Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3396956.3398263acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesdg-oConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Smart city knowledge management: Holistic review and the analysis of the urban knowledge management

Published: 16 June 2020 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    The purpose of this paper is to review city ecosystem systems interactions for urban knowledge management practices and prepare a theoretical discussion about the issues of digital resource management processes. It is going for a conceptual paper based on the literature review and smart city case studies around the world. This theoretical study helps to understand the smart city knowledge management process, and it is focusing on knowledge phenomenon from a holistic perspective, that include smart cities knowledge-based activities, urban data platforms, cyber-physical environment, smart (urban) technologies and city stakeholders. The paper consists of presentations about the smart city ecosystem, definition the smart city stakeholders and their role and the explanation of smart city knowledge management and its processes. The authors’ holistic view facilitates some types of data collection methods of raw as well as processed data and of knowledge-based activities of different stakeholders. This text can serve as a strong background for scientific future research.

    References

    [1]
    Leonidas Anthopoulos. 2016. Smart utopia VS smart reality: Learning by experience from 10 smart city cases. Cities 63, 128-148.
    [2]
    Elias Simon Bibri and John Krogstie. 2017. Smart sustainable cities of the future: An extensive interdisciplinary literature review. Sust. Cit. and Soc. 31, 183-212.
    [3]
    Andrea Caragliu and Chiara F. Del Bo. 2019. Smart innovative cities: The impact of Smart City policies on urban innovation. Tech. For. and Soc. Ch. 142, 373-383.
    [4]
    Ahvenniemi, Hannele, Aapo Huovila, Isabel Pinto-Seppä, and Miimu Airaksinen. 2017. What are the differences between sustainable and smart cities?. Cities 60, 234-245.
    [5]
    Kaya Kuru and Darren Ansell. (2020). TCitySmartF: A comprehensive systematic framework for transforming cities into smart cities. IEEE Acc. 8, 18615-18644.
    [6]
    Ulrike Gretzel, Hannes Werthner, Chulmo Koo, and Carlos Lamsfus. 2015. Conceptual foundations for understanding smart tourism ecosystems. Com. in Hum. Beh. 50, 558-563.
    [7]
    Devender Maheshwari and Marijn Janssen. 2014. Reconceptualizing measuring, benchmarking for improving interoperability in smart ecosystems: The effect of ubiquitous data and crowdsourcing. Gov. Inf. Quart. 31, S84-S92.
    [8]
    Taewoo Nam and Theresa A. Pardo. (2011). Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. In Proceedings of the12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times. ACM Press, New York, NY, 282 – 291.
    [9]
    Leonidas Anthopoulos and Panos Fitsilis. 2014. Exploring architectural and organizational features in smart cities. In Procceding of the 16th international conference on advanced communication technology. IEEE, Pyeongchang.
    [10]
    Nicos Komninos and Luca Mora. 2018. Exploring the big picture of smart city research. Sci. Reg. 17(1), 15-38.
    [11]
    Andrea Caragliu, Chiara Del Bo, and Peter Nijkamp. 2011. Smart cities in Europe. J. of Urb. Tech. 18(2), 65-82.
    [12]
    Vasja Roblek. 2019. Smart city Vienna. In: Leonidas Anthopoulos, ed. Smart city emergence: Cases from around the world, 105-127. Elsiever, Amsterdam, NL.
    [13]
    Leyla Zhuhadar, Evelyn Thrasher, Scarlett Marklin, and Patricia Ordónez de Pablos. 2017. The next wave of innovation—Review of smart cities intelligent operation systems. Comp. in Hum. Beh. 66, 273-281.
    [14]
    Harish Kumar, Manoj Kumar Singh, M.P. Gupta, and Jitendra Madaan. 2020. Moving towards smart cities: Solutions that lead to the Smart City Transformation Framework. Tech. For. and Soc. Chan. 153, 119281.
    [15]
    Leonidas Anthopoulos, Christopher G. Reddick, Irene Giannakidou, and Nikolaos Mavridis. 2016. Why e-government projects fail? An analysis of the Healthcare.gov website. Gov. Inf. Quart. 33(1), 161-173.
    [16]
    Willem van Winden and Daniel van den Buuse. 2017. Smart city pilot projects: Exploring the dimensions and conditions of scaling up. J. of Urb. Tech. 24(4), 51-72.
    [17]
    Ikujiro Nonaka. 1998. The knowledge – creating company. In Peter F. Drucker, ed. Harvard business review on knowledge management, 21-46. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
    [18]
    Maryam Alavi and Dorothy E. Leidner. 2001. Review knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quat. 25 (1), 107–136.
    [19]
    Richard Baskerville and Alina Dulipovici. 2006. The theoretical foundations of knowledge management. KM Res. & Pract. 4 (4), 83–105.
    [20]
    Peter F. Drucker, Esther Dyson, Charles Handy, Paul Saffo, and Peter M. Senge. 1997. Looking ahead: implications of the present. HBR 75 (6): 18–32.
    [21]
    Peter F. Drucker. 1999. Management challenges for the 21st century. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK.
    [22]
    Gary Hamel. 2002. Leading the revolution: how to drive in turbulent times by making innovation a way of life. Plume Book, New York, NY.
    [23]
    Manfred Bornermann, Marion Graggober, Erich Hartlieb, Bern Humpl, Phillip Koronakis, Arthur Primus, Karl Ritsch, Herwig Rollett, Martin Sammer, Josef Tuppinger, Reinhard Willifort, and Kurt Wöls. 2003. In Martin Sammer, ed. An illustrated guide to knowledge management.Graz: Wissenmanagement forum.
    [24]
    Ijukiro Nonaka and Hirotaka Takeuchi. 1995. The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
    [25]
    Chris Marshall, Larry Prusak, and David Spilberg. 1996. Financial risk and the need for superior knowledge management. Cal. Man. Rev. 38 (3), 76-101.
    [26]
    Jennifer Rowley. 1999. What is knowledge management? Lib. Man. 20 (8), 416–419.
    [27]
    John Israildis, Kayode Odusanya, and Muhammad Usman Mazhar. 2019. Exploring knowledge management perspectives in smart city research: A review and future research agenda. Int. J. of Inf. Man. In press 101989.
    [28]
    Ward Ooms, Marjolein CJ Caniëls, Nadine Roijakkers, and Dieudonnee Cobben. 2020. Ecosystems for smart cities: tracing the evolution of governance structures in a dutch smart city initiative. Int. Ent. and Man. J.
    [29]
    Ivanka Visnjic, Andy Neely, Carmelo Cennamo, and Nikola Visnjic. 2016). Governing the city: Unleashing value from the business ecosystem. Cal. Man. Rev. 59(1), 109-140.
    [30]
    Laurie Hughes, Yogesh K. Dwivedi, Santosh K. Misra, Nripendra P. Rana, Vishnupriya Raghavan, and Viswanadh Akella. 2019. Blockchain research, practice and policy: Applications, benefits, limitations, emerging research themes and research agenda. Int. J. of Inf. Man. 49, 114-129.
    [31]
    Suraju P. Mohanty, Saraju, Uma Choppali, and Elias Kougianos. 2016. Everything you wanted to know about smart cities: The internet of things is the backbone. IEEE Cons. Elec. Mag. 5(3), 60-70.
    [32]
    Christos G. Cassandras. (2016). Smart cities as cyber-physical social systems. Eng. 2(2), 156-158.
    [33]
    Leighton Andrews. 2019. Public administration, public leadership and the construction of public value in the age of the algorithm and ‘big data. Pub. Admin. 97(2), 296-310.
    [34]
    Margarita Angelidou, Artemis Psaltoglou, Nicos Komninos, Christina Kakderi, Panagiotis Tsarchopoulos, and Anastasia Panori. 2018. Enhancing sustainable urban development through smart city applications. J. of Sci. and Tech. Pol. Man.9(2), 146-169.
    [35]
    Tan Yigitcanlar. 2008 . Urban management revolution: intelligent management systems for ubiquitous cities. In Proceddings of the International Symposium on land, transport, and marine technology. Korean institute of construction and transport technology evaluation and planning, Seoul. Retrieved from https://eprints.qut.edu.au/26212/.
    [36]
    Alfio Costanzo, Alberto Faro, Daniela Giordano,and Concetto Spampinato. 2016. Implementing Cyber physical social systems for smart cities: A semantic web perspective. In Procceding of the 13th IEEE Annual Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC). IEEE. Las Vegas, NV, USA.
    [37]
    Sarah Barns. 2018. Smart cities and urban data platforms: Designing interfaces for smart governance. City, Cul. and Soc. 12, 5-12.
    [38]
    Florina Pinzaru, Alexandra Zbuchea, and Alexandra Vitelar. 2019. Knowledge transfer from business to public administration on smart city development. In Procceding of the 19 th Europen conference on knowledge management. University of Padua, Padua.
    [39]
    Ignacio Delio Castaneda, Luisa Fernanda Manrique, and Sergio Cuellar. 2018. Is organizational learning being absorbed by knowledge management? A systematic review. J. of KM 22(2), 299-325.
    [40]
    Mordechay Haklay.2001. Conceptual models of urban environmental information systems: toward improved information provision, Working Paper Series, 38. UCL Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis, London, UK.
    [41]
