research-article

An Overview of Ten Years of Liquid Democracy Research

Author:

Alois PaulinAuthors Info & Claims

dg.o '20: Proceedings of the 21st Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research

Pages 116 - 121

https://doi.org/10.1145/3396956.3396963

Published: 16 June 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Ten years have passed since in 2009 two independent technical systems pioneered liquid democracy (LD): Župa, a system developed for the Student Organisation of FIS in Slovenia, followed closely by LiquidFeedback, which served the Pirate Party in Berlin, Germany. First academic papers appeared in 2010 targeting the e-democracy research community, and later followed by researchers from artificial intelligence. This paper provides an overview of the scholarly discussions that developed in the past decade, and the technical implementations and initiatives that emerged.

References

[1]

A. Paulin, ‘Controlling Citizens or Controlling the State?’, in Smart City Governance, Elsevier, 2019, pp. 61–79.

[2]

A. Paulin, ‘Through Liquid Democracy to Sustainable Non-Bureaucratic Government - Harnessing the Power of ICTs for a novel form of Digital Government’, JeDEM, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 216–230, 2014.

[3]

C. Blum and C. I. Zuber, ‘Liquid Democracy: Potentials, Problems, and Perspectives: Liquid Democracy’, Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 162–182, Jun. 2016.

[4]

S. Münz, ‘Votorola - eine Softwareumgebung für Demokratie’, Webkompetenz - Geschriebenes und Dahingeschriebenes von Stefan Münz, 03-Nov-2009. [Online]. Available: http://webkompetenz.wikidot.com/blog:64. [Accessed: 01-Jan-2020].

[5]

A. Paulin, ‘Župa - Grassroots E-Democracy Revolution on the Web’, in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on E-Democracy, Krems, 2010, vol. 265, pp. 113–123.

[6]

A. Paulin, ‘Župa’, Technical Report, University of Maribor, Novo mesto, Slovenia, 2010.

[7]

J. Behrens, A. Kistner, A. Nitsche, and B. Swierczek, The principles of LiquidFeedback, 1st edition. Berlin: Interaktive Demokratie e.V, 2014.

[8]

B. Swierczek, ‘Five Years of Liquid Democracy in Germany’, The Liquid Democracy Journal, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 8–19, Mar. 2014.

[9]

R. Hainisch and A. Paulin, ‘Civicracy: Establishing a Competent and Responsible Council of Representatives Based on Liquid Democracy’, in Proceedings of the International Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government 2016, Krems, Austria, 2016, pp. 10–16.

[10]

S. Hardt and L. C. R. Lopes, ‘Google Votes: A Liquid Democracy Experiment on a Corporate Social Network’. Technical Disclosure Commons, 06-May-2015.

[11]

S. Siri Sovereign. 2019.

[12]

P. Boldi, C. Monti, M. Santini, and S. Vigna, ‘Liquid FM: Recommending Music through Viscous Democracy’, arXiv:1503.08604v1, Mar. 2015.

[13]

A. Paulin, ‘The Quantum Budget vs. Participatory Budgeting’, in Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 2019, pp. 154–158.

Digital Library

[14]

X. Fan, P. Li, Y. Zeng, and X. Zhou, ‘Implement Liquid Democracy on Ethereum: A Fast Algorithm for Realtime Self-Tally Voting System’. arXiv:1911.08774v1, 21-Nov-2019.

[15]

Z. Christoff and D. Grossi, ‘Liquid Democracy: An Analysis in Binary Aggregation and Diffusion’, arXiv:1612.08048v2, Nov. 2018.

[16]

Z. Christoff and D. Grossi, ‘Binary Voting with Delegable Proxy: An Analysis of Liquid Democracy’, Electron. Proc. Theor. Comput. Sci., vol. 251, pp. 134–150, Jul. 2017.

[17]

P. Gölz, A. Kahng, S. Mackenzie, and A. D. Procaccia, ‘The Fluid Mechanics of Liquid Democracy’, arXiv:1808.01906v1, Aug. 2018.

