Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3404709.3404714acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicfetConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Relationship between Teachers' Misbehavior and Students' Scientific Literacy: the Mediation Effect of Students' Scientific Interest

Published: 13 July 2020 Publication History

Abstract

To put emphasis on students' scientific literacy and cultivate it has been an essential theme of contemporary education. This study analyzed 9841 middle school students from PISA 2015 China, used scientific interest as a mediator explores the influence of teachers' misbehavior on students' scientific literacy performance. Based on controlling the irrelevant confounding variables at the student level and the school level, and using the multi-level mediation effect model as a method, which can reach conclusions as follows: 1) teachers' misbehavior had no significant direct effect on students' scientific literacy performance; 2) teachers' misbehavior had a significant negative effect on students' scientific interest; 3) students' scientific interest had a significant positive effect on their scientific literacy performance; 4) teachers' misbehavior had an indirect negative effect on students' scientific literacy performance through the mediation effect of scientific interest. This mediating effect was a completely multi-level mediation. Therefore, schools should boost the quality of teachers, strengthen the construction of teacher ethics, improve the standards of teacher education, and establish a more comprehensive teacher management system to reduce the occurrence of teachers' misbehavior. Teachers should pay more attention to cultivate students' scientific interest during the educational process to promote the development of students' scientific literacy.

References

[1]
Kearney, P., Plax, T. G., Hays, E. R., and Ivey, M. J. 1991. College Teacher Misbehaviors: What Students Don't Like About What Teachers Say and Do. Communication Quarterly. 39, 4 (Oct. 1991), 309--324.
[2]
Cai Baolai and Che Weiyan. 2008. Research on Classroom Teaching Behaviors of Foreign Teachers: Hot Issues and Future Trends. Curriculum. Teaching materials. Teaching methods. 12 (Dec. 2008), 82--87.
[3]
Mehmet Karakus, Alpay Ersozlu, and Necati Cobanoglu. 2016. Teacher Misbehaviors at Elementary Schools in Turkey Their Causes, Consequences, and Suggestions. International Journal of Educational Development. 25, 1 (Jan. 2016), 79--98.
[4]
Dolin, D. J. 1995. Ain't misbehavin': A Study of Teacher misbehaviors, Related Communication Behaviors, and Student Resistance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Morgantown: West Virginia University.
[5]
Toale, M. C. 2001. Teacher Clarity and Teacher Misbehaviors: Relationships with Students' Affective Learning and Teacher Credibility. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Morgantown: West Virginia University.
[6]
Kearney, P., Plax, T. G., and McPherson, M. B. 2006. Student Incivility and Resistance in the Classroom. In T. P. Mottet, V. P. Richmond, & J. C. McCroskey (Eds.), Handbook of Instructional Communication: Rhetorical and Relational Perspectives. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. 235--251.
[7]
Çinkir, Ş. 2004. Okulda Etkili Öğretmen-Öğrenci İletişiminin Yönetimi. Milli Eğitim Dergisi. 164.
[8]
Kelsey, D. M., Kearney, P., Plax, T. G., Allen, T. H., and Ritter, K. J. 2004. College Students' Attributions of Teacher Misbehaviors. Communication Education. 53, 1(Jan. 2010), 40--55.
[9]
Thweat, K. S. and McCroskey, J. C. 1996. Teacher Nonimmediacy and Misbehavior: Unintentional Negative Communication. Communication Research Report. 13, 2 (Sep. 1996), 198--204.
[10]
Chen Yanlei and Guo Shaoyang. 2016. The Impact of Junior High School Students' Perception of Teacher Support Behavior on Academic Achievement: A Mediating Moderating Effect. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology. 24, 02 (Apr. 2016), 332--337.
[11]
Hendrickx MM, Mainhard T., Oudman S., Boor- Klip H. J., and Brekelmans M. 2017. Teacher Behavior and Peer Liking and Disliking: The Teacher as a Social Referent for Peer Status. Journal of Educational Psychology. 109, 4 (May. 2017), 546--558.
[12]
Alan K. Goodboy and San Bolkan. 2009. College Teacher Misbehaviors: Direct and Indirect Effects on Student Communication Behavior and Traditional Learning Outcomes. Western Journal of Communication. 73, 2 (Apr. 2009), 204--219.
[13]
Krapp A. 2005. Basic Needs and the Development of Interest and Intrinsic Motivational Orientations. Learning and Instruction. 15, 5 (Oct. 2005), 381--395.
[14]
Hidi S. and Harackiewicz J. M. 2000. Motivating the Academically Unmotivated: A Critical Issue for the 21st Century. Review of Educational Research. 70, 2 (Jun. 2000), 151--179.
[15]
Hidi S. and Renninger K. A. 2006. The Four-Phase Model of Interest Development. Educational Psychologist. 41, 2 (Jun. 2006), 111--127.
[16]
Hidi S. 2000. An Interest Researcher's Perspective on the Effects of Extrinsic and Intrinsic Factors on Motivation. In: Sansone C, Harackiewicz J M. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The Search for Optimum Motivation and Performance. Academic Press.
[17]
Rotgans J. I. and Schmidt H. G. 2014. Situational Interest and Learning: Thirst for Knowledge. Learning and Instruction. 32 (Aug. 2014), 37--50.
[18]
Schiefele U., Krapp A., and Winteler A. 2014. Interest as A Predictor of Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis of Research. In: Renninger A, Hidi S, Krapp A. The Role of Interest in Learning and Development. Psychology Press.
[19]
Chiu M. M. and Xihua Z. 2008. Family and Motivation Effects on Mathematics Achievement: Analyses of Students in 41 Countries. Learning and Instruction. 18, 4 (Aug. 2008), 321--336.
[20]
Liu Zhi, Liu Shiqi, Li Qing, Chai Huoyou, Kang Lingyun, and Liu Sanniya. 2019. Study on the Modeling of Learner Interest Topics in SPOC Forum and Their Relationship with Learning Outcomes. E-Education Research. 40, 12 (Dec. 2019), 87--96.
[21]
OECD. 2016. PISA2015 Assessment and Analytical Frame work: Science, Reading, Mathe-matic and Financial Literac y. OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/education/pisa-2015-assessment-and-analytical-framework-9789264255425-en.htm
[22]
OECD. 2017. PISA 2015 Technical Report, OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/data/2015-technical-report/
[23]
Bronfenbrenner, U. B. and Morris, P. A. 1998. The Ecology of Developmental Processes. R. M. Learner Handbook of Child Psychology. 1, 1993--1028.
[24]
Jones, D. J. Forehand, R., Brody, G., and Armistead, L. 2002. Psychosocial adjustment of African American children in single-mother families: A test of three risk models. Journal of Marriage and Family. 64, 1 (Feb. 2002), 105--115.
[25]
Wang Tingting and Pang Weiguo. 2009. Enlightenment of Self-determination Theory on the Cultivation of Students' Autonomous Learning Ability. Global Education. 11 (Nov. 2009), 40--43.
[26]
Wentzel K. R. and Wigfield A. 1998. Academic and Social Motivational Influences on Students' Academic Performance. Educational Psychology Review. 10, 2 (Jun. 1998), 155--175.
[27]
Wang Tingting. 2008. Research on Motivation in Self-regulated Learning Process. East China Normal University.
[28]
Zhang Kai and Zhang Biyin. 2000. The Role of Interest in Text Understanding. Psychological Science. 4 (Aug. 2000), 482--483.
[29]
li Leijen, Bert Slof, Liina Malva, Pihel Hunt, Jan van Tartwijk, and Marieke van der Schaaf. 2017. Performance-Based Competency Requirements for Student Teachers and How to Assess Them. International Journal of Information and Education Technology. 7, 3 (Mar. 2017), 190--194.
[30]
Kancheera Onkwanmoung. 2016. A Development of Learning Management Skills of Student Teachers in Cooperative Schools. International Journal of Information and Education Technology. 6, 8 (Aug. 2016), 660--663.

Index Terms

  1. The Relationship between Teachers' Misbehavior and Students' Scientific Literacy: the Mediation Effect of Students' Scientific Interest

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICFET '20: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Frontiers of Educational Technologies
      June 2020
      235 pages
      ISBN:9781450375337
      DOI:10.1145/3404709
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 13 July 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Teachers' misbehavior
      2. multi-level mediation model
      3. scientific interest
      4. scientific literacy

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Conference

      ICFET 2020

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • 0
        Total Citations
      • 77
        Total Downloads
      • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
      Reflects downloads up to 10 Nov 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media