research-article

Online Learning During COVID-19: Students' Perception of Multimedia Quality

Authors:

Vajirasak Vanijja,

Syamal PatraAuthors Info & Claims

IAIT '20: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Advances in Information Technology

Article No.: 27, Pages 1 - 6

https://doi.org/10.1145/3406601.3406632

Published: 03 July 2020 Publication History

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has forced educational institutes worldwide to resort to an "online only" mode of teaching delivery. As a consequence, throughout the globe there has been an increasing trend among the students to use different videoconferencing applications for the purpose of learning online. However, the multimedia quality provided by these different applications provides the key to their success i.e. whether or not the students will be willing to use those for learning online. Consequently, three popular applications (Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Cisco Webex) are taken up in this work for the purpose of multimedia quality evaluation by using an objective based approach. Results from both the models are in close agreement with each other. Microsoft Teams provides the least experience, whereas those from the others vary depending upon the objective models used. The results obtained are further verified by conducting relevant hypotheses tests.

References

[1]

E. J. P Hidalgo, C. A. H. Abril, and M. E. G. Parra. 2020. MOOCs: Origins, Concepts and Didactic Applications: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2012-2019). Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 1--27.

[2]

W. A. Rahmi, A. Aldraiweesh, N. Yahaya, Y. B. Cumin, and A. M. Zeki, 2019. Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs): Data on Higher Education. Data in Brief, 118--125.

[3]

Lewis Keegan. 2020. Video Conferencing Statistics (All You Need to Know!). (April 2020). Retrieved May 4, 2020 from https://skillscouter.com/video-conferencing-statistics/

[4]

Laurent Giret. 2020. Microsoft Shares New Usage Numbers on Teams, Announces New Education Features. (April 2020). Retrieved May 4, 2020 from https://www.onmsft.com/news/microsoft-shares-new-usage-numbers-on-teams-announces-new-education-features

[5]

Sarah Perez. 2020. Videoconferencing Apps Saw a Record 62M Downloads During One Week in March. (March 2020). Retrieved May 4, 2020 from https://techcrunch.com/2020/03/30/video-conferencing-apps-saw-a-record-62m-downloads-during-one-week-in-march/

[6]

Y. Chen, K. Wu, and Q. Zhang. 2015. From QoS to QoE: A Tutorial on Video Quality Assessment. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 17, 2, 1126--1165.

Digital Library

[7]

H. J. Kim, and S. G. Choi. 2014. QoE Assessment Model for Multimedia Streaming Services using QoS Parameters. Multimedia Tools and Applications 72, 2163--2175.

Digital Library

[8]

ITU-T E.800. 2008. Definitions of Terms Related to Quality of Service. ITU-T Recommendation E.800 (09/08), Geneva, Switzerland.

[9]

ITU-T P.10. 2017. Vocabulary for Performance, Quality of Service and Quality of Experience. ITU-T Recommendation P.10 (11/17), Geneva, Switzerland.

[10]

D. Pal, and T. Triyason. 2018. A Survey of Standardized Approaches towards the Quality of Experience Evaluation for Video Services: An ITU Perspective. International Journal of Digital Multimedia Broadcasting 2018, Article 1391724, 25 pages.

[11]

L. S. Kapov, and M. Varela. 2012. A Multi-dimensional View of QoE: The ARCU Model. In Proceedings of the 35th International Convention MIPRO, May 21-25, 2012, Opatija, Croatia, 662--666.

[12]

J. You, U. Reiter, M. M. Hannuksela, M. Gabbouj, and A. Perkis. 2010. Perceptual-based Quality Assessment for Audio-visual Services: A Survey. Signal Processing: Image Communication 25, 7, 482--501.

Digital Library

[13]

P. Pornpongtechavanich, and T. Daengsi. 2019. Video Telephony- Quality of Experience: A Simple QoE Model to Assess Video Calls Using Subjective Approach. Multimedia Tools and Applications 78, 31987--32006.

