Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3434780.3436616acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteemConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Pilot study on university students' opinion about STEM studies at higher education

Published: 22 January 2021 Publication History

Abstract

The percentages of women enrolled in higher education in the STEM sector are significantly lower than those of men. Overall, gender representation in science, technology, engineering and mathematics degrees in Europe is not balanced. The Leaky Pipeline phenomenon, marked by gender stereotypes, makes the latent gender gap a relevant topic of study. Studies exist on academic performance, self-perception, self-efficacy, outcome expectations; however, studying gender stereotypes linked to STEM studies is also essential. It is necessary to know the social and family context in which young people have grown up, as well as their perception of such studies. To study gender stereotypes of university students about STEM studies, a questionnaire has been designed for empirical validation. For the design of the instrument, to be validated, items from other instruments have been taken and adapted to Spanish. After the design of the instrument, an online pilot study has been applied in the University of Salamanca, the University of Valencia and the Polytechnic University of Valencia. A total of 115 people answered the questionnaire. The results of the pilot study reveal that the study sample is not particularly marked by gender stereotypes about gender equality in STEM. Also, the sample is receptive to learning about science and applying it in their lives. On the other hand, the idea that women have to give up their studies and careers to look after their families and children is rejected. The idea that men are more interested in university studies than women is also rejected. At the same time, the sample is aware of the difficulties that women encounter in the STEM sector. Another optimistic point of the results is that there are no alarming data on bad experiences due to gender. In the future, the study will be replicated on a larger scale.

References

[1]
K. Atkins, B.M. Dougan, M.S. Dromgold-Sermen, 2020. “Looking at Myself in the Future”: how mentoring shapes scientific identity for STEM students from underrepresented groups. International Journal of STEM Education.7, 1.
[2]
J. Blizzard, L. Klotz, G. Potvin, 2015. Using survey questions to identify and learn more about those who exhibit design thinking traits. Design Studies. 38, 92–110.
[3]
N. Broughton, and Social Market Foundation. 2013. In the balance: the STEM human capital crunch.
[4]
G. Cerinsek, T. Hribar, N. Glodez, 2013. Which are my Future Career Priorities and What Influenced my Choice of Studying Science, Technology, Engineering or Mathematics? Some Insights on Educational Choice—Case of Slovenia. International Journal of Science Education. 35, 17, 2999–3025.
[5]
N. Codiroli. 2017. Who studies STEM subjects at A level and degree in England? An investigation into the intersections between students’ family background, gender and ethnicity in determining choice. British Educational Research Journal.43, 3, 528–553.
[6]
C. Corbett and C. Hill. 2015. Solving the equation: the variables for women's success in engineering and computing. AAUW.
[7]
M. Cupani, A.E. Azpilicueta and V. Sialle. 2017. Evaluación de un modelo social-cognitivo de la elección de la carrera desde la tipología de Holland en estudiantes de la escuela secundaria. Revista Española de Orientación y Psicopedagogía.28, 3, 18–24.
[8]
C. Delgado, A. Iraegui, L. Marquina, 2007. Patrones de masculinidad y feminidad asociados al ciclo de la violencia de género. Revista de Investigación Educativa. 25, 1, 187–217.
[9]
S.G. Duncan, G. Aguilar, C.G. Jensen, 2019. Survey of Heteronormative Attitudes and Tolerance Toward Gender Non-conformity in Mountain West Undergraduate Students. Frontiers in Psychology. 10.
[10]
European Institute for Gender Equality: 2020. https://eige.europa.eu/.Accessed: 2020-09-07.
[11]
Eurostat. Tu clave para las estadísticas europeas: 2020. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/education-and-training/data/database.Accessed: 2020-09-07.
[12]
J.G. Figueroa and T. Hernández. 2019. Hombres en profesiones de cuidado tradicionalmente feminizadas. Papeles de población. 25, 100, 121–151.
[13]
A. García-Holgado, S. Verdugo-Castro, C. González, 2020. European Proposals to Work in the Gender Gap in STEM: A Systematic Analysis. Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje (IEEE RITA).15, 3, 215–224.
[14]
F.J. García-Peñalvo. Engineering contributions to a Knowledge Society multicultural perspective. IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologías del Aprendizaje (IEEE RITA). 10, 1, 17–18.
[15]
F.J. García-Peñalvo. 2014. Formación en la sociedad del conocimiento, un programa de doctorado con una perspectiva interdisciplinar. Education in the Knowledge Society.15, 1, 4–9.
[16]
C.E. George, E.L. Castro and B. Rincon. 2019. Investigating the origins of STEM intervention programs: an isomorphic analysis. Studies in Higher Education.44, 9, 1645–1661.
[17]
A. Godwin. 2014. Understanding Female Engineering Enrollment: Explaining Choice with Critical Engineering Agency. All Dissertations.
[18]
M. Goulden, K. Frasch and M.A. Mason. 2009. Patching America's Leaky Pipeline in the Sciences. 52.
[19]
M.W. Kier, M.R. Blanchard, J.W. Osborne, 2014. The Development of the STEM Career Interest Survey (STEM-CIS). Research in Science Education.44, 3, 461–481.
[20]
R.W. Lent, S.D. Brown and G. Hackett. 1994. Toward a Unifying Social Cognitive Theory of Career and Academic Interest, Choice, and Performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior.45, 1, 79–122.
[21]
D.M. López. 2013. El género como factor determinante al escoger una carrera profesional en sistemas de información. Universidad del Turabo. Escuela de Negocios y Empresarismo.
[22]
L.A. Medrano and P.E. Flores. 2017. La problemática del ingreso a la Universidad desde una perspectiva de la teoría de la agencia social: aportes de la Teoría Social Cognitiva. Revista Argentina de Educación Superior. 15, 11–35.
[23]
A. Morales. 2010. Género, mujeres, trabajo social y sección femenina. Historia de una profesión feminizada y con vocación feminista. Universidad de Granada.
[24]
J.V. Peña, M.I. Caro and M.C. Rodríguez. 2015. La teoría cognitivo social de desarrollo de la carrera: evidencias al modelo con una muestra de estudiantes universitarios de la rama científica. Bordón. Revista de pedagogía. 67, 3, 103–122.
[25]
K. Peterman, R. Kermish-Allen, G. Knezek, 2016. Measuring Student Career Interest within the Context of Technology-Enhanced STEM Projects: A Cross-Project Comparison Study Based on the Career Interest Questionnaire. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 25, 6, 833–845.
[26]
S.C. Pinzón, M.V. Aponte and M.L. Useche. 2017. ¿Sexismo en enfermería? Una mirada desde la perspectiva de género a roles feminizados como el cuidado. Prospectiva: Revista de Trabajo Social e Intervención Social. 123–146.
[27]
M.C. Rodríguez, J.V. Peña and M.I. Caro. 2015. Validación de la teoría cognitivo social de desarrollo de la carrera con una muestra de estudiantes de ingeniería. Educación XX1: Revista de la Facultad de Educación. 18, 2, 257–276.
[28]
P.N. Rojas. 2019. La promoción profesional de las mujeres en el mercado de trabajo español. Propuestas para reducir la segregación horizontal y vertical. Femeris: Revista Multidisciplinar de Estudios de Género. 4, 2, 70–104.
[29]
A.E. Rossi and M. Barajas. 2015. Elección de estudios CTIM y desequilibrios de género. Enseñanza de las ciencias.0059–0076.
[30]
S. Banchefsky and B. Park 2018. Negative Gender Ideologies and Gender-Science Stereotypes Are More Pervasive in Male-Dominated Academic Disciplines. Social Sciences.7, 2, 27.
[31]
L.J. Sax. 2009. Women Graduates of Single-sex and Coeducational High Schools, Differences in Their Characteristics and the Transition to College. Sudikoff Family Institute for Education & New Media, UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies.
[32]
G. Stoet and D.C. Geary. 2018. The Gender-Equality Paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education. Psychological Science.29, 4, 581–593.
[33]
K. Szelényi, K. Bresonis and M.M. Mars. 2016. Who Am I versus Who Can I Become?: Exploring Women's Science Identities in STEM Ph.D. Programs. The Review of Higher Education.40, 1, 1–31.
[34]
I.M. Vázquez and A. Blanco. 2019. Factores sociocognitivos asociados a la elección de estudios científico-matemáticos. Un análisis diferencial por sexo y curso en la Educación Secundaria. Revista de investigación educativa, RIE.37, 1, 269–286.
[35]
S. Verdugo-Castro, A. García-Holgado and M.C. Sánchez-Gómez. 2019. Age influence in gender stereotypes related to Internet use in young people: a case study. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM 2019) (León, Spain, October 16-18, 2019).M.Á. Conde-González, eds. ACM. 223–231.
[36]
S. Verdugo-Castro, A. García-Holgado and M.C. Sánchez-Gómez. In press. Análisis e intervención sobre la brecha de género en los ámbitos educativos STEM. Estudios interdisciplinares de género. Tirant Lo Blanch.
[37]
S. Verdugo-Castro, A. García-Holgado and M.C. Sánchez-Gómez. 2019. Analysis of instruments focused on gender gap in STEM education. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM 2019) (León, Spain, October 16-18, 2019).M.Á. Conde-González, eds. ACM. 999–1006.
[38]
S. Verdugo-Castro, A. García-Holgado and M.C. Sánchez-Gómez. 2019. Percepción de los estereotipos de género asociados al uso de Internet en estudiantes de pedagogía. Aprendizaje, Innovación y Cooperación como impulsores del cambio metodológico. Actas del V Congreso Internacional sobre Aprendizaje, Innovación y Competitividad. CINAIC 2019 (9-11 de octubre de 2019, Zaragoza, España).M.L. Sein-Echaluce Lacleta, eds. Servicio de Publicaciones Universidad de Zaragoza. 629–634.
[39]
S. Verdugo-Castro, M.C. Sánchez-Gómez, A. García-Holgado, 2019. Revisión y estudio cualitativo sobre la brecha de género en el ámbito educativo STEM por la influencia de los estereotipos de género. Atas - Investigação Qualitativa em Ciências Sociais/Investigación Cualitativa en Ciencias Sociales.A.P. Costa, eds. 381–386.
[40]
M. Winterbotham. 2014. The UK Commission's Employer Skills Survey 2013: UK Results. London, UK Commission.200.
[41]
HERI. 2020. Encuesta de estudiantes de primer año del CIRP - HERI.
[42]
2012. La feminización de las profesiones. Sistema: revista de ciencias sociales.228, 81–96.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Policies, Projects, and Initiatives for Sustainable Higher Education with Gender Equity: Literature Review and Case Study—Universidad de La FronteraSustainability10.3390/su1612503816:12(5038)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2024
  • (2024)¿De ciencias o de letras? Brechas de género en el espacio educativo STEMScience or Arts? Gender gaps in the STEM education spaceEuropean Public & Social Innovation Review10.31637/epsir-2024-14629(1-20)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2024
  • (2023)The Opinion of the Spanish University Population on the Existence of Studies and Professions According to GenderProceedings TEEM 2022: Tenth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality10.1007/978-981-99-0942-1_32(315-324)Online publication date: 4-May-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
TEEM'20: Eighth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality
October 2020
1084 pages
ISBN:9781450388504
DOI:10.1145/3434780
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 22 January 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Questionnaire
  2. STEM
  3. gender gap
  4. gender roles
  5. gender stereotypes
  6. leaky pipeline

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

Conference

TEEM'20

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 496 of 705 submissions, 70%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)31
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 15 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Policies, Projects, and Initiatives for Sustainable Higher Education with Gender Equity: Literature Review and Case Study—Universidad de La FronteraSustainability10.3390/su1612503816:12(5038)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2024
  • (2024)¿De ciencias o de letras? Brechas de género en el espacio educativo STEMScience or Arts? Gender gaps in the STEM education spaceEuropean Public & Social Innovation Review10.31637/epsir-2024-14629(1-20)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2024
  • (2023)The Opinion of the Spanish University Population on the Existence of Studies and Professions According to GenderProceedings TEEM 2022: Tenth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality10.1007/978-981-99-0942-1_32(315-324)Online publication date: 4-May-2023
  • (2023)Visualising Bibliographic Metadata Using CAQDAS in the Research on the Gender Gap in STEM Studies in Higher EducationComputer Supported Qualitative Research10.1007/978-3-031-31346-2_23(371-388)Online publication date: 3-May-2023
  • (2022)University students’ views regarding gender in STEM studies: Design and validation of an instrumentEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-022-11110-827:9(12301-12336)Online publication date: 28-May-2022
  • (2022)Examples of Good Practices in Erasmus+ Projects that Integrate Gender and STEM in Higher EducationWomen in STEM in Higher Education10.1007/978-981-19-1552-9_10(181-197)Online publication date: 25-May-2022
  • (2021)The experience of women students in engineering and mathematics careers: a focus group study2021 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)10.1109/EDUCON46332.2021.9454079(50-56)Online publication date: 21-Apr-2021

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media