research-article

The Values Clustering Teaching Activity – a Case Study on Two Teachers’ Appropriations of Open Educational Resources for Teaching Values in Design

Authors:

Elisabet M. Nilsson,

Wolmet Barendregt,

Anne-Marie Hansen,

Rikke Toft Nørgård,

Daisy YooAuthors Info & Claims

NordiCHI '20: Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society

Article No.: 98, Pages 1 - 8

https://doi.org/10.1145/3419249.3421238

Published: 26 October 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Currently, we see an increased focus on the social and environmental responsibilities of designers when designing technologies. There are however few academic examples describing how to teach students to become responsible designers and engineers who are attentive to values in design. We are therefore developing teaching activities as open educational resources for teaching values in design to students in different kinds of engineering and design courses and programs. The activities address values in different phases of the design process. This case study article reports on the appropriation of a teaching activity by two university teachers. The aim is to provide the reader with an insight into how a teaching activity that we have developed can be appropriated in different educational settings, what the teachers’ perceived effectiveness of this activity is, and what kind of adaptations individual teachers may need to make to fit them into their particular course.

References

[1]

Ronald Barnett. 2009. Knowing and becoming in the higher education curriculum. Studies in Higher Education 34, 4 (2009), 429–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070902771978 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070902771978

[2]

Ronald Barnett and Kelly Coate. 2005. Engaging the Curriculum in Higher Education. Open University Press., Berkshire.

[3]

Jonathan Belman and Mary Flanagan. 2010. Exploring the Creative Potential of Values Conscious Design: Students’ Experiences with the Values at Play Curriculum. Eludamos. Journal for Computer Game Culture. 4, 1, 57–67.

[4]

K. Biggs, J.and Collis. 1982. Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy. Academic Press., New York.

[5]

Susanne Bødker. 2003. A for Alternatives. Scand. J. Inf. Syst. 15, 1 (Jan. 2003), 87–89.

[6]

Gilbert Cockton. 2006. Designing Worth is Worth Designing. In Proceedings of the 4th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Changing Roles (Oslo, Norway) (NordiCHI ’06). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1145/1182475.1182493

Digital Library

[7]

Hilary Cottam. 2018. Radical help : how we can remake the relationships between us and revolutionise the welfare state. Virago, London.

[8]

Alan Dix. 2007. Designing for Appropriation. In Proceedings of the 21st British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: HCI...but Not as We Know It - Volume 2(University of Lancaster, United Kingdom) (BCS-HCI ’07). BCS Learning and Development Ltd., Swindon, GBR, 27–30.

[9]

Mary Flanagan, Daniel C. Howe, and Helen Nissenbaum. 2008. Embodying Values in Technology: Theory and Practice. In Information Technology and Moral Philosophy, Jeroen van den Hoven and John Weckert (Eds.). Cambridge University Press, 322–353. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511498725.017

[10]

Christopher Frauenberger and Peter Purgathofer. 2019. Ways of Thinking in Informatics. Commun. ACM 62, 7 (June 2019), 58–64. https://doi.org/10.1145/3329674

Digital Library

[11]

Batya Friedman. 1996. Value-Sensitive Design. Interactions 3, 6 (Dec. 1996), 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/242485.242493

Digital Library

[12]

Batya Friedman and David G. Hendry. 2019. Value Sensitive Design: Shaping Technology with Moral Imagination. The MIT Press.

[13]

Barbara J. Grosz, David Gray Grant, Kate Vredenburgh, Jeff Behrends, Lily Hu, Alison Simmons, and Jim Waldo. 2019. Embedded EthiCS: Integrating Ethics across CS Education. Commun. ACM 62, 8 (July 2019), 54–61. https://doi.org/10.1145/3330794

Digital Library

[14]

Ole Sejer Iversen and Tuck W. Leong. 2012. Values-Led Participatory Design: Mediating the Emergence of Values. In Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense Through Design (Copenhagen, Denmark) (NordiCHI ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 468–477. https://doi.org/10.1145/2399016.2399087

Digital Library

[15]

Belman J., Flanagan M., and Nissenbaum H.2009. Methods and Curricula for Values Conscious Design. Loading: The Official Journal of the Canadian Game Studies Association 4, 3(2009).