[18]

A. Kahng, S. Mackenzie, and A. D. Procaccia, ‘Liquid Democracy: An Algorithmic Perspective’, in Proceedings of 32nd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2018.

[19]

T. von der Elbe, ‘Software-Vergleich’. 17-Aug-2015.

[20]

A. Downing and B. Molloy, Polly. 2013.

[21]

C. Velikanov, ‘О демократии обыкновенной, прямой и электронной [On Traditional-, Direct- and e-Democracy]’, Otchestvennye zapisky, vol. 6, no. 57, pp. 203–30, 2013.

[22]

S. Harraß, ‘Liquid Democracy im Feldversuch – Beteiligungsmöglichkeiten in der Enquete-Kommission “Internet und digitale Gesellschaft” des Deutschen Bundestages’, in Digitale Politikvermittlung, M. Friedrichsen and R. A. Kohn, Eds. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2015, pp. 485–498.

[23]

J. Ramos, ‘Liquid Democracy and the Futures of Governance’, in The Future Internet, vol. 17, J. Winter and R. Ono, Eds. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015, pp. 173–191.

[24]

A. E. Fischer, Ed., ‘Schlussbericht der Enquete-Kommission “Internet und digitale Gesellschaft” [Final Report of the Commission of Enquiry “The Internet and the Digital Society”]’. Deutscher Bundestag, 05-Apr-2013.

[25]

O. P. Boyd, ‘Differences in Grassroots Parties’ e-Participation Systems’, Örebro University, 2008.

[26]

www.makeyourlaws.org, ‘Make Your Laws - Our Principles’, 14-Sep-2015. [Online]. Available: https://web.archive.org/web/20150914233854/https://www.makeyourlaws.org/principles. [Accessed: 02-Jan-2020].

[27]

D. Crichton, ‘Liquid democracy uses blockchain to fix politics, and now you can vote for it’, TechCrunch, 24-Feb-2018. [Online]. Available: https://techcrunch.com/2018/02/24/liquid-democracy-uses-blockchain. [Accessed: 02-Jan-2020].

[28]

G. Boella ‘WeGovNow: A Map Based Platform to Engage the Local Civic Society’, in Companion of the The Web Conference 2018 on The Web Conference 2018 – WWW’ 18, Lyon, France, 2018, pp. 1215–1219.

Digital Library

[29]

D. Bloembergen, D. Grossi, and M. Lackner, ‘On Rational Delegations in Liquid Democracy’, presented at the 33rd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2018.

[30]

M. Brill, ‘Interactive Democracy’, in Proc. of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2018)., Stockholm, Sweden, 2018.

[31]

A. Antonini ‘WeGovNow Deliverable D3.5 - Final release of WeGovNow platform prototype’. 22-Dec-2017.

[32]

A. Paulin, ‘WeGovNow - use of LiquidFeedback’, 12-Dec-2019.

[33]

M. Allan and C. Weilbach, ‘Votorola Shortlog’. [Online]. Available: http://reluk.ca/var/repo/hg/votorola/shortlog. [Accessed: 01-Jan-2020].

[34]

‘Contributors to Votorola’. [Online]. Available: http://reluk.ca/project/Votorola/contributors.xht. [Accessed: 01-Jan-2020].

[35]

M. Allan, ‘Votorola’, 2014. [Online]. Available: http://reluk.ca/project/Votorola/home-2014.html. [Accessed: 01-Jan-2020].

[36]

‘Liquid Democracy/Votorola’, 16-Sep-2011. [Online]. Available: https://wiki.piratenpartei.de/Liquid_Democracy/Votorola. [Accessed: 01-Jan-2020].

[37]

I. Korthagen, C. F. Larsen, and R. Ø. Nielsen, ‘Non-binding Decision-Making’, in European E-Democracy in Practice, L. Hennen, I. van Keulen, I. Korthagen, G. Aichholzer, R. Lindner, and R. Ø. Nielsen, Eds. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020, pp. 237–271.

[38]

C. C. Kling, J. Kunegis, H. Hartmann, M. Strohmaier, and S. Staab, ‘Voting Behaviour and Power in Online Democracy: A Study of LiquidFeedback in Germany's Pirate Party’, presented at the 9th International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 2015, vol. abs/1503.07723.

[39]

S. Jabbusch, ‘Liquid Democracy in der Piratenpartei - Eine neue Chance für innerparteiliche Demokratie im 21. Jahrhundert? [Liquid Democracy in the Pirate Party - A New Chance for Interparty-Democracy in the 21th Century?]’, Universität Greifswald, Philosophische Fakultät, Greifswald, 2011.

[40]

B. Bullwinkel and L. Probst, ‘Innerparteiliche Willensbildung und Entscheidungsprozesse durch digitale Partizipation. Ein Praxistest des Konzepts der Liquid Democracy’, ZParl, pp. 382–401, 2014.

[41]

S. Buck, ‘Liquid Democracy - eine Realisierung deliberativer Hoffnungen? Zum Selbstverständnis der Piratenpartei’, Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 625–635, 2012.

[42]

U. Zolleis, S. Prokopf, and F. Strauch, Die Piratenpartei - Hype oder Herausforderung für die deutsche Parteienlandschaft [The Pirate Party - Hype or Challenge for the German Party Landscape]. München: Hanns-Seidel-Stiftung, 2010.

[43]

A. Litvinenko, ‘Social Media and Perspectives of Liquid Democracy on the Example of Political Communication of the Pirate Party in Germany’, in Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on eGovernment, Barcelona, 2012, pp. 403–408.

[44]

F. Vogelmann, ‘Flüssige Betriebssysteme. Liquid democracy als demokratische Machttechnologie’, Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, vol. 48, 2012.

[45]

F. De Cindio and S. Stortone, ‘Experimenting LiquidFeedback for Online Deliberation in Civic Contexts’, in Electronic Participation, vol. 8075, M. A. Wimmer, E. Tambouris, and A. Macintosh, Eds. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013, pp. 147–158.

[46]

‘Liquid Friesland’. [Online]. Available: https://liquid-friesland.de. [Accessed: 06-Jan-2020].

[47]

S. Siri ‘The Social Smart Contract’. The Democracy Earth Foundation, 25-Jan-2018.

[48]

P. Mancini, ‘Why it is Time to Redesign Our Political System’, European View, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 69–75, Jun. 2015.

[49]

D. Reichert and E. Panek, ‘Alles ist im Fluss – die fließenden Ebenen einer Liquid Democracy’, in Internet und Partizipation, K. Voss, Ed. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2014, pp. 299–310.

[50]

I. Caragiannis and E. Micha, ‘A Contribution to the Critique of Liquid Democracy’, in Proceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2019.

[51]

A. Paulin, ‘Applied Nonmediated Governance: Common Scenarios’, in Smart City Governance, Elsevier, 2019, pp. 251–270.

[52]

A. Paulin, ‘Model for Nonmediated Governance’, in Smart City Governance, Elsevier, 2019, pp. 187–201.

[53]

A. Paulin, Smart City Governance. Elsevier, 2019.

Cited By

Revel MBoehmer NColley RBrill MFaliszewski PElkind EDastani MSichman JAlechina NDignum V(2024)Selecting Representative Bodies: An Axiomatic ViewProceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems10.5555/3635637.3663261(2701-2705)Online publication date: 6-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3635637.3663261
Armstrong BLarson KDastani MSichman JAlechina NDignum V(2024)Liquid Democracy for Low-Cost Ensemble PruningProceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems10.5555/3635637.3663085(2135-2137)Online publication date: 6-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3635637.3663085
Amanatidis GFilos-Ratsikas ALazos PMarkakis EPapasotiropoulos GDastani MSichman JAlechina NDignum V(2024)On the Potential and Limitations of Proxy Voting: Delegation with Incomplete VotesProceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems10.5555/3635637.3662851(49-57)Online publication date: 6-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3635637.3662851
Show More Cited By

Recommendations

A tool for liberty or oppression? A cross-national study of the Internets influence on democracy

This study tackles the inquiry of whether the Internet is a tool for democracy or oppression.E-participation did not significantly mediate political evolution from electoral democracy to liberal democracy.Online filtering or censorship significantly ...
e-government... not e-governance... not e-democracy not now!: not ever?
ICEGOV '10: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance

The argument that I offer in this paper, supported by literature and empirical evidence, is that e-government is just that -- electronic government -- and little more. I define e-government as the delivery by alternate, electronic means of governmental ...
E-democracy at the American grassroots: Not now … not likely?

Using data from two national surveys conducted in 2006 and 2011, we empirically examine whether, and the extent to which, grassroots or local governments in the United States have adopted electronic democracy e-democracy. We contrast this empirical ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

dg.o '20: Proceedings of the 21st Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research

June 2020

389 pages

ISBN:9781450387910

DOI:10.1145/3396956

Editors:
Seok-Jin Eom,
Jooho Lee

Copyright © 2020 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 16 June 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Conference

dg.o '20

dg.o '20: The 21st Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research

June 15 - 19, 2020

Seoul, Republic of Korea

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 150 of 271 submissions, 55%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

18
Total Citations
View Citations
505
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)116
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)10

Reflects downloads up to 16 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Revel MBoehmer NColley RBrill MFaliszewski PElkind EDastani MSichman JAlechina NDignum V(2024)Selecting Representative Bodies: An Axiomatic ViewProceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems10.5555/3635637.3663261(2701-2705)Online publication date: 6-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3635637.3663261
Armstrong BLarson KDastani MSichman JAlechina NDignum V(2024)Liquid Democracy for Low-Cost Ensemble PruningProceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems10.5555/3635637.3663085(2135-2137)Online publication date: 6-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3635637.3663085
Amanatidis GFilos-Ratsikas ALazos PMarkakis EPapasotiropoulos GDastani MSichman JAlechina NDignum V(2024)On the Potential and Limitations of Proxy Voting: Delegation with Incomplete VotesProceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems10.5555/3635637.3662851(49-57)Online publication date: 6-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3635637.3662851
Wang RKovacs MKryssanov VSerdult U(2024)A BERT-based Approach to Alleviate Civic Tech Tools Overcrowding: A case study of Taiwan's JOIN e-petition systemProceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research10.1145/3657054.3657136(695-702)Online publication date: 11-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3657054.3657136
Fritsch RMüller MWattenhofer R(2024)Analyzing Voting Power in Decentralized Governance: Who controls DAOs?Blockchain: Research and Applications10.1016/j.bcra.2024.100208(100208)Online publication date: Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcra.2024.100208
Sun XMasur JAbramowitz BMattei NZheng ZEvans RShpitser I(2023)Pandering in a (flexible) representative democracyProceedings of the Thirty-Ninth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence10.5555/3625834.3626027(2058-2068)Online publication date: 31-Jul-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3625834.3626027
Sun XMasur JAbramowitz BMattei NZheng ZAgmon NAn BRicci AYeoh W(2023)Does Delegating Votes Protect Against Pandering Candidates?Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems10.5555/3545946.3599043(2685-2687)Online publication date: 30-May-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3545946.3599043
Butterworth GBooth R(2023)A Contribution to the Defense of Liquid DemocracyProceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research10.1145/3598469.3598496(244-250)Online publication date: 11-Jul-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3598469.3598496
Daliparthi VMomen NTutschku KDe Prado M(2023)ViSDM: A Liquid Democracy based Visual Data Marketplace for Sovereign Crowdsourcing Data CollectionProceedings of the 2023 European Interdisciplinary Cybersecurity Conference10.1145/3590777.3590794(108-115)Online publication date: 14-Jun-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3590777.3590794
Allayarova NKadirov DKrisjanous JJohnstone M(2023)Liquid consumption and Islam: The Continual Drift Adjustment (CDA) frameworkJournal of Islamic Marketing10.1108/JIMA-05-2022-013815:1(101-123)Online publication date: 20-Mar-2023
https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-05-2022-0138
Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents