Towards verified construction of correct and optimised GPU software
Pages 10 - 14
Abstract
Techniques are required that support developers to produce GPU software that is both functionally correct and high-performing. We envision an integration of push-button formal verification techniques into a Model Driven Engineering workflow. In this paper, we present our vision on this topic, and how we plan to make steps in that direction in the coming five years.
References
[1]
L. Ab. Rahim and J. Whittle. 2010. Verifying Semantic Conformance of State Machine-to-Java Code Generators. In Proceedings of MODELS 2010 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 6394 ). Springer, 166-180.
[2]
P. Adamczyk. 2003. The anthology of the finite state machine design patterns. In Proceedings of PLoP 2003.
[3]
W. Ahrendt, B. Beckert, R. Bubel, R. Hähnle, P. Schmitt, and M. Ulbrich. 2016. Deductive Software Verification-The KeY Book: From Theory to Practice. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 10001. Springer.
[4]
A. Amighi, C. Haack, M. Huisman, and C. Hurlin. 2015. Permissionbased separation logic for multithreaded Java programs. Logical Methods in Computer Science 11, 1 ( 2015 ). htps://doi.org/10.2168/ LMCS11 (1 :2 ) 2015 arXiv: 1411.0851v1
[5]
C. Baier and J.-P. Katoen. 2008. Principles of Model Checking. The MIT Press.
[6]
J. Barnat, P. Bauch, L. Brim, and M. Češka. 2012. Designing fast LTL model checking algorithms for many-core GPUs. J. Parallel and Distrib. Comput. 72, 9 ( 2012 ), 1083-1097. htps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpdc. 2011. 10.015
[7]
E. Bartocci, R. DeFrancisco, and S. A. Smolka. 2014. Towards a GPGPUparallel SPIN Model Checker. In Proceedings of SPIN 2014. ACM Press, 87-96.
[8]
S. Berkovich, B. Bonakdarpour, and S. Fischmeister. 2013. GPU-based runtime verification. In Proceedings of IPDPS 2013. IEEE Computer Society Press, 1025-1036. htps://doi.org/10.1109/IPDPS. 2013.105
[9]
C. Bertolli, A. Betts, G. Mudalige, M. Giles, and P. Kelly. 2012. Design and performance of the OP2 library for unstructured mesh applications. In Proceedings of CGWS 2011 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 7155 ). Springer, 191-200. htps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29737-3-22
[10]
A. Betts, N. Chong, and A. F. Donaldson. 2012. GPUVerify: a verifier for GPU kernels. In Proceedings of OOPSLA 2012. ACM Press, 113-132. htps://doi.org/10.1145/2398857.2384625
[11]
A. Betts, N. Chong, A. F. Donaldson, J. Ketema, S. Qadeer, P. Thomson, and J. Wickerson. 2015. The Design and Implementation of a Verification Technique for GPU Kernels. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems 37, 3 ( 2015 ), 1-49. htps: //doi.org/10.1145/2743017
[12]
P. Bjesse. 2005. What is Formal Verification? ACM SIGDA Newsletter 35, 24 ( 2005 ).
[13]
J.O. Blech, S. Glesner, and J. Leitner. 2005. Formal Verification of Java Code Generation from UML Models. In 3rd International Fujaba Days 2005-MDD In Practice. 49-56.
[14]
S. Blom, M. Huisman, and M. Mihelčić. 2014. Specification and Verification of GPGPU programs. Science of Computer Programming 95 ( 2014 ), 376-388. Issue 3.
[15]
S. C. C. Blom, S. Darabi, M. Huisman, and W. Oortwijn. 2017. The VerCors tool set: Verification of parallel and concurrent software. In Proceedings of iFM 2017 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 10510 ). Springer, 102-110. htps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66845-1_7
[16]
D. Bošnački, M. R. Odenbrett, A. J. Wijs, W. P. A. Ligtenberg, and P. A. J. Hilbers. 2012. Eficient Reconstruction of Biological Networks via Transitive Reduction on General Purpose Graphics Processors. BMC Bioinformatics 13 ( 2012 ), 281.
