Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3400903.3400917acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesssdbmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper
Open access

Unsupervised non-parametric change point detection in electrocardiography

Published: 30 July 2020 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    We propose a new unsupervised and non-parametric method to detect change points in electrocardiography. The detection relies on optimal transport theory combined with topological analysis and the bootstrap procedure. The algorithm is designed to detect changes in virtually any harmonic or a partially harmonic signal and is verified on ECG data streams. We successfully find abnormal or irregular cardiac cycles in the waveforms for the six of the most frequent types of clinical arrhythmias using a single algorithm. Our unsupervised approach reaches the level of performance of the supervised state-of-the-art techniques. We provide conceptual justification for the efficiency of the method.

    References

    [1]
    Ryan Prescott Adams and David J. C. MacKay. 2007. Bayesian Online Changepoint Detection. arXiv 0710.3742(2007).
    [2]
    Miquel Alfaras, Miguel C. Soriano, and Silvia Ortín. 2019. A Fast Machine Learning Model for ECG-Based Heartbeat Classification and Arrhythmia Detection. Frontiers in Physics 7(2019), 103. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2019.00103
    [3]
    Nazar Buzun. 2019. Gaussian approximation for empirical barycenters. arXiv 1904.00891(2019).
    [4]
    Nazar Buzun and Valeriy Avanesov. 2017. Bootstrap for change point detection. arXiv 1710.07285(2017).
    [5]
    Victor Chernozhukov, Denis Chetverikov, and Kengo Kato. 2013. Comparison and anti-concentration bounds for maxima of Gaussian random vectors. arXiv 1301.4807(2013).
    [6]
    Victor Chernozhukov, Denis Chetverikov, and Kengo Kato. 2014. Anti-concentration and honest, adaptive confidence bands. The Annals of Statistics 42, 5 (Oct 2014), 1787–1818. https://doi.org/10.1214/14-aos1235
    [7]
    Victor Chernozhukov, Denis Chetverikov, and Kengo Kato. 2014. Gaussian approximation of suprema of empirical processes. The Annals of Statistics 42, 4 (Aug 2014), 1564–1597. https://doi.org/10.1214/14-aos1230
    [8]
    Aritra Chowdhury, Dmitry V Dylov, Qing Li, Michael MacDonald, Dan E Meyer, Michael Marino, and Alberto Santamaria-Pang. 2017. Blood vessel characterization using virtual 3D models and convolutional neural networks in fluorescence microscopy. In IEEE ISBI 2017. IEEE, 629–632.
    [9]
    Marco Cuturi. 2013. Sinkhorn distances: Lightspeed computation of optimal transport. In Advances in neural information processing systems. 2292–2300.
    [10]
    J Faganeli and F Jager. 2010. Automatic classification of transient ischaemic and transient non-ischaemic heart-rate related ST segment deviation episodes in ambulatory ECG records. Physiological Measurement 31, 3 (feb 2010), 323–337. https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/31/3/004
    [11]
    Giulia Guidi and Manas Karandikar. 2014. Classification of Arrhythmia using ECG data. https://doi.org/proj2014
    [12]
    Jing Hua, Hua Zhang, Jizhong Liu, Yilu Xu, and Fumin Guo. 2018. Direct arrhythmia classification from compressive ECG signals in wearable health monitoring system. Journal of Circuits, Systems and Computers 27, 06 (2018), 1850088.
    [13]
    Jane Huff. 2006. ECG workout: Exercises in arrhythmia interpretation. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
    [14]
    Tae Joon Jun, Hoang Minh Nguyen, Daeyoun Kang, Dohyeun Kim, Daeyoung Kim, and Young-Hak Kim. 2018. ECG arrhythmia classification using a 2-D convolutional neural network. arXiv 1804.06812(2018).
    [15]
    Hiroshi Kawazoe, Yukiko Nakano, Hidenori Ochi, Masahiko Takagi, Yusuke Hayashi, Yuko Uchimura, Takehito Tokuyama, Yoshikazu Watanabe, Hiroya Matsumura, Shunsuke Tomomori, Akinori Sairaku, Kazuyoshi Suenari, Akinori Awazu, Yosuke Miwa, Kyoko Soejima, Kazuaki Chayama, and Yasuki Kihara. 2016. Risk stratification of ventricular fibrillation in Brugada syndrome using noninvasive scoring methods. Heart Rhythm 13, 10 (2016), 1947 – 1954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.07.009 Focus Issue: Sudden Death.
    [16]
    Rebecca Killick, Paul Fearnhead, and Idris A Eckley. 2012. Optimal detection of changepoints with a linear computational cost. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 107, 500 (2012), 1590–1598.
    [17]
    Dmitrii Krylov, Dmitry V. Dylov, and Michael Rosenblum. 2020. Reinforcement learning for suppression of collective activity in oscillatory ensembles. Chaos 30, 3 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5128909 arxiv:1909.12154
    [18]
    Hans R Kunsch. 1989. The jackknife and the bootstrap for general stationary observations. The annals of Statistics(1989), 1217–1241.
    [19]
    Soumendra Nath Lahiri. 2013. Resampling methods for dependent data. Springer Science & Business Media.
    [20]
    Vadim Liventsev, Irina Fedulova, and Dmitry Dylov. 2019. Deep Text Prior: Weakly Supervised Learning for Assertion Classification. In International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks. Springer, 243–257.
    [21]
    Nicos Maglaveras, Telemachos Stamkopoulos, Konstantinos Diamantaras, Costas Pappas, and Michael Strintzis. 1998. ECG pattern recognition and classification using non-linear transformations and neural networks: A review. International Journal of Medical Informatics 52, 1(1998), 191 – 208. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1386-5056(98)00138-5
    [22]
    George B Moody and Roger G Mark. 2001. The impact of the MIT-BIH arrhythmia database. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine 20, 3 (2001), 45–50.
    [23]
    Jose Perea and John Harer. 2013. Sliding Windows and Persistence: An Application of Topological Methods to Signal Analysis. arXiv 1307.6188(2013).
    [24]
    Philip de Chazal, M. O’Dwyer, and R. B. Reilly. 2004. Automatic classification of heartbeats using ECG morphology and heartbeat interval features. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 51, 7 (July 2004), 1196–1206. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2004.827359
    [25]
    Ivan Rodin, Irina Fedulova, Artem Shelmanov, and Dmitry V Dylov. 2019. Multitask and Multimodal Neural Network Model for Interpretable Analysis of X-ray Images. In 2019 IEEE BIBM. IEEE, 1601–1604.
    [26]
    Artem Shelmanov, Vadim Liventsev, Danil Kireev, Nikita Khromov, Alexander Panchenko, Irina Fedulova, and Dmitry V Dylov. 2019. Active Learning with Deep Pre-trained Models for Sequence Tagging of Clinical and Biomedical Texts. In 2019 IEEE BIBM. IEEE, 482–489.
    [27]
    Nikolay Shvetsov, Nazar Buzun, and Dmitry V. Dylov. 2020. Unsupervised non-parametric change point detection in quasi-periodic signals. arxiv:2002.02717 [cs.LG]
    [28]
    Max Sommerfeld and Axel Munk. 2016. Inference for Empirical Wasserstein Distances on Finite Spaces. arXiv 1610.03287(2016).
    [29]
    Charles Truong, Laurent Oudre, and Nicolas Vayatis. 2018. Selective review of offline change point detection methods. Signal Processing 167(2018).

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Change Point Detection for Process Data Analytics Applied to a Multiphase Flow FacilityComputer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences10.32604/cmes.2022.019764134:3(1737-1759)Online publication date: 2023
    • (2023)Gaussian Approximation for Penalized Wasserstein BarycentersMathematical Methods of Statistics10.3103/S106653072301003932:1(1-26)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2023
    • (2022)Detection of operating mode changes, without a priori model and in uncertain environmentsTransactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control10.1177/0142331222109252744:13(2653-2671)Online publication date: 27-Apr-2022
    • Show More Cited By

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    SSDBM '20: Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management
    July 2020
    241 pages
    ISBN:9781450388146
    DOI:10.1145/3400903
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 30 July 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Anomaly detection
    2. Arrhythmia detection
    3. Bootstrap
    4. Data streams
    5. Optimal transport
    6. Periodic and quasi-periodic signals
    7. Topological data analysis
    8. Unsupervised learning.
    9. Wasserstein distance

    Qualifiers

    • Short-paper
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    SSDBM 2020

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 56 of 146 submissions, 38%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)190
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)92
    Reflects downloads up to 27 Jul 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Change Point Detection for Process Data Analytics Applied to a Multiphase Flow FacilityComputer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences10.32604/cmes.2022.019764134:3(1737-1759)Online publication date: 2023
    • (2023)Gaussian Approximation for Penalized Wasserstein BarycentersMathematical Methods of Statistics10.3103/S106653072301003932:1(1-26)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2023
    • (2022)Detection of operating mode changes, without a priori model and in uncertain environmentsTransactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control10.1177/0142331222109252744:13(2653-2671)Online publication date: 27-Apr-2022
    • (2022)Novel CUSUM Methods for Repetitive Change Detection in Sensor Signals2022 IEEE 1st Industrial Electronics Society Annual On-Line Conference (ONCON)10.1109/ONCON56984.2022.10127062(1-7)Online publication date: 9-Dec-2022
    • (2022)BRULÈPattern Recognition10.1016/j.patcog.2022.108816131:COnline publication date: 1-Nov-2022
    • (2021)Unsupervised Offline Changepoint Detection EnsemblesApplied Sciences10.3390/app1109428011:9(4280)Online publication date: 9-May-2021

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Get Access

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media