The Cost of Citizen Access to Government Services in China: A Survey of Eight Common Services in All Provinces
Pages 319 - 321
Abstract
To provide better services to citizens is an essential goal of digital government. People believe that online services will be more convenient to citizens because they can reduce the costs by avoiding visits to agency physical offices. There are few researches working on the situation that whether this cost reduction actually comes true or not for citizens. In this poster we argue that it is necessary to evaluate the quality of online services because of the huge investments in building the necessary platforms. To understand the cost for citizen to access government services of the provinces in China, this study reviews the eight most common services offered by all 31 provincial government websites in three consecutive years (2018-2020). The costs are calculated using two factors; the first is the number of visits to physical offices needed and the second is the level of government providing the service, which represents the distance a person needs to travel. Thus, the total cost for citizens in this case is related to how many times they have to visit physical offices and how far away those offices are. This approach allows to have an estimate of the cost for each online service in each of the 31 provincial governments.
References
[1]
Brown, T. L., & Potoski, M. (2003). Transaction costs and institutional explanations for government service production decisions. Journal of Public Administration research and theory, 13(4), 441-468.
[2]
Hindle, G. A., & Hindle, A. (2010). Developing geographical indicators of mileage-related costs: a case study exploring travelling public services in English local areas. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 61(5), 714-722.
[3]
Carruthers, J. I., & Ulfarsson, G. F. (2003). Urban sprawl and the cost of public services. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 30(4), 503-522.
[4]
Shah, N. M., Wang, W., & Bishai, D. M. (2011). Comparing private sector family planning services to government and NGO services in Ethiopia and Pakistan: how do social franchises compare across quality, equity and cost?. Health policy and planning, 26(suppl_1), i63-i71.
[5]
Thakuriah, P., Persky, J., Soot, S., & Sriraj, P. S. (2013). Costs and benefits of employment transportation for low-wage workers: An assessment of job access public transportation services. Evaluation and program planning, 37, 31-42.
[6]
Porcher, S. (2017). The ‘hidden costs’ of water provision: New evidence from the relationship between contracting-out and price in French water public services. Utilities Policy, 48, 166-175.
[7]
Alam, M., & Rashed, M. (2010). Delivering countywide cost-effective and better education services: the models of public private partnership (PPP). Delivering Countywide Cost-Effective and Better Education Services: The Models of Public Private Partnership (PPP), 1840-1503.
[8]
Gradus, R., Schoute, M., & Dijkgraaf, E. (2018). The effects of market concentration on costs of local public services: empirical evidence from Dutch waste collection. Local Government Studies, 44(1), 86-104. DIO:https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2017.1380629
[9]
Breuille, M. L., Grivault, C., Le Gallo, J., & Le Goix, R. (2019). Impact of densification on the costs of infrastructures and public services [Impact de la densification sur les coûts des infrastructures et services publics] (No. halshs-02139638).
[10]
Jorgensen, F., & Mathisen, T. A. (2010). Using standardized revenue and cost norm analyses to reveal subsidy fraud in contracted public transport services. Transport reviews, 30(3), 299-313.
[11]
Official website of Chinese government. Notice of the General Office of the State Council on Printing and Distributing the Implementation Plan of Further Deepening the "Internet + Government Service" and Promoting the "One Network, One Door, One Time" Reform of Government Service. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2018-06/22/content_5300516.htm
[12]
2018 E-Government Survey.https://publicadministration.un.org/en/Research/UN-e-Government-Surveys
[13]
Prochaska F J, Schrimper R A. (1973). Opportunity Cost of Time and Other Socioeconomic Effects on Away-From-Home Food Consumption. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 55(4):595-603.
[14]
Shu Wang, Chao lv. (2011). Study on How to Reduce the Waiting Time of Customers in the Business Hall of the Communication Industry Journal of Changsha Communications Vocational and Technical College, 10 (03): 30-33.
[15]
Per capita disposable income and consumption expenditure of residents in 2019. http://tjj.sh.gov.cn/html/sjfb/202001/1004407.html
[16]
Yi Long (2018). Research on Benefit Evaluation of Government Information Sharing under G2C Scenario. Shanghai, 2018:87
Recommendations
E-Government Services Online: An Exploratory Study on Tax E-Filing in Malaysia
E-filing is a new service launched in the year 2005 by the Malaysian Inland Revenue Board. This is in line with the government's vision to leverage on the Internet technology in extending its services to the citizens and to further embrace the cutting-...
Using E-Government to Reinforce Government–Citizen Relationships
A comparison of the United States and China shows that electronic government (e-government) can be used to enhance citizens' access to government as much as government's access to citizens. Both countries are using e-government initiatives as vehicles to ...
Digital Divide and Citizen Use of E-Government in China's Municipalities
By using the 2014 randomly sampling survey of 36 major cities in China, the author empirically examines the status and predictors of e-government use by citizens. The author finds that nearly one third of the respondents accessed online services of city ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Copyright © 2020 Owner/Author.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 16 June 2020
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Poster
- Research
- Refereed limited
Funding Sources
- Shanghai Planning Office of Philosophy and Social Science
Conference
dg.o '20
dg.o '20: The 21st Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research
June 15 - 19, 2020
Seoul, Republic of Korea
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 150 of 271 submissions, 55%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 76Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)5
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 16 Oct 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format