[17]
M. Brambilla, J. Cabot, and M. Wimmer. 2012. Model Driven Software Engineering in Practice. Morgan & Claypool Publishers.
[18]
P. Brosch, U. Egly, S. Gabmeyer, G. Kappel, M. Seidl, H. Tompits, M. Widl, and M. Wimmer. 2012. Towards scenario-based testing of UML diagrams. In Proceedings of TAP 2012 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 7305 ). Springer, 149-155. htps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30473-6_12
[19]
W. Caarls. 2008. Automated Design of Application-Specific Smart Camera Architectures. Ph.D. Dissertation. Delft University of Technology.
[20]
W. Caarls, P. P. Jonker, and H. Corporaal. 2006. Algorithmic skeletons for stream programming in embedded heterogeneous parallel image processing applications. In Proceedings of IPDPS 2006. IEEE Computer Society Press. htps://doi.org/10.1109/IPDPS. 2006.1639351
[21]
D. K. G. Campbell. 1996. Towards the Classification of Algorithmic Skeletons. Technical Report. University of York. 1-20 pages. htp: //www.cs.uiuc.edu/{~}snir/PPP/skeleton/classification.pdf
[22]
P. Cantiello and B. Di Martino. 2012. Automatic source code transformation for GPUs based on program comprehension. In Proceedings of Euro-Par 2011 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 7156 ). Springer, 188-197. htps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29740-3-22
[23]
L. Carrington, M. Tikir, C. Olschanowsky, M. Laurenzano, J. Peraza, A. Snavely, and S. Poole. 2011. An Idiom-finding Tool for Increasing Productivity of Accelerators. In Proceedings of ICS-25. ACM, 202-212.
[24]
S. Chaki, E. M. Clarke, A. Groce, S. Jha, and H. Veith. 2004. Modular verification of software components in C. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 30, 6 ( 2004 ), 388-402. htps://doi.org/10.1109/TSE. 2004.22
[25]
A. Cimatti, S. Mover, and S. Tonetta. 2011. Proving and explaining the unfeasibility of message sequence charts for hybrid systems. In Proceedings of FMCAD 2011. IEEE Computer Society Press, 54-62. htp://www.scopus.com/inward/ record.url?eid= 2-s2. 0-84857756993 {&}partnerID= 40 {&}md5= 25e8cfbd3b30de6b6275ce8d7e66253f
[26]
E. M. Clarke, O. Grumberg, and D. A. Peled. 1999. Model Checking. The MIT Press.
[27]
David R. Cok. 2014. OpenJML: Software verification for Java 7 using JML, OpenJDK, and Eclipse. In Proceedings of F-IDE 2014 (Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, Vol. 149 ). Elsevier, 79-92. htps: //doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.149.8 arXiv: 1404. 6608
[28]
P. Da Rocha Pinto, T. Dinsdale-Young, and P. Gardner. 2014. TaDA: A logic for time and data abstraction. In Proceedings of ECOOP 2014 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 8586 ). Springer, 207-231. htps: //doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44202-9_9
[29]
M. Dalvandi, M. Butler, and A. Rezazadeh. 2015. From Event-B models to Dafny code contracts. In Proceedings of FSEN 2015 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 9392 ). Springer, 308-315. htps://doi.org/10. 1007/978-3-319-24644-4_21
[30]
S. Darabi, S.C.C. Blom, and M. Huisman. 2017. A Verification Technique for Deterministic Parallel Programs. In NASA Formal Methods (NFM) (LNCS, Vol. 10227 ), C. Barrett, M. Davies, and T. Kahsai (Eds.). 247-264.
[31]
S.M.J. de Putter, A.J. Wijs, and D. Zhang. 2018. The SLCO Framework for Verified, Model-driven Construction of Component Software. In Proceedings of FACS 2018 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 11222 ). Springer, 288-296.
