Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3421937.3421961acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespervasivehealthConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Personalized Process and Decision Support in Emergency Care by Mining Electronic Health Records and Sensor Data

Published: 02 February 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Physicians are constantly confronted with decisions on what should be done next during the diagnosis and treatment of patients. Non-routine medical treatment processes, for example in emergency care, are the most extreme group of such processes due to the large and diverse set of options at each decision point. Such decision making can be very demanding and even overwhelming, especially for less experienced medical personnel. The current IT infrastructure in healthcare remains lacking in support for decision making. In this research project, we lay the foundation process & decision support system that externalizes the knowledge and experience from historic data to offer personalized and process-aware decision support to physicians. The systems uses two separate but complementary components: a process engine and a prediction generator.

References

[1]
Wil M.P. van der Aalst. 2013. Business Process Management: A Comprehensive Survey. ISRN Software Engineering: 1--37. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/507984
[2]
Estefanía Caballero-Ruiz, Gema García-Sáez, Mercedes Rigla, María Villaplana, Belen Pons, and M. Elena Hernando. 2017. A web-based clinical decision support system for gestational diabetes: Automatic diet prescription and detection of insulin needs. International Journal of Medical Informatics 102: 35--49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.02.014
[3]
Claudio Di Ciccio, Andrea Marrella, and Alessandro Russo. 2015. Knowledge-Intensive Processes: Characteristics, Requirements and Analysis of Contemporary Approaches. Journal on Data Semantics 4, 1: 29--57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13740-014-0038-4
[4]
Anne Lise Courbis et al. 2018. Electronic Clinical Decision Support System for allergic rhinitis management: MASK e-CDSS. Clinical and Experimental Allergy 48, 12: 1640--1653. https://doi.org/10.1111/cea.13230
[5]
Marlon Dumas, Marcello La Rosa, Jan Mendling, and Hajo A. Reijers. 2018. Fundamentals of Business Process Management. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56509-4
[6]
Pierre Durieux, Rémy Nizard, Philippe Ravaud, Nicolas Mounier, and Eric Lepage. 2000. A Clinical Decision Support System for Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism. JAMA 283, 21: 2816--2821. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.283.21.2816
[7]
Stijn Goedertier, Jan Vanthienen, and Filip Caron. 2015. Declarative business process modelling: Principles and modelling languages. Enterprise Information Systems 9, 2: 161--185. https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2013.830340
[8]
A.R. Hevner, S.T. March, J Park, and S Ram. 2004. Design science in Information Systems research. MIS Quarterly 28, 1: 75--105.
[9]
Richard Lenz, Mor Peleg, and Manfred Reichert. 2012. Healthcare Process Support: Achievements, Challenges, Current Research. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Organizations (IJKBO) 4, 2.
[10]
Richard Lenz and Manfred Reichert. 2007. IT support for healthcare processes -premises, challenges, perspectives. Data & Knowledge Engineering 61, 1: 39--58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.datak.2006.04.007
[11]
Paul Lillrank and Matti Liukko. 2004. Standard, routine and non-routine processes in health care. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance 17, 1: 39--46. https://doi.org/10.1108/09526860410515927
[12]
Fabrizio Maria Maggi, Chiara Di Francescomarino, Marlon Dumas, and Chiara Ghidini. 2014. Predictive monitoring of business processes. In CAiSE 2014. LNCS vol. 8484, 457--472. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07881-6_31
[13]
Steven Mertens, Frederik Gailly, and Geert Poels. 2017. Towards a decision-aware declarative process modeling language for knowledge-intensive processes. Expert Systems with Applications 87: 316--334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.06.024
[14]
Steven Mertens, Frederik Gailly, and Geert Poels. 2018. Discovering health-care processes using DeciClareMiner. Health Systems - Special Issue: SIG-Health Design, Innovation, and Impact of Healthcare IT 7, 3: 195--211. https://doi.org/10.1080/20476965.2017.1405876
[15]
Steven Mertens, Frederik Gailly, and Geert Poels. 2019. A Generic Framework for Flexible and Data-Aware Business Process Engines. In Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE) Workshops. LNBIP vol. 349, H. Proper and J. Stirna (eds.). Springer, Cham, 201--213. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20948-3_18
[16]
Steven Mertens, Frederik Gailly, Diederik Van Sassenbroeck, and Geert Poels. 2019. Comparing strategies to generate experience-based clinical process recommendations that leverage similarity to historic data. In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI), 1--11. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHI.2019.8904693
[17]
Steven Mertens, Frederik Gailly, Diederik Van Sassenbroeck, and Geert Poels. 2020. Integrated Declarative Process and Decision Discovery of the Emergency Care Process. Information Systems Frontiers. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-020-10078-5
[18]
Somayeh Nazari, Mohammad Fallah, Hamed Kazemipoor, and Amir Salehipour. 2018. A fuzzy inference- fuzzy analytic hierarchy process-based clinical decision support system for diagnosis of heart diseases. Expert Systems with Applications 95: 261--271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.11.001
[19]
Ken Peffers, Tuure Tuunanen, Marcus A Rothenberger, and Samir Chatterjee. 2007. A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research. Journal of Management Information Systems 24, 3: 45--77.
[20]
Saeed Piri, Dursun Delen, Tieming Liu, and Hamed M. Zolbanin. 2017. A data analytics approach to building a clinical decision support system for diabetic retinopathy: Developing and deploying a model ensemble. Decision Support Systems 101: 12--27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2017.05.012
[21]
Ying Shen, Kaiqi Yuan, Daoyuan Chen, Joël Colloc, Min Yang, Yaliang Li, and Kai Lei. 2018. An ontology-driven clinical decision support system (IDDAP) for infectious disease diagnosis and antibiotic prescription. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 86: 20--32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2018.01.003

Index Terms

  1. Personalized Process and Decision Support in Emergency Care by Mining Electronic Health Records and Sensor Data

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        PervasiveHealth '20: Proceedings of the 14th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare
        May 2020
        446 pages
        ISBN:9781450375320
        DOI:10.1145/3421937
        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        In-Cooperation

        • EAI: The European Alliance for Innovation

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 02 February 2021

        Permissions

        Request permissions for this article.

        Check for updates

        Author Tags

        1. Business Process Management
        2. Decision Support Systems
        3. Knowledge Management
        4. Process Execution

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Conference

        PervasiveHealth '20

        Acceptance Rates

        PervasiveHealth '20 Paper Acceptance Rate 55 of 116 submissions, 47%;
        Overall Acceptance Rate 55 of 116 submissions, 47%

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • 0
          Total Citations
        • 95
          Total Downloads
        • Downloads (Last 12 months)14
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
        Reflects downloads up to 17 Feb 2025

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        View Options

        Login options

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        Figures

        Tables

        Media

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media