Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3424911.3425518acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdlfmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An Analysis of Musical Work Datasets and their Current Level of Linkage

Published: 16 October 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Music works are key concepts that present a powerful linkage potential fully acknowledged in the fields of digital music libraries and digital musicology. They form an abstract connecting point for the entities referring to them, and large work datasets act as authority data that offer a promising analysis and search potential. These days, digital music libraries and digital musicology research rely primarily on datasets that have been created over the last decade, mostly from previously existing datasets, such as bibliographic records. In this paper, we try to provide a better understanding of the content of some of the most important datasets available and to evaluate their level of linking. We analyse two leading library datasets, namely those of the Bibliothèque nationale de France (BnF) and the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek (DNB), both available in RDF format, and look at how many works they contain, how these are distributed over time, and their distribution by composer. We compare the results with two other datasets that have completely different backgrounds, namely the Petrucci Music Library (known as IMLSP) and MusicBrainz datasets, two crowd-sourced projects. We evaluate the level of linking the two library datasets currently have with each other through the Virtual International Authority File (VIAF), and their current linking status with other libraries contributing to VIAF. We also evaluate the linking status the IMSLP and the MusicBrainz projects currently have with each other and with other datasets.

References

[1]
Rick Bennett, Christina Hengel-Dittrich, Edward T. O’Neill, and Barbara B. Tillett. 2006. VIAF (Virtual International Authority File): Linking Die Deutsche Bibliothek and Library of Congress Name Authority Files. In IFLA WLIC 2006 ”Libraries: Dynamic Engines for the Knowledge and Information Society”. IFLA, Seoul, Korea. http://archive.ifla.org/IV/ifla72/papers/123-Bennett-en.pdf
[2]
Katrin Bicher and Barbara Wiermann. 2018. Normdaten zu “Werken der Musik” und ihr Potenzial für die digitale Musikwissenschaft. Bibliothek Forschung und Praxis 42, 2 (2018), 222–235. https://doi.org/10.1515/bfp-2018-0043 Place: Berlin, Boston Publisher: De Gruyter.
[3]
Vincent Boulet. 2013. S’appuyer sur la structure des données et les liens : le format MARC comme tremplin pour le Web de données : l’exemple de data.bnf.fr. In IFLA WLIC 2013 ”Future Libraries: Infinite Possibilities”. IFLA, Singapore. http://library.ifla.org/id/eprint/250 Backup Publisher: IFLA.
[4]
Françoise Bourdon and Vincent Boulet. 2011. VIAF: A hub for a multilingual access to varied collections. In IFLA WLIC 2011 ”Libraries beyond libraries: Integration, Innovation and Information for all”, Yves-Gaël Lanchec (Ed.). Fédération internationale des associations de bibliothécaires et d’institutions, San Juan, Puerto Rico. http://conference.ifla.org/past/ifla77/79-bourdon-en.pdfBackup Publisher: Fédération internationale des associations de bibliothécaires et d’institutions.
[5]
Sophie A. Brady. 2019. Review: International Music Score Library Project (IMSLP). Journal of the American Musicological Society 72, 3 (Dec. 2019), 920–935. https://doi.org/10.1525/jams.2019.72.3.920
[6]
Janifer Gatenby, Gail Thornburg, and Jay Weitz. 2015. Collected Work Clustering in WorldCat. Code4Lib Journal 30 (Oct. 2015). https://journal.code4lib.org/articles/10963
[7]
Thomas Hickey and Jenny Toves. 2014. Managing ambiguity in VIAF. D-Lib Magazine 20 (July 2014). https://doi.org/10.1045/july2014-hickey
[8]
Pasquale Lisena, Manel Achichi, Pierre Choffé, Cécile Cecconi, Konstantin Todorov, Bernard Jacquemin, and Raphaël Troncy. 2018. Improving (Re-) Usability of Musical Datasets: An Overview of the DOREMUS Project. Bibliothek Forschung und Praxis 42, 2 (2018), 194–205. https://doi.org/10.1515/bfp-2018-0023
[9]
Giulia Manzotti. 2010. Analisi e riflessioni sul VIAF, Virtual International Authority File. JLIS.it. Italian Journal of Library and Information Science. Rivista italiana di biblioteconomia, archivistica e scienza dell’informazione 1, 2(2010), 357–381.
[10]
IFLA Study Group on the FRBR. 2009. Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records. https://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/frbr/frbr_2008.pdf
[11]
Agnès Simon, Romain Wenz, Vincent Michel, and Adrien Di Mascio. 2013. Publishing Bibliographic Records on the Web of Data: Opportunities for the BnF (French National Library). In The Semantic Web: Semantics and Big Data, Philipp Cimiano, Oscar Corcho, Valentina Presutti, Laura Hollink, and Sebastian Rudolph(Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 563–577.
[12]
Richard P. Smiraglia. 2001. Musical Works as Information Retrieval Entities: Epistemological Perspectives. In ISMIR 2001, 2nd International Symposium on Music Information Retrieval. http://ismir2001.ismir.net/pdf/smiraglia.pdf
[13]
A. Swartz. 2002. MusicBrainz: a semantic Web service. IEEE Intelligent Systems 17, 1 (2002), 76–77.
[14]
Daniel Vila-Suero, Boris Villazón-Terrazas, and Asunción Gómez-Pérez. 2013. datos.bne.es: A library linked dataset. Semantic Web 4, 3 (2013), 307–313. https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-120094 Publisher: IOS Press.
[15]
David M. Weigl, David Lewis, Tim Crawford, Ian Knopke, and Kevin R. Page. 2019. On providing semantic alignment and unified access to music library metadata. International Journal on Digital Libraries 20, 1 (March 2019), 25–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-017-0223-9

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
DLfM '20: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Digital Libraries for Musicology
October 2020
52 pages
ISBN:9781450387606
DOI:10.1145/3424911
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 16 October 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. data quality assessment
  2. metadata and metadata schemas for music
  3. musical corpus-building at scale

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

DLfM '20

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 27 of 48 submissions, 56%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 118
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 09 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media