[32]
S. M. J. de Putter and A. J. Wijs. 2018. A formal verification technique for behavioural model-to-model transformations. Formal Aspects of Computing 30, 1 ( 2018 ), 3-43. htps://doi.org/10.1007/s00165-017-0437-z
[33]
R. DeFrancisco, S. Cho, M. Ferdman, and S. A. Smolka. 2019. Swarm Model Checking on the GPU. In Proceedings of SPIN 2019 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 11636 ). Springer, 94-113. htps://doi.org/10. 1007/978-3-030-30923-7_6
[34]
P. Deligiannis, A. F. Donaldson, J. Ketema, A. Lal, and P. Thomson. 2015. Asynchronous Programming, Analysis and Testing with State Machines. In Proceedings of PLDI 2015 ( ACM SIGPLAN Notices, Vol. 50 ). ACM Press, 154-164.
[35]
E. Denney, B. Fischer, J. Schumann, and J. Richardson. 2005. Automatic certification of kalman filters for reliable code generation. In IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings. IEEE Computer Society Press, 1-10. htps://doi.org/10.1109/AERO. 2005.1559605
[36]
A. Desai, V. Gupta, E. K. Jackson, S. Qadeer, S. K. Rajamani, and D. Zuferey. 2013. P: Safe Asynchronous Event-Driven Programming. In Proceedings of PLDI 2013 ( ACM SIGPLAN Notices, Vol. 48 ). ACM Press, 321-332.
[37]
T. Dinsdale-Young, M. Dodds, P. Gardner, M. J. Parkinson, and V. Vafeiadis. 2010. Concurrent abstract predicates. In Proceedings of ECOOP 2010 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 6183 ). Springer, 504-528. htps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14107-2_24
[38]
D. A. Dufy. 1991. Principles of Automated Theorem Proving. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
[39]
L. J. P. Engelen. 2012. From Napkin Sketches To Reliable Software. Ph.D. Dissertation. Eindhoven University of Technology.
[40]
J. Enmyren and C. W. Kessler. 2010. SkePU: a multi-backend skeleton programming library for multi-GPU systems. In Proceedings of HLPP-4. ACM, 5-14. htps://doi.org/10.1145/1863482.1863487
[41]
M. Fowler and R. Parsons. 2010. Domain-Specific Languages. AddisonWesley.
[42]
J. P. Galeotti, C. A. Furia, E. May, G. Fraser, and A. Zeller. 2015. Inferring loop invariants by mutation, dynamic analysis, and static checking. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 41, 10 ( 2015 ), 1019-1037. htps://doi.org/10.1109/TSE. 2015. 2431688 arXiv:arXiv: 1407.5286v2
[43]
S. Garfinkel. 2008. History's Worst Software Bugs. htp://www.wired. com/software/coolapps/news/2005/11/69355?currentPage=all.
[44]
D. Grewe and A. Lokhmotov. 2011. Automatically generating and tuning GPU code for sparse matrix-vector multiplication from a highlevel representation. In Proceedings of GPGPU-4. 1. htps://doi.org/10. 1145/1964179.1964196
[45]
P. Hijma, C. J. H. Jacobs, R. V. van Nieuwpoort, and H. E. Bal. 2015. Cashmere: Heterogeneous Many-Core Computing. In Proceedings of IPDPS 2015. IEEE Computer Society Press, 135-145.
[46]
K. Hoder, L. Kovács, and A. Voronkov. 2011. Invariant generation in vampire. In Proceedings of TACAS 2011 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 6605 ). Springer, 60-64. htps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19835-9_7
[47]
S. Hong, S. Salihoglu, J. Widom, and K. Olukotun. 2014. Simplifying Scalable Graph Processing with a Domain-Specific Language. In Proceedings of CGO 2014. ACM Press, 208-218. htps://doi.org/10.1145/ 2581122.2544162
[48]
D. Huang, M. Wen, C. Xun, D. Chen, X. Cai, Y. Qiao, N. Wu, and C. Zhang. 2014. Automated transformation of GPU-specific OpenCL kernels targeting performance portability on multi-core/many-core CPUs. In Proceedings of Euro-Par 2014 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 8632 ). Springer, 210-221. htps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09873-9_18
[49]
M. Huisman, S. Blom, S. Darabi, and M. Safari. 2018. Program Correctness by Transformation. In 8th International Symposium On Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation (ISoLA) (LNCS, Vol. 11244 ). Springer.
[50]
ISTAG. 2012. Software Technologies-The Missing Key Enabling Technology: Toward a Strategic Agenda for Software Technologies in Europe.
[51]
M. Janota. 2007. Assertion-based loop invariant generation. RISCLinz 03 ( 2007 ). htp://www.risc.uni-linz.ac.at/publications/download/ risc{_}3128/proceedings.pdf{#}page= 23
[52]
R. Jung, D. Swasey, F. Sieczkowski, K. Svendsen, A. Turon, L. Birkedal, and D. Dreyer. 2015. Iris: Monoids and Invariants as an Orthogonal Basis for Concurrent Reasoning. In Proceedings of POPL 2015, Vol. 50. ACM Press, 637-650. htps://doi.org/10.1145/2775051.2676980
[53]
N. Kapre and S. Bayliss. 2016. Survey of domain-specific languages for FPGA computing. In Proceedings of FPL 2016. IEEE Computer Society Press, 1-12. htps://doi.org/10.1109/FPL. 2016.7577380
[54]
A. Knapp, S. Merz, and C. Rauh. 2002. Model Checking Timed UML State Machines and Collaborations. In Proceedings of FTRTFT 2002 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 2469 ). Springer, 395-416. htps: //doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45739-9_23
[55]
A. Knapp and J. Wuttke. 2006. Model Checking of UML 2.0 Interactions. In Proceedings of ELS 2006 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 4364 ). Springer, 42-51. htps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69489-2_6
[56]
R. Krebbers, R. Jung, A. Bizjak, J. H. Jourdan, D. Dreyer, and L. Birkedal. 2017. The essence of higher-order concurrent separation logic. In Proceedings of ESOP 2017 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 10201 ). Springer, 696-723. htps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54434-1_26
[57]
Q. V. Le, A. Coates, B. Prochnow, and A. Y Ng. 2011. On Optimization Methods for Deep Learning. In Proceedings of ICML 2011. Omnipress, 265-272. htps://doi.org/10.1.1.220.8705
[58]
K. R. M. Leino. 2010. Dafny: An automatic program verifier for functional correctness. In Proceedings of LPAR-16 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 6355 ). Springer, 348-370. htps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17511-4_20
[59]
R. Leißa, K. Boesche, S. Hack, R. Membarth, and P. Slusallek. 2015. Shallow embedding of DSLs via online partial evaluation. In Proceedings of GPCE 2015. ACM Press, 11-20. htps://doi.org/10.1145/2814204. 2814208
[60]
G. Li and G. Gopalakrishnan. 2012. Parameterized verification of GPU kernel programs. In Proceedings of IPDPSW 2012. IEEE Computer Society Press, 2450-2459. htps://doi.org/10.1109/IPDPSW. 2012.302
[61]
X. Li, J. Hu, L. Bu, J. Zhao, and G. Zheng. 2005. Consistency checking of concurrent models for scenario-based specifications. In Proceedings of SDL 2005 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3530 ). Springer, 298-312.
[62]
R. Lim, B. Norris, and A. Malony. 2017. Autotuning GPU Kernels via Static and Predictive Analysis. In Proceedings of ICPP 2017. IEEE Computer Society Press, 523-532. htps://doi.org/10.1109/ICPP. 2017. 61 arXiv: 1701. 08547
[63]
X. Liu, S. Tan, and H. Wang. 2012. Parallel Statistical Analysis of Analog Circuits by {GPU}-accelerated Graph-based Approach. In Proceedings of DATE 2012. IEEE Computer Society Press, 852-857. htps://doi.org/ 10.1109/DATE. 2012.6176615
[64]
T. G. Mattson, B. A. Sanders, and B. L. Massingill. 2004. Patterns for Parallel Programming. Addison-Wesley.
[65]
M. Mernik, J. Heering, and A. M. Sloane. 2005. When and How to Develop Domain-Specific Languages. Comput. Surveys 37, 4 ( 2005 ), 316-344.
[66]
F.R. Monteiro, E.H. Alves, I. Silva, H.I. Ismail, L.C. Cordeiro, and E.B. de Lima Filho. 2018. ESBMC-GPU: A Context-Bounded Model Checking Tool to Verify CUDA Programs. Science of Computer Programming 152 ( 2018 ), 63-69.
[67]
P. Müller, M. Schwerhof, and A. J. Summers. 2016. Viper: A verification infrastructure for permission-based reasoning. In Proceedings of VMCAI 2016 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 9583 ). Springer, 41-62. htps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49122-5_2
[68]
K. Namjoshi and N. Singhania. 2016. Loopy: Programmable and Formally Verified Loop Transformations. In Proceedings of SAS 2016 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 9837 ). Springer, 383-402.
[69]
C. Nugteren. 2014. Improving the Programmability of GPU Architectures. Ph.D. Dissertation. Eindhoven University of Technology.
[70]
S. Owre, J. M. Rushby, and N. Shankar. 1992. PVS: a Prototype Verification System. In Proceedings of CADE 1992 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 607 ). Springer, 748-752.
[71]
A. Pnueli, O. Shtrichman, and M. Siegel. 1998. The Code Validation Tool CVT: Automatic Verification of a Compilation Process. Software Tools for Technology Transfer 2 ( 1998 ), 192-201.
[72]
E. Rodríguez-Carbonell and D. Kapur. 2007. Automatic generation of polynomial invariants of bounded degree using abstract interpretation. Science of Computer Programming 64, 1 SPEC. ISS. ( 2007 ), 54-75. htps: //doi.org/10.1016/j.scico. 2006. 03.003
[73]
D. Rosenberg. 2009. Avoiding the software 'fail whale'. htp://news. cnet.com/8301-13846{_} 3-10349034-62.html.
[74]
M. Safari, W. Oortwijn, S.J.C. Joosten, and M. Huisman. 2020. Formal Verification of Parallel Prefix Sum. In NASA Formal Methods (NFM) (LNCS ), R. Lee, S. Jha, and A. Mavridou (Eds.). Springer.
[75]
D. C. Schmidt. 2006. Model-Driven Engineering. IEEE Computer 39, 2 ( 2006 ), 25-31.
[76]
J. Schumann, B. Fischer, M. Whalen, and J. Whittle. 2003. Certification support for automatically generated programs. In Proceedings of HICSS 2003. IEEE Computer Society Press, 1-10. htps://doi.org/10.1109/ HICSS. 2003.1174914
[77]
R. Sharma, I. Dillig, T. Dillig, and A. Aiken. 2011. Simplifying loop invariant generation using splitter predicates. In Proceedings of CAV 2011 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 6806 ). Springer, 703-719. htps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22110-1_57
[78]
J. Smans, B. Jacobs, and F. Piessens. 2012. Verifying Java Programs with VeriFast. Aliasing in Object-oriented Programming 2 ( 2012 ), 1-18. htp://www.csc.kth.se/utbildning/kth/kurser/DD2460/Tools/ VeriFast/verifast-java.pdf
[79]
M. Staats and M. Heimdahl. 2008. Partial Translation Verification for Untrusted Code-generators. In Proceedings of ICFEM 2008 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 5256 ). Springer, 226-237.
[80]
K. Stenzel, N. Moebius, and W. Reif. 2011. Formal Verification of QVT Transformations for Code Generation. In Proceedings of MoDELS 2011 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 6981 ). Springer, 533-547.
[81]
A. K. Sujeeth, K. J. Brown, H. Lee, T. Rompf, H. Chafi, M. Odersky, and K. Olukotun. 2014. Delite: A Compiler Architecture for PerformanceOriented Embedded Domain-Specific Languages. ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems 13, 4s ( 2014 ), 1-25. htps://doi.org/ 10.1145/2584665
[82]
M. Sulzmann and A. Zechner. 2012. Model Checking DSL-Generated C Source Code. In Proceedings of SPIN 2012 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 7385 ). Springer, 241-247.
[83]
J. Whittle and B. Gajanovic. 2005. Model Transformations Should Be More Than Just Model Generators. In Satellite Events at the MoDELS 2005 Conference (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3844 ). Springer, 32-38.
[84]
J. Whittle, J. Van Baalen, J. Schumann, P. Robinson, T. Pressburger, J. Penix, P. Oh, M. Lowry, and G. Brat. 2001. Amphion/NAV: Deductive Synthesis of State Estimation Software. In Proceedings of ASE 2001. IEEE Computer Society Press, 395-399.
[85]
S. Wienke, P. Springer, C. Terboven, and D. An Mey. 2012. OpenACC-First experiences with real-world applications. In Proceedings of EuroPar 2012 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 7484 ). Springer, 859-870. htps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32820-6_85
[86]
A.J. Wijs and M. Wiłkowski. 2019. Modular Indirect Push-button Formal Verification of Code Generators. In Proceedings of SEFM 2019 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 11724 ). Springer, 410-429.
[87]
A. J. Wijs. 2015. GPU Accelerated Strong and Branching Bisimilarity Checking. In Proceedings of TACAS 2015 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 9035 ). Springer, 368-383.
[88]
A. J. Wijs and D. Bošnački. 2012. Improving GPU Sparse Matrix-Vector Multiplication for Probabilistic Model Checking. In Proceedings of SPIN 2012 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 7385 ). Springer, 98-116.
[89]
A. J. Wijs and D. Bošnački. 2014. GPUexplore: Many-Core On-The-Fly State Space Exploration Using GPUs. In Proceedings of TACAS 2014 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 8413 ). Springer, 233-247.
[90]
A. J. Wijs and L. Engelen. 2014. REFINER: Towards formal verification of model transformations. Vol. 8430 LNCS. htps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06200-6_21
[91]
A. J. Wijs and L. J. P. Engelen. 2013. Eficient Property Preservation Checking of Model Refinements. In Proceedings of TACAS 2013 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 7795 ). Springer, 565-579.
[92]
A. J. Wijs, J. P. Katoen, and D. Bošnački. 2016. Eficient GPU algorithms for parallel decomposition of graphs into strongly connected and maximal end components. Formal Methods in System Design 48, 3 ( 2016 ), 274-300. htps://doi.org/10.1007/s10703-016-0246-7
[93]
A. J. Wijs, T. Neele, and D. Bošnački. 2016. GPUexplore 2.0: Unleashing GPU explicit-state model checking. In Proceedings of FM 2016 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 9995 ). Springer, 694-701. htps://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-319-48989-6_42
[94]
B. Wu, G. Chen, D. Li, X. Shen, and J. Vetter. 2015. Enabling and Exploiting Flexible Task Assignment on GPU through SM-Centric Program Transformations. In Proceedings of ICS 2015. ACM Press, 119-130. htps://doi.org/10.1145/2751205.2751213
Index Terms
- Towards verified construction of correct and optimised GPU software
Recommendations
Verifying Cloud Application for the Interaction Correctness Using SoaML and SPIN
ICSCA '19: Proceedings of the 2019 8th International Conference on Software and Computer ApplicationsCloud application is a kind of software implemented using cloud computing technology and deployed in the cloud environment. This paper focuses on guaranteeing the interaction correctness between cloud application and users. In general, the main methods ...
Authoring and verification of clinical guidelines: A model driven approach
Objectives: The goal of this research is to provide a framework to enable authoring and verification of clinical guidelines. The framework is part of a larger research project aimed at improving the representation, quality and application of clinical ...
Optimized HPL for AMD GPU and multi-core CPU usage
The installation of the LOEWE-CSC ( http://csc.uni-frankfurt.de/csc/__ __51 ) supercomputer at the Goethe University in Frankfurt lead to the development of a Linpack which can fully utilize the installed AMD Cypress GPUs. At its core, a fast DGEMM for ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Copyright © 2020 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 16 November 2020
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Funding Sources
Conference
SPLASH '20
Sponsor:
SPLASH '20: Conference on Systems, Programming, Languages, and Applications, Software for Humanity
July 23, 2020
Virtual, USA
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 51 of 75 submissions, 68%
Upcoming Conference
ISSTA '25
- Sponsor:
- sigsoft
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 63Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)4
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 25 Dec 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in