    Kayoko Yamamoto. 2015. Development and operation of social media GIS for disaster risk management in Japan. In Stan Geertman, Joseph Ferreira, Jr., Robert Goodspeed, John Stillwell, eds. Planning support systems and smart xities. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography, 21-39. Springer, Cham, Suisse.
    [42]
    Christhopher Pettit, Scott N, Lieske, and Murad Jamal. 2017. CityDash: Visualising a Changing City Using Open Data. In: Stan Geertman, Andrew Allan, Chris Pettit, and John Stillwell, eds. Planning support science for smarter urban futures. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography, 337-353. Springer, Cham, Suisse.
    [43]
    Data Market Austria Leit projekt - DMA. 2019. In data market Austria. Retrieved from https://datamarket.at/ueber-dma/.
    [44]
    Smart cities world. 2018. Copenhagen shares takeaways from its City Data Exchange. Retrieved from https://www.smartcitiesworld.net/news/news/copenhagen-shares-takeaways-from-its-city-data-exchange-2961.
    [45]
    Smart London. 2019. Towards a common approach to data…. Retrieved from: https://medium.com/@SmartLondon/towards-a-common-approach-to-data-2d72375c82a.
    [46]
    Stefano Bresciani, Alberto Ferraris, and Manlio Del Giudice. 2018. The management of organizational ambidexterity through alliances in a new context of analysis: Internet of Things (IoT) smart city projects. Tech. For. and Soc. Ch. 136, 331-338.
    [47]
    Edward R. Freeman. 1951. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
    [48]
    Vito Albino, Umberto Berardi, and Rosa Maria Dangelico. 2015. Smart cities: Definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. J. of Urb. Tech. 22(1), 3-21.
    [49]
    Agnieszka Pawłowska. 2004. Failures in large systems projects in Poland: Mission [im] possible?. Inf. Pol.9(3/4), 167-180.
    [50]
    Rahul De’, and Sandeep Sarkar. 2010. Rituals in e-government implementation: An analysis of failure. In Maria A. WimmerJean-Loup ChappeletMarijn JanssenHans J. Scholl, eds. Electronic Government, 226-237. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, DE.
    [51]
    Maarja Toots. 2019. Why E-participation systems fail: The case of Estonia's Osale. ee. Gov. Inf. Quat. 36(3), 546-559.
    [52]
    Edward R. Freeman, Jeffrey S. Harrison, Andrew C. Wicks, Bidhan L. Parmar, and Simone De Colle. 2010. Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
    [53]
    Andrew K. Schnackenberg, and Edward C. Tomlinson. 2016. Organizational transparency: A new perspective on managing trust in organization-stakeholder relationships. J. of Man. 42(7), 1784-1810.
    [54]
    EU Smart Cities Information System. 2020. Vienna. Retrieved from https://smartcities-infosystem.eu/countries-and-cities/austria/vienna.
    [55]
    Elsa Negre, Elsa, Camille Rosenthal-Sabroux, and Mila Gascó. 2015. A knowledge-based conceptual vision of the smart city. In Proceedings of the 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, Kaui, HI.
    [56]
    Elena Marilena Porumb and Nadia Valentina Ivanova. 2014. Development through knowledge economy: Cluj-Napoca–a European smart city. Man. Dyn. in the Know. Eco. 2(3), 453-461.
    [57]
    Yanqing Duan, John S. Edwards, and Yogesh K. Dwivedi. 2019. Artificial intelligence for decision making in the era of Big Data–evolution, challenges and research agenda. Int. J. of Inf. Man. 48, 63-71.
    [58]
    Takuro Kobashi, 2020. Smart city and ICT infrastructure with vehicle to X applications toward urban decarbonization. Urb. Syst. Des. 2020, 289-333.
    [59]
    Dario Bruneo, Salvatore Distefano, S, Maurizio Giacobbe, ... and Nachiket Tapas. (2019). An iot service ecosystem for smart cities: The# smartme project. IoT, 5, 12-33.
    [60]
    Patrizia Lombardi, Silvia Giordano, Hend Farouh, and Wael Yousef. 2012. Modelling the smart city performance. Inn.: The EU J. of Soc. Sci. Res. 25(2), 137-149.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Emergence of Urban Ageing Based on Technological Solutions to Ensure Smart Urban Sustainable DevelopmentDigital Transformation and Sustainable Development in Cities and Organizations10.4018/979-8-3693-3567-3.ch007(141-166)Online publication date: 23-Feb-2024
    • (2023)Blockchain Technology to Enhance Integrated Blue Economy: A Case Study in Strengthening Sustainable Tourism on Smart IslandsSustainability10.3390/su1506534215:6(5342)Online publication date: 17-Mar-2023
    • (2023)How Do Citizens Want to Participate in Smart City Programs? Some Answers from GreeceSustainable, Innovative and Intelligent Societies and Cities10.1007/978-3-031-30514-6_7(135-154)Online publication date: 10-Jun-2023
    • Show More Cited By

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    dg.o '20: Proceedings of the 21st Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research
    June 2020
    389 pages
    ISBN:9781450387910
    DOI:10.1145/3396956
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 16 June 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Knowledge management
    2. Smart city ecosystem
    3. Stakeholders
    4. Urban data platform
    5. Urban management

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    dg.o '20

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 150 of 271 submissions, 55%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)96
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Emergence of Urban Ageing Based on Technological Solutions to Ensure Smart Urban Sustainable DevelopmentDigital Transformation and Sustainable Development in Cities and Organizations10.4018/979-8-3693-3567-3.ch007(141-166)Online publication date: 23-Feb-2024
    • (2023)Blockchain Technology to Enhance Integrated Blue Economy: A Case Study in Strengthening Sustainable Tourism on Smart IslandsSustainability10.3390/su1506534215:6(5342)Online publication date: 17-Mar-2023
    • (2023)How Do Citizens Want to Participate in Smart City Programs? Some Answers from GreeceSustainable, Innovative and Intelligent Societies and Cities10.1007/978-3-031-30514-6_7(135-154)Online publication date: 10-Jun-2023
    • (2022)Bolstering the Pedagogies of Orthodontic Education Using Smart TechnologiesOnline Distance Learning Course Design and Multimedia in E-Learning10.4018/978-1-7998-9706-4.ch010(225-253)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2022
    • (2022)Climate (Un)smart? Case Study of Smart City Projects in Surat, IndiaResilient Smart Cities10.1007/978-3-030-95037-8_12(265-302)Online publication date: 30-Jun-2022
    • (2022)Managing COVID‐19‐related knowledge: A smart cities perspectiveKnowledge and Process Management10.1002/kpm.170630:1(87-109)Online publication date: 14-Mar-2022
    • (2021)A Comparative Study of Traffic Classification Techniques for Smart City NetworksSensors10.3390/s2114467721:14(4677)Online publication date: 8-Jul-2021
    • (2021)Smart learning environments: a basic research towards the definition of a practical modelSmart Learning Environments10.1186/s40561-021-00155-w8:1Online publication date: 5-Jun-2021

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media