Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Green Simulation with Database Monte Carlo

Published: 21 January 2021 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    In a setting in which experiments are performed repeatedly with the same simulation model, green simulation means reusing outputs from previous experiments to answer the question currently being asked of the model. In this article, we address the setting in which experiments are run to answer questions quickly, with a time limit providing a fixed computational budget, and then idle time is available for further experimentation before the next question is asked. The general strategy is database Monte Carlo for green simulation: the output of experiments is stored in a database and used to improve the computational efficiency of future experiments. In this article, the database provides a quasi-control variate, which reduces the variance of the estimated mean response in a future experiment that has a fixed computational budget. We propose a particular green simulation procedure using quasi-control variates, addressing practical issues such as experiment design, and analyze its theoretical properties. We show that, under some conditions, the variance of the estimated mean response in an experiment with a fixed computational budget drops to zero over a sequence of repeated experiments, as more and more idle time is invested in creating databases. Our numerical experiments on the procedure show that using idle time to create databases of simulation output provides variance reduction immediately, and that the variance reduction grows over time in a way that is consistent with the convergence analysis.

    References

    [1]
    Petter Abrahamsen. 1997. A Review of Gaussian Random Fields and Correlation Functions. Technical Report. Norsk Regnesentral/Norwegian Computing Center Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
    [2]
    Athanassios N. Avramidis and James R. Wilson. 1993. A splitting scheme for control variates. Operations Research Letters 14, 4 (1993), 187--198.
    [3]
    Eric S. Blake and Ethan J. Gibney. 2011. The deadliest, costliest, and most intense united states tropical cyclones from 1851 to 2010 (and other frequently requested hurricane facts). Retrieved July 25, 2017, from http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/dcmi.shtml.
    [4]
    Tarik Borogovac and Pirooz Vakili. 2008. Control variate technique: A constructive approach. In Proceedings of the 2008 Winter Simulation Conference, S. J. Mason, R. R. Hill, L. Mönch, O. Rose, T. Jefferson, and Fowler J. W. (Eds.). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., Piscataway, New Jersey, 320--327.
    [5]
    Joshua D. Coval, Jakub W. Jurek, and Erik Stafford. 2009. Economic catastrophe bonds. American Economic Review 99, 3 (June 2009), 628--666.
    [6]
    Angelos Dassios and Ji-Wook Jang. 2003. Pricing of catastrophe reinsurance and derivatives using the Cox process with shot noise intensity. Finance and Stochastics 7, 1 (January 2003), 73--95.
    [7]
    Markus Emsermann and Burton Simon. 2002. Improving simulation efficiency with quasi control variates. Stochastic Models 18, 3 (2002), 425--488.
    [8]
    Mingbin Feng and Jeremy Staum. 2015. Green simulation designs for repeated experiments. In Proceedings of the 2015 Winter Simulation Conference, L. Yilmaz, W. K. V. Chan, I. Moon, T. M. K. Roeder, C. Macal, and M. D. Rossetti (Eds.). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., Piscataway, New Jersey, 403--413.
    [9]
    Mingbin Feng and Jeremy Staum. 2016. Green simulation with database Monte Carlo. In Proceedings of the 2016 Winter Simulation Conference, T. M. K. Roeder, P. I. Frazier, R. Szechtman, E. Zhou, T. Huschka, and S. E. Chick (Eds.). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., Piscataway, New Jersey, 1108--1118.
    [10]
    Mingbin Feng and Jeremy Staum. 2017. Green simulation: Reusing the output of repeated experiments. ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation (TOMACS) 27, 4 (2017), 1--28.
    [11]
    John H. Halton. 1960. On the efficiency of certain quasi-random sequences of points in evaluating multi-dimensional integrals. Numerical Mathematics 2, 1 (1960), 84--90.
    [12]
    Stephen S. Lavenberg, Thomas L. Moeller, and Peter D. Welch. 1982. Statistical results on control variables with application to queueing network simulation. Operations Research 30, 1 (1982), 182--202.
    [13]
    Donald F. Morrison. 1971. Expectations and variances of maximum likelihood estimates of the multivariate normal distribution parameters with missing data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 66, 335 (1971), 602--604.
    [14]
    Munich Re Geo Risks Research. 2015. Loss Events Worldwide 1980-2014, 10 Costliest Events Ordered by Overall Losses. Technical Report. Munich Re.
    [15]
    Barry L. Nelson. 1987. On control variate estimators. Computers 8 Operations Research 14, 3 (1987), 219--225.
    [16]
    Barry L. Nelson. 1990. Control variate remedies. Operations Research 38, 6 (1990), 974--992.
    [17]
    Harald Niederreiter. 1988. Low-discrepancy and low-dispersion sequences. Journal of Number Theory 30, 1 (1988), 51--70.
    [18]
    Harald Niederreiter. 1992. Random Number Generation and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods. Vol. 63. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
    [19]
    Raghu Pasupathy, Bruce W. Schmeiser, Michael R. Taaffe, and Jin Wang. 2012. Control-variate estimation using estimated control means. IIE Transactions 44, 5 (2012), 381--385.
    [20]
    C. Radhakrishna Rao. 1967. Least squares theory using an estimated dispersion matrix and its application to measurement of signals. In Proceedings of the 5th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Vol. 1. Berkeley, University of California Press, Berkeley, California, 355--372.
    [21]
    Brian D. Ripley. 2009. Stochastic Simulation. Vol. 316. John Wiley 8 Sons, New York.
    [22]
    Imry Rosenbaum and Jeremy Staum. 2015. Database Monte Carlo for simulation on demand. In Proceedings of the 2015 Winter Simulation Conference, L. Yilmaz, W. K. V. Chan, I. Moon, T. M. K. Roeder, C. Macal, and M. D. Rossetti (Eds.). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., Piscataway, New Jersey, 679--688.
    [23]
    Jeremy Staum. 2009. Better simulation metamodeling: The why, what, and how of stochastic kriging. In Proceedings of the 2009 Winter Simulation Conference, M. D. Rossetti, R. R. Hill, B. Johansson, A. Dunkin, and R. G. Ingalls (Eds.). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., Piscataway, New Jersey, 119--133.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)A Comprehensive Review of Green Computing: Past, Present, and Future ResearchIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2023.330433211(87445-87494)Online publication date: 2023
    • (2023)Two-stage nested simulation of tail risk measurement: A likelihood ratio approachInsurance: Mathematics and Economics10.1016/j.insmatheco.2022.10.002108(1-24)Online publication date: Jan-2023

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation
    ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation  Volume 31, Issue 1
    January 2021
    144 pages
    ISSN:1049-3301
    EISSN:1558-1195
    DOI:10.1145/3446631
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 21 January 2021
    Accepted: 01 September 2020
    Revised: 01 June 2020
    Received: 01 May 2018
    Published in TOMACS Volume 31, Issue 1

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Simulation experiment design and analysis
    2. control variates
    3. database Monte Carlo
    4. low-discrepancy sequence
    5. low-dispersion sequence
    6. quasi Monte Carlo
    7. simulation budget allocation

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed

    Funding Sources

    • National Science Foundation (NSF)
    • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)21
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
    Reflects downloads up to 27 Jul 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)A Comprehensive Review of Green Computing: Past, Present, and Future ResearchIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2023.330433211(87445-87494)Online publication date: 2023
    • (2023)Two-stage nested simulation of tail risk measurement: A likelihood ratio approachInsurance: Mathematics and Economics10.1016/j.insmatheco.2022.10.002108(1-24)Online publication date: Jan-2023

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    Full Access

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media