Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3396851.3397723acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagese-energyConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Network-aware Participation of Aggregators in NEM Energy and FCAS Markets

Published: 18 June 2020 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    The integration of distributed energy resources (DER) has created a demand-side flexibility which can be traded in the electricity market by aggregators. However, generating bids that accurately represent the flexibility of consumers while maintaining the network limits is a challenging task--especially since the aggregators typically do not have access to the network data nor the bids of other aggregators. To overcome these challenges, we propose a price-generating bidding strategy enabling aggregators that share the same distribution network to participate in the energy and FCAS (frequency control ancillary service) markets. Complying with the Australian National Electricity Market (NEM), we develop energy-FCAS trapeziums that represent aggregators' energy and FCAS bid interdependency across their fleet of flexible consumers. We also obtain the prices at which the aggregators should submit their energy and FCAS bids. Moreover, to ensure network feasibility for any market clearing output, we obtain the network feasible region using three sets of optimal power flows (OPFs). Aggregators' trapeziums are then restricted to be within the network feasible region, making them ready to submit to the NEM. We illustrate the effectiveness of our proposed approach using 207 consumers being served by three aggregators in a 69-bus distribution network. The results show that our approach could increase aggregators' benefits by 18%, on average, compared to a price-taking approach.

    References

    [1]
    Yi Ding, Preben Nyeng, Jacob Østergaard, Maj Dang Trong, Salvador Pineda, Koen Kok, George B Huitema, and Ove S Grande. Ecogrid EU-a large scale smart grids demonstration of real time market-based integration of numerous small DER and DR. IEEE, 2012.
    [2]
    Paul Scott, Dan Gordon, Evan Franklin, Laura Jones, and Sylvie Thiébaux. Network-aware coordination of residential distributed energy resources. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2019.
    [3]
    Marina González Vayá and Göran Andersson. Optimal bidding strategy of a plug-in electric vehicle aggregator in day-ahead electricity markets under uncertainly. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 30(5):2375--2385, 2014.
    [4]
    Yue Wang, Hao Liang, and Venkata Dinavahi. Two-stage stochastic demand response in smart grid considering random appliance usage patterns. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, 12(18):4163--4171, 2018.
    [5]
    Enxin Yao, Vincent WS Wong, and Robert Schober. Optimization of aggregate capacity of pevs for frequency regulation service in day-ahead market. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 9(4):3519--3529, 2018.
    [6]
    Stig Ødegaard Ottesen, Asgeir Tomasgard, and Stein-Erik Fleten. Multi market bidding strategies for demand side flexibility aggregators in electricity markets. Energy, 149:120--134, 2018.
    [7]
    Jose P Iria, Filipe Joel Soares, and Manuel A Matos. Trading small prosumers flexibility in the energy and tertiary reserve markets. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 10(3):2371--2382, 2018.
    [8]
    Soon-Jeong Lee, Jun-Hyeok Kim, Chul-Hwan Kim, Seul-Ki Kim, Eung-Sang Kim, Doo-Ung Kim, Khawaja Khalid Mehmood, and Saad Ullah Khan. Coordinated control algorithm for distributed battery energy storage systems for mitigating voltage and frequency deviations. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 7(3):1713--1722, 2016.
    [9]
    Diwei Zhu and Ying-Jun Angela Zhang. Optimal coordinated control of multiple battery energy storage systems for primary frequency regulation. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 34(1):555--565, 2019.
    [10]
    José Iria, Filipe Soares, and Manuel Matos. Optimal bidding strategy for an aggregator of prosumers in energy and secondary reserve markets. Applied Energy, 238:1361--1372, 2019.
    [11]
    Seyyed Mahdi Noori Rahim Abadi, Masoume Mahmoodi, Paul Scott, Lachlan Blackhall, and Sylvie Thiébaux. Active management of LV residential networks under high PV penetration. In 2019 IEEE Milan PowerTech, pages 1--6. IEEE, 2019.
    [12]
    Alexdandre Oudalov, Daniel Chartouni, Christian Ohler, and Gerhard Linhofer. Value analysis of battery energy storage applications in power systems. In Power Systems Conference and Exposition, 2006. PSCE'06. 2006 IEEE PES, pages 2206--2211. IEEE, 2006.
    [13]
    Behzad Vatandoust, Ali Ahmadian, Masoud Golka, Ali Elkamel, Ali Almansoori, and Mohammad Ghaljehei. Risk-averse optimal bidding of electric vehicles and energy storage aggregator in day-ahead frequency regulation market. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2018.
    [14]
    Ahmad Attarha, Paul Scott, and Sylvie Thiébaux. Affmefy adjustable robust ADMM for residential DER coordination in distribution networks. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2019.
    [15]
    Soroush Shafiee, Hamidreza Zareipour, and Andrew M Knight. Developing bidding and offering curves of a price-maker energy storage facility based on robust optimization. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 10(1):650--660, 2017.
    [16]
    Soroush Shafiee, Payam Zamani-Dehkordi, Hamidreza Zareipour, and Andrew M Knight. Economic assessment of a price-maker energy storage facility in the alberta electricity market. Energy, 111:537--547, 2016.
    [17]
    Juan Arteaga and Hamidreza Zareipour. A price-maker/price-taker model for the operation of battery storage systems in electricity markets. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2019.
    [18]
    The Frequency operating standard. https://www.aemc.gov.au, 2017.
    [19]
    Jenny Riesz, Joel Gilmore, and Iain MacGill. Frequency control ancillary service market design: Insights from the australian national electricity market. The Electricity Journal, 28(3):86--99, 2015.
    [20]
    Australian Energy Market Operator. Guide to ancillary services in the national electricity market. Australian Energy Market Operator: Melbourne, Australia, 2015.
    [21]
    Australian Energy Market Operator. http://www.aemo.com.au.
    [22]
    Masoud Farivar and Steven H Low. Branch flow model: Relaxations and convexification---part i. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 28(3):2554--2564, 2013.
    [23]
    JS Savier and Debapriya Das. Impact of network reconfiguration on loss allocation of radial distribution systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 22(4):2473--2480, 2007.
    [24]
    Reposit Power. http://www.repositpower.com.
    [25]
    Iain Dunning, Joey Huchette, and Miles Lubin. Jump: A modeling language for mathematical optimization. SIAM Review, 59(2):295--320, 2017.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Towards Distributed Energy Markets: Accurate and Intuitive DLMP DecompositionIEEE Transactions on Energy Markets, Policy and Regulation10.1109/TEMPR.2024.33609962:2(240-253)Online publication date: Jun-2024
    • (2024)Shaped operating envelopes: Distribution network capacity allocation for market servicesElectric Power Systems Research10.1016/j.epsr.2024.110639234(110639)Online publication date: Sep-2024
    • (2023)Adjustable Price-Sensitive DER Bidding Within Network EnvelopesIEEE Transactions on Energy Markets, Policy and Regulation10.1109/TEMPR.2023.33039111:4(248-258)Online publication date: Dec-2023
    • Show More Cited By

    Index Terms

    1. Network-aware Participation of Aggregators in NEM Energy and FCAS Markets

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      e-Energy '20: Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM International Conference on Future Energy Systems
      June 2020
      601 pages
      ISBN:9781450380096
      DOI:10.1145/3396851
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 18 June 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Bidding strategy
      2. Electricity Market
      3. FCAS
      4. NEM
      5. OPF

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Conference

      e-Energy '20
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      e-Energy '20 Paper Acceptance Rate 77 of 173 submissions, 45%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 160 of 446 submissions, 36%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)27
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Towards Distributed Energy Markets: Accurate and Intuitive DLMP DecompositionIEEE Transactions on Energy Markets, Policy and Regulation10.1109/TEMPR.2024.33609962:2(240-253)Online publication date: Jun-2024
      • (2024)Shaped operating envelopes: Distribution network capacity allocation for market servicesElectric Power Systems Research10.1016/j.epsr.2024.110639234(110639)Online publication date: Sep-2024
      • (2023)Adjustable Price-Sensitive DER Bidding Within Network EnvelopesIEEE Transactions on Energy Markets, Policy and Regulation10.1109/TEMPR.2023.33039111:4(248-258)Online publication date: Dec-2023
      • (2023)An optimized trading strategy for an energy storage systems aggregator in an ancillary service marketJournal of Energy Storage10.1016/j.est.2023.10858872(108588)Online publication date: Nov-2023
      • (2022)CIMTradeProceedings of the Thirteenth ACM International Conference on Future Energy Systems10.1145/3538637.3538857(277-288)Online publication date: 28-Jun-2022
      • (2022)The Effect of Battery Storage Participation in Australian Wholesale Electricity and Frequency Control Markets2022 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies - Asia (ISGT Asia)10.1109/ISGTAsia54193.2022.10003493(600-604)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2022
      • (2021)Network-Secure and Price-Elastic Aggregator Bidding in Energy and Reserve MarketsIEEE Transactions on Smart Grid10.1109/TSG.2021.304946412:3(2284-2294)Online publication date: May-2021
      • (2021)Network-Aware Distributed Electricity Markets: A Techno-Economic Comparative Study2021 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies - Asia (ISGT Asia)10.1109/ISGTAsia49270.2021.9715558(1-5)Online publication date: 5-Dec-2021
      • (2020)Bidding Strategy for Two-Sided Electricity MarketsProceedings of the 7th ACM International Conference on Systems for Energy-Efficient Buildings, Cities, and Transportation10.1145/3408308.3427976(110-119)Online publication date: 18-Nov-2020

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media