascades be predicted?. In WWW Conference. ACM, 925--936.
    [5]
    Abir De, Sourangshu Bhattacharya, and Niloy Ganguly. 2018. Demarcating endogenous and exogenous opinion diffusion process on social networks. In WWW Conference. 549--558.
    [6]
    Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2019. BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding. In NAACL-HLT. 4171--4186.
    [7]
    Subhabrata Dutta, Dipankar Das, and Tanmoy Chakraborty. 2019. Modeling Engagement Dynamics of Online Discussions using Relativistic Gravitational Theory. In ICDM. IEEE, 180--189.
    [8]
    Mats Ekström and Adam Shehata. 2018. Social media, porous boundaries, and the development of online political engagement among young citizens. New Media & Society, Vol. 20, 2 (2018), 740--759.
    [9]
    Marco Guerini, Carlo Strapparava, and Gozde Ozbal. 2011. Exploring text virality in social networks. In ICWSM. 1--10.
    [10]
    Felix Hamborg, Norman Meuschke, Corinna Breitinger, and Bela Gipp. 2017. news-please: A Generic News Crawler and Extractor. In ICIS, Maria Gaede, Violeta Trkulja, and Vivien Petra (Eds.). 218--223.
    [11]
    Lala Hu. 2018. Luxury brand communication on social media: A qualitative study of the Chinese market. In 2018 Global Marketing Conference at Tokyo. 160--161.
    [12]
    Henry Jenkins, Sangita Shresthova, Liana Gamber-Thompson, Neta Kligler-Vilenchik, and Arely Zimmerman. 2018. By any media necessary: The new youth activism. Vol. 3. NYU Press.
    [13]
    Nal Kalchbrenner, Edward Grefenstette, and Phil Blunsom. 2014. A convolutional neural network for modelling sentences. arXiv preprint arXiv:1404.2188 (2014).
    [14]
    M Laeeq Khan. 2017. Social media engagement: What motivates user participation and consumption on YouTube? Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 66 (2017), 236--247.
    [15]
    Yoon Kim. 2014. Convolutional neural networks for sentence classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1408.5882 (2014).
    [16]
    Diederik P Kingma and Jimmy Ba. 2014. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 (2014).
    [17]
    Ryota Kobayashi and Renaud Lambiotte. 2016. TiDeH: Time-dependent Hawkes process for predicting retweet dynamics. In Tenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media .
    [18]
    Andrey Kupavskii, Liudmila Ostroumova, Alexey Umnov, Svyatoslav Usachev, Pavel Serdyukov, Gleb Gusev, and Andrey Kustarev. 2012. Prediction of retweet cascade size over time. In CIKM. 2335--2338.
    [19]
    Lian Fen Lee, Amy P Hutton, and Susan Shu. 2015. The role of social media in the capital market: Evidence from consumer product recalls. Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 53, 2 (2015), 367--404.
    [20]
    Cheng Li, Jiaqi Ma, Xiaoxiao Guo, and Qiaozhu Mei. 2017. DeepCas: An End-to-end Predictor of Information Cascades. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2017, Perth, Australia, April 3--7, 2017, Rick Barrett, Rick Cummings, Eugene Agichtein, and Evgeniy Gabrilovich (Eds.). ACM, 577--586. https://doi.org/10.1145/3038912.3052643
    [21]
    Ryosuke Nishi, Taro Takaguchi, Keigo Oka, Takanori Maehara, Masashi Toyoda, Ken-ichi Kawarabayashi, and Naoki Masuda. 2016. Reply trees in twitter: data analysis and branching process models. SNAM, Vol. 6, 1 (2016), 1--13.
    [22]
    Sinya Peng, Vincent S Tseng, Che-Wei Liang, and Man-Kwan Shan. 2018. Emerging Product Topics Prediction in Social Media without Social Structure Information. In WWW Conference (Companion). 1661--1668.
    [23]
    Benjamin Shulman, Amit Sharma, and Dan Cosley. 2016. Predictability of popularity: Gaps between prediction and understanding. In Web and Social Media. AAAI, 348--357.
    [24]
    Ke Wang, Mohit Bansal, and Jan-Michael Frahm. 2018. Retweet wars: Tweet popularity prediction via dynamic multimodal regression. In WACV. 1842--1851.
    [25]
    Lilian Weng, Alessandro Flammini, Alessandro Vespignani, and Fillipo Menczer. 2012. Competition among memes in a world with limited attention. Sci. Rep., Vol. 2 (2012), 335.
    [26]
    Sheng Yu and Subhash Kak. 2012. A Survey of Prediction Using Social Media. arxiv: 1203.1647
    [27]
    Qingyuan Zhao, Murat A Erdogdu, Hera Y He, Anand Rajaraman, and Jure Leskovec. 2015. SEISMIC: A self-exciting point process model for predicting tweet popularity. In KDD Conference. 1513--1522.
    [28]
    Zhou Zhao, Lingtao Meng, Jun Xiao, Min Yang, Fei Wu, Deng Cai, Xiaofei He, and Yueting Zhuang. 2018. Attentional Image Retweet Modeling via Multi-Faceted Ranking Network Learning. In IJCAI. 3184--3190.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)ExoFIA: Deep Exogenous Assistance in the Prediction of the Influence of Fake News with Social Media ExplainabilityApplied Sciences10.3390/app1311678213:11(6782)Online publication date: 2-Jun-2023
    • (2023)Modeling information diffusion in social media: data-driven observationsFrontiers in Big Data10.3389/fdata.2023.11351916Online publication date: 17-May-2023
    • (2022)Proactively Reducing the Hate Intensity of Online Posts via Hate Speech NormalizationProceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining10.1145/3534678.3539161(3524-3534)Online publication date: 14-Aug-2022
    • Show More Cited By

    Index Terms

    1. Deep Exogenous and Endogenous Influence Combination for Social Chatter Intensity Prediction

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      KDD '20: Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining
      August 2020
      3664 pages
      ISBN:9781450379984
      DOI:10.1145/3394486
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 20 August 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. chatter prediction
      2. deep learning
      3. exogenous influence
      4. reddit

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Conference

      KDD '20
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 1,133 of 8,635 submissions, 13%

      Upcoming Conference

      KDD '24

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)35
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
      Reflects downloads up to 12 Aug 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2023)ExoFIA: Deep Exogenous Assistance in the Prediction of the Influence of Fake News with Social Media ExplainabilityApplied Sciences10.3390/app1311678213:11(6782)Online publication date: 2-Jun-2023
      • (2023)Modeling information diffusion in social media: data-driven observationsFrontiers in Big Data10.3389/fdata.2023.11351916Online publication date: 17-May-2023
      • (2022)Proactively Reducing the Hate Intensity of Online Posts via Hate Speech NormalizationProceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining10.1145/3534678.3539161(3524-3534)Online publication date: 14-Aug-2022
      • (2022)Nipping in the budACM SIGWEB Newsletter10.1145/3522598.35226012022:Winter(1-9)Online publication date: 17-Mar-2022
      • (2022)"This is damn slick!"Proceedings of the 44th International Conference on Software Engineering10.1145/3510003.3510121(2116-2129)Online publication date: 21-May-2022
      • (2022)Incomplete Gamma Integrals for Deep Cascade Prediction using Content, Network, and Exogenous SignalsIEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering10.1109/TKDE.2022.3174206(1-12)Online publication date: 2022
      • (2022)Social media activity forecasting with exogenous and endogenous signalsSocial Network Analysis and Mining10.1007/s13278-022-00927-312:1Online publication date: 8-Aug-2022
      • (2021)Learning to select exogenous events for marked temporal point processProceedings of the 35th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems10.5555/3540261.3540288(347-361)Online publication date: 6-Dec-2021
      • (2021)From Symbols to Embeddings: A Tale of Two Representations in Computational Social ScienceJournal of Social Computing10.23919/JSC.2021.00112:2(103-156)Online publication date: Jun-2021
      • (2021)Hate is the New Infodemic: A Topic-aware Modeling of Hate Speech Diffusion on Twitter2021 IEEE 37th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE)10.1109/ICDE51399.2021.00050(504-515)Online publication date: Apr-2021
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media