Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3396956.3398262acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesdg-oConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Understanding Willingness to Share Information among Citizens and Public Organizations:: The Case of Emergency Preparedness and Response

Published: 16 June 2020 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    The relationships between citizens and public organizations have long been explored, particularly through the lenses of service provision and, more recently, participation and engagement. Previous research has described how citizens could interact with government agencies as well as some of the reasons why they are willing to do it and why governments promote or hinder certain interactions with citizens. However, the complexities of these relationships, especially as they evolve into more collaborative expressions such as information sharing, require further study. Particularly, willingness to share information among citizens and public organizations is not well understood and more details about different information sharing flows and a diversity of perspectives are needed. Using data from focus groups with first responders and local residents in a rural community, this paper analyzes multiple interactions focusing on specific information sharing flows (i.e. Citizen to Government; Government to Citizen; Citizen to Citizen; and Government to Government). We found that there are important differences and similarities between the perspectives of first responders and local residents in terms of the importance and rationale of sharing information among different actors. We are also providing more details about the willingness of citizens and first responders to share information with different actors in the context of emergency management in a rural community as well as some of their main reasons.

    References

    [1]
    Eshuis, Jasper and Edwards, Arthur. 2012. Branding the City: The Democratic Legitimacy of a New Mode of Governance. Urban Studies, 50, 5 (April 2012),1066–1082.
    [2]
    Yang, Kaifeng and Callahan, Kathe. Citizen Involvement Efforts and Bureaucratic Responsiveness: Participatory Values, Stakeholder Pressures, and Administrative Practicality. Public Administration Review, 67, 2 (March 2007), 249–264.
    [3]
    Porwol, Lukasz 2016. An Ontology for Next Generation e-Participation Initiatives. Government Information Quarterly, 33, 3 (July 2016), 583–594.
    [4]
    Sandoval-Almazan, Rodrigo and Gil-Garcia, J. Ramon. 2012. Are Government Internet Portals Evolving towards More Interaction, Participation, and Collaboration? Revisiting the Rhetoric of e-Government among Municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 29 (January 2012), 72-81.
    [5]
    Lee, Yunsoo and Schachter, Hindy Lauer. 2018. Exploring the Relationship between Trust in Government and Citizen Participation. International Journal of Public Administration, 42, 5 (April 2018), 405–416.
    [6]
    Avery, James M. 2006. The Sources and Consequences of Political Mistrust among African Americans. American Politics Research, 34, 5 (September 2006), 653–682.
    [7]
    Fonseca, Tania Dias. The Internet as a Global Playground: Young Citizens and Informal Spaces of Agency, a Portuguese Case Study. 2019. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 26, 4 (October 2019), 353–370.
    [8]
    Nelson, Jacob 2017. Digital Democracy in America: A Look at Civic Engagement in an Internet Age. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 94, 1 (Mar. 2017), 318–34.
    [9]
    Pechta, Laura E. 2010. Understanding the Dynamics of Emergency Communication: Propositions for a Four-Channel Model. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 7, 1 (2010), 50-51.
    [10]
    Reuter, Christian and Kaufhold, Marc-André. 2018. Fifteen Years of Social Media in Emergencies: A Retrospective Review and Future Directions for Crisis Informatics. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 26, 1 (March 2018), 41–57.
    [11]
    Li, Meng-Hao and Feeney, Mary K. 2014. Adoption of Electronic Technologies in Local U.S. Governments. The American Review of Public Administration, 44, 1 (January 2014), 75–91.
    [12]
    Klischewski, Ralf. 2014. When Virtual Reality Meets Realpolitik: Social Media Shaping the Arab Government–Citizen Relationship. Government Information Quarterly, 31, 3 (July 2014), 358–364.
    [13]
    Sandoval-Almazan, Rodrigo and Gil-Garcia, J. Ramon. 2014. Towards Cyberactivism 2.0? Understanding the Use of Social Media and Other Information Technologies for Political Activism and Social Movements. Government Information Quarterly, 31, 3 (July 2014), 365–378.
    [14]
    Panagiotopoulos, Panagiotis 2014. Citizen–Government Collaboration on Social Media: The Case of Twitter in the 2011 Riots in England. Government Information Quarterly, 31, 3 (July 2014), 349–357.
    [15]
    Alteri, Ashley 2015. Citizens as Sensors: Examining Co-production, Sensor Technologies, and Data Analytics in Government. Public Management Research Association Conference, 9-10 June 2015, Minneapolis, MN. Conference Presentation.
    [16]
    Gascó, Mila 2017. What Do Citizens Communicate about during Crises? Analyzing Twitter Use during the 2011 UK Riots. Government Information Quarterly, 34, 4 (December 2017), 635–645.
    [17]
    Hughes, Amanda L. 2014. Online Public Communications by Police & Fire Services During the 2012 Hurricane Sandy. Proceedings of the 32nd ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 1505-14.
    [18]
    Yin, Robert K. 2009. Case Study Research: Design and Methods (3rd ed.), Sage Publications.
    [19]
    Scapens, Robert W. 2004. Chapter 15 - Doing Case Study Research. The Real Life Guide to Accounting Research, Elsevier Ltd., 257–279.
    [20]
    Marshall, Catherine, and Rossman, Gretchen B. 1995. Designing Qualitative Research (2nd ed.), Sage Publications.
    [21]
    Depaula, Nic, 2018. Toward a Typology of Government Social Media Communication: Democratic Goals, Symbolic Acts and Self-Presentation. Government Information Quarterly, 35, 1 (January 2018), 98–108.
    [22]
    Simon, Tomer, 2015. Socializing in Emergencies—A Review of the Use of Social Media in Emergency Situations. International Journal of Information Management, 35, 5, (October 2015) 609–619.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Understanding Cross-Boundary Information Sharing in Emergency Management: Insights from Public Alert and Warning Messages in US Local GovernmentsProceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research10.1145/3598469.3598524(486-495)Online publication date: 11-Jul-2023

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    dg.o '20: Proceedings of the 21st Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research
    June 2020
    389 pages
    ISBN:9781450387910
    DOI:10.1145/3396956
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 16 June 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Citizen-government collaboration
    2. Information sharing
    3. citizen participation
    4. communication
    5. emergency preparedness and response
    6. rural

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    dg.o '20

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 150 of 271 submissions, 55%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)12
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Understanding Cross-Boundary Information Sharing in Emergency Management: Insights from Public Alert and Warning Messages in US Local GovernmentsProceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research10.1145/3598469.3598524(486-495)Online publication date: 11-Jul-2023

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media