[16]

Belman Jonathan, Nissenbaum Helen, and Flanagan Mary. 2011. Grow-A-Game: A Tool for Values Conscious Design and Analysis of Digital Games. In DiGRA &#3911 - Proceedings of the 2011 DiGRA International Conference: Think Design Play. DiGRA/Utrecht School of the Arts. http://www.digra.org/wp-content/uploads/digital-library/11310.10534.pdf

[17]

Shadi Kheirandish, Mathias Funk, Stephan Wensveen, Maarten Verkerk, and Matthias Rauterberg. 2019. HuValue: a tool to support design students in considering human values in their design. International Journal of Technology and Design Education (May 2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09527-3

[18]

Bran Knowles and Janet Davis. 2017. Is Sustainability a Special Case for Persuasion?Interacting with Computers 29, 1 (2017), 58–70. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iww005

[19]

Helen Nissenbaum. [n.d.]. Values Embodied in Computer and Information Systems. Retrieved April 16, 2020 from https://nissenbaum.tech.cornell.edu/courses_values.html

[20]

Helen Nissenbaum. [n.d.]. Values in Design Council. Retrieved April 16, 2020 from https://nissenbaum.tech.cornell.edu/

[21]

Shalom H. Schwartz. 2012. An Overview of the Schwartz Theory of Basic Values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture 2, 1 (Dec. 2012). https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1116

[22]

M. L. J. Søndergaard and L. K. Hansen. 2017. Designing with Bias and Privilege. Nordes 2017 7(2017).

[23]

Lucy Suchman. 2002. Located Accountabilities in Technology Production. Scand. J. Inf. Syst. 14, 2 (Sept. 2002), 91–105. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=782686.782694

Digital Library

Cited By

Schaper MTamashiro MVan Mechelen MIversen OEriksson E(2024)Onboarding new talent to Child–Computer Interaction researchInternational Journal of Child-Computer Interaction10.1016/j.ijcci.2024.10065540:COnline publication date: 1-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.ijcci.2024.100655
Eriksson ENilsson EHansen ABekker T(2022)Teaching for Values in Human–Computer InteractionFrontiers in Computer Science10.3389/fcomp.2022.8307364Online publication date: 22-Feb-2022
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2022.830736
Constantin AKorte JGood JSim GRead JFails JEriksson E(2022)A Distributed Participatory Design Research Protocol for Co-designing with ChildrenProceedings of the 21st Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference10.1145/3501712.3535286(510-516)Online publication date: 27-Jun-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3501712.3535286

Index Terms

The Values Clustering Teaching Activity – a Case Study on Two Teachers’ Appropriations of Open Educational Resources for Teaching Values in Design

Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

Recommendations

Web-based logging of classroom teaching activities for blended learning
ICWL'07: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Advances in web based learning

Nowadays, eLearning has been adapted in all educational institutes, starting from kindergartens, primary schools, high schools, to the universities. Teachers are encouraged to use computer and Internet as a teaching medium in addition to the classroom ...
EFL Students’ Perception of Emergency Remote Learning: Associations with Teachers’ Behavior, Teaching Content, Learning Process and Learning Achievements
ICDEL '22: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Distance Education and Learning

The COVID-19 pandemic requires EFL teachers to take charge of emergency remote teaching shortly. Understanding students’ perception of the online teaching and learning could help instructors optimize the virtual EFL lecture planning. This study aimed to ...
Values & design in HCI education
CHI EA '14: CHI '14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems

The aim of this one-day workshop is to share existing research and practice, and to develop new strategies and tools, for teaching values and design in HCI. Through collaborative group discussions and exercises, participants will critique and create ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

NordiCHI '20: Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society

October 2020

1177 pages

ISBN:9781450375795

DOI:10.1145/3419249

General Chairs:
David Lamas
Tallinn University, Estonia
,
Hegle Sarapuu
Trinidad Wiseman, Estonia
,
Publications Chairs:
Ilja Šmorgun
Tallinn University, Estonia
,
Gerd Berget
Oslo Metropolitan University, Norway

Copyright © 2020 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 26 October 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Funding Sources

Erasmus+

Conference

NordiCHI '20

NordiCHI '20: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society

October 25 - 29, 2020

Tallinn, Estonia

Acceptance Rates

NordiCHI '20 Paper Acceptance Rate 89 of 399 submissions, 22%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 379 of 1,572 submissions, 24%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

3
Total Citations
View Citations
93
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)16
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 25 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Schaper MTamashiro MVan Mechelen MIversen OEriksson E(2024)Onboarding new talent to Child–Computer Interaction researchInternational Journal of Child-Computer Interaction10.1016/j.ijcci.2024.10065540:COnline publication date: 1-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.ijcci.2024.100655
Eriksson ENilsson EHansen ABekker T(2022)Teaching for Values in Human–Computer InteractionFrontiers in Computer Science10.3389/fcomp.2022.8307364Online publication date: 22-Feb-2022
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2022.830736
Constantin AKorte JGood JSim GRead JFails JEriksson E(2022)A Distributed Participatory Design Research Protocol for Co-designing with ChildrenProceedings of the 21st Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference10.1145/3501712.3535286(510-516)Online publication date: 27-Jun-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3501712.3535286
Eriksson EBarendregt WTorgersson O(2022)Ethical dilemmas experienced by students in Child–Computer Interaction—A case studyInternational Journal of Child-Computer Interaction10.1016/j.ijcci.2021.10034130:COnline publication date: 9-Apr-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.ijcci.2021.100341

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents