Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3397271.3401457acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Towards Legal Case Retrieval

Published: 25 July 2020 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Legal case retrieval is a specialized IR task that aims to retrieve supporting precedents given a query case. Different from the traditional ad-hoc text retrieval, the query case is much longer and complex than common keyword queries. Legal relevance between a supporting case and a query case is defined beyond general topical relevance and it requires legal knowledge to make relevance judgment. It is thus difficult to collect a large-scale case retrieval dataset along with accurate relevance judgments. Therefore, legal case retrieval is more challenging. As a primary attempt, we propose to develop a retrieval model to tackle these challenges based on the benchmarks in this task. Moreover, we plan to investigate the practical interactions between legal practitioners and retrieval systems and further apply the user behavior models to improve system performance. Beyond the binary labels, we would like to take a deeper look at the decision process of relevance judgment in legal practice, which will benefit related tasks such as relevance estimation and result ranking.

    References

    [1]
    David C Blair and Melvin E Maron. 1985. An evaluation of retrieval effectiveness for a full-text document-retrieval system. Commun. ACM, Vol. 28, 3 (1985), 289--299.
    [2]
    Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2018. Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805 (2018).
    [3]
    Juliano Rabelo, Mi-Young Kim, Randy Goebel, Masaharu Yoshioka, Yoshinobu Kano, and Ken Satoh. 2019. COLIEE 2019 Overview. In COLIEE'19. 1--9.
    [4]
    Tefko Saracevic. 1975. Relevance: A review of and a framework for the thinking on the notion in information science. Journal of the American Society for information science, Vol. 26, 6 (1975), 321--343.
    [5]
    Marc Van Opijnen and Cristiana Santos. 2017. On the concept of relevance in legal information retrieval. Artificial Intelligence and Law, Vol. 25, 1 (2017), 65--87.
    [6]
    Jun Xu, Xiangnan He, and Hang Li. 2018. Deep learning for matching in search and recommendation. In SIGIR'18. ACM, 1365--1368.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Result Diversification for Legal case RetrievalProceedings of the Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval in the Asia Pacific Region10.1145/3624918.3625319(158-168)Online publication date: 26-Nov-2023
    • (2022)Toward automatic support for leading court debates: a novel task proposal & effective approach of judicial question generationNeural Computing and Applications10.1007/s00521-022-07588-534:19(16367-16385)Online publication date: 17-Aug-2022
    • (2022)Similar Case Based Prison Term PredictionArtificial Intelligence10.1007/978-3-031-20503-3_23(284-297)Online publication date: 17-Dec-2022
    • Show More Cited By

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGIR '20: Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
    July 2020
    2548 pages
    ISBN:9781450380164
    DOI:10.1145/3397271
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 25 July 2020

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. legal search
    2. relevance
    3. user behavior

    Qualifiers

    • Abstract

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    SIGIR '20
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 792 of 3,983 submissions, 20%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)35
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Result Diversification for Legal case RetrievalProceedings of the Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval in the Asia Pacific Region10.1145/3624918.3625319(158-168)Online publication date: 26-Nov-2023
    • (2022)Toward automatic support for leading court debates: a novel task proposal & effective approach of judicial question generationNeural Computing and Applications10.1007/s00521-022-07588-534:19(16367-16385)Online publication date: 17-Aug-2022
    • (2022)Similar Case Based Prison Term PredictionArtificial Intelligence10.1007/978-3-031-20503-3_23(284-297)Online publication date: 17-Dec-2022
    • (2022)Towards Explainable Search in Legal TextAdvances in Information Retrieval10.1007/978-3-030-99739-7_65(528-536)Online publication date: 5-Apr-2022

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media