research-article

Flex-ER: A Platform to Evaluate Interaction Techniques for Immersive Visualizations

Authors:

María Jesús Lobo,

Christophe Hurter,

Pourang IraniAuthors Info & Claims

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Volume 4, Issue ISS

Article No.: 195, Pages 1 - 20

https://doi.org/10.1145/3427323

Published: 04 November 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Extended Reality (XR) systems (which encapsulate AR, VR and MR) is an emerging field which enables the development of novel visualization and interaction techniques. To develop and to assess such techniques, researchers and designers have to face choices in terms of which development tools to adopt, and with very little information about how such tools support some of the very basic tasks for information visualization, such as selecting data items, linking and navigating. As a solution, we propose Flex-ER, a flexible web-based environment that enables users to prototype, debug and share experimental conditions and results. Flex-ER enables users to quickly switch between hardware platforms and input modalities by using a JSON specification that supports both defining interaction techniques and tasks at a low cost. We demonstrate the flexibility of the environment through three task design examples: brushing, linking and navigating. A qualitative user study suggest that Flex-ER can be helpful to prototype and explore different interaction techniques for immersive analytics.

Supplementary Material

ZIP File (v4issa195aux.zip)

JSON specification and documentation.

Download
799.96 KB

MP4 File (v4issa195.mp4)

Supplemental video

Download
48.89 MB

References

[1]

W. Aigner, S. Hoffmann, and A. Rind. 2013. EvalBench: A Software Library for Visualization Evaluation. Computer Graphics Forum 32, 3pt1 (2013), 41--50. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.12091 arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/cgf.12091

[2]

Caroline Appert and Michel Beaudouin-Lafon. 2006. SwingStates: Adding State Machines to the Swing Toolkit. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Montreux, Switzerland) (UIST '06). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 319--322. https://doi.org/10.1145/1166253.1166302

Digital Library

[3]

Caroline Appert, Stéphane Huot, Pierre Dragicevic, and Michel Beaudouin-Lafon. 2009. FlowStates: Prototypage D'Applications Interactives Avec Des Flots De DonnÉEs Et Des Machines À ÉTats. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Association Francophone D'Interaction Homme-Machine (Grenoble, France) (IHM '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 119--128. https://doi.org/10.1145/1629826.1629845

Digital Library

[4]

Ferran Argelaguet and Carlos Andujar. 2013. A survey of 3D object selection techniques for virtual environments. Computers Graphics 37, 3 (2013), 121 - 136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2012.12.003

Digital Library

[5]

B. Bach, R. Sicat, J. Beyer, M. Cordeil, and H. Pfister. 2018. The Hologram in My Hand: How Effective is Interactive Exploration of 3D Visualizations in Immersive Tangible Augmented Reality? IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 24, 1 (Jan 2018), 457--467. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2017.2745941

[6]

Renaud Blanch and Michel Beaudouin-Lafon. 2006. Programming Rich Interactions Using the Hierarchical State Machine Toolkit. In Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (Venezia, Italy) (AVI '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 51--58. https://doi.org/10.1145/1133265.1133275

Digital Library

[7]

M. Bostock, V. Ogievetsky, and J. Heer. 2011. D3 Data-Driven Documents. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 17, 12 (Dec 2011), 2301--2309. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2011.185

Digital Library

[8]

Doug A. Bowman, Donald B. Johnson, and Larry F. Hodges. 2001. Testbed Evaluation of Virtual Environment Interaction Techniques. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 10, 1 (2001), 75--95. https://doi.org/10.1162/ 105474601750182333 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1162/105474601750182333

Digital Library

[9]

W. Broll, I. Lindt, J. Ohlenburg, I. Herbst, M. Wittkamper, and T. Novotny. 2005. An infrastructure for realizing custom-tailored augmented reality user interfaces. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 11, 6 (Nov 2005), 722?733. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2005.90

Digital Library

[10]

P. W. S. Butcher, N. W. John, and P. D. Ritsos. 2020. VRIA: A Web-based Framework for Creating Immersive Analytics Experiences. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (2020), 1--1.

[11]

W. Büschel, S. Vogt, and R. Dachselt. 2019. Augmented Reality Graph Visualizations. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 39, 3 (2019), 29--40.

Digital Library

[12]

Zhutian Chen, Wai Tong, Qianwen Wang, Benjamin Bach, and Huamin Qu. 2020. Augmenting Static Visualizations with PapARVis Designer. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831. 3376436

Digital Library

[13]

J. Choi, D. G. Park, Y. L. Wong, E. Fisher, and N. Elmqvist. 2015. VisDock: A Toolkit for Cross-Cutting Interactions in Visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 21, 9 (Sep. 2015), 1087--1100. https: //doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2015.2414454

Digital Library

[14]

M. Cordeil, A. Cunningham, B. Bach, C. Hurter, B. H. Thomas, K. Marriott, and T. Dwyer. 2019. IATK: An Immersive Analytics Toolkit. In 2019 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). 200--209. https://doi.org/10. 1109/VR.2019.8797978

[15]

M. Cordeil, T. Dwyer, K. Klein, B. Laha, K. Marriott, and B. H. Thomas. 2017. Immersive Collaborative Analysis of Network Connectivity: CAVE-style or Head-Mounted Display? IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 23, 1 (Jan 2017), 441--450. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2016.2599107

Digital Library

[16]

Sarah H. Creem-Regehr, Jeanine K. Stefanucci, William B. Thompson, Nathan Nash, and Michael McCardell. 2015. Egocentric Distance Perception in the Oculus Rift (DK2). In Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Applied Perception (Tbingen, Germany) (SAP '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 47--50. https://doi.org/10.1145/2804408.2804422

Digital Library

[17]

A. Drogemuller, A. Cunningham, J.Walsh, M. Cordeil,W. Ross, and B. Thomas. 2018. Evaluating Navigation Techniques for 3D Graph Visualizations in Virtual Reality. In 2018 International Symposium on Big Data Visual and Immersive Analytics (BDVA). 1--10.

[18]

Alexander Eiselmayer, Chat Wacharamanotham, Michel Beaudouin-Lafon, and Wendy E. Mackay. 2019. Touchstone2: An Interactive Environment for Exploring Trade-offs in HCI Experiment Design. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., Vol. 4, No. ISS, Article 195. Publication date: November 2020. 195:18 María-Jesús Lobo et al. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 217, 11 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300447

[19]

Niklas Elmqvist and Ji Soo Yi. 2015. Patterns for visualization evaluation. Information Visualization 14, 3 (2015), 250--269. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473871613513228 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/1473871613513228

[20]

R. Englund, S. Kottravel, and T. Ropinski. 2016. A crowdsourcing system for integrated and reproducible evaluation in scientific visualization. In 2016 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis). 40--17. https://doi.org/10.1109/ PACIFICVIS.2016.7465249

[21]

Ugo Erra, Delfina Malandrino, and Luca Pepe. 2019. Virtual Reality Interfaces for Interacting with Three-Dimensional Graphs. International Journal of Human?Computer Interaction 35, 1 (2019), 75--88. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318. 2018.1429061

[22]

R. Etemadpour, E. Monson, and L. Linsen. 2013. The Effect of Stereoscopic Immersive Environments on Projection-Based Multi-dimensional Data Visualization. In 2013 17th International Conference on Information Visualisation. 389--397.

[23]

Fiona Fidler and John Wilcox. 2018. Reproducibility of Scientific Results. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (winter 2018 ed.), Edward N. Zalta (Ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.

[24]

J. A. W. Filho, W. Stuerzlinger, and L. Nedel. 2020. Evaluating an Immersive Space-Time Cube Geovisualization for Intuitive Trajectory Data Exploration. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 26, 1 (2020), 514--524.

[25]

Daniel Filonik, Tomasz Bednarz, Markus Rittenbruch, and Marcus Foth. 2016. Glance: Generalized Geometric Primitives and Transformations for Information Visualization in AR/VR Environments. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGGRAPH Conference on Virtual-Reality Continuum and Its Applications in Industry - Volume 1 (Zhuhai, China) (VRCAI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 461--468. https://doi.org/10.1145/3013971.3014006

Digital Library

[26]

A. Fonnet and Y. Prié. 2019. Survey of Immersive Analytics. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (2019), 1--1.

[27]

GW French, J Richard Kennaway, and AM Day. 2014. Programs as visual, interactive documents. Software: Practice and Experience 44, 8 (2014), 911--930.

Digital Library

[28]

N. Greffard, F. Picarougne, and P. Kuntz. 2014. Beyond the classical monoscopic 3D in graph analytics: An experimental study of the impact of stereoscopy. In 2014 IEEE VIS International Workshop on 3DVis (3DVis). 19--24.

[29]

B. Hoppenstedt, T. Probst, M. Reichert, W. Schlee, K. Kammerer, M. Spiliopoulou, J. Schobel, M. Winter, A. Felnhofer, O. D. Kothgassner, and R. Pryss. 2019. Applicability of Immersive Analytics in Mixed Reality: Usability Study. IEEE Access 7 (2019), 71921--71932.

[30]

C. Hurter, N. H. Riche, S. M. Drucker, M. Cordeil, R. Alligier, and R. Vuillemot. 2019. FiberClay: Sculpting Three Dimensional Trajectories to Reveal Structural Insights. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 25, 1 (Jan 2019), 704--714. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2018.2865191

Digital Library

[31]

N.W. Kim, E. Schweickart, Z. Liu, M. Dontcheva,W. Li, J. Popovic, and H. Pfister. 2017. Data-Driven Guides: Supporting Expressive Design for Information Graphics. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 23, 1 (Jan 2017), 491--500. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2016.2598620

Digital Library

[32]

P. Koytek, C. Perin, J. Vermeulen, E. André, and S. Carpendale. 2018. MyBrush: Brushing and Linking with Personal Agency. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 24, 1 (Jan 2018), 605--615. https://doi.org/10.1109/ TVCG.2017.2743859

[33]

Matthias Kraus, Katrin Angerbauer, Juri Buchmüller, Daniel Schweitzer, Daniel A. Keim, Michael Sedlmair, and Johannes Fuchs. 2020. Assessing 2D and 3D Heatmaps for Comparative Analysis: An Empirical Study. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376675

Digital Library

[34]

M. Kraus, N.Weiler, D. Oelke, J. Kehrer, D. A. Keim, and J. Fuchs. 2020. The Impact of Immersion on Cluster Identification Tasks. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 26, 1 (2020), 525--535.

[35]

O. Kwon, C. Muelder, K. Lee, and K. Ma. 2016. A Study of Layout, Rendering, and Interaction Methods for Immersive Graph Visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 22, 7 (July 2016), 1802-1815. https: //doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2016.2520921

Digital Library

[36]

H. Lam, E. Bertini, P. Isenberg, C. Plaisant, and S. Carpendale. 2012. Empirical Studies in Information Visualization: Seven Scenarios. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 18, 9 (Sep. 2012), 1520--1536. https: //doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2011.279

Digital Library

[37]

David Ledo, Steven Houben, Jo Vermeulen, Nicolai Marquardt, Lora Oehlberg, and Saul Greenberg. 2018. Evaluation Strategies for HCI Toolkit Research. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 36, 17 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574. 3173610

Digital Library

[38]

J. K. Li and K. Ma. 2020. P5: Portable Progressive Parallel Processing Pipelines for Interactive Data Analysis and Visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 26, 1 (2020), 1151--1160. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., Vol. 4, No. ISS, Article 195. Publication date: November 2020. Flex-ER: A Platform to Evaluate Interaction Techniques for Immersive Visualizations 195:19

Digital Library

[39]

J. Liu, A. Prouzeau, B. Ens, and T. Dwyer. 2020. Design and Evaluation of Interactive Small Multiples Data Visualisation in Immersive Spaces. In 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). 588--597.

[40]

P. Lubos, G. Bruder, and F. Steinicke. 2014. Analysis of direct selection in head-mounted display environments. In 2014 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI). 11--18. https://doi.org/10.1109/3DUI.2014.6798834

[41]

Wendy E. Mackay, Caroline Appert, Michel Beaudouin-Lafon, Olivier Chapuis, Yangzhou Du, Jean-Daniel Fekete, and Yves Guiard. 2007. Touchstone: Exploratory Design of Experiments. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1425--1434. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240840

Digital Library

[42]

Kim Marriott, Jian Chen, Marcel Hlawatsch, Takayuki Itoh, Miguel A. Nacenta, Guido Reina, andWolfgang Stuerzlinger. 2018. Just 5 Questions: Toward a Design Framework for Immersive Analytics. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 259--288. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3-030-01388--2_9

[43]

Xiaojun Meng, Pin Sym Foong, Simon Perrault, and Shengdong Zhao. 2017. NexP: A Beginner Friendly Toolkit for Designing and Conducting Controlled Experiments. In Human-Computer Interaction - INTERACT 2017, Regina Bernhaupt, Girish Dalvi, Anirudha Joshi, Devanuj K. Balkrishan, Jacki O'Neill, and Marco Winckler (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 132-141.

[44]

T. Munzner. 2009. A Nested Model for Visualization Design and Validation. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 15, 6 (Nov 2009), 921--928. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2009.111

Digital Library

[45]

Brad Myers, Scott E Hudson, and Randy Pausch. 2000. Past, present, and future of user interface software tools. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 7, 1 (2000), 3--28.

Digital Library

[46]

Brad A Myers. 1986. Visual programming, programming by example, and program visualization: a taxonomy. ACM sigchi bulletin 17, 4 (1986), 59--66.

Digital Library

[47]

Michael Nebeling, Maximilian Speicher, Xizi Wang, Shwetha Rajaram, Brian D. Hall, Zijian Xie, Alexander R. E. Raistrick, Michelle Aebersold, Edward G. Happ, Jiayin Wang, Yanan Sun, Lotus Zhang, Leah E. Ramsier, and Rhea Kulkarni. 2020. MRAT: The Mixed Reality Analytics Toolkit. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376330

Digital Library

[48]

Alex Olwal and Steven Feiner. 2004. Unit: Modular Development of Distributed Interaction Techniques for Highly Interactive User Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2Nd International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques in Australasia and South East Asia (Singapore) (GRAPHITE '04). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 131--138. https://doi.org/10.1145/988834.988857

Digital Library

[49]

Stephen Oney, Brad Myers, and Joel Brandt. 2014. InterState: A Language and Environment for Expressing Interface Behavior. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Honolulu, Hawaii, USA) (UIST '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 263--272. https://doi.org/10.1145/2642918.2647358

Digital Library

[50]

Etienne Peillard, Thomas Thebaud, Jean-Marie Normand, Ferran Argelaguet, Guillaume Moreau, and Anatole Lécuyer. 2019. Virtual Objects Look Farther on the Sides: The Anisotropy of Distance Perception in Virtual Reality. In VR 2019 - 26th IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces. IEEE, Osaka, Japan, 1--10. https://hal.archivesouvertes. fr/hal-02084069

[51]

Emmanuel Pietriga, Caroline Appert, and Michel Beaudouin-Lafon. 2007. Pointing and beyond: an operationalization and preliminary evaluation of multi-scale searching. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 1215--1224.

Digital Library

[52]

Ivan Poupyrev, SuzanneWeghorst, Mark Billinghurst, and Tadao Ichikawa. 1997. A Framework and Testbed for Studying Manipulation Techniques for Immersive VR. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (Lausanne, Switzerland) (VRST '97). ACM, NewYork, NY, USA, 21--28. https://doi.org/10.1145/261135.261141

Digital Library

[53]

Arnaud Prouzeau, Maxime Cordeil, Clément Robin, Barrett Ens, Bruce H. Thomas, and Tim Dwyer. 2019. Scaptics and Highlight-Planes: Immersive Interaction Techniques for Finding Occluded Features in 3D Scatterplots. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2019, May 4--9, 2019, Glasgow, Scotland Uk). Glasgow, United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300555

Digital Library

[54]

Donghao Ren, Bongshin Lee, and Tobias Höllerer. 2017. Stardust: Accessible and Transparent GPU Support for Information Visualization Rendering. Computer Graphics Forum 36, 3 (2017), 179--188. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.13178

Digital Library

[55]

Maxime Reynal, Euan Freeman, and Stephen Brewster. 2020. Avoiding Collisions When Interacting with Levitating Particle Displays. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI EA '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--7. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 3334480.3382965

[56]

Arvind Satyanarayan and Jeffrey Heer. [n.d.]. Lyra: An Interactive Visualization Design Environment. Computer Graphics Forum 33, 3 ([n. d.]), 351--360. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.12391 arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/cgf.12391 Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., Vol. 4, No. ISS, Article 195. Publication date: November 2020. 195:20 María-Jesús Lobo et al.

[57]

A. Satyanarayan, D. Moritz, K. Wongsuphasawat, and J. Heer. 2017. Vega-Lite: A Grammar of Interactive Graphics. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 23, 1 (Jan 2017), 341--350. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG. 2016.2599030

Digital Library

[58]

A. Satyanarayan, R. Russell, J. Hoffswell, and J. Heer. 2016. Reactive Vega: A Streaming Dataflow Architecture for Declarative Interactive Visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 22, 1 (Jan 2016), 659--668. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2015.2467091

Digital Library

[59]

R. Sicat, J. Li, J. Choi, M. Cordeil, W. Jeong, B. Bach, and H. Pfister. 2019. DXR: A Toolkit for Building Immersive Data Visualizations. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 25, 1 (Jan 2019), 715--725. https: //doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2018.2865152

Digital Library

[60]

Mark Simpson, Jiayan Zhao, and Alexander Klippel. 2017. Take a walk: Evaluating movement types for data visualization in immersive virtual reality. In Proceedings of Workshop on Immersive Analytics (IA).

[61]

Terece L. Turton, Anne S. Berres, David H. Rogers, and James Ahrens. 2017. ETK: An Evaluation Toolkit for Visualization User Studies. In Proceedings of the Eurographics/IEEE VGTC Conference on Visualization: Short Papers (Barcelona, Spain) (EuroVis '17). Eurographics Association, Goslar Germany, Germany, 43--47. https://doi.org/10.2312/eurovisshort. 20171131

[62]

Teoman Ulusoy, Kurtis Thorvald Danyluk, and Wesley J Willett. 2018. Beyond the Physical: Examining Scale and Annotation in Virtual Reality Visualizations. Technical Report. Department of Computer Science, University of Calgary.

[63]

J. A.Wagner Filho, C.M.D.S. Freitas, and L. Nedel. 2018. VirtualDesk: A Comfortable and Efficient Immersive Information Visualization Approach. Computer Graphics Forum 37, 3 (2018), 415--426. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.13430

[64]

J. A. Wagner Filho, M. F. Rey, C. M. D. S. Freitas, and L. Nedel. 2018. Immersive Visualization of Abstract Information: An Evaluation on Dimensionally-Reduced Data Scatterplots. In 2018 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). 483--490. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2018.8447558

[65]

Y. Yang, T. Dwyer, B. Jenny, K. Marriott, M. Cordeil, and H. Chen. 2019. Origin-Destination Flow Maps in Immersive Environments. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 25, 1 (Jan 2019), 693--703. https://doi.org/10. 1109/TVCG.2018.2865192

Digital Library

[66]

Yalong Yang, Tim Dwyer, Kimbal Marriott, Bernhard Jenny, and Sarah Goodwin. 2020. Tilt Map: Interactive Transitions Between Choropleth Map, Prism Map and Bar Chart in Immersive Environments. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (2020), 1--1. https://doi.org/10.1109/tvcg.2020.3004137

Digital Library

[67]

Yalong Yang, Bernhard Jenny, Tim Dwyer, Kim Marriott, Haohui Chen, and Maxime Cordeil. [n.d.]. Maps and Globes in Virtual Reality. Computer Graphics Forum 37, 3 ([n. d.]), 427--438. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.13431 arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/cgf.13431

[68]

Ji Soo Yi, Youn ah Kang, and John Stasko. 2007. Toward a deeper understanding of the role of interaction in information visualization. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 13, 6 (2007), 1224--1231.

Cited By

Woo RHarley DWallace J(2024)"I'm not alone in that battle": Designing Mobile AR for Mental Health Communication and Community ConnectednessProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661626(328-342)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3661626
Batch AButcher PRitsos PElmqvist N(2024)Wizualization: A “Hard Magic” Visualization System for Immersive and Ubiquitous AnalyticsIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2023.332658030:1(507-517)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TVCG.2023.3326580
Mahadevan KZhou QFitzmaurice GGrossman TAnderson F(2023)Tesseract: Querying Spatial Design Recordings by Manipulating Worlds in MiniatureProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3580876(1-16)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3544548.3580876
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Flex-ER: A Platform to Evaluate Interaction Techniques for Immersive Visualizations
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
  2. Visualization
    1. Empirical studies in visualization

Recommendations

STREAM: Exploring the Combination of Spatially-Aware Tablets with Augmented Reality Head-Mounted Displays for Immersive Analytics
CHI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Recent research in the area of immersive analytics demonstrated the utility of head-mounted augmented reality devices for visual data analysis. However, it can be challenging to use the by default supported mid-air gestures to interact with ...
A Pilot Study Comparing User Interactions Between Augmented and Virtual Reality
Advances in Visual Computing
Abstract
Immersive Analytics (IA) and consumer adoption of augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) head-mounted displays (HMDs) are both rapidly growing. When used in conjunction, stereoscopic IA environments can offer improved user understanding ...
Ground Control: Leveraging the User's Spatial Position as an Input Modality in an Embodied Immersive Analysis Use Case
MuC '24: Proceedings of Mensch und Computer 2024

Extended Reality (XR) has already enabled sophisticated implementations of immersive visualizations, providing a more intuitive and engaging way of analyzing data. Yet, the user interaction with such immersive visualizations remains challenging, often ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction Volume 4, Issue ISS

ISS

November 2020

488 pages

EISSN:2573-0142

DOI:10.1145/3433930

Editor:
Jeff Nichols
Apple Inc.

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2020 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 04 November 2020

Published in PACMHCI Volume 4, Issue ISS

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

SESAR H2020

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

7
Total Citations
View Citations
374
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)29
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

Reflects downloads up to 12 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Woo RHarley DWallace J(2024)"I'm not alone in that battle": Designing Mobile AR for Mental Health Communication and Community ConnectednessProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661626(328-342)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3661626
Batch AButcher PRitsos PElmqvist N(2024)Wizualization: A “Hard Magic” Visualization System for Immersive and Ubiquitous AnalyticsIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2023.332658030:1(507-517)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TVCG.2023.3326580
Mahadevan KZhou QFitzmaurice GGrossman TAnderson F(2023)Tesseract: Querying Spatial Design Recordings by Manipulating Worlds in MiniatureProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3580876(1-16)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3544548.3580876
Turan ZKarabey S(2023)The use of immersive technologies in distance education: A systematic reviewEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-023-11849-828:12(16041-16064)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10639-023-11849-8
Pang YReinecke KJust R(2022)Apéritif: Scaffolding Preregistrations to Automatically Generate Analysis Code and Methods DescriptionsProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3517707(1-15)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3491102.3517707
Klacansky PMiao HGyulassy ATownsend AChampley KTringe JPascucci VBremer P(2022)Virtual Inspection of Additively Manufactured Parts2022 IEEE 15th Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis)10.1109/PacificVis53943.2022.00017(81-90)Online publication date: Apr-2022
https://doi.org/10.1109/PacificVis53943.2022.00017
Dukhanov AChistyakova T(2022)Educational Programs’ Development in the Field of Software Systems for Designing and Control Cyber-Physical Systems Using Information Modeling TechnologiesSociety 5.0: Human-Centered Society Challenges and Solutions10.1007/978-3-030-95112-2_30(365-381)Online publication date: 3-Apr-2022
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95112-2_30

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents