research-article

Open access

Factors affecting the market adoption of cyber-security products in energy and electrical systems: the case of SPEAR

Authors:

Theodoros Rokkas,

Ioannis NeokosmidisAuthors Info & Claims

ARES '20: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security

Article No.: 116, Pages 1 - 8

https://doi.org/10.1145/3407023.3409315

Published: 25 August 2020 Publication History

Abstract

In this paper the results of a survey that was performed aiming to identify the main factors that can affect the market adoption of a cyber-security product in the Energy and Electrical systems is presented. In more detail the survey was implemented using the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process method among experts of the H2020 R&D project SPEAR. The survey reveals experts' vision regarding the significance of the critical factors anticipated to influence the introduction and acceptance of SPEAR or similar solutions as a technology for actors of the Energy and Electrical ecosystem.

References

[1]

https://www.spear2020.eu/

[2]

T. L. Saaty, "A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures," Journal of Mathematical Psychology, vol. 15, pp. 234--281, 1977.

[3]

A. M. A. Bahurmoz, "The analytic hierarchy process at DarAl-Hekma, Saudi Arabia," Interfaces, vol. 33, pp. 70--78, 2003.

Digital Library

[4]

A. Kengpol and C. O'Brien, "The development of a decision support tool for the selection of advanced technology to achieve rapid product development," International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 69, pp. 177--191, 2001.

[5]

G. Noci and G. Toletti, "Selecting quality-based programmes in small firms: A comparison between the fuzzy linguistic approach and the analytic hierarchy process," International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 67, pp. 113--133, 2000.

[6]

M. M. Albayrakoglu, "Justification of New Manufacturing Technology: A Strategic Approach Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process," Production and Inventory Management Journal, First Quarter, vol. 37, pp. 71--76, 1996.

[7]

T. L. SAATY, The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation. New York: McGraw-Hill International Book Co., 1980.

[8]

G. Dede, et al., "Towards a Roadmap for Future Home Networking Systems: An Analytical Hierarchy Process Approach," IEEE Systems Journal, vol. 5, pp. 374--384, 2011.

[9]

G. Dede, et al., "Evaluation of Optical Wireless Technologies in Home Networking: An Analytical Hierarchy Process Approach," IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking, vol. 3, pp. 850--859, 2011.

[10]

S. Nikou, et al., "Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Approach for Selecting Mobile Service Category (Consumers' Preferences)," in 2011 10th International Conference on Mobile Business, 2011, pp. 119--128.

Digital Library

[11]

S. Qingyang and A. Jamalipour, "Network selection in an integrated wireless LAN and UMTS environment using mathematical modeling and computing techniques," IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 12, pp. 42--48, 2005.

Digital Library

[12]

D.-Y. Chang, "Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 95, pp. 649--655, 1996.

[13]

P. J. M. van Laarhoven and W. Pedrycz, "A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory," Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 11, pp. 229--241, 1983/01/01 1983.

[14]

T.-H. Chang and T.-C. Wang, "Using the fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approach for measuring the possibility of successful knowledge management," Information Sciences, vol. 179, pp. 355--370, 2009.

Digital Library

[15]

L. A. Zadeh, "Fuzzy sets," Information and Control, vol. 8, pp. 338--353, 1965.

Digital Library

[16]

J. J. Buckley, "Ranking alternatives using fuzzy numbers," Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 15, pp. 21--31, 1985/02/01 1985.

[17]

J. J. Buckley, "Fuzzy hierarchical analysis," Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 17, pp. 233--247, 1985/12/01 1985.

[18]

J. J. Buckley, et al., "Fuzzy hierarchical analysis revisited," European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 129, pp. 48--64, 2001.

[19]

T. L. Saaty and M. S. Ozdemir, "Why the magic number seven plus or minus two," Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 38, pp. 233--244, 2003.

Digital Library

[20]

N.-F. Pan, "Fuzzy AHP approach for selecting the suitable bridge construction method," Automation in Construction, vol. 17, pp. 958--965, 2008.

Cited By

Bhol SMohanty JPattnaik P(2024)Enhancing Cybersecurity Metrics Evaluation Through the Application of Fuzzy Ahp MethodologyIntelligent Computing Systems and Applications10.1007/978-981-97-5412-0_10(135-147)Online publication date: 20-Sep-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-5412-0_10
Rokkas TNeokosmidis I(2022)Classifying the factors affecting the adoption of the SDN-microSENSE innovationsProceedings of the 17th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security10.1145/3538969.3544481(1-6)Online publication date: 23-Aug-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3538969.3544481
Pickering BBoletsis CHalvorsrud RPhillips SSurridge M(2021)It’s Not My Problem: How Healthcare Models Relate to SME Cybersecurity AwarenessHCI for Cybersecurity, Privacy and Trust10.1007/978-3-030-77392-2_22(337-352)Online publication date: 3-Jul-2021
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77392-2_22

Index Terms

Factors affecting the market adoption of cyber-security products in energy and electrical systems: the case of SPEAR

Recommendations

Classifying the factors affecting the adoption of the SDN-microSENSE innovations
ARES '22: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security

This paper presents the results of a survey conducted in order to identify the most critical factors that can affect the market adoption of the innovations developed in the H2020 R&I project SDN-microSENSE. A hierarchy of the main criteria and sub-...
Factors Affecting the Adoption of Smart Energy at Universities
iiWAS '20: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications & Services

Energy demand has increased over the last few years, it is increasing faster than new technologies are being developed and faster than new energy sources can be found. The study explored the factors affecting the adoption smart energy at universities. ...
Charge Allocation in Hybrid Electrical Energy Storage Systems

A hybrid electrical energy storage (HEES) system consists of multiple banks of heterogeneous electrical energy storage (EES) elements placed between a power source and some load devices and providing charge storage and retrieval functions. For an HEES ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

ARES '20: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security

August 2020

1073 pages

ISBN:9781450388337

DOI:10.1145/3407023

Program Chairs:
Melanie Volkamer
Karlsruhe Institute of Technologie (KIT), Competence Center for Applied Security Technology (KASTEL)
,
Christian Wressnegger
Karlsruhe Institute of Technologie (KIT), Competence Center for Applied Security Technology (KASTEL)

Copyright © 2020 Owner/Author.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike International 4.0 License.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 25 August 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme

Conference

ARES 2020

ARES 2020: The 15th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security

August 25 - 28, 2020

Virtual Event, Ireland

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 228 of 451 submissions, 51%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

3
Total Citations
View Citations
339
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)66
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5

Reflects downloads up to 09 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Bhol SMohanty JPattnaik P(2024)Enhancing Cybersecurity Metrics Evaluation Through the Application of Fuzzy Ahp MethodologyIntelligent Computing Systems and Applications10.1007/978-981-97-5412-0_10(135-147)Online publication date: 20-Sep-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-5412-0_10
Rokkas TNeokosmidis I(2022)Classifying the factors affecting the adoption of the SDN-microSENSE innovationsProceedings of the 17th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security10.1145/3538969.3544481(1-6)Online publication date: 23-Aug-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3538969.3544481
Pickering BBoletsis CHalvorsrud RPhillips SSurridge M(2021)It’s Not My Problem: How Healthcare Models Relate to SME Cybersecurity AwarenessHCI for Cybersecurity, Privacy and Trust10.1007/978-3-030-77392-2_22(337-352)Online publication date: 3-Jul-2021
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77392-2_22

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents