Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3397271.3401401acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

APS: An Active PubMed Search System for Technology Assisted Reviews

Published: 25 July 2020 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Systematic reviews constitute the cornerstone of Evidence-based Medicine. They can provide guidance to medical policy-making by synthesizing all available studies regarding a certain topic. However, conducting systematic reviews has become a laborious and time-consuming task due to the large amount and rapid growth of published literature. The TAR approaches aim to accelerate the screening stage of systematic reviews by combining machine learning algorithms and human relevance feedback. In this work, we built an online active search system for systematic reviews, named APS, by applying an state-of-the-art TAR approach -- Continuous Active Learning. The system is built on the top of the PubMed collection, which is a widely used database of biomedical literature. It allows users to conduct the abstract screening for systematic reviews. We demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of the APS in detecting relevant literature and reducing workload for systematic reviews using the CLEF TAR 2017 benchmark.

    Supplementary Material

    MP4 File (3397271.3401401.mp4)
    Systematic reviews constitute the cornerstone of Evidence-based Medicine. They can provide guidance to medical policy-making by synthesizing all available studies regarding a certain topic. However, conducting systematic reviews has become a laborious and time-consuming task due to the large amount and rapid growth of published literature. The TAR approaches aim to accelerate the screening stage of systematic reviews by combining machine learn- ing algorithms and human relevance feedback. In this work, we built an online active search system for systematic reviews, named APS, by applying an state-of-the-art TAR approach Continuous Active Learning. The system is built on the top of the PubMed collection, which is a widely used database of biomedical literature. It allows users to conduct the abstract screening for systematic reviews. We demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of the APS in detecting relevant literature and reducing workload for systematic reviews using the CLEF TAR 2017 benchmark.

    References

    [1]
    Mustafa Abualsaud, Nimesh Ghelani, Haotian Zhang, Mark D. Smucker, Gordon V. Cormack, and Maura R. Grossman. 2018. A System for Efficient High-Recall Retrieval. In SIGIR '18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209978.3210176
    [2]
    Elaine Beller, Justin Clark, Guy Tsafnat, Clive Adams, Heinz Diehl, Hans Lund, Mourad Ouzzani, Kristina Thayer, James Thomas, Tari Turner, et al. 2018. Making progress with the automation of systematic reviews: principles of the International Collaboration for the Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR). Systematic reviews, Vol. 7, 1 (2018), 77.
    [3]
    Gordon V. Cormack and Maura R. Grossman. 2014. Evaluation of machine-learning protocols for technology-assisted review in electronic discovery. In SIGIR '14. https://doi.org/10.1145/2600428.2609601
    [4]
    Gordon V. Cormack and Maura R. Grossman. 2015. Autonomy and Reliability of Continuous Active Learning for Technology-Assisted Review. CoRR, Vol. abs/1504.06868 (2015). arxiv: 1504.06868
    [5]
    Gordon V. Cormack and Maura R. Grossman. 2016. Scalability of Continuous Active Learning for Reliable High-Recall Text Classification. In CIKM '16. https://doi.org/10.1145/2983323.2983776
    [6]
    Gordon V. Cormack and Maura R. Grossman. 2018. Beyond Pooling. In SIGIR '18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209978.3210119
    [7]
    Evangelos Kanoulas, Dan Li, Leif Azzopardi, and René Spijker. 2017. CLEF 2017 Technologically Assisted Reviews in Empirical Medicine Overview. In CLEF '17.
    [8]
    Evangelos Kanoulas, Dan Li, Leif Azzopardi, and René Spijker. 2018. CLEF 2018 Technologically Assisted Reviews in Empirical Medicine Overview. In CLEF '18.
    [9]
    Evangelos Kanoulas, Dan Li, Leif Azzopardi, and René Spijker. 2019. CLEF 2019 Technology Assisted Reviews in Empirical Medicine Overview. In CLEF '19.
    [10]
    Jinhyuk Lee, Wonjin Yoon, Sungdong Kim, Donghyeon Kim, Sunkyu Kim, Chan Ho So, and Jaewoo Kang. 2020. BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining. Bioinform., Vol. 36, 4 (2020), 1234--1240. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btz682
    [11]
    Jimmy J. Lin, Matt Crane, Andrew Trotman, Jamie Callan, Ishan Chattopadhyaya, John Foley, Grant Ingersoll, Craig MacDonald, and Sebastiano Vigna. 2016. Toward Reproducible Baselines: The Open-Source IR Reproducibility Challenge. In ECIR '16. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--319--30671--1_30
    [12]
    Iain J Marshall and Byron C Wallace. 2019. Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis. Systematic reviews, Vol. 8, 1 (2019), 163.
    [13]
    Adam Roegiest, Gordon V. Cormack, Charles L. A. Clarke, and Maura R. Grossman. 2015. TREC 2015 Total Recall Track Overview. In TREC 2015 .

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Fully Automated Scholarly Search for Biomedical Systematic Literature ReviewsIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.340552912(83764-83773)Online publication date: 2024
    • (2023)The use of artificial intelligence for automating or semi-automating biomedical literature analyses: A scoping reviewJournal of Biomedical Informatics10.1016/j.jbi.2023.104389142(104389)Online publication date: Jun-2023
    • (2022)Search strategy formulation for systematic reviews: Issues, challenges and opportunitiesIntelligent Systems with Applications10.1016/j.iswa.2022.20009115(200091)Online publication date: Sep-2022
    • Show More Cited By

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGIR '20: Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
    July 2020
    2548 pages
    ISBN:9781450380164
    DOI:10.1145/3397271
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 25 July 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. PubMed
    2. TAR
    3. active search
    4. systematic reviews

    Qualifiers

    • Short-paper

    Funding Sources

    • the NWO Innovational Research Incentives Scheme Vidi
    • the H2020-EU.3.4. - SOCIETAL CHALLENGES - Smart Green And Integrated Transport
    • the NWO Smart Culture - Big Data / Digital Humanities

    Conference

    SIGIR '20
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 792 of 3,983 submissions, 20%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)15
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 09 Aug 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Fully Automated Scholarly Search for Biomedical Systematic Literature ReviewsIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.340552912(83764-83773)Online publication date: 2024
    • (2023)The use of artificial intelligence for automating or semi-automating biomedical literature analyses: A scoping reviewJournal of Biomedical Informatics10.1016/j.jbi.2023.104389142(104389)Online publication date: Jun-2023
    • (2022)Search strategy formulation for systematic reviews: Issues, challenges and opportunitiesIntelligent Systems with Applications10.1016/j.iswa.2022.20009115(200091)Online publication date: Sep-2022
    • (2021)Science2Cure: A Clinical Trial Search PrototypeProceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval10.1145/3404835.3462797(2620-2624)Online publication date: 11-Jul-2021

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media