Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Maps Around Me: 3D Multiview Layouts in Immersive Spaces

Published: 04 November 2020 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Visual exploration of maps often requires a contextual understanding at multiple scales and locations. Multiview map layouts, which present a hierarchy of multiple views to reveal detail at various scales and locations, have been shown to support better performance than traditional single-view exploration on desktop displays. This paper investigates the extension of such layouts of 2D maps into 3D immersive spaces, which are not limited by the real-estate barrier of physical screens and support sensemaking through spatial interaction. Based on our initial implementation of immersive multiview maps, we conduct an exploratory study with 16 participants aimed at understanding how people place and view such maps in immersive space. We observe the layouts produced by users performing map exploration search, comparison and route-planning tasks. Our qualitative analysis identifies patterns in layoutgeometry (spherical, spherical cap, planar),overview-detail relationship (central window, occluding, coordinated) andinteraction strategy. Based on these observations, along with qualitative feedback from a user walkthrough session, we identify implications and recommend features for immersive multiview map systems. Our main findings are that participants tend to prefer and arrange multiview maps in a spherical cap layout around them and that they often rearrange the views during tasks.

    Supplementary Material

    ZIP File (v4issa201aux.zip)
    The supplementary materials contain 1 pdf file and 2 folders. 1. MapsAroundMe_Supplementary_Materials.pdf, contains: - SP1. Observation Study Tasks - SP2. User Generated Layouts, describes how to run the viewer. Alternatively, the live version can be accessed on https://kadeksatriadi.github.io/Maps-Around-Me-Viewer/ - SP3. Clips of Interactions, shows short clips of interaction techniques. 2. interaction_clips folder contains the SP3 3. viewer folder contains the SP2
    MP4 File (v4issa201.mp4)
    Supplemental video

    References

    [1]
    R. Alghofaili, M. S. Solah, H. Huang, Y. Sawahata, M. Pomplun, and L. Yu. 2019. Optimizing Visual Element Placement via Visual Attention Analysis. In 2019 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). 464--473.
    [2]
    Christopher Andrews, Alex Endert, and Chris North. 2010. Space to think: large high-resolution displays for sensemaking. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 55--64.
    [3]
    Christopher Andrews and Chris North. 2012. Analyst's Workspace: An embodied sensemaking environment for large, high-resolution displays. In 2012 IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST). IEEE, 123--131.
    [4]
    Gennady Andrienko, Natalia Andrienko, Urska Demsar, Doris Dransch, Jason Dykes, Sara Irina Fabrikant, Mikael Jern, Menno-Jan Kraak, Heidrun Schumann, and Christian Tominski. 2010. Space, time and visual analytics. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, Vol. 24, 10 (2010), 1577--1600.
    [5]
    Christopher R Austin, Barrett Ens, Kadek Ananta Satriadi, and Bernhard Jenny. 2020. Elicitation study investigating hand and foot gesture interaction for immersive maps in augmented reality. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, Vol. 47, 3 (2020), 214--228.
    [6]
    Robert Ball and Chris North. 2005. Effects of tiled high-resolution display on basic visualization and navigation tasks. In CHI'05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1196--1199.
    [7]
    Robert Ball, Chris North, and Doug A Bowman. 2007. Move to improve: promoting physical navigation to increase user performance with large displays. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 191--200.
    [8]
    Robert Ball, Michael Varghese, Andrew Sabri, E Dana Cox, Chris Fierer, Matthew Peterson, Bill Carstensen, and Chris North. 2005. Evaluating the benefits of tiled displays for navigating maps. In IASTED International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. 66--71.
    [9]
    A. Batch, A. Cunningham, M. Cordeil, N. Elmqvist, T. Dwyer, B. H. Thomas, and K. Marriott. 2020. There Is No Spoon: Evaluating Performance, Space Use, and Presence with Expert Domain Users in Immersive Analytics. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, Vol. 26, 1 (2020), 536--546.
    [10]
    Benjamin B Bederson and James D Hollan. 1994. Pad
    [11]
    : a zooming graphical interface for exploring alternate interface physics. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM, 17--26.
    [12]
    Christophe Bortolaso, Matthew Oskamp, Greg Phillips, Carl Gutwin, and TC Graham. 2014. The effect of view techniques on collaboration and awareness in tabletop map-based tasks. In Proceedings of the Ninth ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces. ACM, 79--88.
    [13]
    Doug A. Bowman, Ryan P. McMahan, and Eric D. Ragan. 2012. Questioning Naturalism in 3D User Interfaces. Commun. ACM, Vol. 55, 9 (Sept. 2012), 78--88.
    [14]
    Felix Brodkorb, Arjan Kuijper, Gennady Andrienko, Natalia Andrienko, and Tatiana Von Landesberger. 2016. Overview with details for exploring geo-located graphs on maps. Information Visualization, Vol. 15, 3 (2016), 214--237.
    [15]
    Simon Butscher, Kasper Hornbæk, and Harald Reiterer. 2014. SpaceFold and PhysicLenses: simultaneous multifocus navigation on touch surfaces. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces . ACM, 209--216.
    [16]
    Tom Chandler, Maxime Cordeil, Tobias Czauderna, Tim Dwyer, Jaroslaw Glowacki, Cagatay Goncu, Matthias Klapperstueck, Karsten Klein, Kim Marriott, Falk Schreiber, et almbox. 2015. Immersive analytics. In 2015 Big Data Visual Analytics (BDVA). IEEE, 1--8.
    [17]
    Andy Cockburn, Amy Karlson, and Benjamin B Bederson. 2009. A review of overview
    [18]
    detail, zooming, and focus
    [19]
    context interfaces. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), Vol. 41, 1, Article 2 (2009), bibinfonumpages31 pages.
    [20]
    Andy Cockburn and Bruce McKenzie. 2001. 3D or not 3D? Evaluating the effect of the third dimension in a document management system. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 434--441.
    [21]
    Andy Cockburn and Bruce McKenzie. 2002. Evaluating the effectiveness of spatial memory in 2D and 3D physical and virtual environments. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 203--210.
    [22]
    Christopher Collins and Sheelagh Carpendale. 2007. VisLink: Revealing relationships amongst visualizations. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, Vol. 13, 6 (2007), 1192--1199.
    [23]
    Maxime Cordeil, Andrew Cunningham, Tim Dwyer, Bruce H Thomas, and Kim Marriott. 2017. ImAxes: Immersive axes as embodied affordances for interactive multivariate data visualisation. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM, 71--83.
    [24]
    Mary Czerwinski, Desney S Tan, and George G Robertson. 2002. Women take a wider view. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 195--202.
    [25]
    Niklas Elmqvist, Nathalie Henry, Yann Riche, and Jean-Daniel Fekete. 2008. Melange: space folding for multi-focus interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1333--1342.
    [26]
    Niklas Elmqvist, Andrew Vande Moere, Hans-Christian Jetter, Daniel Cernea, Harald Reiterer, and TJ Jankun-Kelly. 2011. Fluid interaction for information visualization. Information Visualization, Vol. 10, 4 (2011), 327--340.
    [27]
    Barrett Ens, Juan David Hincapié-Ramos, and Pourang Irani. 2014b. Ethereal planes: a design framework for 2D information space in 3D mixed reality environments. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction. ACM, 2--12.
    [28]
    Barrett Ens, Eyal Ofek, Neil Bruce, and Pourang Irani. 2015. Spatial Constancy of Surface-Embedded Layouts Across Multiple Environments. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction (Los Angeles, California, USA) (SUI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 65--68.
    [29]
    Barrett M Ens, Rory Finnegan, and Pourang P Irani. 2014a. The personal cockpit: a spatial interface for effective task switching on head-worn displays. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3171--3180.
    [30]
    Andreas Fender, David Lindlbauer, Philipp Herholz, Marc Alexa, and Jörg Müller. 2017. HeatSpace: Automatic Placement of Displays by Empirical Analysis of User Behavior. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Québec City, QC, Canada) (UIST '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 611--621.
    [31]
    George W Furnas. 1986. Generalized fisheye views. SIGCHI Bulletin, Vol. 17, 4 (1986), 16--23.
    [32]
    George W Furnas and Benjamin B Bederson. 1995. Space-scale diagrams: Understanding multiscale interfaces. In CHI, Vol. 95. 234--241.
    [33]
    Sohaib Ghani, N Henry Riche, and Niklas Elmqvist. 2011. Dynamic Insets for Context-Aware Graph Navigation. In Computer Graphics Forum, Vol. 30. Wiley Online Library, 861--870.
    [34]
    Yves Guiard and Michel Beaudouin-Lafon. 2004. Target acquisition in multiscale electronic worlds. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 61, 6 (2004), 875--905.
    [35]
    Edward Twitchell Hall. 1966. The Hidden Dimension .Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
    [36]
    Kasper Hornbæk and Erik Frøkjær. 2003. Reading patterns and usability in visualizations of electronic documents. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), Vol. 10, 2 (2003), 119--149.
    [37]
    Alexandra Ion, Y-L Betty Chang, Michael Haller, Mark Hancock, and Stacey D Scott. 2013. Canyon: providing location awareness of multiple moving objects in a detail view on large displays. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3149--3158.
    [38]
    Yvonne Jansen, Jonas Schjerlund, and Kasper Hornbæk. 2019. Effects of Locomotion and Visual Overview on Spatial Memory when Interacting with Wall Displays. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--12.
    [39]
    Waqas Javed and Niklas Elmqvist. 2012. Exploring the design space of composite visualization. In 2012 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium. IEEE, 1--8.
    [40]
    Waqas Javed, Sohaib Ghani, and Niklas Elmqvist. 2012. Polyzoom: multiscale and multifocus exploration in 2d visual spaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 287--296.
    [41]
    Charles Jekel. 2016. Obtaining Non-linear Orthotropic Material Models for PVC-Coated Polyester via Inverse Bubble Inflation. Thesis, Stellenbosch University. https://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/98627
    [42]
    Susanne Jul and George W Furnas. 1998. Critical zones in desert fog: aids to multiscale navigation. In Proceedings of the 11th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM, 97--106.
    [43]
    Pushpak Karnick, David Cline, Stefan Jeschke, Anshuman Razdan, and Peter Wonka. 2009. Route visualization using detail lenses. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, Vol. 16, 2 (2009), 235--247.
    [44]
    Matthias Klapperstueck, Tobias Czauderna, Cagatay Goncu, Jaroslaw Glowacki, Tim Dwyer, Falk Schreiber, and Kim Marriott. 2018. ContextuWall: Multi-site collaboration using display walls. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, Vol. 46 (2018), 35--42.
    [45]
    Heidi Lam and Tamara Munzner. 2010. A guide to visual multi-level interface design from synthesis of empirical study evidence. Synthesis Lectures on Visualization, Vol. 1, 1 (2010), 1--117.
    [46]
    Nina Siu-Ngan Lam and Dale A Quattrochi. 1992. On the issues of scale, resolution, and fractal analysis in the mapping sciences. The Professional Geographer, Vol. 44, 1 (1992), 88--98.
    [47]
    Fritz Lekschas, Michael Behrisch, Benjamin Bach, Peter Kerpedjiev, Nils Gehlenborg, and Hanspeter Pfister. 2019. Pattern-Driven Navigation in 2D Multiscale Visualizations with Scalable Insets. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, Vol. 26, 1 (2019), 611--621.
    [48]
    Lars Lischke, Sven Mayer, Jan Hoffmann, Philipp Kratzer, Stephan Roth, Katrin Wolf, and Paweł Wo'zniak. 2017. Interaction techniques for window management on large high-resolution displays. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia . 241--247.
    [49]
    Lee Lisle, Xiaoyu Chen, JK Edward Gitre, Chris North, and Doug A Bowman. 2020. Evaluating the Benefits of the Immersive Space to Think. In 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW). IEEE, 331--337.
    [50]
    Jiazhou Liu, Arnaud Prouzeau, Barrett Ens, and Tim Dwyer. 2020. Design and Evaluation of Interactive Small Multiples Data Visualisation in Immersive Spaces. In 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). IEEE, 588--597.
    [51]
    Zhicheng Liu and Jeffrey Heer. 2014. The effects of interactive latency on exploratory visual analysis. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, Vol. 20, 12 (2014), 2122--2131.
    [52]
    Zhicheng Liu and John Stasko. 2010. Mental models, visual reasoning and interaction in information visualization: A top-down perspective. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, Vol. 16, 6 (2010), 999--1008.
    [53]
    Paul Lubos, Gerd Bruder, Oscar Ariza, and Frank Steinicke. 2016. Touching the Sphere: Leveraging Joint-Centered Kinespheres for Spatial User Interaction. In Proceedings of the 2016 Symposium on Spatial User Interaction (Tokyo, Japan) (SUI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 13--22.
    [54]
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). 1995. NASA-STD-3000: Man-Systems Integration Standards, Revision B, July 1995, Volume I. https://msis.jsc.nasa.gov/
    [55]
    Tao Ni, Doug A Bowman, and Jian Chen. 2006. Increased display size and resolution improve task performance in information-rich virtual environments. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2006. Canadian Information Processing Society, 139--146.
    [56]
    Matthew Plumlee and Colin Ware. 2002. Zooming, multiple windows, and visual working memory. In Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces. ACM, 59--68.
    [57]
    Matthew D Plumlee and Colin Ware. 2006. Zooming versus multiple window interfaces: Cognitive costs of visual comparisons. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), Vol. 13, 2 (2006), 179--209.
    [58]
    Quang Quach and Bernhard Jenny. 2020. Immersive visualization with bar graphics. Cartography and Geographic Information Science (2020).
    [59]
    Khairi Reda, Andrew E Johnson, Michael E Papka, and Jason Leigh. 2015. Effects of display size and resolution on user behavior and insight acquisition in visual exploration. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2759--2768.
    [60]
    George Robertson, Mary Czerwinski, Kevin Larson, Daniel C Robbins, David Thiel, and Maarten Van Dantzich. 1998. Data mountain: using spatial memory for document management. In Proceedings of the 11th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology . 153--162.
    [61]
    George Robertson, Maarten Van Dantzich, Daniel Robbins, Mary Czerwinski, Ken Hinckley, Kirsten Risden, David Thiel, and Vadim Gorokhovsky. 2000. The Task Gallery: a 3D window manager. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 494--501.
    [62]
    George G Robertson, Jock D Mackinlay, and SK Card. 1991. The perspective wall: Detail and context smoothly integrated. In Proceedings of ACM CHI, Vol. 91. 173--179.
    [63]
    Chris Rooney, Alex Endert, Jean-Daniel Fekete, Kasper Hornbæk, and Chris North. 2013. Powerwall: int. workshop on interactive, ultra-high-resolution displays. In CHI'13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 3227--3230.
    [64]
    Chris Rooney and Roy A Ruddle. 2015. HiReD: a high-resolution multi-window visualisation environment for cluster-driven displays. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems. 2--11.
    [65]
    Robert E Roth. 2013. An empirically-derived taxonomy of interaction primitives for interactive cartography and geovisualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, Vol. 19, 12 (2013), 2356--2365.
    [66]
    Roy A Ruddle, Rhys G Thomas, Rebecca S Randell, Phil Quirke, and Darren Treanor. 2015. Performance and interaction behaviour during visual search on large, high-resolution displays. Information Visualization, Vol. 14, 2 (2015), 137--147.
    [67]
    V'it Rusnák, Caroline Appert, Olivier Chapuis, and Emmanuel Pietriga. 2018. Designing coherent gesture sets for multi-scale navigation on tabletops. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1--12.
    [68]
    K. A. Satriadi, B. Ens, M. Cordeil, B. Jenny, T. Czauderna, and W. Willett. 2019. Augmented Reality Map Navigation with Freehand Gestures. In 2019 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). 593--603.
    [69]
    Lauren Shupp, Robert Ball, Beth Yost, John Booker, and Chris North. 2006. Evaluation of viewport size and curvature of large, high-resolution displays. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2006. Canadian Information Processing Society, 123--130.
    [70]
    Monica Tavanti and Mats Lind. 2001. 2D vs 3D, implications on spatial memory. In IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, 2001. INFOVIS 2001. IEEE, 139--145.
    [71]
    Lucia Terrenghi, Aaron Quigley, and Alan Dix. 2009. A taxonomy for and analysis of multi-person-display ecosystems. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, Vol. 13, 8 (2009), 583--598.
    [72]
    Sabine Timpf. 1998. Hierarchical structures in map series. Thesis, Department of Geoinformation, Technical University Vienna.
    [73]
    Jorge A Wagner Filho, Wolfgang Stuerzlinger, and Luciana Nedel. 2019. Evaluating an immersive space-time cube geovisualization for intuitive trajectory data exploration. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, Vol. 26, 1 (2019), 514--524.
    [74]
    Fangzhou Wang, Yang Li, Daisuke Sakamoto, and Takeo Igarashi. 2014. Hierarchical route maps for efficient navigation. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. ACM, 169--178.
    [75]
    Michelle Q Wang Baldonado, Allison Woodruff, and Allan Kuchinsky. 2000. Guidelines for using multiple views in information visualization. In Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces. ACM, 110--119.
    [76]
    Daniel Wigdor and Dennis Wixon. 2011. Brave NUI World: Designing Natural User Interfaces for Touch and Gesture .Morgan Kaufmann.
    [77]
    Yalong Yang, Maxime Cordeil, Johanna Beyer, Tim Dwyer, Kim Marriott, and Hanspeter Pfister. 2020 a. Embodied Navigation in Immersive Abstract Data Visualization: Is Overview

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)A New Generation of Collaborative Immersive Analytics on the Web: Open-Source Services to Capture, Process and Inspect Users’ Sessions in 3D EnvironmentsFuture Internet10.3390/fi1605014716:5(147)Online publication date: 25-Apr-2024
    • (2024)Survey of visualization methods for multiscene visual cue information in immersive environmentsJournal of Image and Graphics10.11834/jig.22114729:1(1-21)Online publication date: 2024
    • (2024)Interaction with Physical Referents In and Around the Field of View of Optical See-Through Augmented-Reality HeadsetsProceedings of the 35th Conference on l'Interaction Humain-Machine10.1145/3649792.3649796(1-15)Online publication date: 25-Mar-2024
    • Show More Cited By

    Index Terms

    1. Maps Around Me: 3D Multiview Layouts in Immersive Spaces

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
      Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 4, Issue ISS
      ISS
      November 2020
      488 pages
      EISSN:2573-0142
      DOI:10.1145/3433930
      Issue’s Table of Contents
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 04 November 2020
      Published in PACMHCI Volume 4, Issue ISS

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. immersive space
      2. multiscale exploration
      3. multiview maps
      4. virtual reality

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)250
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)26
      Reflects downloads up to 26 Jul 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)A New Generation of Collaborative Immersive Analytics on the Web: Open-Source Services to Capture, Process and Inspect Users’ Sessions in 3D EnvironmentsFuture Internet10.3390/fi1605014716:5(147)Online publication date: 25-Apr-2024
      • (2024)Survey of visualization methods for multiscene visual cue information in immersive environmentsJournal of Image and Graphics10.11834/jig.22114729:1(1-21)Online publication date: 2024
      • (2024)Interaction with Physical Referents In and Around the Field of View of Optical See-Through Augmented-Reality HeadsetsProceedings of the 35th Conference on l'Interaction Humain-Machine10.1145/3649792.3649796(1-15)Online publication date: 25-Mar-2024
      • (2024)I Did Not Notice: A Comparison of Immersive Analytics with Augmented and Virtual RealityExtended Abstracts of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3651085(1-7)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
      • (2024)Exploring Spatial Organization Strategies for Virtual Content in Mixed Reality EnvironmentsExtended Abstracts of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3638181(1-6)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
      • (2024)Evaluating Navigation and Comparison Performance of Computational Notebooks on Desktop and in Virtual RealityProceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642932(1-15)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
      • (2024)A Systematic Literature Review of User Evaluation in Immersive AnalyticsComputer Graphics Forum10.1111/cgf.1511143:3Online publication date: 10-Jun-2024
      • (2024)WindowMirror: An Opensource Toolkit to Bring Interactive Multi-Window Views into XR2024 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW)10.1109/VRW62533.2024.00085(436-438)Online publication date: 16-Mar-2024
      • (2024)A Survey of Designs for Combined 2D+3D Visual RepresentationsIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2024.338851630:6(2888-2902)Online publication date: Jul-2024
      • (2024)This is the Table I Want! Interactive Data Transformation on Desktop and in Virtual RealityIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2023.329960230:8(5635-5650)Online publication date: Aug-2024
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      Full Access

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media