Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3428029.3428033acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pageskoli-callingConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Fostering Knowledge of Computer Viruses among Children: The Effects of a Lesson with a Cartoon Series

Published: 22 November 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Children increasingly use computing devices. However, it is unclear whether they have basic knowledge of security-related issues such as computer viruses and, in case they do not, what they can learn about them. It was found previously that Czech 8-year-olds have only limited knowledge of computer viruses, but neither naïve understanding of older children nor what they can learn has been researched. Here, we first examined preconceptions of computer viruses among Czech 5-6-graders (N = 14) and German 3-4-graders (N = 28) by means of a written test. Second, the German sample (experimental group), but not the Czech one (control group), received an intervention to learn about computer viruses, antiviruses, and software updates by means of a 45-min lesson combining a cartoon series on viruses, frontal instruction, and discussion. Both groups again completed the written test. A joint analysis of both samples indicated that Czech and German children already knew key points concerning computer viruses. These included, for instance, that viruses harm our computers (88% of the total sample). However, overall, their knowledge was patchy, and children also had misconceptions such as that viruses can only infect devices connected to the Internet (57%), and antiviruses can delete viruses from the Internet (40%). Due to the intervention, the experimental group improved from pre to posttest (d = 1.06), while this was not the case for the control group. A more in-depth analysis indicated that knowledge gains were mostly related to information repeatedly mentioned during the lesson, but it was less clear whether the lesson helped correct previously held misconceptions. Taken together, the results indicated that knowledge of computer viruses should and can be taught to primary school children, but attention must be paid to existing preconceptions.

References

[1]
Computing at School Working Group (CAS). 2012. Computer Science: A curriculum for schools.
[2]
Torsten Brinda and Thorsten Terjung. 2017. A Database is Like a Dresser With Lots of Sorted Drawers: Secondary School Learners’ Conceptions of Relational Databases. In Proceedings of the 12th Workshop on Primary and Secondary Computing Education. 39–48.
[3]
Cyril Brom, Vít Šisler, Michaela Slussareff, Tereza Selmbacherová, and Zdeněk Hlávka. 2016. You like it, you learn it: affectivity and learning in competitive social role play gaming. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 11, 3(2016), 313–348.
[4]
Code.org. 2013. Code.org. http://code.org
[5]
CZ.NIC. 2014. Computer security. Retrieved October 21, 2020 from https://www.jaknainternet.cz/page/1179/bezpecnost-pocitace/
[6]
Pablo Del Rio and Amelia Alvarez. 2007. Inside and outside the zone of proximal development: An ecofunctional reading of Vygotsky.(2007).
[7]
Ira Diethelm, Peter Hubwieser, and Robert Klaus. 2012. Students, teachers and phenomena: educational reconstruction for computer science education. In Proceedings of the 12th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research. 164–173.
[8]
Ira Diethelm, Henning Wilken, and Stefan Zumbrägel. 2012. An investigation of secondary school students’ conceptions on how the internet works. In Proceedings of the 12th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research. 67–73.
[9]
Jérôme Dinet and Muneo Kitajima. 2011. ” Draw me the Web” impact of mental model of the web on information search performance of young users. In Proceedings of the 23rd Conference on l’Interaction Homme-Machine. 1–7.
[10]
Andrea A. diSessa. 2014. A History of Conceptual Change Research(2 ed.). Cambridge University Press, 88–108. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519526.007
[11]
Janice A Dole and Gale M Sinatra. 1998. Reconceptalizing change in the cognitive construction of knowledge. Educational psychologist 33, 2-3 (1998), 109–128.
[12]
R Duit, H Gropengießer, U Kattmann, M Komorek, and I Parchmann. 2012. Science education research and practice in Europe. Sense Publishers) The Model of Educa-tional Reconstruction Framework for Improving Teaching and Learning Science 1 (2012), 13–37.
[13]
Internet-ABC e.V.2001. Internet-ABC. https://www.internet-abc.de
[14]
Julian Fraillon, John Ainley, Wolfram Schulz, Tim Friedman, and Eveline Gebhardt. 2014. Preparing for life in a digital age: The IEA International Computer and Information Literacy Study international report. Springer Nature.
[15]
Shuchi Grover, Daisy Rutstein, and Eric Snow. 2016. ” What Is A Computer” What do Secondary School Students Think?. In Proceedings of the 47th acm technical symposium on computing science education. 564–569.
[16]
Tereza Hannemann, Tereza Stárková, Pavel Ježek, Kristina Volná, Kateřina Kačerovská, and Cyril Brom. 2019. Eight-Year-Olds’ Conceptions of Computer Viruses: A Quantitative Study. In Proceedings of the 14th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education. 1–7.
[17]
Yasmin B Kafai. 2008. Understanding virtual epidemics: children’s folk conceptions of a computer virus. Journal of Science Education and Technology 17, 6 (2008), 523–529.
[18]
Daniel Kardefelt-Winther. 2017. How Does the Time Children Spend Using Digital Technology Impact Their Mental Well-being, Social Relationships and Physical Activity?: An Evidence-Focused Literature Review. UNICEF Office of Research-Innocenti Florence, Italy.
[19]
Richard E Mayer. 2002. Multimedia learning. In Psychology of learning and motivation. Vol. 41. Elsevier, 85–139.
[20]
Manuel Ninaus, Simon Greipl, Kristian Kiili, Antero Lindstedt, Stefan Huber, Elise Klein, Hans-Otto Karnath, and Korbinian Moeller. 2019. Increased emotional engagement in game-based learning–A machine learning approach on facial emotion detection data. Computers & Education 142 (2019), 103641.
[21]
Marina Papastergiou. 2005. Students’ mental models of the Internet and their didactical exploitation in informatics education. Education and Information Technologies 10, 4 (2005), 341–360.
[22]
Judy Robertson, Andrew Manches, and Helen Pain. 2017. “It’s Like a Giant Brain With a Keyboard”: Children’s Understandings About How Computers Work. Childhood Education 93, 4 (2017), 338–345.
[23]
Michael T Rücker and Niels Pinkwart. 2016. Review and discussion of children’s conceptions of computers. Journal of Science Education and Technology 25, 2 (2016), 274–283.
[24]
Andreas Schleicher. 2019. PISA 2018: Insights and Interpretations.OECD Publishing (2019).
[25]
David Smahel, Hana MacHackova, Giovanna Mascheroni, Lenka Dedkova, Elisabeth Staksrud, Kjartan Olafsson, Sonia Livingstone, and Uwe Hasebrink. 2020. EU Kids Online 2020: Survey results from 19 countries.
[26]
Katerina Tsarava, Korbinian Moeller, and Manuel Ninaus. 2018. Training computational thinking through board games: The case of Crabs & Turtles. International Journal of Serious Games 5, 2 (2018), 25–44.
[27]
Katerina Tsarava, Manuel Ninaus, Tereza Hannemann, Kristina Volná, Korbinian Moeller, and Cyril Brom. 2020. Teaching primary school children about computer viruses: preliminary results of an intervention study. In Proceedings of the 15th Workshop on Primary and Secondary Computing Education. 1–2.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Equitable Access to Cybersecurity Education: A Case Study of Underserved Middle School StudentsProceedings of the 2024 on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3649217.3653581(625-632)Online publication date: 3-Jul-2024
  • (2023)Eight-year-olds’ naïve and acquired knowledge about computer viruses: a mixed methods studyInternational Journal of Technology and Design Education10.1007/s10798-023-09847-534:3(903-938)Online publication date: 9-Aug-2023
  • (2021)Wrong Answers for Wrong Reasons: The Risks of Ad Hoc InstrumentsProceedings of the 21st Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research10.1145/3488042.3488045(1-11)Online publication date: 17-Nov-2021

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
Koli Calling '20: Proceedings of the 20th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research
November 2020
295 pages
ISBN:9781450389211
DOI:10.1145/3428029
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 22 November 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Computer viruses
  2. Conceptions
  3. Multimedia learning
  4. Primary computing education
  5. Primary school children

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

Koli Calling '20

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 80 of 182 submissions, 44%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)19
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
Reflects downloads up to 13 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Equitable Access to Cybersecurity Education: A Case Study of Underserved Middle School StudentsProceedings of the 2024 on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3649217.3653581(625-632)Online publication date: 3-Jul-2024
  • (2023)Eight-year-olds’ naïve and acquired knowledge about computer viruses: a mixed methods studyInternational Journal of Technology and Design Education10.1007/s10798-023-09847-534:3(903-938)Online publication date: 9-Aug-2023
  • (2021)Wrong Answers for Wrong Reasons: The Risks of Ad Hoc InstrumentsProceedings of the 21st Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research10.1145/3488042.3488045(1-11)Online publication date: 17-Nov-2021

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media