[14]

A. N. Moldovan, I. Ghergulescu, and C. H. Muntean. 2016. VQAMap: A Novel Mechanism for Mapping Objective Video Quality Metrics to Subjective MOS Scale. IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting 62, 3, 610--627.

[15]

T. Zinner, O. Abboud, O. Hohlfeld, T. Hossfeld, and P. T. Gia. 2010. Towards QoE Management for Scalable Video Streaming. In Proceedings of the 21st ITC Specialist Seminar on Multimedia Applications- Traffic, Performance, and QoE, March 2-3, 2010, Miyazaki, Japan, 64--69.

[16]

S. Möller, W. Chan, N. Côté, T. H. Falk, A. Raake and M. Wältermann. 2011. Speech Quality Estimation: Models and Trends. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 28, 6, 18--28.

[17]

B. Weiss, S. Möller, B. Belmudez and B. Lewcio. 2014. Analysis of Call-quality Prediction Performance for Speech-only and Audio-visual Telephony. In Proceedings 2014 Sixth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX), September 18-20, 2014, Singapore, 263--268.

[18]

L. Yu, T. Tillo and J. Xiao. 2017. QoE-Driven Dynamic Adaptive Video Streaming Strategy with Future Information. IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, 63, 3, 523--534.

[19]

D. Pal, and V. Vanijja. 2017. Effect of Network QoS on User QoE for a Mobile Video Streaming Service using H.265/VP9 Codec. Procedia Computer Science, 111, 214--222.

Digital Library

[20]

T. Hoßfeld., L. S. Kapov, P. E. Heegaard, M. Varela, K. Chen. 2016. On Additive and Multiplicative QoS-QoE Models for Multiple QoS Parameters. In Proceedings 5th ISCA/DEGA Workshop on Perceptual Quality of Systems (PQS 2016), August 29-31, 2016, Berlin, Germany, 44--48.

[21]

D. S. Hands. 2004. A Basic Multimedia Quality Model. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 6, 6, 806--816.

Digital Library

[22]

S. Winkler and C. Faller. 2006. Perceived Audiovisual Quality of Low-Bitrate Multimedia Content. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 8, 5, 973--980.

Digital Library

[23]

B. Belmudez, and S. Möller. 2013. Audiovisual Quality Integration for Interactive Communications. EURASIP Journal on Audio, Speech, and Music Processing, 24, Article 24, 23 pages.

[24]

ITU-T G.1070. 2018. Opinion Model for Video-telephony Applications. ITU-T Recommendation G.1070 (06/18), Geneva, Switzerland.

[25]

D. Pal, and V. Vanijja. 2018. A No-Reference Modular Video Quality Prediction Model for H.265/HEVC and VP9 Codecs on a Mobile Device. Advances in Multimedia, 2017, Article 8317590, 19 pages.

[26]

P. Pornpongtechavanich, and T. Daengsi. 2020. Audiovisual Quality Assessment: A Study of Video Calls provided by Social Media Applications. The Journal of Industrial Technology, 16, 1, 31--46.

Cited By

Yazici H(2024)Learner acceptance of video conferencing technologies and e-professionalismEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-024-12880-zOnline publication date: 11-Jul-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12880-z
Joskowicz JLiu MSotelo RArmendariz AYang L(2023)Conversational Subjective Tests Based on Video-telephony Platform2023 IEEE International Symposium on Broadband Multimedia Systems and Broadcasting (BMSB)10.1109/BMSB58369.2023.10211186(1-5)Online publication date: 14-Jun-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/BMSB58369.2023.10211186
Pal DZhang XMukherjee SFunilkul S(2023)Switching to metaverse? Perspectives from push–pull–mooring modelJournal of Computers in Education10.1007/s40692-023-00301-yOnline publication date: 10-Nov-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-023-00301-y
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Online Learning During COVID-19: Students' Perception of Multimedia Quality
1. Networks
  1. Network performance evaluation
    1. Network performance analysis

Recommendations

Fostering Interaction to Enhance Learning in Online Learning Environments

Interaction is central to educational experiences in online learning environments. Interaction enhances learning by fostering three types of learning interaction: learner-instructor, learner-learner, and learner-content. Additionally, online students ...
Online Learning Platform Analysis During COVID- 19 Pandemic in Indonesia
Abstract
Covid-19 forces Indonesia's education institutions to operate learning online. The continuity of online learning is influenced by several factors, such as personal space, environment, and learning system. Out of all categories, Learning Management ...
Online Collaborative Learning Using Microsoft Teams in Higher Education Amid COVID-19

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, most universities needed to move to online teaching and learning, in some cases with very limited knowledge or experience in running online programmes. Engaging students online has become an imminent challenge that ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

IAIT '20: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Advances in Information Technology

July 2020

370 pages

ISBN:9781450377591

DOI:10.1145/3406601

General Chair:
K. Porkaew,
Program Chairs:
M. Chignell,
S. Fong,
B. Watanapa

Copyright © 2020 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

In-Cooperation

Microsoft Corporation: Microsoft Corporation
NECTEC: National Electronics and Computer Technology Center
KMUTT: King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 03 July 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Conference

IAIT2020

IAIT2020: The 11th International Conference on Advances in Information Technology

July 1 - 3, 2020

Bangkok, Thailand

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 20 of 47 submissions, 43%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

23
Total Citations
View Citations
1,046
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)31
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

Reflects downloads up to 10 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Yazici H(2024)Learner acceptance of video conferencing technologies and e-professionalismEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-024-12880-zOnline publication date: 11-Jul-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12880-z
Joskowicz JLiu MSotelo RArmendariz AYang L(2023)Conversational Subjective Tests Based on Video-telephony Platform2023 IEEE International Symposium on Broadband Multimedia Systems and Broadcasting (BMSB)10.1109/BMSB58369.2023.10211186(1-5)Online publication date: 14-Jun-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/BMSB58369.2023.10211186
Pal DZhang XMukherjee SFunilkul S(2023)Switching to metaverse? Perspectives from push–pull–mooring modelJournal of Computers in Education10.1007/s40692-023-00301-yOnline publication date: 10-Nov-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-023-00301-y
Rohan RMukherjee SPatra SFunilkul SPal D(2023)Student Personality, Motivation and Sustainability of Technology Enhanced Learning: A SEM-Based ApproachAdvances in Computing and Data Sciences10.1007/978-3-031-37940-6_42(516-528)Online publication date: 23-Jul-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37940-6_42
Lin YMarjerison RChoi JChae C(2022)Supply Chain Sustainability during COVID-19: Last Mile Food Delivery in ChinaSustainability10.3390/su1403148414:3(1484)Online publication date: 27-Jan-2022
https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031484
YÜKSELİR CYUVAYAPAN F(2022)An Evaluation of Students Studying English Language and Literature about Transitioning to Online Classes during COVID-19 PandemicInternational Journal of Contemporary Educational Research10.33200/ijcer.8707328:3(81-91)Online publication date: 30-Oct-2022
https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.870732
Sutoyo MRahayu P(2022)Evaluasi Usability Aplikasi EDMODO dengan SUS dan Thematic AnalysisJ. Sistem Info. Bisnis10.21456/vol11iss2pp146-15111:2(146-151)Online publication date: 31-Jan-2022
https://doi.org/10.21456/vol11iss2pp146-151
Haggag O(2022)Better Identifying and Addressing Diverse Issues in mHealth and Emerging Apps Using User ReviewsProceedings of the 26th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering10.1145/3530019.3535346(329-335)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3530019.3535346
Piao YChoi KChoi KPark MPark M(2022)Depth-Wise Split Unit Coding Order for Video CompressionIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology10.1109/TCSVT.2022.316291832:9(6375-6384)Online publication date: Sep-2022
https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSVT.2022.3162918
Ahmed VAhmed HZamzam HSaboor S(2022)Covid-19 and Online Learning Challenges in Engineering Education: A Case Study of the American University of Sharjah2022 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)10.1109/EDUCON52537.2022.9766751(975-980)Online publication date: 28-Mar-2022
https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON52537.2022.9766751
Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents